Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2008, p. 7431-7433, Vol. 74, No. 23
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01446-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Institute for Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, and CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Spain, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
Received 27 June 2008/ Accepted 24 September 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The molecular organization and quality of the soluble protein population, which is generally believed to adopt the native, functional conformation, have been studied much less. Therefore, in this conventional view, soluble proteins are expected to show a rather narrow conformational spectrum and to be highly functional. However, the recent finding that the solubility and conformational quality in recombinant bacteria are divergently controlled (8) seriously challenges such an assumption. Moreover, several independent observations clearly argue against a model picturing the soluble protein fraction as fully functional and structurally homogeneous. First, the specific activity of a recombinant β-galactosidase aggregated as inclusion bodies is, under defined production conditions, higher than that of its soluble counterpart (7). This strongly suggests that the activity of soluble protein species represents an average of the numbers of coexisting active and inactive protein forms. In the same context, reducing the growth temperature of recombinant Escherichia coli cells from 37°C to 16°C results in a significant increase of the specific emission of a recombinant green fluorescent protein (GFP) (19), indicating that at 37°C an important fraction of soluble species have not maturated to an optimal conformation for fluorescence emission. Finally, the finding of the so-called soluble aggregates, which are fibril-like structures in E. coli cells overproducing GFP variants (4), indicates that even soluble species can display an amyloidal organization, such as that found in inclusion bodies, and that GFP in these soluble aggregates may eventually fold into a form very different from the native conformation. Aggregation of soluble versions of other structurally diverse proteins, including β-galactosidase (1) and different maltose-binding fusion proteins (16), has also been reported. The functional properties of such soluble aggregates remain unexplored. Therefore, the meaning of "solubility" in both structural and functional terms is as yet essentially obscure.
To clarify the folding scenery of the soluble protein population in recombinant bacteria and the biological significance of solubility, we have examined (through fluorescence emission) the conformational quality in the soluble fraction of recombinant E. coli MC4100 cells producing a model GFP (mGFP) by conventional culture and induction of gene expression procedures (8). mGFP is a GFP fused to the VP1 capsid protein of foot-and-mouth disease virus that drives protein aggregation immediately upon production in E. coli. Consequently, most of the fusion protein is found in the form of inclusion bodies and only up to 45% of the total mGFP yield occurs in the soluble cell fraction (8).
Cell pellets were obtained by centrifugation of bacterial cultures producing mGFP at 6,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C, frozen overnight at –80°C, and resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8]). Ice-jacketed samples were sonicated for 35 min at 50 W in cycles of 0.5 s. The soluble cell fraction was separated from cell debris and inclusion bodies by centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C and was submitted to density gradient ultracentrifugation (ranging from 0 to 80% sucrose) at 92,444 x g for 16 h at 4°C. Recombinant GFP widely dispersed along the gradient, showing a profile that was not coincident with that of the total fluorescence (Fig. 1a). In contrast to what would be expected for a monodispersal conformational model, such a lack of matching indicates a variable functional status within the soluble protein population. This functional heterogeneity was further confirmed by Western blot quantitative analysis of GFP as described previously (8) to determine the specific fluorescence, which peaked as three independent protein fractions (Fig. 1b). The GFP population enclosed in peak number 1 was further purified by size exclusion chromatography using fast protein liquid chromatography equipment, resulting in a highly (84%) pure and fluorescent population. Therefore, according to the conventional concept of soluble protein characteristics, the protein species found therein would be conformationally homogeneous and functional, having reached the native conformation. However, when we analyzed this particular population by transmission electron microscopy we observed a spectrum of soluble aggregates ranging from particulate material to fibril-like structures, with both categories demonstrating immunoreactivity with anti-GFP antibodies (Fig. 2a) as inclusion bodies themselves (Fig. 2b). Moreover, the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) pattern of these protein species was compared with that of GFP inclusion bodies. The insoluble aggregates were observed to be rich in intermolecular β-sheets, with a minor occurrence of native-like
-helix and/or unfolded stretches (Fig. 1c). However, the soluble GFP did show a wider set of conformational types in which
-helix and intramolecular native-like β-sheets were prominent. The significant occurrence of these protein forms, indicative of native conformation, accounts for the higher specific emission level found in the soluble protein species within peak 1 (and also peak 2; Fig. 1b) compared with that of inclusion bodies (shown in the inset of Fig. 2b). In addition, such native-like folding patterns in soluble material were accompanied by unfolded and intermolecular β-sheet species. The smoother peaks in the FTIR plot of soluble protein (resulting from the contribution of several bands between 1,650 and 1,630 cm–1) compared to those of the more defined inclusion body FTIR spectra and the higher number of structural patterns again stressed the high structural heterogeneity of soluble protein species. Polypeptides aggregated as inclusion bodies (Fig. 2b) would then represent a particular and narrow subpopulation among the total recombinant protein species which, upon clustering through intermolecular interactions, deposit as insoluble material. Still being conformationally diverse, they would be significantly more homogeneous regarding their folding state than their soluble counterparts.
|
View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (a) Distribution of the soluble version of the aggregation-prone mGFP (triangles) and fluorescence emission (circles) along a sucrose gradient. (b) Specific fluorescence emission of soluble GFP populations. Arrows indicate discrete peaks of highly fluorescent protein subfractions (with GFP purity values given as percentages), and the inset shows values for the average specific fluorescence of soluble GFP in the whole soluble cell fraction. (c) FTIR spectra (normalized at the tyrosine peak by use of GRAMS/AI spectroscopic software, version 7) of isolated GFP inclusion bodies (dashed line) and the purified GFP population (from peak 1) (continuous line). Vertical lines indicate the relevant peaks corresponding to -helix ( ), unfolded stretches (U), native intramolecular β-sheet (β intra), and intermolecular cross β-sheet (β inter).
|
![]() View larger version (93K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (a) Transmission electron microscopy analysis of fast protein liquid chromatography-purified GFP from peak 1, showing fibril-like and particulate microaggregates (top). At the bottom, the results of immunodetection of GFP on the same samples are shown. (b) Immunolabeling of GFP in inclusion bodies, on cryosections of GFP-producing E. coli cells. In the inset figures, the specific fluorescence values of GFP determined on isolated inclusion bodies are indicated. Bars, 0.2 µm.
|
We thank Salvador Bartolomé and Alejandro Sànchez Chardi for helpful technical assistance.
Published ahead of print on 3 October 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-D-glucose-1-phosphate. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35:219-223.[Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»