Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sriraman, K. Articles by Jayaraman, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sriraman, K. Articles by Jayaraman, G. Agricola Articles by Sriraman, K. Articles by Jayaraman, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2008, p. 7442-7446, Vol. 74, No. 23
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00638-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

HtrA Is Essential for Efficient Secretion of Recombinant Proteins by Lactococcus lactis

Kalpana Sriraman and Guhan Jayaraman^*

Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology—Madras, Chennai, India 600036

Received 15 March 2008/ Accepted 23 September 2008

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Secretion efficiencies of... HtrA activity and suppression... REFERENCES

 
HtrA is a unique protease on the extracellular surface of Lactococcus lactis. It is known to take part in the proteolysis of many secreted recombinant proteins, and the mutation of htrA can lead to the complete stabilization of recombinant proteins. In this work, we have shown that htrA mutation also leads to significant reduction of the efficiency of recombinant-protein secretion. We also show that the level of HtrA can be lowered by the suppression of the acid tolerance response (ATR) in L. lactis. Instead of using an L. lactis htrA mutant, the reduction of the HtrA level in wild-type recombinant cultures of L. lactis by ATR suppression may serve as a better strategy for the production of secreted recombinant proteins.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Secretion efficiencies of... HtrA activity and suppression... REFERENCES

 
Lactococcus lactis is a potential host for the production of therapeutic recombinant proteins. L. lactis strains used for recombinant protein production are known to express very few membrane-bound or secreted proteases. In such strains, HtrA is the only protease that has been characterized on the extracellular surface (15). HtrA is a key factor in the L. lactis response to specific stress conditions (5) and is known to be involved in the maturation of native proteins, processing of propeptides (15), and proteolysis of secreted recombinant proteins (12). Hence, L. lactis htrA mutants have been considered as potential hosts for the production of stable recombinant proteins (13, 15). The objectives of this work were to compare the efficacy of an L. lactis htrA mutant with that of wild-type L. lactis for the production of secreted recombinant proteins and to investigate the role of HtrA in the processing of recombinant proteins.

We analyzed the secretion efficiencies of two recombinant proteins, streptokinase (a therapeutic protein) and staphylococcal nuclease (a reporter protein), in wild-type L. lactis and an L. lactis htrA mutant. The efficiency of secretion of both proteins was found to be severely affected in the L. lactis htrA mutant compared to their secretion in wild-type L. lactis. In an earlier report, we showed that the suppression of the acid tolerance response (ATR) in L. lactis leads to a decrease in the degradation of recombinant streptokinase (18). In this paper, we correlate our earlier observations with the observed downregulation of htrA expression during ATR suppression. We also demonstrate an enhancement in the accumulation of recombinant staphylococcal nuclease during ATR suppression. The results indicate that ATR suppression in wild-type L. lactis may serve as a better strategy than the use of an L. lactis htrA mutant for the production of secreted recombinant proteins.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Secretion efficiencies of... HtrA activity and suppression... REFERENCES

 
The wild-type L. lactis strains used in this work were L. lactis MG1363 (6) and L. lactis NZ9000 (MG1363 with chromosomally integrated nisRK) (8), which are suitable for use with a nisin-inducible expression plasmid (1). The htrA mutant used was NZ9000 htrA (16). All strains were cultured in G5-M17 medium (standard M17 medium with 5 g/liter of glucose). The two proteins under study were expressed using two different expression systems. Streptokinase was expressed by using a P170 expression system. P170 is a derivative of a native L. lactis promoter identified during screening for environmentally regulated promoters (7). The P170 promoter is an autoinducible promoter which is strongly upregulated at pH values below 6.5 during the transition to stationary phase (9). The plasmid pSK99 (18) was used for expressing the streptokinase gene under the control of the strongest promoter derivative, P170gx, which was 150- to 200-fold more active than the native promoter (2), in the wild-type L. lactis MG1363 and in NZ9000 htrA.

Nuclease expression in L. lactis NZ9000 and in NZ9000 htrA was induced with 2 ng/ml of nisin, added during the exponential phase of growth (at an optical density at 600 nm [OD₆₀₀] of 0.5). For exploitation of the autoinduction mechanism of nisin for gene expression, the genes for the signal transduction system nisK and nisR have been inserted into the chromosome of L. lactis MG1363 (nisin negative), creating strain NZ9000 (8). When a gene of interest is placed under the control of promoter PnisA in a plasmid, the expression of that gene can be induced by the addition of a subinhibitory concentration of nisin to the growth medium (11). The plasmid used for expression was pSEC:Nuc (1). To assess the secretion efficiency, the distribution of the recombinant protein in the cytoplasmic, extracellular, and membrane fractions was analyzed. Cell fractionation was carried out according to the method of Obis et al. (14). Enzymatic assays were used to determine the activities of streptokinase (18) and nuclease (4). The activity of the protein obtained in each fraction was normalized to the activity obtained per unit of dry cell weight (DCW). The activity in the membrane fraction (<1.5%) was found to be negligible for both proteins and is not reported. The results of activity analysis of the various fractions showed that the secretion efficiency of streptokinase in MG1363 was nearly 100%, while in NZ9000 htrA, the efficiency was reduced to about 20%, with most of the streptokinase accumulating in the cytoplasm (Table 1). The results of Western blot analysis showed that streptokinase bands appear in all three fractions of the NZ9000 htrA culture (Fig. 1). The bands corresponding to the cytoplasm and membrane fractions were congruent with those for the extracellular fraction, as well as the standard streptokinase (without the signal sequence), thus indicating the inability of processed streptokinase to be secreted. On the other hand, the streptokinase bands appear only in the extracellular fraction of the wild-type strain L. lactis MG1363, thus indicating complete secretion of the processed protein (Fig. 1). One can also clearly observe bands corresponding to degraded streptokinase in the extracellular fraction of the L. lactis MG1363 culture. The absence of these streptokinase degradation bands in the NZ9000 htrA culture clearly shows that HtrA is primarily responsible for streptokinase degradation in L. lactis.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Activities of recombinant streptokinase and nuclease in the extracellular and cytoplasmic fractions of (wild type) L. lactis MG1363 and NZ9000 and mutant NZ9000 htrA during early stationary phase culture in G5-M17 medium

View larger version (57K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Expression of streptokinase in MG1363 and NZ9000 htrA: Western blot analysis of different cellular fractions. Lanes: 1, standard streptokinase; 2, extracellular fraction from NZ9000 htrA; 3, extracellular fraction from MG1363; 4, membrane fraction from NZ9000 htrA; 5, membrane fraction from MG1363; 6, cytoplasmic fraction from NZ9000 htrA; 7, cytoplasmic fraction from MG1363. Pre-stk, prestreptokinase (streptokinase with signal sequence).

Similar results were obtained with recombinant staphylococcal nuclease using the nisin-inducible expression system. The secretion efficiency of staphylococcal nuclease is high in NZ9000 (71%) and low in NZ9000 htrA (33%) at 6 h after induction (Table 1). A temporal analysis of the nuclease secretion efficiency confirmed that the percentage of nuclease in the extracellular fraction was lower at all times in NZ9000 htrA than in NZ9000. Since HtrA is involved in the processing of NucB to NucA (15), the above data also correlated well with a higher intracellular accumulation of NucB (data not shown). These results suggest that the secretion of recombinant proteins is impaired in L. lactis NZ9000 htrA, irrespective of the protein or expression system used. Some reports in the literature have concluded that the secretion of recombinant proteins (and not secretion efficiency) is better in L. lactis htrA mutants (3, 12, 13). These conclusions were based on estimations made from Western blot analyses of the extracellular fraction only. Based on quantitative analysis of all cellular fractions, we have shown that secretion efficiency is lower in an L. lactis htrA mutant.

HtrA is known to be involved in the alteration of cell surface properties; L. lactis htrA mutants have increased bacterial sedimentation in liquid cultures and increased bacterial chain length compared to these characteristics in wild-type strains (5). This increased aggregation of cells may reduce the exposure of secretion machinery to the outside environment, potentially reducing secretion efficiency. Apart from inefficient secretion, L. lactis htrA mutant strains also pose other problems. We observed that the overall amount of recombinant nuclease produced in L. lactis NZ9000 htrA was very low compared to the level in the wild-type strain (Table 1). This has also been observed in other reports on recombinant protein production in an L. lactis htrA mutant (12). Out of five proteins studied by using nisin-inducible expression systems, the overall production of four proteins was low in the L. lactis htrA mutant. Such low productivity was not observed in our work with streptokinase in the P170 expression system. This may be attributed to the mechanism of induction. P170 promoter activity depends on the cytoplasmic regulator molecule, RcfB, which gets activated in acidic conditions and binds to the 14-bp regulatory region of P170 (10). Thus, the promoter activity will not be affected by cellular aggregation. On the other hand, nisin induction depends on the activation of NisK, a membrane-bound histidine kinase (11). Nisin binds to the receptor NisK. Subsequently, NisK activates NisR by phosphorylation and the activated NisR induces the transcription of the PnisA-based genes. Thus, the increased aggregation of cells in NZ9000 htrA cultures reduces the membrane exposure and may affect the activation of NisK. We also observed that the htrA mutant cultures have a longer lag phase (2 to 3 h as against <1 h for wild-type L. lactis for similar inoculation conditions) and can often grow very slowly.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Secretion efficiencies of... HtrA activity and suppression... REFERENCES

 
We have shown in an earlier report (18) that the suppression of ATR in L. lactis leads to at least a 2.5-fold increase in productivity for recombinant streptokinase and a significant decrease in the degradation of streptokinase (a process mediated by HtrA, as seen in this study). We also showed that the suppression of ATR could be achieved by increasing the phosphate level and the buffering capacity of the medium (18). In this study, we investigated the effect of ATR suppression on the production of recombinant staphylococcal nuclease and the processing by HtrA of the NucB form to the NucA form (both of which are active). The ATR level, nuclease activity, and the extent of processing by HtrA (as given by the proportion of the NucA form of nuclease) were analyzed for nuclease production in two different media, G5-M17 (standard M17 medium with 5 g/liter of glucose) and a medium with a higher buffering capacity, G5-3xM17. The latter had three times the concentration of all M17 components with the exception of glucose. The buffering capacity of G5-3xM17 is increased due to the additional levels of glycerophosphate in the medium, and therefore, ATR is suppressed during the growth of L. lactis in this medium (18). The ATR level was measured as follows. The cells were given an acid shock by exposure to G5-M17 medium (without sodium β-glycerophosphate) at pH 4 (adjusted using acetic acid). The cell numbers were estimated as CFU by plating shocked cells immediately after resuspension and after 2 h on G5-M17 plates containing the appropriate antibiotic. The percentage of organisms surviving was taken as the measure of ATR (18). The proportion of NucA was measured by densitometric analysis of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels, using bovine serum albumin as the internal standard.

The activity of nuclease increased by 2.7-fold in the G5-3xM17 medium, and this correlated with the suppression of ATR. It was also observed that the proportion of NucA decreased with suppression of ATR (Table 2). The results with nuclease were similar to the ones obtained in the earlier work with streptokinase (18), thus indicating that the effect of ATR on recombinant protein production in L. lactis cultures may be a general phenomenon. The reductions in streptokinase degradation and nuclease processing suggest that HtrA levels may decrease with suppression of ATR, leading to decreased processing of recombinant proteins by HtrA. To confirm this hypothesis, the mRNA level of htrA was measured by using real-time PCR during the growth of streptokinase-expressing MG1363 cultures in both the media mentioned above.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Comparison of recombinant streptokinase and nuclease activities in the extracellular fraction during ATR development and suppression, and effects of ATR on protein processing by HtrAa

The mRNA level was measured from cDNA (obtained from the reverse transcription of total RNA [Qiagen-GmBH]) by using a Quantitect Sybr green real-time PCR kit (Qiagen-GmBH) in Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time PCR equipment (Applied Biosystems, United States) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The kit has a Hotstart Taq DNA polymerase. The primers used for the experiment were designed by using web-based Primer3 software (17). The primers used for amplifying the htrA and 16S rRNA transcripts, along with the conditions for the real-time PCR experiment, are given in Tables 3 and 4. The mRNA level was computed by using relative quantification (threshold cycle method) with 16S rRNA as the internal reference gene. The mRNA level at early exponential phase (OD₆₀₀, 0.3) was taken as the basal level and was used to calibrate samples for the relative quantification of mRNA. The changes in htrA mRNA levels during growth were expressed as multiples of the basal level of mRNA.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Primers used for real-time PCR

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 4. Conditions used for PCR

The mRNA level of htrA increased severalfold during the transition to stationary phase of L. lactis MG1363 cultured in G5-M17 medium (Fig. 2). This result correlated well with the high ATR level (which also develops during late exponential phase) and the high degradation of streptokinase observed in this medium (Table 2). The cell densities for the two cultures (in G5-M17 and G5-3xM17) are mainly dependent on the initial glucose concentration, and the growth phases of the two cultures are comparable at a given OD (data not shown). Therefore, the htrA mRNA levels at corresponding growth phases can be suitably compared by taking measurements of the culture at a particular OD (Fig. 2). In the G5-3xM17 medium, the htrA mRNA level did not change significantly from the basal level throughout the culture, correlating well with the reduced ATR level and lower level of streptokinase degradation (Fig. 2 and Table 2). These results confirm that suppression of ATR leads to lowering of the HtrA level and thus reduces the processing of recombinant proteins in L. lactis. It was also seen that the lower level of HtrA resulting from ATR suppression does not result in the changes in bacterial chain length generally associated with htrA mutation (4). Microscopic examination of cells grown in G5-3xM17 showed chain lengths similar to those of cells grown in G5-M17 (data not shown).

View larger version (7K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Variations in htrA mRNA relative to basal level during growth in G5-M17 or G5-3xM17 medium. Basal level was mRNA level at an OD600 of 0.3, corresponding to early exponential phase. Correspondence of OD600 values to growth phases: 1, mid-exponential phase; 2.5, late exponential phase; above 3.0, transition phase and early stationary phase (growth phases at corresponding OD600 values are comparable in the two media).

It can be easily discerned from the results in Table 2 that the reduction in HtrA processing is not enough to account for the increase in recombinant protein activity obtained due to ATR suppression. First, the increase in activity was more than proportionate to the reduction in degradation of streptokinase by HtrA; the increase in activity was more than threefold, while the reduction in degradation was only around 40% (Table 2). Second, nuclease does not get degraded by HtrA; HtrA only processes one form of nuclease (NucB) to another (NucA), both of which are active. Hence, the increase in activity per unit of cell mass for streptokinase, as well as nuclease, is due to the increase in the accumulation of the recombinant protein. It is not clear what factors contribute to this increase in accumulation. We have observed that the mRNA level of streptokinase during ATR suppression (obtained from real-time PCR experiments) is actually lower than the mRNA level during fully developed ATR (data not shown). Therefore, the increase in the accumulation of the recombinant protein may be due to enhanced translation rates or a reduction in proteolysis by other undetermined proteases.

In conclusion, the results presented in this paper highlight the limitations of using L. lactis htrA mutants for the production of recombinant proteins. It was observed that htrA mutation reduces the efficiency of secretion of the recombinant protein produced, although the protein produced was completely stabilized. We have also shown that suppression of ATR leads to improved levels of the active recombinant protein and also correlates well with lower HtrA levels in wild-type L. lactis cultures. These results suggest that the suppression of ATR may serve as a better alternative strategy (to using L. lactis htrA mutants), as it improves both the productivity and stability of proteolytically sensitive recombinant proteins.

 
We are grateful to Luis Bermudez-Humaran, INRA-France, and Bioneer A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark, for providing us pSEC:Nuc and NZ9000 htrA. We thank Subash Babu (Tuberculosis Research Centre, Chennai, India) for providing us the real-time PCR facilities. We also thank Bhagawat Chandrasekar (Alagappa University—Karaikudi, India) for technical assistance.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology—Madras, Chennai, India 600036. Phone: 91 44 22574108. Fax: 91 44 22574102. E-mail: guhanj{at}iitm.ac.in

Published ahead of print on 3 October 2008.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Secretion efficiencies of... HtrA activity and suppression... REFERENCES

 

1
1. Bermudez-Humaran, L. G., P. Langella, J. Commissaire, S. Gilbert, Y. Le Loir, R. L'Haridon, and G. Corthier. 2003. Controlled intra- or extracellular production of staphylococcal nuclease and ovine omega interferon in Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 224:307-313.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Bredmose, L., S. M. Madsen, A. Vrang, P. Ravn, M. G. Johnsen, J. Arnau, and H. Israelsen. 2001. Development of a heterologous gene expression system for use in Lactococcus lactis, p. 269-275. In O. W. Merten, D. Mattonovich, C. Lang, G. Larsson, P. Neubauer, D. Porro, P. Postma, J. T. de Mattos, and J. A. Cole (ed.), Recombinant protein production with prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
3
3. Cortes-Perez, N. G., I. Poquet, M. Oliveira, J. J. Gratadoux, S. M. Madsen, A. Miyoshi, G. Corthier, V. Azevedo, P. Langella, and L. G. Bermudez-Humaran. 2006. Construction and characterization of a Lactococcus lactis strain deficient in intracellular ClpP and extracellular HtrA proteases. Microbiology 152:2611-2618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Erickson, A., and R. H. Deibel. 1973. Turbidimetric assay of staphylococcal nuclease. Appl. Microbiol. 25:337-341.[Medline]
5
5. Foucaud-Scheunemann, C., and I. Poquet. 2003. HtrA is a key factor in the response to specific stress conditions in Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 224:53-59.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Gasson, M. J. 1983. Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO712 and other lactis streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J. Bacteriol. 154:1-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Israelsen, H., S. M. Madsen, A. Vrang, E. B. Hansen, and E. Johansen. 1995. Cloning and partial characterization of regulated promoters from Lactococcus lactis Tn917-lacZ integrants with the new promoter probe vector, pAK80. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:2540-2547.[Abstract]
8
8. Kuipers, O. P., P. G. G. A. de Ruyter, M. Kleerebezem, and W. M. de Vos. 1998. Quorum sensing controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 64:15-21.[CrossRef]
9
9. Madsen, S. M., J. Arnau, A. Vrang, M. Givskov, and H. Israelsen. 1999. Molecular characterization of the pH-inducible and growth phase-dependent promoter P170 of Lactococcus lactis. Mol. Microbiol. 32:75-87.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Madsen, S. M., T. Hindre, J. Le Pennec, H. Israelsen, and A. Dufour. 2005. Two acid-inducible promoters from Lactococcus lactis require the cis-acting ACiD box and the transcription regulator RcfB. Mol. Microbiol. 56:735-746.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
11. Mierau, I., and M. Kleerebezem. 2005. 10 years of the nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 68:705-717.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Miyoshi, A., I. Poquet, V. Azevedo, J. Commissaire, L. Bermudez-Humaran, E. Domakova, Y. Le Loir, S. C. Oliveira, A. Gruss, and P. Langella. 2002. Controlled production of stable heterologous proteins in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:3141-3146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Morello, E., L. G. Bermudez-Humaran, D. Llull, V. Sole, N. Miraglio, P. Langella, and I. Poquet. 2008. Lactococcus lactis, an efficient cell factory for recombinant protein production and secretion. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14:48-58.[Medline]
14
14. Obis, D., A. Guillot, J. C. Gripon, P. Renault, A. Bolotin, and M. Y. Mistou. 1999. Genetic and biochemical characterization of a high-affinity betaine uptake system in Lactococcus lactis reveals a new functional organization within bacterial ABC transporters. J. Bacteriol. 181:6238-6246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Poquet, I., V. Saint, E. Seznec, N. Simoes, N. Bolontin, and A. Gruss. 2000. HtrA is the unique surface housekeeping protease in Lactococcus lactis and is required for natural protein processing. Mol. Microbiol. 35:1042-1051.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Rigoulay, C., I. Poquet, S. M. Madsen, and A. Gruss. 2004. Expression of Staphylococcus aureus surface proteins HtrA1 and HtrA2 in Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 237:279-288.[Medline]
17
17. Rozen, S., and H. J. Skaletsky. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers, p. 365-386. In S. Krawetz and S. Misener (ed.), Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
18
18. Sriraman, K., and G. Jayaraman. 2006. Enhancement of recombinant streptokinase production in Lactococcus lactis by suppression of acid tolerance response. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 72:1202-1209.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2008, p. 7442-7446, Vol. 74, No. 23
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00638-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sriraman, K. Articles by Jayaraman, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sriraman, K. Articles by Jayaraman, G. Agricola Articles by Sriraman, K. Articles by Jayaraman, G.