This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Derrien, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vos, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Derrien, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vos, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Derrien, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vos, W. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1646-1648, Vol. 74, No. 5
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01226-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The Mucin Degrader Akkermansia muciniphila Is an Abundant Resident of the Human Intestinal Tract{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Muriel Derrien,1* M. Carmen Collado,2 Kaouther Ben-Amor,1 Seppo Salminen,2 and Willem M. de Vos1,3

Laboratory of Microbiology, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands,1 Functional Foods Forum, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland,2 Department of Basic Veterinary Sciences, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland3

Received 1 June 2007/ Accepted 1 December 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
A 16S rRNA-targeted probe, MUC-1437, was designed and validated in order to determine the presence and numbers of cells of Akkermansia muciniphila, a mucin degrader, in the human intestinal tract. As determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization, A. muciniphila accounted more than 1% of the total fecal cells and was shown to be a common bacterial component of the human intestinal tract.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The human intestinal mucosal surfaces are exposed to an enormous amount of bacteria; the concentrations approach 1014 organisms per individual and represent more than 1,000 species (14). This intestinal microbiota is thought to have evolved in an alliance with its host, and this symbiotic relationship is particularly relevant in the protective mucus layer that covers the epithelium and consists of water-containing mucins (1), which are high-molecular-weight glycoproteins, and other host-encoded products. Mucus offers numerous ecological advantages to intestinal bacteria as it represents a direct source of nutrients for these bacteria, especially in the colon, where carbon sources are limited (15). By incorporating mucin in a medium as a major carbon and energy source, we were able to isolate a novel bacterium, Akkermansia muciniphila MucT (6), that belongs to the Verrucomicrobia phylum, a recently recognized division of the Bacteria (9). Analysis of the results obtained for reported clone libraries generated from either feces or biopsy samples showed that eight 16S rRNA sequences showed levels of sequence similarity of ≥98% and three sequences showed <98% similarity with the 16S rRNA gene sequence of A. muciniphila (Fig. 1), indicating that they might represent other species in the genus Akkermansia. These sequences were derived from human clone libraries from healthy individuals (7, 8, 10, 12, 17; K. Saunier et al., unpublished data) and biopsies of inflammatory bowel disease patients (12; R. A. Hutson and M. D. Collins, unpublished data), as well as animals, such as herbivores (13) and mice (16). In this study, we designed, validated, and used a specific probe targeting the 16S rRNA gene sequence of A. muciniphila in fecal samples from healthy adults and babies to determine the prevalence and proportion of this novel mucin-degrading bacterium using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) combined with flow cytometry.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic tree showing the position of A. muciniphila and the clone sequences in the Verrucomicrobia phylum. The numbers after the commas are accession numbers. Bar = 10% sequence divergence.


arrow
Probe design and validation.
 
Sequences of the 16S rRNA genes of A. muciniphila and its closest relatives (Table 1) and sequences of 96 intestinal 16S rRNA gene clones were aligned using CLUSTAL-X and checked for regions with conserved and variable sequences. Based on this alignment, a 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probe targeting part of hypervariable region V9 of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of A. muciniphila was designed. A region corresponding to nucleotides 1437 to 1456 of Escherichia coli was chosen. The newly designed probe was checked against the small-subunit rRNA database of the Ribosomal Data Project II software package using the Probe Match function (4), and a similarity search sequence of the NCBI database was performed with BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). The probe was designated S-St-Muc-1437-a-A-20 (MUC-1437) based on the nomenclature of the Oligonucleotide Probe Database (2) and had the following sequence: 5'-CCTTGCGGTTGGCTTCAGAT-3'. The oligonucleotide probe sequence has been deposited in probeBase (11). All oligonucleotide probes were purchased from Thermo Electron (Ulm, Germany) and were double labeled at both the 5' and 3' ends with Cy5, Cy3, or fluorescein isothiocyanate. The EUB-338 probe (5'-GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT-3') was used as the positive control (3), and the NON-EUB probe (5'-ACATCCTACGGGAGGC-3') was used as a negative control to monitor nonspecific binding (18). EUB-338 or the nucleic acid stain TOTO-1 iodide (Invitrogen, Leiden, The Netherlands) was used for total bacterial and cell counting. TOTO-1 is a membrane-impermeant nucleic acid with very high fluorescence enhancement and quantum yield when it binds to the nucleic acids of a cell. Fifty bacterial strains belonging to the genera Atopobium, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Colinsella, Coprococcus, Enterococcus, Escherichia, Eubacterium, Faecalibacterium, Lachnospira, Lactobacillus, Megasphaera, Mitsuokella, Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, Roseburia, Ruminococcus, Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Victivallis (5) were used for optimization and validation of the FISH probe. The hybridization conditions for MUC-1437 with A. muciniphila were optimized by increasing the concentration of formamide in the hybridization buffer as described by Zoetendal et al. (19). To quantify hybridized cells, samples were analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA) equipped with an air-cooled argon ion laser providing 15 mW at 488 nm combined with a 670-nm red-diode laser with the standard filter setup. For total cell enumeration, samples were incubated in the presence of 1 nM TOTO-1 (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands) for 5 min at room temperature. Unlabeled beads (diameter, 6.0 µm) provided with a bacterial counting kit (Molecular Probes BV, Leiden, The Netherlands) were added to each sample stained with TOTO-1 at a final concentration of 106 beads/ml and were used as an internal standard to calibrate the sample volume. The relative abundance (proportion) of A. muciniphila-like bacteria was estimated by determining the ratio of the number of cells hybridized with Cy5-labeled MUC-1437 to the number of TOTO-1-stained cells. The analysis was performed using the WinMDI version 2.8 software (http://facs.scripps.edu/software.html) or the CellQuest Pro program (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Aligned sequences of the oligonucleotide probe and the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the closest relatives of A. muciniphila in the Verrucomicrobia phylum

Optimal discrimination between the 50 strains (5) and A. muciniphila was achieved using a formamide concentration of 20%, and under these conditions none of the nontarget organisms showed cross-hybridization with the MUC-1437-Cy5 probe (data not shown). Hence, these conditions were considered specific for A. muciniphila in further FISH analysis of fecal samples. Remarkably, when cells were hybridized to the general bacterial probe EUB-338, the percentage of hybridized cells was intermediate between the values for the NON-EUB and MUC-1437 signals (see Fig. S1, panels A to C, in the supplemental material). This could be explained by the two mismatches between the sequences from the EUB-338 probe and the corresponding region of the 16S rRNA sequence from A. muciniphila. It is noteworthy that we also found in the 16S rRNA sequence of A. muciniphila two mismatches with the bacterial probe (EUB-338) commonly used as a positive control in FISH analysis, and A. muciniphila cells showed only a weak signal after EUB-338 hybridization. In retrospect, this suggests why A. muciniphila has not been identified previously.


arrow
Quantification of A. muciniphila in feces.
 
Fresh fecal samples were collected from 50 Finnish babies who were 6 and 12 months old (25 females and 25 males), 13 healthy Dutch adults (8 females and 5 males; ages, 26 to 40 years), and 13 Finnish adults (all females; ages, 26 to 34 years). These volunteers had not been subjected to any feeding trial, specific diet, or antibiotic treatment for the previous year. Samples were processed immediately after collection, and fixed samples were hybridized in 20% (vol/vol) formamide buffer as described above. For total cell enumeration, samples were incubated in the presence of TOTO-1 iodide as described above. Paired and unpaired t tests were used for statistical analysis of comparisons of the numbers of A. muciniphila cells in fecal samples. Cytometric dot plots obtained after staining with TOTO-1 and hybridization with Cy5-labeled NON-EUB and MUC-1437 are shown in Fig. S1, panels D to F, in the supplemental material. A. muciniphila cells (see Fig. S1, panel F, in the supplemental material) were represented in the FL4 signal (Cy5 fluorescence) as the black population separated from the nonhybridized cells (gray). The percentage of A. muciniphila in the 13 samples from Dutch individuals was 92%, and this organism was clearly detected in 12 of the samples. For these 12 subjects, dot plot analysis based on the bead method resulted in a mean value of 1.26% ± 0.85% of the total fecal cells, corresponding to 8.24 x 108 ± 7.35 x 108 cells g (wet weight)–1. The level of A. muciniphila cells ranged between the detection limit (<0.1%) and 3.08% of the total fecal cells and did not differ significantly for male and female individuals (data not shown). Subsequently, A. muciniphila was also quantified using feces from 13 Finnish subjects. The results indicated that A. muciniphila accounted for 1.32 x 109 ± 1.50 x 109 cells g (wet weight)–1 and represented 2.04% ± 0.90% of the total bacterial cells. The differences between Dutch and Finnish individuals (Fig. 2) were found to be not significant (P = 0.08). Feces from a total of 50 6- and 12-month-old babies were used to quantify A. muciniphila by FISH-flow cytometry using MUC-1437. The concentration of A. muciniphila increased significantly between 6 and 12 months (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2), and the levels of this organism were 1.41 x 108 ± 3.23 x 108 and 4.92 x 108 ± 4.20 x 108 cells g (wet weight) feces–1 for the 6- and 12-month-old babies, respectively, representing 0.86% ± 1% and 1.56% ± 0.58% of the bacterial cells. These data indicate that A. muciniphila colonizes the intestinal tract early in life and that within 1 year the level is close to the level observed in adults.


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Quantification of A. muciniphila (log cells/g [wet weight] of feces) in feces from Finnish (F) babies and adults and Dutch (D) adults, with the results represented by box and whisker plots. Each box extends from the 25th percentile to the 75th percentile, and a line indicates the median. The whiskers show the highest and lowest values after exclusion of the outliers, which are represented by dots.


arrow
Perspectives.
 
In conclusion, we describe for the first time validation and application of a novel phylogenetic probe, MUC-1437, targeting an intestinal organism. The data indicate that the mucus-utilizing organism A. muciniphila colonizes the intestinal tract early in life and that within 1 year the level is close to the level observed in healthy adults, representing approximately 1 to 3% of the total microbiota. The abundance of A. muciniphila in the human intestine provides new perspectives for further investigating its role in health and disease in relation to mucin degradation.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was carried out with financial support from the European Community specific RTD program "Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources" (research project EU & Microfunction QKL1-2001-00135). M. Carmen Collado was the recipient of an Excellence postdoctoral grant from Generalitat Valenciana, Spain (grant BPOSTDOC 06/016).

We thank the volunteers who took part in this study. We acknowledge Sylvia Duncan for the gift of some fixed strains and Erwin Zoetendal for critical reading of the manuscript.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Microbiology, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 317 483 742. Fax: 31 317 483 829. E-mail: muriel.derrien{at}wur.nl Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 14 December 2007. Back

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Allen, A. 1983. Mucus—a protective secretion of complexity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 8:169-173.[CrossRef]
  2. 2
  3. Alm, E., D. Oerther, N. Larsen, D. Stahl, and L. Raskin. 1996. The oligonucleotide probe database. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3557-3559.[Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Amann, R., L. Krumholz, and D. Stahl. 1990. Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J. Bacteriol. 172:762-770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Cole, J. R., B. Chai, R. J. Farris, Q. Wang, S. A. Kulam, D. M. McGarrell, G. M. Garrity, and J. M. Tiedje. 2005. The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:D294-D296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Collado, M. C., M. Derrien, E. Isolauri, W. de Vos, and S. Salminen. 2007. Intestinal integrity and Akkermansia muciniphila, a mucin-degrading member of the intestinal microbiota present in infants, adults, and the elderly. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:7767-7770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 6
  11. Derrien, M., E. E. Vaughan, C. M. Plugge, and W. M. de Vos. 2004. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:1469-1476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. Eckburg, P. B., E. M. Bik, C. N. Bernstein, E. Purdom, L. Dethlefsen, M. Sargent, S. R. Gill, K. E. Nelson, and D. A. Relman. 2005. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308:1635-1638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Hayashi, H., M. Sakamoto, and Y. Benno. 2002. Fecal microbial diversity in a strict vegetarian as determined by molecular analysis and cultivation. Microbiol. Immunol. 46:819-831.[Medline]
  16. 9
  17. Hedlund, B. P., J. Gosink, and J. Staley. 1997. Verrucomicrobia div. nov., a new division of the Bacteria containing three new species of Prosthecobacter. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 72:29-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Hold, G. L., S. E. Pryde, V. J. Russell, E. Furrie, and H. J. Flint. 2002. Assessment of microbial diversity in human colonic samples by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 39:33-39.
  20. 11
  21. Loy, A., M. Horn, and M. Wagner. 2003. probeBase: an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:514-516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. 12
  23. Mangin, I., R. Bonnet, P. Seksik, L. Rigottier-Gois, M. Sutren, Y. Bouhnik, C. Neut, M. D. Collins, J.-F. Colombel, P. Marteau, and J. Dore. 2004. Molecular inventory of faecal microflora in patients with Crohn's disease. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 50:25-36.[Medline]
  24. 13
  25. Nelson, K. E., S. H. Zinder, I. Hance, P. Burr, D. Odongo, D. Wasawo, A. Odenyo, and R. Bishop. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the microbial populations in the wild herbivore gastrointestinal tract: insights into an unexplored niche. Environ. Microbiol. 5:1212-1220.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Rajilic-Stojanovic, M. 2007. Diversity of the human gastro-intestinal microbiota: novel perspectives from high throughput analyses. Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  28. 15
  29. Salyers, A. A. 1977. Fermentation of mucins and plant polysaccharides by anaerobic bacteria from the human colon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34:529-533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Salzman, N. H., H. de Jong, Y. Paterson, H. J. M. Harmsen, G. W. Welling, and N. A. Bos. 2002. Analysis of 16S libraries of mouse gastrointestinal microflora reveals a large new group of mouse intestinal bacteria. Microbiology 148:3651-3660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. 17
  33. Suau, A., R. Bonnet, M. Sutren, J.-J. Godon, G. R. Gibson, M. D. Collins, and J. Dore. 1999. Direct analysis of genes encoding 16S rRNA from complex communities reveals many novel molecular species within the human gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4799-4807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Wallner, G., R. Amann, and W. Beisker. 1993. Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytometry 14:136-143.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. 19
  37. Zoetendal, E. G., K. Ben-Amor, H. J. M. Harmsen, F. Schut, A. D. L. Akkermans, and W. M. de Vos. 2002. Quantification of uncultured Ruminococcus obeum-like bacteria in human fecal samples by fluorescent in situ hybridization and flow cytometry using 16S rRNA-targeted probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:4225-4232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1646-1648, Vol. 74, No. 5
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01226-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Zoetendal, E G, Rajilic-Stojanovic, M, de Vos, W M (2008). High-throughput diversity and functionality analysis of the gastrointestinal tract microbiota. Gut 57: 1605-1615 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Derrien, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vos, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Derrien, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vos, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Derrien, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vos, W. M.