Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2008, p. 2391-2397, Vol. 74, No. 8
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02587-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

David R. Mason,2
Michael W. Peck,2 and
Peter Rådström1*
Applied Microbiology, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden,1 Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UA, United Kingdom,2 Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden3
Received 16 November 2007/ Accepted 14 February 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent consumer demand for mildly processed foods that are convenient, easy to use, and low in preservatives (e.g., salt and nitrite) has led to the development of new processes and packaging techniques. The safety and quality of minimally heated chilled foods commonly relies on a combination of a mild heat treatment, refrigerated storage, and low-oxygen modified-atmosphere packaging (MAP). Carbon dioxide is frequently included in a modified atmosphere because of its antimicrobial activity (13). While the mild heat treatments applied to these foods are sufficient to kill vegetative cells, they will not eliminate all bacterial spores; in fact, they may even induce their germination. The anaerobic atmosphere used in MAP is strongly inhibitory to aerobic organisms but has a lesser effect on anaerobic bacteria such as nonproteolytic C. botulinum (16, 18). Nonproteolytic C. botulinum is the principal microbiological safety hazard in these new minimally heated chilled foods (31). Fish packed in modified atmosphere is one of the greatest hazards, as fish may be heavily contaminated with spores of nonproteolytic C. botulinum (26), and toxin production may precede microbial spoilage and sensory rejection (1, 17).
Formations of botulinum neurotoxin are reported to vary with serotype, strain, medium, and culture condition (21). However, little is known about the direct regulation of the neurotoxin gene (cnt) or of neurotoxin formation by nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E. While a positive regulator, cntR, has been found in other types of C. botulinum, it appears to be absent in C. botulinum type E (9, 24, 36). Several in vitro methods have been developed for monitoring cnt expression in proteolytic C. botulinum and nonproteolytic C. botulinum, including a gene reporter system (12), competitive reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (29, 39, 40), and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) (10, 23, 27, 28, 42). Experiments using these methods found a peak in neurotoxin gene expression in late exponential or early stationary phase. However, many of these studies examined only one or two points during growth, making it uncertain if the full cnt expression profile had been found. To establish the position for C. botulinum type E, a qRT-PCR method was developed to quantify the relative expression of cntE mRNA during all stages of growth, using two different strains. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to correlate the levels of cntE mRNA with the amount of extracellular neurotoxin formed.
A recent study of nonproteolytic C. botulinum type B (27) showed that the expression of cntB and the formation of BoNT/B in a 70% carbon dioxide atmosphere were fivefold greater than those in a 10% carbon dioxide atmosphere. Intermediate gene expression and neurotoxin formation occurred in a 35% carbon dioxide atmosphere (27). In order to determine if this response to carbon dioxide is also shown by nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E, the effects of three concentrations of carbon dioxide on the growth of cntE expression and BoNT/E production by C. botulinum type E strain ATCC 9564 were investigated. Finally, in order to establish that there is a close relationship between cntE mRNA accumulation (as measured by qRT-PCR) and its rate of gene expression, the rate of cntE mRNA breakdown was determined.
|
|
|---|
qRT-PCR primer and probe design.
Two assays were used, one for cntE and one for the housekeeping gene encoding the 16S rRNA (rrn). This gene has previously been used as a reference gene for quantification of both the toxin gene in nonproteolytic C. botulinum type B (27, 28) and the germination gene (gerA) in proteolytic C. botulinum type B (5). The primers and probes used in this study are listed in Table 1. Primers and probes previously designed for the detection of the cntE gene were used (2). The primers of Lövenklev et al. (28) for the rrn gene were compared to the sequence of the rrn gene for nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E and found to be compatible, as this is a highly conserved region. Several probes were designed and compared. The hybridization probes consist of two parts: a donor probe labeled with fluorescein at the 3' end and an acceptor probe labeled with LC Red640 (LC) at the 5' end with its 3' end blocked with a phosphate moiety. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that the amplified products were of the expected sizes.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Sequences and fluorescent dye of primers and hybridization probes used for qRT-PCR
|
First-strand cDNA was synthesized in two separate RT assays using the reverse primers for the cntE gene and the rrn gene (Table 1). Synthesis of cDNA was performed in a Gene Amp 9700 thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, CT). The total volume of the reaction mixture was 20 µl and contained 0.1 µg total RNA, 0.5 µM of each primer (Sigma-Genosys), 0.5 mM each of nucleotides dATP, dTTP, dCTP, and dGTP (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), 20 U RNasin RNase inhibitor (Promega), 5 mM DTT (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), 1x first-strand buffer, and 200 U Superscript II RNase H– reverse transecriptase (Life Technologies). Before RT enzymes were added, the reaction mixture was heated to 65°C for 5 min and then chilled on ice. After a brief centrifugation and the addition of RT enzymes, the reaction mixture was incubated at 42°C for 50 min and the reaction was terminated by incubation at 70°C for 15 min.
PCR amplification was carried out in a LightCycler instrument (Roche Diagnostics). The PCR mixture specific for the cntE gene contained 1x PCR buffer (Roche Diagnostics), 4 mM MgCl2 (Roche Diagnostics), 0.2 mM of each dNTP (Roche Diagnostics), 0.3 µM of each primer, 0.3 µM of each probe (TIB Molbiol, Berlin, Germany), 1.25 U Tth DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics), and 4 µl of template solution. For the rrn gene, the mixture was the same except for the primer concentration (0.5 µM). The cDNA solution for the rrn gene was diluted 100-fold in water treated with diethyl pyrocarbonate before PCR amplification. The total volume added to each capillary was 20 µl. The LightCycler amplification protocol that was used started with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 60 s, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 0 s (i.e., no hold at 95°C), annealing and fluorescence acquisition at 56°C for 5 s, and elongation at 72°C for 25 s. The temperature transition rate was 20°C/s. The specificity was confirmed using melting curve analysis. It consisted of 95°C for 0 s, 50°C for 15 s, and then an increase in temperature of 0.2°C/s up to 90°C. Each sample was analyzed three times for each gene. The crossing point was determined using the second derivative maximum mathematical model in the LightCycler software (version 3.5; Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
A dilution series of total RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified with the LightCycler to determine the amplification efficiency (AE) and log-linear range of amplification for each real-time assay. The AE in the exponential phase was calculated as 10(–1/s) – 1, where s is the slope of the crossing point value (CP) plotted against the logarithm of the amount of RNA transcribed. The cntE assay had a linear range of amplification between 50 pg and 5 µg of added total RNA, and the AE was determined to be EcntE = 0.87. The rrn assay had a linear range of amplification between 5 pg and 0.5 µg of added total RNA, and the AE was Errn = 1.3.
To confirm the effectiveness of the DNase treatment, DNase-treated RNA was amplified using real-time PCR assays. None of the controls gave a fluorescent signal with real-time PCR, confirming that the DNase treatment removed all genomic DNA (data not shown).
The relative expression (RE) of the cntE gene compared to that of the rrn gene was calculated using these E values and the crossing point deviation (
CP) of the unknown sample compared to a calibrator sample using the equation
(33).
Measurement of neurotoxin concentration.
The concentrations of type E neurotoxin in culture supernatant samples were determined using a commercial ELISA procedure according to the manufacturer's instructions (Metabiologics, Madison, WI). The ELISA procedure incorporates polyclonal antibodies from rabbits specific for type E neurotoxin. Culture samples were centrifuged (4°C, 10,000 x g, 10 min) to separate the bacteria from the supernatant fluid. The supernatant samples were then diluted in casein buffer so that the concentration was within the linear range of the calibration curve (seven standards: 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 ng/ml). A 100-µl sample of culture supernatant was placed in each well and the absorbance measured at 450 nm using an ELISA plate reader. Each sample was measured in duplicate, and the mean and standard deviation were calculated.
Assessment of mRNA degradation.
An aliquot (12.5 ml) of overnight culture of exponentially growing strain ATCC 9564 was inoculated into 237.5 ml of TPY-C broth and incubated in the standard anaerobic atmosphere at 37°C. Growth was monitored by determining the OD620. The result was a typical sigmoid curve. When the cells were in mid-exponential phase (OD620 = 2.3), rifampin was added at a final concentration of 100 mg/liter. Samples (10 ml) were removed at the time of the rifampin addition and thereafter at appropriate time intervals for RNA extraction, in order to quantify mRNA degradation. The RNA extraction was performed as stated earlier, with the exception that cells were harvested by centrifugation for 4 min at 12,500 x g at 4°C. The shorter centrifugation time enabled more-frequent sampling. RT-PCR for cntE mRNA was performed on 1 µg of total RNA, as described above. A standard curve was made by serial dilution of RNA from the reference sample, the sample taken at the time of the rifampin addition. The percentage of cntE mRNA remaining was calculated using the reference sample as 100%.
The effects of carbon dioxide concentration on growth, neurotoxin gene expression, and neurotoxin formation.
Strain ATCC 9564 was used. Three different modified atmospheres containing 10%, 35%, and 70% (per vol) CO2 were tested. The concentration of H2 was 10%, and the balance was N2. Three flasks, each containing 237.5 ml TPY-C, were boiled to create anaerobic conditions and then flushed with the appropriate gas mixture, before autoclaving. The flasks were equilibrated in a Macs MG 1000 anaerobic workstation (Don Whitley, Shipley, United Kingdom) with the same atmosphere. Each flask was inoculated with 12.5 ml of an overnight culture and incubated at 30°C. Growth was followed by measuring the OD620. Samples for total RNA extraction and ELISA were withdrawn in early exponential phase (OD620 = 0.5 to 1), in late exponential phase (OD620
3), and in late stationary phase (after ca. 30 h). The growth experiment was carried out in triplicate for each CO2 concentration. Maximum specific growth rates [µ (OD)] and lag times [
(OD)] of the change in OD620 with time data were estimated by fitting the equation of Baranyi and Roberts (3). It is noted that
(OD), the period during which the cell population reaches a detectable turbidity, is longer than the lag time (
) of the cell population estimated using viable count data. Regression analysis was carried out to describe the relationship between the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere and the growth parameters.
|
|
|---|
Relative quantification of cntE expression in strain ATCC 9564 showed that the transcript level of cntE mRNA increased sharply during growth and reached a maximum in the transition between exponential phase and stationary phase (Fig. 1). It then decreased rapidly and did not rise again. Similar results were also obtained with strain BL 1177 (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effect of growth stage on relative expression of cntE and neurotoxin (BoNT/E) production by nonproteolytic C. botulinum strain ATCC 9564. Growth in TPY-C medium at 30°C with 10% H2, 10% CO2, and 80% N2. Diamonds, OD620; squares, RE of cntE; triangles, BoNT/E. Data are mean values of three independent experiments. Error bars show standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Breakdown of cntE mRNA in nonproteolytic C. botulinum strain ATCC 9564. The amount of cntE mRNA remaining is expressed as a percentage of the starting concentration (at the time of the rifampin addition). Data are from two independent experiments. The means and standard deviations are based on three technical replicates.
|
(OD) increased with carbon dioxide concentration (Table 2).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on the growth of nonproteolytic C. botulinum strain ATCC 9564. Diamonds, 10% CO2; squares, 35% CO2; triangles, 70% CO2. The mean values and standard deviations are based on three independent growth experiments for each gas atmosphere.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on the growth parameters of nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E strain ATCC 9564 in TPY-C medium at 30°C in an atmosphere of 10% H2, 10 to 70% CO2, and 20 to 80% N2a
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of carbon dioxide concentration and growth phase on the RE of cntE (bars) and the formation of neurotoxin (diamonds, BoNT/E) by nonproteolytic C. botulinum strain ATCC 9564. Light gray, 10% CO2; dark gray, 35% CO2; black, 70% CO2. The mean values and standard deviations are based on three independent growth experiments for each treatment.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Effect of carbon dioxide concentration and stage of growth on expression of the neurotoxin gene (cntE) by nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E strain ATCC 9564
|
|
|
|---|
The expression profile of cntE mRNA has both similarities and differences to those reported previously for other neurotoxin genes. The general trends for nonproteolytic C. botulinum type B at 30°C seem very similar, with an increase in cntB mRNA expression during growth, followed by a peak in early stationary phase, although the decrease in mRNA expression in stationary phase is neither as rapid nor as full as that in nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E (28). In proteolytic C. botulinum types A and B, a second rise in cnt mRNA expression has been observed in late stationary phase (10, 28). Furthermore, the decrease in mRNA expression in early stationary phase is not as rapid as that in cntE mRNA (4, 10, 28, 37, 42). The choice of media has also been reported to affect the expression profile (4). The differences between different types and strains may be due to differences in regulation, since nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E does not appear to have the positive regulator cntR, which has been found in the other botulinum toxin gene clusters (9, 24, 36). The tight regulation of expression of cntE in nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E does, however, suggest the presence of a positive regulator that remains to be identified.
Previous studies have reported that growth of nonproteolytic C. botulinum is slowed by high concentrations of carbon dioxide (16, 18, 27). The present study has extended these studies by demonstrating that this delay in turbidity is due to both an increased lag time and a decreased growth rate. However, from a food safety perspective, it is the production of neurotoxin, not cell growth, that is the important parameter. The present study has established that neurotoxin formation by nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E is greater at a higher concentration of carbon dioxide, confirming similar observations made previously by Lövenklev et al. (27) with nonproteolytic C. botulinum type B. In the present study, both relative gene expression and the amount of neurotoxin produced after 30 h were twofold higher when the headspace CO2 concentration was 70% than when the CO2 was 10%. It is possible that this is a growth rate phenomenon, where toxin production is enhanced due to a lowered growth rate, as reported for Clostridium difficile under stress conditions (30). Sharkey et al. (39), however, indicated that for nonproteolytic C. botulinum type E, an increased growth rate was associated with an increased expression of cntE, while the presence of sorbic acid and sodium nitrite reduced both the growth rate and expression of cntE (40). Lövenklev et al. (27, 28) also reported an inhibitory effect of nitrite on cntB expression. These reports, taken together, imply that the increase in neurotoxin gene expression and neurotoxin formation in our experiments is more likely to be related to the increased carbon dioxide concentration than to the decrease in growth rate. Similar trends have been found in other species. In Streptococcus pyogenes, it was found that expression of emm, the gene encoding M protein, and scpA, encoding the C5a endopeptidase Scp, which are major virulence factors, were stimulated by an increased concentration of carbon dioxide (6, 43). Carbon dioxide has also been found to stimulate toxin production in Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholerae, and Bacillus anthracis (14, 15, 20, 38, 41, 43).
In conclusion, the finding that carbon dioxide, frequently used as an antimicrobial in MAP, actually stimulates neurotoxin production in nonproteolytic C. botulinum types B and E sheds a new, cautionary light on the risk of botulism and the use of MAP. Thus, in order to ensure the continued production of microbiologically safe food that also shows a high quality for human consumption, data about microbial virulence (including the formation of toxins) is required to complement existing knowledge on the growth and survival of pathogenic microbes. Further investigations are therefore required to identify the effect of factors such as food composition, gas atmosphere, preservatives, and temperature on the down- and upregulation of virulence factors (including toxin formation) in food-borne pathogens. This information will enable the development of new knowledge-led molecule-based strategies for food formulation and food preservation and will also inform quantitative risk assessments.
We are very grateful to Carmen Pin for statistical advice.
Published ahead of print on 29 February 2008. ![]()
Present address: SIK—The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, SE-402 29 Gothenburg, Sweden. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»