Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2008, p. 7750-7758, Vol. 74, No. 24
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00982-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Top Institute Food and Nutrition, Nieuwe Kanaal 9A, 6709 PA Wageningen, The Netherlands,1 Wageningen University and Research Centre, Laboratory of Microbiology, P.O. Box 8033, 6700 EJ Wageningen, The Netherlands,2 NIZO food research, P.O. Box 20, 6710 BA Ede, The Netherlands3
Received 30 April 2008/ Accepted 15 October 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies of the response of Lactobacillus species to pH stress to date have concentrated on measuring the average response of the population (e.g., references 3 and 8). However, it is clear that for many stresses, there is considerable variation within a genetically identical population, even within a homogeneous environment (2, 6). The heterogeneity of stress response is of particular interest in cases in which we wish to kill bacteria or inhibit their growth. Phenotypic heterogeneity makes judging the optimal effective dosage of an antimicrobial treatment difficult. It may also be relevant in cases in which microbial survival under fluctuating stresses is desired. One method of studying phenotypic heterogeneity is to directly or indirectly follow the growth or survival of individual cells (12, 16, 23, 26, 28, 34, 36, 37) during imposition of stress and during recovery. Also, a heterogeneous response to stress can be revealed by biphasic kill curves (5, 11). More recent approaches have used flow cells and digital image analysis to identify subpopulations such as "persister" cells with increased resistance to antibiotics (4). Recently, imaging of microcolonies grown on porous aluminum oxide (PAO) has been used to quantify heterogeneity in the salt stress response of Bacillus cereus (10). This method has been used during exposure to a stressing agent and also in recovery, particularly during the outgrowth of a CFU over the first few hours after exposure to stress.
A common response to stress is a change in cell morphology, particularly filamentation, in which cell growth (in particular, elongation) continues but septation (i.e., division) is inhibited. Filamentation occurs in response to antibiotics, desiccation, high salinity, irradiation and other forms of DNA damage, prophage induction, temperature or pH extremes, and organic solvents, as well as in human infections and in biofilms (14, 32, 35, 36). The production of heterologous proteins in Lactobacillus casei also induces filamentous cells (1). Despite this change being such a widespread phenomenon, the fitness advantage of this change in morphology to the bacterium is often unclear. Filamentation is commonly, but not exclusively, linked to the SOS response. The SOS response is known to be subject to phenotypic heterogeneity (11). Many of the other features of the SOS response, including an elevated mutation rate and stimulation of plasmid transfer, directly contribute to increased fitness for the stressed microorganisms (14). Filamentation during microbial stress recovery in the food industry is of interest. Filamentation may have survival value to microorganisms during processing, and the viable count for CFU may not accurately assess the danger posed by the contamination of foods by filamentous microorganisms (19). The latter point is relevant if a highly elongated cell can rapidly divide into a large number of progeny. In this scenario, an elongated cell with greater biomass could be more effective in immediate outgrowth than a shorter cell, despite both being potentially counted as a single CFU.
In this study, we used cell and microcolony imaging to quantify the heterogeneity of L. plantarum WCFS1 microcolonies in response to rapid acidification, particularly in the recovery of the survivors.
|
|
|---|
Survival curves at pH 3.
Mid-log-phase anaerobic cultures of L. plantarum in MRS medium (pH 5 to 5.5) were diluted into liquid medium at pH 3 at densities of ca. 109 and 107 CFU ml–1. At intervals, samples were taken and a viable count was determined on pH 6.5 MRS agar at 37°C with incubation for 36 h. Additionally, the pH of the medium was checked during sampling (as described for medium preparation) and samples were taken for observation by microscopy.
Recovery from low pH monitored by transmission microscopy of growing cells.
A 1.5-mm-thick film of MRS-Gelrite at the appropriate pH was poured on a sterile microscope slide with spacers, and a second slide was set on top to ensure a flat upper surface, which was removed after gelling. After 3 days of culture on PAO at pH 3, cells from discrete microcolonies were sampled using a sterile toothpick and the microcolony was viewed by transmission light microscopy. Cells sampled with a toothpick were inoculated onto this MRS gel film. A coverslip was placed over the inoculum, and the rest of the slide was sealed with plastic film (Euroshopper, The Netherlands) to limit desiccation. The slides were maintained at 37°C on a DC60 heated microscope stage (Linkham Scientific, United Kingdom). Cells were imaged periodically by transmission microscopy (1,000x optical magnification with an oil immersion lens). Imaging was performed with minimal illumination (<10 s per picture), with pictures captured every 20 to 30 min over a period of up to 4 h. Similar experiments were performed by transferring L. plantarum from microcolonies grown on PAO strips on pH 6.5 MRS plates to pH 6.5 MRS-Gelrite or agar slides. For each condition, the outgrowth of at least 20 CFU was measured in at least six separate experiments.
SEM.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of microcolonies was performed as previously described (20). For stress recovery experiments, strips of PAO with cells cultured for 2 to 3 days at pH 3 were transferred to MRS agar plates at pH 6.5 and incubated for 1 to 3 h under anaerobic conditions at 37°C before fixation.
Staining of cells for fluorescence microscopy.
The Live/Dead staining system (Invitrogen, The Netherlands) was used to assess the membrane integrity of L. plantarum cells cultured on PAO (18, 20) by dual staining with Syto9 and propidium iodide (PI). Membranes and nucleic acids of cells isolated from growing microcolonies were stained by adding the lipophilic dye F4-64 (40) (Invitrogen, The Netherlands) at 10 µg ml–1 and Syto9 at (1 µg ml–1) in MRS medium (pH 6.5). The cells were incubated at room temperature for 20 min and then imaged by oil immersion fluorescence microscopy after spotting 5-µl aliquots onto agar gel-pad slides.
Image capture and analysis.
Image acquisition was performed with a charge-coupled-device camera mounted on an Olympus BX41 microscope. Cell and microcolony dimensions were analyzed from TIFF images by using the open source software ImageJ version 1.37v (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) via the method described for the analysis of B. cereus microcolonies on PAO (10). Cell length was measured by tracing the cell from pole to pole. Cell areas excluded intercellular areas. Both image capture and subsequent processing were performed as previously described (10, 20).
Calculations and statistical analysis.
Calculation of the heterogeneity used log10 transformed microcolony areas. Variances and means were calculated for each time point as previously described (10). Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and coefficients of determination (r2) were calculated using the Vassar statistics server (R. Lowry, VassarStats [http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/VassarStats.html]).
|
|
|---|
Strips of PAO were used to facilitate rapid changes in the environment of the microcolonies simply by moving the strip to a new agar or Gelrite base. Because PAO is highly porous and the strips are 60-µm thick, the change in medium experienced by cells on the surface is rapid; generally it occurred within seconds or minutes (21). This method allowed staining of cells in situ or shifts in the pH (21). PAO is an oxide of aluminum and as such is extremely stable at low pH (20). A combination of these techniques allowed microcolonies to be grown, stressed, and visualized despite the acidic conditions. L. plantarum was grown anaerobically in MRS broth until mid-log phase (pH 5), then rapidly subjected to a change in pH by plating on PAO on MRS-Gelrite (pH range, 2.5 to 6), and then incubated under anaerobic conditions. Staining with Syto9 and PI allowed visualization of microcolonies, which in some cases appeared incapable of growing to visible colonies. The growth of at least a fraction of the plated CFU was observed at a pH value as low as 2.5 (Fig. 1A). The majority of the cells (>90%) in these microcolonies stained preferentially with Syto9, suggesting good membrane integrity and likely viability (Fig. 2). At pH 3, growth of a subpopulation of 1 to 2% of the inoculum formed viable microcolonies of up to 100 cells over a 2- to 4-day period. The majority of cells that did not grow (>95%) stained preferentially with PI, suggesting a compromised membrane and probable loss of viability. This level of PI staining occurred a few hours after plating on PAO. Comparison of the microcolony area of the PI-stained cells grown at pH 3 with the average microcolony area (Syto9-PI staining) of the inoculum suggested there was no significant difference (a P value of <0.05 by Student's t test for >3,000 cells). Therefore, most of the cells inoculated at pH 3 failed to grow, and the preferential PI staining suggested they were dead or damaged. The microcolonies that did grow after 2 days were dominated by filamentous cells (Fig. 2). The arrangement of cells was also unusual for the survivors: not only were the cells often highly elongated but they were growing in entangled or aligned groups. In contrast, L. plantarum WCFS1 cultured on PAO on MRS medium (starting pH of 6.5) formed microcolonies of up to 100 cells (2 to 3 µm long) as a tightly packed monolayer and only then stacked up to form a second layer (data not shown). Growth of cells at a starting pH of 6.5 had a doubling time of 51 min on PAO on MRS. Imaging of cells inoculated at pH 3 suggested that, just considering the growing subpopulation, the doubling time was in excess of 3 h.
![]() View larger version (6K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effect of low pH on growth and survival of L. plantarum WCFS1. (A) Percentages of CFU showing growth after pH downshift from pH 5 to pH, determined after plating from liquid culture onto PAO on Gelrite plates at the indicated pH, are shown. (B) Kill curve after pH downshift in liquid culture from pH 5 to 3, assayed by a viable count onto pH 6.5 plates. Open squares, pH downshift for cells at high density; filled squares, pH downshift for cells diluted 100-fold; filled triangles, control cells resuspended to high density in pH 6.5 MRS.
|
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Fluorescence microscopy images of L. plantarum WCFS1 grown at pH 3 for 2 days. (A) Overview. Scale bar, 100 µm. The growing microcolonies are composed mainly of Syto9 (blue/green)-stained filamented and unfilamented cells with a small number of PI-stained cells (red). More numerous unfilamented and PI-stained bacteria representing CFU composed of nonviable cells with a compromised membrane are also visible. The figure shows the highest plating density to emphasize the heterogeneity of survival; the isolation of cells by use of toothpicks was from lower-density samples. (B) Image similar to that in panel A but at higher magnification. The scale bar from panel A indicates 20 µm when applied to this panel.
|
Cells from a late-log-phase culture of L. plantarum (optical density at 600 nm, >10; pH 4) were also plated and cultured on PAO under anaerobic conditions. As with the mid-log-phase inoculum, only a subpopulation of the CFU viable at pH 6.5 formed microcolonies at pH 3 to 3.5. However, after 1 day of culture on PAO, while the percentage growing as microcolonies was similar to the mid-log-phase inoculum, the average microcolony area was smaller (twofold). Additionally, the filamentation in the growing microcolonies of the late-log-phase culture was less extreme than that in the mid-log-phase culture (on average, two- to threefold shorter). After 2 and 3 days incubation, the mid-log-phase culture showed a threefold increase in the percentage of growing microcolonies compared to the value for the late-log-phase culture. This was apparently due to cells with a long lag phase now starting to divide.
Mid-log-phase cells, cultured under anaerobic conditions (pH 5.5), were resuspended in MRS medium at pH 4 (2 h) for exposure to an intermediate level of acid stress. These cells were then plated to PAO on pH 3 MRS-Gelrite. Pretreatment at pH 4 increased the relative percentage of microcolonies formed by two- to fivefold (up to 10%) suggesting an adaptive response. This effect was not seen when cells grown overnight in MRS medium (already at pH 4) were resuspended in fresh pH 4 MRS medium before being plated on PAO.
Inactivation of L. plantarum at low pH in liquid culture.
The decline in viability of L. plantarum was examined after a downshift from pH 5.0 to pH 3.0 in liquid culture by plating at pH 6.5 (Fig. 1B). Despite rapid transfer to pH 3 MRS, the decline in viability was relatively slow; indeed, for some days it was only marginally faster than a stationary-phase culture resuspended in fresh MRS medium. Irrespective of the concentration of cells, there was no shift in the pH of the growth medium and no detectable growth at pH 3. This suggests that survival in liquid culture was not facilitated by the cells making the bulk environment more alkaline. Cell density did not appear to affect survival; a 100-fold dilution of the culture in pH 3 MRS medium yielded a kill curve similar to that of the more concentrated sample (Fig. 1B).
Recovery of individual cells from acid stress.
The ability to visualize microcolonies growing at pH 3 was exploited to allow the selective isolation of these cells. Cell isolation was performed with a sterile toothpick, and low-power light microscopy was used to guide the tip to its intended target. The cell density used was 50-fold lower than the density used for the experiment whose results are shown in Fig. 2, to avoid cross-contamination. Three approaches were taken to analyze these cells before and during recovery: (i) SEM imaging of the cell surface, (ii) visualization of membranes by fluorescence microscopy using the lipophilic dye FM4-64, and (iii) monitoring of growth using transmission microscopy of cells cultured on MRS-Gelrite-covered microscope slides (described in the three sections below).
(i) SEM imaging of growth at pH 3 and recovery.
SEM imaging of microcolonies in situ reinforced the observations made by fluorescence microscopy. The elongated cells growing at pH 3 on PAO had no external trace of septation and had an unusually rough lateral surface with smoother domed surfaces at both poles (Fig. 3B and C). The rough surface resembled that caused by lactate stress; cells grown at pH 4.8 with lactate in continuous culture had a similar appearance (39). Cells growing a higher pH also tended to have smoother poles, but the contrast was less extreme, as the main body of the cell was smoother (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (122K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. SEM images of cells from microcolonies of acid-stressed L. plantarum WCFS1 grown on PAO and subsequently during recovery. (A) Cells grown at pH 6.5. (B) Filamented cells grown at pH 3 displaying a rougher cell surface without obvious septation. (C) Cells grown at pH 3 that were subsequently allowed to recover for 1 h at pH 6.5. (D) Cells grown at pH 3 that were subsequently allowerd to recover for 2 h at pH 6.5. Arrows show septation; here, the left-hand end of a filamented cell, where cell division is in progress and the cell surface is becoming smoother, is shown. The scale bar in panel D indicates 1 µm for panels C and D and 6 µm for A and B.
|
(ii) Imaging of membranes during septation by staining with FM4-64.
In order to visualize the cell membrane and reveal possible septation points, cells were stained with the lipophilic dye FM4-64 and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. Cells grown at pH 6.5 showed normal division and FM4-64 stained the cytoplasmic membrane, particularly in dividing cells (Fig. 4A). The staining characteristics were similar to those of other gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacillus subtilis, treated with this dye (40). Most filamentous cells (>85%) growing at pH 3 showed an absence of FM4-64 staining membrane across the cell (Fig. 4B). However, a subpopulation (<15%) gave a staining pattern that may indicate membrane inclusion bodies and/or abortive septation (Fig. 4C). In the latter group, bodies staining with FM4-64 were seen but usually failed to completely cross the cell, and hence cell division was not observed.
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Staining filamented cells with FM4-64 (red) and Syto9 (blue/green) with imaging by fluorescence microscopy (left panels) and transmission microscopy (right panels). Scale bar (in panel A), 5 µm (all panels). (A) L. plantarum WCFS1 inoculated onto PAO and cultured on pH 6.5 Gelrite, then picked by a toothpick, stained, and imaged. Nascent septation points are seen in three of the five cells as bright FM4-64 staining across the dividing cells in regions where Syto9 staining was absent. (B) Typical filamented cell from culture on pH 3 after 2 days. FM4-64 staining was consistent with aseptate cells. (C) Example of a less abundant subpopulation (<20%) from 2 days growth at pH 3, stained with FM4-64. Staining was generally more irregular and punctuate than that for putative septa from cells grown at high pH. (D) Example of pH 3 cultured cells after 2.5-h recovery at pH 6.5. The filamentous cell (lower left) is dividing predominantly from the left-hand end; the irregularity at the right-hand end is a twisted region partially out of focus. (E) Further example of the cells shown in panel D; division primarily at the right-hand end.
|
(iii) Recovery from pH 3 by monitoring cell growth using light microscopy.
Recovery of L. plantarum from pH 3 was also assessed after cells were picked with a toothpick from microcolonies (after 3 days) and set onto microscope slides coated with a layer of MRS medium solidified with Gelrite or agar. These cells were cultured on a heated microscope stage at 37°C over a period of several hours, with periodic imaging by transmission microscopy. Incubation of 200 recovered cells for periods up to 4 h indicated that 96% of the cells recovered were viable. For a more detailed analysis, stacks of images were created from a time series taken over a few hours, and the fates of individual cells and their progeny were followed through several rounds of division. Qualitatively, these observations supported the results obtained by FM4-64 staining and SEM in terms of the way cells divided upon incubation at pH 6.5, i.e., recovery of filamented cells was generally by outgrowth of a specific portion of the cell and not by symmetrical division (Fig. 5). The difference in the outgrowth potential at different points along a filament was large; for example, for the cell shaded red in Fig. 5, the first progeny cell of normal length divided several times ahead of any other outgrowth. However, the flanking regions of the cell immediately adjacent to those that were growing rapidly were not dead or completely inactive. Measurements of cell elongation from time-lapse pictures suggested that these regions were also elongating but at least fivefold more slowly. These observations suggest that there was intracellular heterogeneity in recovery from acid stress, that regions within a filament have an advantage in forming new cells when the pH of their environment shifts from pH 3 to 6.5. Consistent with this view, a rapid return to normal-length cells (1 to 3 µm) evenly along a filamented cell was never seen (for 200 cells).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Example of the elongation and division of filamentous cells imaged by transmission light microscopy during recovery from pH 3. Individual cells and their corresponding progeny are shaded (red, green, and blue). Arrows indicates where division first occurred for each cell. Scale bar, 5 µm. Times at which the images were captured are 0 min (A), 100 min (B), and 200 min (C).
|
|
View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Quantification of growth and recovery of L. plantarum WCFS1 cultured on MRS-Gelrite on warmed microscope slides, tracked during growth by transmission microscopy, and quantified by calculation of microcolony areas. (A) Individual growth curves during recovery from low pH. The outgrowth of 20 CFU is shown. These cells were grown for 2 days on PAO at pH 3 and then moved by use of a toothpick onto MRS-Gelrite at pH 6.5 and imaged during growth. (B) Results of a control experiment with 20 CFU of L. plantarum transferred after 2 days growth on PAO (at a starting pH of 6.5) to MRS-Gelrite at pH 6.5. (C) Variance within microcolony areas of each of the two populations plotted against recovery time, calculated from log10 microcolony areas. Open squares represent data for cells recovering from pH 3 (data calculated as described for panel A), and filled squares represent data for control cells (data from the results described for panel B).
|
|
|
|---|
The acid-resistant subpopulation was taken as the starting point for a second set of experiments that focused on recovery from acid stress. Many survivors of low-pH stress became elongated during sustained growth at an acidic pH. After return of the microorganism to a less acidic growth environment, detectable septation and the creation of new cells developed preferentially at specific points along a filamented cell. Division never occurred simultaneously all along such an elongated cell. The early septation events appeared localized and were usually asymmetric (i.e., not bisecting the cell). While there was differential growth within a filamented cell, the regions that were not rapidly dividing were not completely inactive, as limited elongation was still observed over a period of a few hours in these less productive regions.
Several authors have argued that filamented cells are a confounding factor in viable counting within the food industry (19, 32). A serious error in viable counting may occur if a filamented cell was already multiply septate and could therefore form a large number of viable cells with a single simultaneous round of division. However, this is clearly not the only model for recovery, and we have shown here that the increased biomass of a filament is not an advantage in the return to relatively unstressed growth. If there is survival value of highly elongated cells in this situation, this suggests it is more likely to be in viability or growth under stress.
For some species, asymmetric division is the norm. For many rod-shaped bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli or B. subtilis), vegetative cell division normally precisely bisects the cell, and this is also observed with L. plantarum under favorable growth conditions. Under stress, division can shift from a symmetric to an asymmetric mode, e.g., in an extreme case for B. subtilis sporulation (40), and return to symmetric division upon spore outgrowth. Relatively little is known about septation in L. plantarum. However, a knockout mutation of the alanine racemase gene in this organism results in an unusual lytic phenotype compared to B. subtilis (38). Taken with the observation that the regular and symmetric recovery from filamentation is not found, unlike the model proposed for Listeria (19), this suggests there may be interesting features of cell division yet to be discovered in L. plantarum that contrast with other gram-positive rods.
There are a number of possible explanations for differential growth within a single filamentous cell, including the following. (i) The least damaged region of a filamented cell may be dividing. Alternatively, if it contains multiple genomes, growth may occur in the region containing the most viable genome or other cellular components required for survival. (ii) The rest of the filamented cell may be "sacrificed" supporting the growth of the dividing cell. (iii) A single filamented cell may apply multiple survival strategies, leading to a high fitness in a fluctuating environment. Cellular regions growing slowly may be more stress resistant, providing a survival advantage if the stress returns. Other parts growing more rapidly may be able to exploit the new environment that is favorable for growth. Whatever the case, when L. plantarum returns to rapid, unstressed growth, a decrease in the heterogeneity is observed. This may be explained by the fact that in a homogeneous environment that is favorable for growth, there may only one good cell shape for optimal fitness, whereas under stressful conditions, a high level of phenotypic heterogeneity yields the highest benefits in terms of fitness (2, 6).
The mechanism(s) allowing the survival and growth of a small fraction of the population during acid stress is not clear. However, it is known that individual bacteria do vary in their membrane potential and internal pH. It may be that this heterogeneity contributes to some individuals surviving and growing at pH 3 (42). Given recent improvement in tracking and imaging subpopulations in flow cells and other situations (4), it should be possible to address these questions experimentally, potentially integrating measurements of intracellular pH. In E. coli, it is often variation in global regulators that mediates variation in the phenotypic heterogeneity of stress resistance (27). For example, the PhoU global negative regulator in E. coli mediates both a persister response to antibiotics and other stresses, including low pH (29). L. plantarum WCFS1 has two putative PhoU homologues encoded by its genome (17, 24; data not shown). Additionally, it has been shown recently that, in L. plantarum strain BAA-793, the principal sigma factor (RpoD) can mediate the heterogeneity of pH stress (25). This study used (among other conditions) HCl-adjusted MRS medium at pH 3.85 and visible colony size to determine the variation in growth. Our work used a lower pH and smaller microcolony size than this work as the readout. In the study by Klein-Marcushaumer and Stephanopoulous (25), mutations within the rpoD gene were shown to alter the phenotypic variation. Increasing this form of population diversity proved a good point for strain improvement. We suggest that microcolony assays may have a similar potential but are possible under more extreme stresses under which visible colonies rarely form.
In summary, multiple levels of heterogeneity exist within pH-stressed cultures of L. plantarum. In terms of growth at low pH, there is clearly phenotypic heterogeneity resulting in the appearance of subpopulations of cells able to grow in acidic conditions. In recovery, there is intracellular heterogeneity, at least within the more elongated cells. Filamentous cells recover through asymmetric cell division and are not at an advantage in outgrowth compared to shorter cells.
We thank Michiel Kleerebezem, Maria Marco, and Marcel Zwietering for constructive comments on the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 24 October 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»