Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Linke, K. Articles by Vogel, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Linke, K. Articles by Vogel, R. F. Agricola Articles by Linke, K. Articles by Vogel, R. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2008, p. 7821-7823, Vol. 74, No. 24
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02028-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Influence of High Pressure on the Dimerization of ToxR, a Protein Involved in Bacterial Signal Transduction

Kai Linke,¹ Nagarajan Periasamy,² Matthias Ehrmann,¹ Roland Winter,² and Rudi F. Vogel^1*

Technische Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Technische Mikrobiologie, 85350 Freising, Germany,¹ Dortmund University of Technology, Physical Chemistry I—Biophysical Chemistry, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany²

Received 2 September 2008/ Accepted 10 October 2008

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION REFERENCES

 
High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) is suggested to influence the structure and function of membranes and/or integrated proteins. We demonstrate for the first time HHP-induced dimer dissociation of membrane proteins in vivo with Vibrio cholerae ToxR variants in Escherichia coli reporter strains carrying ctx::lacZ fusions. Dimerization ceased at 20 to 50 MPa depending on the nature of the transmembrane segments rather than on changes in the ToxR lipid bilayer environment.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION REFERENCES

 
Bacteria are exposed to high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) in deep-sea environments and when HHP is used as a nonthermal food preservation method. Multiple effects on microbial physiology have been described for sublethal HHP treatments (20 to 150 MPa), which induce stress response, influence ribosomal protein synthesis, and directly affect membrane properties (2, 20). The physical state of the membrane affects the structure and function of membrane proteins, while in turn, integrated proteins can influence the phase state and lateral organization of the membrane. Until now, experiments on the influence of pressure on proteins and lipids have essentially been performed using monomeric and oligomeric proteins in aqueous solution and pure lipid bilayer systems, respectively (1, 4, 19). Still, little is known about the behavior upon pressurization of membrane proteins integrated in their natural lipid bilayer environment, and their putative function in pressure sensing and any in vivo data are missing. Therefore, we studied HHP-induced dimer dissociation of membrane proteins in vivo by using Vibrio cholerae ToxR variants in Escherichia coli reporter strains.

In Vibrio cholerae, ToxR is the central regulator of virulence gene expression which initiates transcription from the cholera toxin gene promoter ctx (12, 13), while it regulates adaptation to high pressure in the deep-sea bacterium Photobacterium profundum (18). This renders ToxR a relevant model to study HHP-modulated membrane protein interaction. Dimerization of ToxR is essential to initiate the required signaling function (3, 5, 9, 10, 15). We used a system in which the cytoplasmic domain of V. cholerae ToxR was linked to a periplasmic maltose binding protein (MalE) moiety via different transmembrane segments (TMS). An E. coli strain in which the ctx promoter was fused to a lacZ gene allowed the determination of ToxR dimerization according to β-galactosidase activity.

Four different TMS were tested: AZ2, a simplified version of a membrane-spanning leucine zipper interaction domain (LLAALLALLAALLALL); EG4, a mutant consisting of a simplified version of the leucine zipper (LLAALAAALAALAAAL); GpA13, a wild-type glycophorin A TMS (LIIFGVMAGVIGT); and GpAG83A, a mutant of the wild-type glycophorin A TMS (LIIFGVMAAVIGT). A nondimerizing TMS consisting of the ToxR cytoplasmic domain and MalE was used for comparison. The reporter strain E. coli FHK12 was transformed with plasmids pToxRIV+AZ2, pToxRIV+EG4, pToxRIV+GpA13, pToxRIV+GpAG83A, and pToxRIV+TM carrying the ToxR variants (6, 11). Aliquots of 3-ml cultures were incubated for 22 h at 37°C and 30°C under different pressure conditions. The measurement of β-galactosidase activity (30-µl samples) was performed as described by Kolmar et al. (10). The fatty acid composition was determined from late-exponential-phase cells grown at 30°C and 37°C. The fatty acids were extracted, transesterified, and analyzed by gas chromatography. Laurdan (6-dodecanoyl-2-dimethylaminonaphthalene) fluorescence spectroscopy was used to study the polarity of the lipid interface and to detect potential phase changes of the lipid membrane (16). Protoplasts of stationary phase cells were prepared as described by Weiss (17). One-milliliter samples (Laurdan embedded in E. coli protoplasts) were pressurized at 37°C by using a pressure cell with optical windows (7).

Figure 1 shows the β-galactosidase activities resulting from HHP-dependent ToxR dimerization at 37°C. A temperature change to 30°C had no significant influence on the β-galactosidase activities. The β-galactosidase activities of all constructs were not significantly affected by pressures up to 20 MPa. The leucine zipper (EG4) and glycophorin A (GpAG83A) segments showed lower and decreasing β-galactosidase activities with increasing pressure above 20 MPa, leading to an almost-complete loss of activity at 50 MPa (ca. 20% of the activity at 0.1 MPa). The β-galactosidase activity of the leucine zipper TMS AZ2 drastically decreased at pressures above 20 MPa, resulting in 25% β-galactosidase activity at 50 MPa compared to the activity at 0.1 MPa. The wild-type glycophorin A segment (GpA13) had the highest β-galactosidase activity up to 20 MPa, and, most interestingly, its β-galactosidase activity was affected to a much lesser extent between 20 MPa and 40 MPa than the activity of the other constructs. Its activity at 40 MPa was still around 66% of that at ambient pressure. However, at 50 MPa, GPA showed a reduced activity similar to that of AZ2. For the construct without a TMS (TM), only a very weak β-galactosidase activity was measured, with almost no change in activity up to 50 MPa.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Maximal values of the β-galactosidase activity in Miller units from the strains E. coli FHK12(pToxRIV+AZ2) (•), E. coli FHK12(pToxRIV+EG4) (), E. coli FHK12(pToxRIV+GpA13) (), E. coli FHK12(pToxRIV+GpAG83A) (), and E. coli FHK12(pToxRIV+_TM) () after high-pressure treatment in the range of 0.1 MPa to 50 MPa at 37°C. The error bars represent standard deviations (n = 10). p, pressure.

The fatty acid composition at 30°C showed only marginally larger amounts of unsaturated fatty acids than that at 37°C (data not shown). The effect of pressure on the generalized polarization (GP) of Laurdan-labeled E. coli protoplasts is shown in Fig. 2, which exhibits GP data at 37°C as a function of pressure. The GP values increase steadily with increasing pressure, starting from a relatively high value at ambient pressure (GP = 0.34) which is already characteristic of a membrane with a rather rigid conformational order of the lipid chains. Typically GP values range from about –0.2 to 0.2 for pure-fluid-like, disordered phases of lipid bilayers up to 0.55 to 0.60 in all-solid-ordered, gel-like lipid phases (14). Upon pressurization up to 50 MPa, GP values of 0.43 are reached, which is close to the tight packing of membranes reached for all-ordered conformational states of lipid bilayers.

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. GP values of E. coli protoplasts stained with Laurdan at 37°C under pressure conditions ranging from 0.1 to 50 MPa. p, pressure.

In this study, the effects of HHP on the dimerization ability of an integral membrane protein were examined in vivo. The four transmembrane constructs showed different degrees of lacZ expression and, accordingly, protein dimerization at low pressure, which declined above 20 MPa. The (cytoplasmic) construct lacking a TMS supported little lacZ expression (i.e., little dimerization) and did not change with pressure. LacZ reporter gene expression patterns as a function of pressure were similar at 30°C and 37°C, probably because the membrane fluidities were similar at 30°C and 37°C as the result of a slightly higher unsaturated fatty acid content at the lower temperature. The GP value of the amphiphilic Laurdan fluorophore increased linearly with pressure from 0.34 to 0.43 over the range of pressures tested, indicating the absence of any phase transition in the membrane to which the dimer dissociation described could be attributed. This result corresponds with the results of the related work of Kato et al. (8), who also found a (reversible) conformational change in a protein (ATPase) below the lipid phase transition.

Our results show that pressures between 20 and 50 MPa are sufficient to promote the dissociation of this regulatory membrane protein. Evidence is also provided that integral membrane proteins may be essential in pressure sensing and thus influence bacterial signal transduction. Moreover, dimerization ability under low pressure conditions in vivo is strongly controlled by the nature of the TMS. Pressure-dependent changes in the TMS environment probably are restricted to changes in the rigidity of the membrane and modulate the dimerization, only. Specifically, the glycophorin TMS dimerization is markedly less pressure sensitive than the leucine zipper, which is probably due to the closer packing at the dimer interface and, hence, a larger activation volume for dissociation of the dimer.

 
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) project grants VO 582/3-1 and WI 742/10-1.

We thank Dieter Langosch, Technische Universität München, Germany, for kindly providing toxR constructs.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Lehrstuhl für Technische Mikrobiologie, Technische Universität München, Weihenstephaner Steig 16, 85350 Freising, Germany. Phone: 49 8161 713663. Fax: 49 8161 713327. E-mail: rudi.vogel{at}wzw.tum.de

Published ahead of print on 17 October 2008.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Balny, C., P. Masson, and K. Heremans. 2002. High pressure effects on biological macromolecules: from structural changes to alteration of cellular processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1595:3-10.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Bartlett, D. H. 2002. Pressure effects on in vivo microbial processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1595:367-381.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Bidle, K. A., and D. H. Bartlett. 2001. RNA arbitrarily primed PCR survey of genes regulated by ToxR in the deep-sea bacterium Photobacterium profundum strain SS9. J. Bacteriol. 183:1688-1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Boonyaratanakornkit, B. B., C. B. Park, and D. S. Clark. 2002. Pressure effects on intra- and intermolecular interactions within proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1595:235-249.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Dziejman, M., and J. J. Mekalanos. 1994. Analysis of membrane protein interaction: ToxR can dimerize the amino terminus of phage lambda repressor. Mol. Microbiol. 13:485-494.
6
6. Gurezka, R., and D. Langosch. 2001. In vitro selection of membrane-spanning leucine zipper protein-protein interaction motifs using POSSYCCAT. J. Biol. Chem. 276:45580-45587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Herberhold, H., S. Marchal, R. Lange, C. H. Scheyhing, R. F. Vogel, and R. Winter. 2003. Characterization of the pressure-induced intermediate and unfolded state of red-shifted green fluorescent protein: a static and kinetic FTIR, UV/VIS and fluorescence spectroscopy study. J. Mol. Biol. 330:1153-1164.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Kato, M., R. Hayashi, T. Tsuda, and K. Taniguchi. 2002. High pressure-induced changes of biological membrane. Study on the membrane-bound Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase as a model system. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:110-118.[Medline]
9
9. Kolmar, H., C. Frisch, G. Kleemann, K. Gotze, F. J. Stevens, and H. J. Fritz. 1994. Dimerization of Bence Jones proteins: linking the rate of transcription from an Escherichia coli promoter to the association constant of REIV. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 375:61-70.[Medline]
10
10. Kolmar, H., F. Hennecke, K. Gotze, B. Janzer, B. Vogt, F. Mayer, and H. J. Fritz. 1995. Membrane insertion of the bacterial signal transduction protein ToxR and requirements of transcription activation studied by modular replacement of different protein substructures. EMBO J. 14:3895-3904.[Medline]
11
11. Langosch, D., B. Brosig, H. Kolmar, and H. J. Fritz. 1996. Dimerisation of the glycophorin A transmembrane segment in membranes probed with the ToxR transcription activator. J. Mol. Biol. 263:525-530.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Miller, V. L., and J. J. Mekalanos. 1984. Synthesis of cholera toxin is positively regulated at the transcriptional level by ToxR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:3471-3475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Miller, V. L., R. K. Taylor, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1987. Cholera toxin transcriptional activator ToxR is a transmembrane DNA binding protein. Cell 48:271-279.[CrossRef][Medline]
14
14. Nicolini, C., J. Kraineva, M. Khurana, N. Periasamy, S. S. Funari, and R. Winter. 2006. Temperature and pressure effects on structural and conformational properties of POPC/SM/cholesterol model raft mixtures: a FT-IR, SAXS, DSC, PPC and Laurdan fluorescence spectroscopy study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1758:248-258.[Medline]
15
15. Ottemann, K. M., and J. J. Mekalanos. 1996. The ToxR protein of Vibrio cholerae forms homodimers and heterodimers. J. Bacteriol. 178:156-162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Parasassi, T., G. De Stasio, G. Ravagnan, R. M. Rusch, and E. Gratton. 1991. Quantitation of lipid phases in phospholipid vesicles by the generalized polarization of Laurdan fluorescence. Biophys. J. 60:179-189.[Medline]
17
17. Weiss, R. L. 1976. Protoplast formation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 128:668-670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Welch, T. J., and D. H. Bartlett. 1998. Identification of a regulatory protein required for pressure-responsive gene expression in the deep sea bacterium Photobacterium species strain SS9. Mol. Microbiol. 27:977-985.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Winter, R., D. Lopes, S. Grudzielanek, and K. Vogtt. 2007. Towards an understanding of the temperature/pressure configurational and free-energy landscape of biomolecules. J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 32:41-97.
20
20. Yayanos, A. A., and E. C. Pollard. 1969. A study of the effects of hydrostatic pressure on macromolecular synthesis in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 9:1464-1482.[Medline]

---

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2008, p. 7821-7823, Vol. 74, No. 24
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02028-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Linke, K. Articles by Vogel, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Linke, K. Articles by Vogel, R. F. Agricola Articles by Linke, K. Articles by Vogel, R. F.