Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2008, p. 1820-1828, Vol. 74, No. 6
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02770-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China,1 State Key Laboratory of Bioorganic and Natural Product Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 354 Fenglin Rd., Shanghai 200032, China2
Received 8 December 2007/ Accepted 14 January 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Biosynthetic pathway and structures of Er-A, Er-B, Er-C, and Er-D. The dashed arrows indicate the shunt pathway (II).
|
A few members in the Er family, including Er-B, Er-C, and Er-D, occur as the intermediates in the biosynthetic pathway of Er-A (Fig. 1). The biotransformation of Er-D into the desired major component Er-A involves two final enzymatic reactions, EryK-catalyzed hydroxylation at the C-12 position of the aglycone (26) and EryG-catalyzed O methylation at the C-3' position of macrose (10, 20). Previous biochemical and kinetic studies with EryK confirmed its 1,200- to 1,900-fold preference for Er-D over Er-B (14), supporting the idea that the C-12 hydroxylation catalyzed by EryK on Er-D proceeds to form Er-C, the "natural" substrate of EryG for the C-3' O methylation to produce Er-A (pathway I), and the competitive action of EryG on Er-D results in the shunt metabolite Er-B, which might be an unsuitable substrate for EryK for further conversion to Er-A in vivo (pathway II). Since Er-B and Er-C are biologically much less active and cause >2-fold-greater side effects than Er-A, the proportion of Er-B plus Er-C in the commercial production of Ers is limited to within 5% according to the criteria of the European Pharmacopoeia (8a). However, many industrial strains produce a mixture of Ers in a ratio of Er-A to Er-B plus Er-C of around 3:1 in the fermentation culture, suggesting that the final two tailoring modifications involving C-12 hydroxylation and C-3' O methylation are not as efficient as other enzymatic steps in the Er biosynthetic pathway. An amount of Er-B and Er-C needs to be removed during the postfermentation stage as they are impurities, potentially complicating the downstream process of isolation, increasing the production cost, and causing environmental concerns.
In recent years, the emerging biotechnique of rational genetic engineering (2, 9) has been applied to improving the production of Ers and fulfilled the potential that might be hard to attain solely by the still-used traditional methods based on random mutagenesis and selection over 50 years in S. erythraea. For example, heterologous expression of the Vitreoscilla hemoglobin gene (vhb) in an industrial Er-producing strain of S. erythraea produced a >60%-higher Er titer due to the increase of oxygen supply and consequent enhancement of the Er biosynthetic flux (4, 17), and engineering of the methylmalonyl-CoA metabolite node of the wild type of S. erythraea by inactivation or duplication of the methylmalonyl-CoA mutase gene also led to a significant increase in Er production in a high-performance carbohydrate-based or oil-based fermentation medium (23, 24). In contrast to extensive efforts toward improving total Er production, to our knowledge there have been few reports on the elimination of by-products such as Er-B and Er-C and improvement of Er-A purity at the fermentation stage by using the tools of genetic engineering.
In this study, we report systematical modulation of the amounts of tailoring enzymes EryK (the P450 hydroxylase) and EryG (the S-adenosylmethionine-dependent O-methyltransferase) by genetic engineering in S. erythraea. Increase of the copy numbers of eryK and eryG by homologous recombination significantly enhanced their transcript levels and the process of biotransformation from Er-D to Er-A due to gene dose effects. At the eryK/eryG copy number ratio of 3:2 as well as their resultant transcript ratio of around 2.5:1 to 3.0:1, Er-B and Er-C were nearly completely eliminated, and Er-A production was improved around 25% in the recombinant strain ZL1004 (genotype PermK*-K-K-G + PermE*-K + PermA*-G) and ZL1007 (genotype PermK*-K-G-K + PermE*-K + PermA*-G). The improvement of the Er-A purity and production at the fermentation stage resulted from the efficient biotransformation of the previous by-products Er-B and Er-C into Er-A and enhancement of the biosynthetic flux of Er-A by overcoming the limitations of tailoring modification.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Plasmid constructions and recombinant strain generations.
To duplicate eryK alone in S. erythraea, a 1.7-kb DNA fragment that contains the 1,194-bp complete sequence of eryK and the 358-bp downstream sequence involving a native terminator was amplified by PCR using the primer pair 5'-AAA CTG CAG CAC CGC GGA AGT CTC GAC ACC-3' and 5'-TTT AAG CTT CGC CGG GGC AGT GCA AGT ACG-3' and cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector, yielding pZL1001. The identity of the PCR product with eryK (GenBank accession number AM420293) was confirmed by sequencing. The 1.7-kb PstI/HindIII fragment and a 0.5-kb EcoRI/XbaI fragment that contains a PermE* promoter were sequentially inserted into the corresponding sites of pWHM3, yielding pZL1002. Consequently, the resultant 2.2-kb fragment was cloned into the EcoRI/HindIII site of pKC1139 (a temperature-sensitive vector), yielding pZL1003 for overexpression of eryK alone.
To duplicate both eryK and eryG in S. erythraea, a 1.3-kb fragment that contains the entire eryK sequence without its native terminator was reamplified by PCR using the primer pair 5'-AAA CTC GAG CAC CGC GGA AGT CTC GAC ACC-3' and 5'-TTT ACT AGT GCT GCC CGA CTA CGC CGA CTG-3' and cloned into the pANT841 vector, yielding pZL1004. After sequencing of the PCR product confirmed its identity, a 0.5-kb PermE*-containing fragment was cloned into the EcoRI/SacI site of pZL1004, yielding the recombinant plasmid pZL1005, in which eryK is under the control of PermE*. On the other hand, a 1.5-kb fragment that contains the entire eryG sequence was amplified by PCR using primers 5'-TTA CCA TGG GGT GCT GTT GCC GTC CCT GCG-3' and 5'-TCG ACT AGT CTA CCG CGT GCT GCG CTC CTA-3' and cloned into the pANT841 vector, yielding pZL1006. After sequencing of the PCR product confirmed its identity with eryG (GenBank accession number AM420293), the 1.5-kb fragment was cloned into the NcoI/HindIII site of the pET-28a vector, yielding pZL1007. The 1.5-kb eryG-containing fragment was recovered and inserted into the SpeI/HindIII site of pZL1005, yielding pZL1008, which contains the eryK-eryG copy under the control of PermE*. Finally, the resultant 3.3-kb EcoRI/HindIII fragment was cloned into pKC1139, yielding pZL1009 for overexpression of both eryK and eryG.
To triplicate eryK and duplicate eryG in S. erythraea, two recombinant plasmids that carry genes in the orders eryK-K-G and eryK-G-K, respectively, were constructed. The 1.3-kb XhoI/HindIII fragment that contains the entire eryK sequence was recovered from pZL1004 and cloned into the pGEM-7zf vector, yielding pZL1010. Subsequently, the 1.3-kb eryK-containing fragment from pZL1010 and the 1.5-kb eryG-containing fragment from pZL1006 were successively cloned into the SpeI/HindIII sites of pZL1005, yielding pZL1011 and pZL1012, respectively, dependent on the insertion order. Finally, the resultant 4.6-kb fragment was recovered and cloned into pKC1139, yielding pZL1013 or pZL1014, in which genes are organized in the order eryK-K-G or eryK-G-K, respectively, under the control of PermE*.
In summary, for overexpressing eryK alone, the "long" version of eryK with the native terminator (containing a 358-bp downstream sequence) was chosen to shorten the length of mRNA. For overexpressing eryK-G, eryK-G-K, and eryK-K-G, the "short" version of eryK without the native terminator (containing only a 39-bp downstream sequence) for each was chosen to maintain the translational continuity of downstream genes. Both versions of eryK contain a 105-bp upstream flanking sequence of eryK. The version of eryG in this study contains a 308-bp upstream sequence and a 226-bp downstream sequence of eryG.
These constructs were introduced into S. erythraea by intergeneric conjugation from E. coli ET12567(pUZ8002), following the procedures described previously (15). Colonies that were apramycin resistant at 37°C were identified as the recombinant strains, genotypes of which were further confirmed by Southern hybridization.
Production and analysis of Ers in fermentation cultures.
S. erythraea HL3168 E3 and recombinant strains were grown on agar plates (with appropriate antibiotics for recombinant strains) of the medium [consisting of 1% cornstarch, 1% corn steep liquor, 0.3% NaCl, 0.3% (NH4)2SO4, 0.5% CaCO3, and 2% agar, pH 7.0] at 34°C for sporulation. For fermentation, an agar piece around 1 cm2 was inoculated into a 500-ml flask containing 50 ml of the seed medium [consisting of 5% cornstarch, 1.8% soybean flour, 1.3% corn steep liquor, 0.3% NaCl, 0.1% (NH4)2SO4, 0.1% NH4NO3, 0.5% soybean oil, and 0.6% CaCO3, pH 6.8 to 7.0] and incubated at 34°C and 250 rpm for 2 days. To a 500-ml flask containing 50 ml of the fresh fermentation medium [consisting of 4% cornstarch, 3% soybean flour, 3% dextrin, 0.2% (NH4)2SO4, 1% soybean oil, and 0.6% CaCO3] was then added 5 ml of the seed culture, and incubation was continued at 34°C and 250 rpm for 6 days. The mixture was supplemented with an additional 0.5 ml of n-propanol after 1 day of cultivation. Er isolation from the fermentation culture was carried out according to the methods described previously (28), which were slightly modified by using n-heptane instead of n-hexane.
High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of Ers was carried out on a Nucleosil 100-5 CN column (250 x 4.6 mm; catalog no. 720090.46; Macherey-Nagel Inc., Germany), which was equilibrated with 69% solvent A (32 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0) and 31% solvent B (acetonitrile/methanol ratio of 75/25). An isocratic program (7) was carried out at a flow rate of 1 ml/min, and UV detection was performed at 215 nm using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of Ers was carried out on a Microsorb-MV C18 column (250 x 4.6 mm; catalog no. 281505; Varian Inc.), which was equilibrated with 62% solvent A (30 mM ammonium acetate, pH 4.8) and 38% solvent B (acetonitrile). An isocratic program (28) was carried out on an LCMS-2010 A liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min, and UV detection was performed at 215 nm.
Bioassay-based titration of the Er production.
From the liquid culture, fermentation supernatant (250 µl) was added to stainless steel cylinders on agar plates containing the test medium (consisting of 0.5% peptone, 0.3% beef extract, 0.3% K2HPO4, and 1.5% agar), which was preseeded with an overnight Bacillus pumilus culture at a concentration of 0.8% (vol/vol). The plates were incubated at 37°C for 16 h, and the Er production was estimated by measuring the sizes of the inhibition zones and calculated according to the standard curve made by using the commercially available Er as a control. Since Er-A is biologically much higher in activity than other Er components, the production of Er-A is nearly equal to the total Er production according to the titration done by assaying antibacterial activity against Bacillus pumilus CMCC(B)63 202.
Assay of transcript levels by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) amplification.
Total RNAs of S. erythraea HL3168 E3 and its derivatives were isolated as described previously (6) from mycelia in the fermentation cultures, and an additional purification step was performed using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).
The transcription levels of eryK and eryG were assayed on an FTC-2000 (FengLing BioTech. Co., Shanghai, China) instrument, using real-time, quantitative PCR and the 2–
CT method (16, 21). DNase treatment and cDNA synthesis were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. RT-PCR amplification was performed on each 25 µl of mixture (consisting of 1 µg/ml of template cDNA, 2x SYBR Premix EX Taq mix buffer [TaKaRa, Japan], and 0.3 µM of forward and reverse primers) with the following program: 5 min at 95°C and 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C followed by 60 s at 60°C. For assessing the transcript level of eryK, the 115-bp internal fragment was amplified using the following primers: 5'-ACC TGA TCT CCC GCC TTG TC-3' and 5'-AGG ACG GTC GTG GTG ATG TG-3'. For assessing the transcript level of eryG, the 107-bp internal fragment was amplified using the following primers: 5'-CAA GAA GAG CGT GAG CAG GC-3' and 5'-CTG AGG CGA TCA CGA AGT CG-3'. For assessing the transcript level of the PKS gene eryAIII (as a control) involved in the Er aglycone biosynthesis, the 102-bp internal fragment encoding the thioesterase domain of EryAIII was amplified using the following primers: 5'-CCT GAT CGA CGT CTA CCC GC-3' and 5'-TCG TCC ATC CGC ACC GTC TC-3'.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. HPLC analysis of Er production in fermentation of the controlled strain S. erythraea HL3168 E3, with standard Ers as controls.
|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Genotypes and phenotypes of S. erythraea HL3168 E3 and its recombinant strains. (A) Restriction maps showing predicted fragment sizes upon SmaI and/or SphI digestion. (B) Southern analyses of genomic DNAs digested with SmaI or SphI by using the 1.7-kb eryK-containing fragment as a probe. (C) HPLC analyses of the Er production in fermentations. I, HL3168 E3; II, ZL1001; III, ZL1002; IV, ZL1003; V, ZL1004; VI, ZL1005; VII, ZL1006; VIII, ZL1007; IX, ZL1008; X, ZL1009. Solid circles, stars, and triangles indicate Er-C, Er-A, and Er-B, respectively. Each wavy line indicates the DNA fragment of the vector integrated by single-crossover homologous recombination.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Titration of Er-A production in fermentations of S. erythraea HL3168 E3 and its recombinant strains, by assaying the antibacterial activity against B. pumilus. Error bars represent standard deviations.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Productions of Ers, ratios of Er-A to Er-B plus Er-C, and ratios of transcript levels of eryK to eryG in S. erythraea HL3168 E3 and its recombinant strains
|
To investigate the effects of genetic locus (for homologous recombination) and gene organization of eryK and eryG on Er production, an additional construct that carries genes in the order eryK-G-K was introduced into S. erythraea HL3168 E3, as shown in Fig. 3A and B, resulting in the recombinant strains ZL1007 (PermK*-K-G-K + PermE*-K + PermA*-G), ZL1008 (PermK*-K + PermE*-K-G-K + PermA*-G), and ZL1009 (PermK*-K + PermA*-G-K + PermE*-K-G), respectively. Again, the increase of Er-A accompanied the decrease of Er-B plus Er-C upon HPLC analysis (Fig. 3C), and the bioassay-based titration showed that the Er titer was improved 30.2% in ZL1007, 27.7% in ZL1008, and 11.5% in ZL1009. Combined with the above data, these results indicated that integration of the locus on the chromosome by homologous recombination has a more significant impact on the improvement of Er-A production than the gene organization of eryK and eryG under the same promoter in each recombinant strain (Fig. 4; Table 2).
Assay of the transcript levels of eryK and eryG by RT-PCR amplification.
To assess gene dose effects on the increase of enzyme amounts, RT-PCR amplification for analysis of the transcription levels of eryK and eryG was performed on the total RNAs that were extracted from 3-day fermentation cultures of S. erythraea HL3168 E3 and its recombinant derivatives. The transcript level of the gene fragment that encodes the thioesterase domain of the PKS EryAIII served as a control in this study. As shown in Fig. 5, introduction of an eryK, eryK-G, eryK-K-G, or eryK-G-K copy under the control of PermE* into HL3168 E3 caused significant improvement of the transcript level of eryK or eryG. While duplication of eryK and eryG in each recombinant strain led to six- and two- to fivefold increases, respectively, triplication of eryK resulted in an increase of up to 8- to 13-fold. As shown in Table 2, in which the transcript level ratios of eryK to eryG for these recombinant strains are summarized, the recombinant strains ZL1004 and ZL1007, with the highest Er-A production and purity in fermentations, share a similar ratio of around 2.5:1 to 3.0:1.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Transcript levels of eryK and eryG in S. erythraea HL3168 E3 and its recombinant strains. Error bars represent standard deviations. For each strain, the experiment has been independently carried out three times.
|
|
|
|---|
The selective improvement of production of the desired components and elimination of the undesired components are always the goals in many projects of metabolic engineering (5). Based on the significant success in genetic and biochemical elucidation of the Er biosynthetic machinery, extensive efforts have been made in expanding Er structural diversity and improving total Er production. On the other hand, to reach the criteria of the European Pharmacopoeia regarding the quality of the commercial Er product, an amount of Er-B and Er-C needs to be removed during the postfermentation stage. In this study, we focused on systematically modulating the amounts of EryK and EryG by genetic engineering in an industrial Er-producing strain, S. erythraea HL3168 E3. The methods described here allowed us to biotransform the previous by-products Er-B and Er-C into Er-A and selectively improve the Er-A production and purity at the fermentation stage.
Introduction of a single PermE*-controlled eryK copy into S. erythraea HL3168 E3 caused nearly complete elimination of Er-B, a corresponding increase of Er-C, and Er-A production comparable to that of the control strain. These results clearly showed that the improvement of the amount of EryK through a gene dose effect efficiently blocked the shunt Er-B biosynthetic pathway and enhanced the natural Er-C pathway by competitive action on the common substrate Er-D and, more importantly, demonstrated that the industrial strain HL3168 E3 is amenable to genetic engineering without decreasing the Er-A production.
To reach Er-A without accumulation of both Er-B and Er-C, we introduced an additional eryG copy into S. erythraea HL3168 E3 and modulated the increased amounts of EryK and EryG by altering the copy number ratio, gene organization, and integration locus for homologous recombination. In ZL1004 and ZL1007, the copy number ratio of eryK to eryG at 3:2 as well as their resultant transcript ratio at 2.5:1 to 3.0:1 led to the nearly complete biotransformation of Er-B and Er-C into Er-A and the highest improvement in titer of Er (around 25%), strongly supporting the idea that increase and modulation of the amounts of tailoring enzymes at a certain ratio would enhance the biotransformation process and biosynthetic flux and selectively improve the production and purity of the desired components at the fermentation stage. On the other hand, compared to the gene organization of eryK and eryG introduced under the same promoter in each recombinant strain, the integration of the locus on the chromosome by homologous recombination showed a more significant impact on the Er-A/Er-B plus Er-C ratio and an increase of Er-A production. To obtain the stable recombinant strains, we opted to integrate the additional gene copies into the chromosome of S. erythraea by homologous recombination between the introduced and genomic DNAs. This event happened at either the eryK or the eryG locus when both of them were introduced and caused distinct effects on Er production. In this study, the strains that harbor the integration at the eryK locus where the single gene constitutes an operon always produce more Er-A than do the strains with the integration at the eryG locus, probably due to the fact that eryG resides in the largest operon, and homologous combination occurring there may interfere with the transcription of other structural genes in it, including the PKS genes for Er skeleton formation.
Since Er-A is biologically much more highly active than other Er components, the production of Er-A is nearly equal to the total Er production according to titration by assay of antibacterial activity against Bacillus pumilus. As summarized in Table 2, the decreases of Er-B plus Er-C concentrations are close to the increases of Er titers in the recombinant strains ZL1002, ZL1004, and ZL1007, indicating the improvement of Er-A purity and production at the fermentation stage resulting from the efficient biotransformation of the previous by-products Er-B and Er-C into Er-A, and enhancement of the biosynthetic flux of Er-A could be achieved by rational engineering of the tailoring enzymes in the Er biosynthetic pathway.
In conclusion, systematically modulating the enzyme amounts of EryK and EryG by integrating additional eryK and eryG copies into the industrial strain S. erythraea HL3168 E3 significantly enhanced the process of biotransformation from Er-D to Er-A, competitively blocked the shunt biosynthetic pathway II, nearly completely eliminated the previous by-products Er-B and Er-C, and efficiently improved Er-A production and purity at the fermentation stage. In conjunction with other traditional and genetic ways to continuously evaluate the Er-A production system, this study may facilitate further attempts to improve Er-A production, simplify the downstream purification process, and lower the production costs and environmental concerns in industry.
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30525001 and 20321202), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2006AA020304 and 2006AA022185), the Chinese Academy of Science (KJCX2-YW-H08 and KJCX2-YW-G015), and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (074319115-3 and 04DZ14901).
Published ahead of print on 25 January 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|

CT method. Methods 25:402-408.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»