Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1667-1670, Vol. 74, No. 5
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02090-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, CB334, University of Colorado—Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309
Received 12 September 2007/ Accepted 2 January 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fleas, like other animals, harbor a bacterial community. Previous molecular surveys of flea-related bacteria have been screened for the presence or absence of specific pathogenic lineages (4, 12, 14, 17, 25, 26). However, within an individual flea, pathogens are members of bacterial communities, and they may interact with coexisting bacteria. Bacterial communities in other hematophagous invertebrates including ticks, mosquitoes, lice, and leeches have been targeted by using a clone library approach (1, 13, 24, 28).
Here, we used clone libraries and 16S rRNA gene sequence data to characterize bacterial communities in two flea species, Oropsylla hirsuta, collected from three black-tailed prairie dogs, Cynomys ludovicianus (from the family Sciuridae), and Oropsylla montana, collected from one rock squirrel, Spermophilus variegatus (also from the Sciuridae family). Prairie dogs occur in the plains, and rock squirrels occur in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains; we collected fleas in Boulder County, CO, where these two ecosystems converge. O. hirsuta bacteria were screened for the presence of Bartonella strains before selection for this study at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Fort Collins, CO, by using Bartonella-specific primers to amplify the gltA gene (26). Fleas were kept at –20°C until they were identified based on morphology (3, 5).
We cleaned the fleas to minimize the contribution of ephemeral bacteria on external flea parts. Fleas were washed twice (0.133 M NaCl, 1.11% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.0088 M EDTA), treated with a lysozyme (11.6 mg/liter, for 30 min, at 37°C), and washed again (three washes in total). Before DNA was extracted (Qiagen DNeasy tissue kit) from the cleaned fleas, they were crushed and subjected to a lysozyme treatment (2 mg/ml, for 30 min, at 37°C) to lyse spore-forming bacteria.
16S PCR products were generated using the universal primers 27f (5'AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) and 1492r (5'GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT) (11). Purified PCR products were cloned using a pGem-T cloning kit (Promega). Cells were shipped to Functional Biosciences, Inc. (Madison, WI), for two-pass sequencing. Forward and reverse sequencing readings were assembled using Sequencher version 4.6 software (Gene Codes Corp.). We obtained 305 16S rRNA gene sequences (GenBank accession no. EU137334 to EU137638). Sequences were aligned by using the Greengenes NAST aligner (2) imported into ARB (15) and corrected by hand. Aligned sequences were checked for chimeras using Bellerophon software (6). Sequences were classified according to Greengenes phylogeny as implemented in ARB (15). Ten "families" of proteobacteria represent greater than 90% of the total discovered diversity (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Classification of 305 16S rRNA gene sequences from O. hirsuta and O. montana
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. The proportions of 10 proteobacterial "families" within individual fleas are depicted. Samples are arranged based on Bartonella abundance data. Individual fleas tend to be dominated by one bacterial lineage. Numbers in parentheses indicate the total number of proteobacterial DNA sequences obtained from each flea. Fleas were collected from three different prairie dogs (prairie dog 1 harbored O. hirsuta fleas 1 to 3 [Oh_1 to Oh_3]; prairie dog 2, Oh_4; prairie dog 3, Oh_5 to Oh_6).
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Maximum likelihood (GTR plus G correction model) tree of Bartonella from O. hirsuta (Oh) and O. montana (Om), with a number of sequences from GenBank. The clade with both O. hirsuta and O. montana is indicated by Om/h. Bartonella strains obtained from GenBank in the tree include B. washoensis (w; accession no. AF070463), two Bartonella sequences from Spermophilus sp. in China (C; accession no. DQ641913 and DQ641912), B. quintana (accession no. M73228), B. koehlerae (accession no. AF076237), B. grahamii (accession no. Z31349), B. bacilliformis (accession no. M65249), B. clarridgeiae (accession no. X97822), and a Bartonella sequence from another O. hirsuta (accession no. DQ473482). The tree was constructed using all of the Bartonella sequences detected, but some were removed to minimize the figure's size.
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Maximum likelihood (GTR plus G correction model) tree of Rickettsiales detected in O. hirsuta (Oh) and O. montana (Om). Except for R. typhi, R. prowazekii, Rickettsiales bacterium "Montezuma" (R. montezuma), Orientalis tsutsugamushi, Anaplasma sp., Ehrlichia sp., and C. caryophilus, the taxon names indicate the genus of the host in which the bacteria were found (e.g., Wolbachia bacteria were found in a Nasonia parasitoid wasp host). Sequences from GenBank in the tree include Caedibacter caryophilus (accession no. AY753195), O. tsutsugamushi (accession no. U17258), Rickettsia typhi (accession no. AE017197), R. prowazekii (accession no. M21789), Rickettsiales bacterium "Montezuma" (accession no. AF493952), Anaplasma sp. (accession no. AY527214), Ehrlichia sp. (accession no. DQ324367), Hyalomma (accession no. AM181356), Acanthamoeba (accession no. AF132137), Anopheles (accession no. AY837738), Oh_GenBank (accession no. AY335925), Phtiropsylla (accession no. AY335932), Pulirritans (accession no. AY335926), Nephila (accession no. AF232234), Drosophila (accession no. AY833061), Nasonia (acces sion no. M84688), Myrmeleon (accession no. DQ068803), Paramecium (accession no. X58198), Louse 1 (accession no. AF467369), and Louse 2 (accession no. AF467370). The tree was constructed using all of the Rickettsiales sequences detected, but some were removed to minimize the figure's size.
|
The Rickettsiales phylogenetic tree shows that the Rickettsiales strains detected in this study are unique relative to those of the known diversity (Fig. 3). The Rickettsiales sequences detected in O. hirsuta are most closely related to a sequence detected in the bacteria of a pocket gopher louse (95% sequence similarity) but are not closely related to any other known diversity. Both of the Rickettsiales lineages detected in O. montana are related to those of Wolbachia, but they are more closely related to the Wolbachia lineage detected in flies than to that of Wolbachia from fleas.
Strains of Rickettsiales and Bartonella have different transmission strategies that may affect the accumulation of genetic diversity within a lineage. Bartonella bacteria are horizontally transmitted, and fleas acquire Bartonella lineages through the environment, from host blood, flea feces, etc. Rickettsial lineages, on the other hand, have either a strictly vertical transmission strategy or a mixture of vertical and horizontal transmission strategies (23). We investigated diversity patterns using PAUP version 4.0b10-Altivec (Sinauer Associates) to generate pairwise distances (general time reversible [GTR] plus gamma correction) between all members of each Bartonella and Rickettsiales lineage. We used full sequences for these comparisons (i.e., no LANE mask). A cumulative frequency distribution of pairwise distances depicts patterns of genetic diversity within a lineage (Fig. 4). The average genetic similarity is greater within the Bartonella lineages than within the Rickettsiales lineages. Vertically transmitted bacterial lineages have been found to have a higher rate of evolution (19, 22, 27), and this may explain the higher diversity found in Rickettsiales.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Cumulative frequency distributions of pairwise genetic distances (GTR plus G corrected) for Bartonella and Rickettsiales strains from each flea species show that Rickettsiales lineages harbor more genetic diversity than Bartonella lineages. As genetic diversity within a lineage increases, the frequency distribution shifts to the right. Distributions of Bartonella genetic distances are presented as black lines, and Rickettsiales distances are presented as gray lines. Distributions for the two Bartonella lineages almost completely overlap and fall to the left of those for the Rickettsiales lineages. As an example of how to interpret this figure, the data point marked by the arrow indicates that 33.33% of the O. montana (Om) Rickettsiales (Rick) group 1 (G1) shares 99.65% or more sequence similarity.
|
We also thank Boulder City OSMP and Boulder County Open Space for access to land and animals. We also thank Amelia Markeson, Jory Brinkerhoff, and Adam Mitchell for help with collecting and identifying fleas.
Published ahead of print on 18 January 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»