Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2009, p. 547-550, Vol. 75, No. 2
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01665-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Detection of Wolbachia Bacteria in Multiple Organs and Feces of the Triatomine Insect Rhodnius pallescens (Hemiptera, Reduviidae)
C. I. Espino,1
T. Gómez,1
G. González,1,2
M. F. Brazil do Santos,2
J. Solano,2
O. Sousa,1
N. Moreno,1
D. Windsor,3
A. Ying,1
S. Vilchez,2 and
A. Osuna2*
Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Panamá, República de Panamá,1
Grupo de Bioquímica y Parasitología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad de Granada, Campus Universitario de Fuentenueva, 18071 Granada, Spain,2
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apdo. 0843-03092, Panamá, República de Panamá3
Received 18 July 2008/
Accepted 12 November 2008

ABSTRACT
At least two types of
Wolbachia bacteria were detected in wild
and insectarium-raised
Rhodnius pallescens, a natural vector
of
Trypanosoma cruzi and
Trypanosoma rangeli. Wolbachia was
detected in all the organs and tissues studied and in the feces,
and this provided a methodological advantage for determining
the presence of this endosymbiont in this host, obviating the
need to kill the specimens. The occurrence of trypanosomatids
in wild individuals was also studied.

INTRODUCTION
Wolbachia is an obligate intracellular bacterium (
18) that is
present in 20 to 75% of insect species (
3,
14,
33,
38,
41,
42).
This bacterium was first described in 1924 in mosquitoes (
Culex pipiens) (
12,
13) and was initially classified as
Rickettsia sp. (
9,
33).
Wolbachia displays a tropism for the reproductive
tissue of its hosts and is transmitted vertically from insect
to insect through the ovules, while interspecific transmission
appears to occur horizontally with the possible help of parasitoids
(
1,
3,
6,
17,
19,
33,
43). Despite the fact that infected insects
show no pathological signs, the presence of
Wolbachia can result
in diverse reproductive alterations in its hosts, including
parthenogenesis, feminization, male killing, and unidirectional
or bidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility (
33,
35,
38,
44).
The relationship between Wolbachia and its arthropod hosts ranges from mutualistic to parasitic, which makes it all the more interesting and necessary to ascertain the exact nature of the interaction between particular symbionts and their hosts (40). Wolbachia isolates have been found in numerous disease-carrying insects, such as Culex (12, 13), Aedes (27), Glossina (2, 26, 39), Phlebotominae (16), Cimex (28, 29), Ctenocephalides felis (11), and Tunga penetrans (10). It also occurs in parasitic nematodes, such as Onchocerca volvulus, is responsible for the inflammatory reaction that induces blindness (22, 24), and has been detected in Brugia malayi (34, 36). Wolbachia has recently been found in Angiostrongylus cantonensis, a nematode that is not related to filarias (37).
The sylvatic triatomine Rhodnius pallescens is considered the most important vector of the trypanosomatids Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli in the neotropics. Its capacity to invade houses located near its natural habitat, the royal palm tree (Attalea butyracea), and to transmit T. cruzi and Chagas' disease to humans has been well documented in Panama (4, 23, 32). Wolbachia was previously found in only one individual of R. pallescens that was described in a list of Panamanian species (41). However, information on the occurrence of this bacterium and its distribution in the organs of its hosts is not available. In this work we examined whether there is any correlation between the presence of this endosymbiont and the presence of the parasites T. cruzi and T. rangeli.
In this study we examined a total of 72 individuals of the triatomine insect R. pallescens; 27 of these individuals were collected from their natural habitat, and 45 were obtained from an insectarium. Wild specimens were collected in regions of the Republic of Panama where Chagas' disease is endemic (Table 1). Insectarium specimens were obtained from the Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud and from the Centro de Investigaciones Parasitarias de la Universidad de Panamá.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Occurrence of trypanosomes and Wolbachia in R. pallescens individuals collected from several Panamanian districts
|
Each specimen was dissected, and gonads, salivary glands, and
intestines were extracted under sterile conditions. The posterior
intestine, rectal ampolla, and salivary glands from wild triatomines
were homogenized, and any trypanosomes present were observed
with a microscope or cultured in Grace medium to facilitate
detection of
T. cruzi and
T. rangeli (
20,
21).
T. cruzi and
T. rangeli were also detected by PCR, as previously described
(
7,
45,
46).
The presence of Wolbachia was detected in each organ by PCR using specific primers for 16S rRNA and wsp genes, as previously reported (42, 44). Standard reaction mixtures (final volume, 10 µl) contained 0.5 µl of the template DNA (extracted with a Qiagen DNeasy tissue kit) plus 0.08 µl of deoxynucleoside triphosphates (25 mM), 0.5 µl of the forward and reverse primers (10 µM), 0.1 µl of Taq polymerase (5 U/µl), 0.5 µl of MgCl2 (50 mM), and 0.4 µl of dimethyl sulfoxide (5%).
The integrity of the total DNA extracted was verified by amplification of the 28S rRNA gene as previously described (5), and DNAs from Nasonia that was positive and negative for Wolbachia (kindly provided by J. Werren) were used as controls.
The results of the screening analysis of the 27 wild triatomines are shown in Table 1. This analysis revealed that 56% of the triatomines were infected with T. cruzi and 25% of the triatomines were infected with T. rangeli. Simultaneous infection with T. cruzi and T. rangeli was also detected in 12% of the specimens. The presence of T. cruzi in the wild insects indicates that the risk of Chagas' disease in humans was elevated in the areas where insects were captured.
PCR analysis with probes for the wsp gene detected the presence of Wolbachia in the gonads and salivary glands of 100% of the insects, while PCR analysis with the primers specific for 16S rRNA detected Wolbachia in 95.9% of the cases. As recommended by Duron and Gavotte (8), the two pairs of primers were used to rule out the possibility of false negatives.
The analysis of specimens from the insectarium produced very different results. Only 51.0% of the insects were positive for Wolbachia with both probes (Table 2). Of the positive insects, 51.0% were positive when the gonads were tested, 44.4% were positive when the salivary glands were tested, and 94.0% were positive when the intestine was tested.
Given
Wolbachia's presence in all of the wild triatomines collected,
it seems that the presence of the endosymbiont does not influence
the susceptibility of the insects to infection by the parasitic
protozoan
T. cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas' disease,
and
T. rangeli, for which these insects are natural hosts.
Wolbachia is vertically transmitted by oocyst infection and in this way maintains a high incidence in arthropods (33). Its presence has been reported in other tissues, including nerve tissue or hemocytes (25). In order to determine the degree of Wolbachia infection in organs of R. pallescens insects other than the organs used in the screening analysis, an insectarium specimen of R. pallescens was dissected to extract the hemolymph, the musculature, the Malpighian tubules, and the intestine. Each organ was tested for the presence of Wolbachia with specific primers for 16S rRNA and wsp genes. All PCRs were positive, indicating that the bacterium was distributed throughout the tissues of the insect and was not restricted to the digestive tract and gonads.
The presence of Wolbachia both in the salivary glands and in the intestine might be explained by the coprophagous and cannibalistic habits of the insects in the early phases of their development, when they acquire the symbionts essential for their development (30, 31). This could also be the mechanism that transmits and spreads the endosymbiont among triatomines. To verify that Wolbachia is present in the digestive products of the triatomines, feces were collected after an insectarium specimen was fed, and the feces were probed with the 16S rRNA and wsp gene primers. Both amplification reactions were positive. The fact that Wolbachia can be detected in the feces of triatomines makes it unnecessary to neutralize the insects in order to determine the presence of this endosymbiont, which is an important methodological advantage.
In order to characterize the Wolbachia strain present in R. pallescens, several PCR products were sequenced. The sequence of the 16S rRNA gene obtained from feces of an insectarium specimen was 99 to 100% identical to the sequences of a Wolbachia endosymbiont of Pseudolynchia canariensis (accession no. DQ115537) and other unculturable bacteria obtained from insects, such as the cat flea C. felis (accession no. EF121347), the ant lion Myrmeleon mobilis (accession no. EF121347, DQ068883, and DQ068882), and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (accession no. DQ981371, DQ981358, and DQ981347). The same 16S rRNA sequence was found in the feces of a wild Rhodnius specimen collected in Chuzo (Table 1). The wsp gene sequence from this wild individual was compared with the sequences in the database constructed and maintained by K. A. Jolley and L. Baldo (Wolbachia MLST Databases [http://pubmlst.org/wolbachia/]). The results of this comparison showed that the level of similarity with allele 92 in the database was 96.10%. Given that Jolley and Baldo consider a single difference in the nucleotide sequence an indication of different alleles, it appears that the strain of Wolbachia present in the triatomines is a novel strain and is not included in this database.
The fbpA gene was also amplified (15) from gonads of nine wild specimens positive for Wolbachia and sequenced (Table 1). Direct observation of the DNA chromatograms revealed superimposed peaks at 16 different positions. These results were interpreted as showing that R. pallescens was infected by at least two Wolbachia strains. Surprisingly, an analysis of the sequence of the fbpA gene from three insectarium specimens (Table 2) revealed only four superimposed peaks. Although insectarium and wild triatomines were collected from different areas of Panama, superimposed peaks were found at the same positions for both groups. A possible explanation for this observation is that both insect groups were infected by the same Wolbahcia strains and at least one of the strains was cured when triatomines were raised in laboratory colonies. This result strongly indicates that the vertical transmission of Wolbachia could be affected in insects raised under laboratory conditions. Some factors that alter the presence and spread of Wolbachia in insects have been described previously (33). In our case the exposure to high temperatures, the immune response of the vertebrate used for laboratory feeding, or genetic factors of the host could be relevant factors. It would be interesting to study the effect of removing triatomines from their natural habitat and raising them in laboratories on the development or spread of this endosymbiont.
Study of the presence of Wolbachia in triatomines opens up a new area of research and the possibility of using this endosymbiont to manipulate the reproduction of these insects that are responsible for the vectorial transmission of Chagas' disease.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank J. Werren of the University of Rochester for his advice
and Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud and
Centro de Investigaciones Parasitarias de la Universidad de
Panamá for providing the insectarium triatomines. We
also thank J. Trout for revising the manuscript.
Susana Vilchez received a grant from the Programa Ramón y Cajal (MEC, Spain, and EDRF, European Union). We thank the Spanish Agency for International Co-operation for covering the travel expenses of the research team (grants A/5115/06 and A/8187/07).

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Biotechnology, University of Granada, Campus Universitario Fuentenueva, E-18071 Granada, Spain. Phone: 34-958244163. Fax: 34-958243174. E-mail:
aosuna{at}ugr.es 
Published ahead of print on 21 November 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Ahrens, M., and D. Shoemaker. 2005. Evolutionary history of Wolbachia infections in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. BMC Evol. Biol. 5:35.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Aksoy, S., and R. V. Rio. 2005. Interactions among multiple genomes: tsetse, its symbionts and trypanosomes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35:691-708.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Baldo, L., N. Lo, and J. Werren. 2005. Mosaic nature of the Wolbachia surface protein. J. Bacteriol. 187:5406-5418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Calzada, J. E., V. Pineda, E. Montalvo, D. Alvarez, A. M. Santamaría, F. Samudio, V. Bayard, L. Cáceres, and A. Saldaña. 2006. Human trypanosome infection and the presence of intradomicile Rhodnius pallescens in the western border of the Panama Canal, Panama. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 74:762-765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Campbell, B. C., J. D. Steffen-Campbell, and J. H. Werren. 1993. Phylogeny of the Nasonia species complex (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) inferred from an internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) and 28S rRNA sequences. Insect Mol. Biol. 2:225-237.[Medline]
6 - Charlat, S., K. Bourtzis, and H. Merçot. 2002. Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility, p. 621-644. In J. Seckbach (ed.), Symbiosis. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
7 - Chiurillo, M. A., G. Crisante, A. Rojas, A. Peralta, M. Dias, P. Guevara, N. Añez, and J. L. Ramírez. 2003. Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli infection by duplex PCR assay based on telomeric sequences. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 10:775-779.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Duron, O., and L. Gavotte. 2007. Absence of Wolbachia in nonfilariid worms parasitizing arthropods. Curr. Microbiol. 55:193-197.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Fenollar, F., B. La Scola, H. Inokuma, S. Dumler, M. Taylor, and D. Raoult. 2003. Culture and phenotypic characterization of a Wolbachia pipiensis isolate. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5434-5441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Fischer, P., C. Schmetz, C., Bandi, I. Bonow, S. Mand, K. Fischer, and D. W. Buttner. 2002. Tunga penetrans: molecular identification of Wolbachia endobacteria and their recognition by antibodies against proteins of endobacteria from filarial parasites. Exp. Parasitol. 102:201-211.[Medline]
11 - Gorham, C. H., Q. Q. Fang, and L. A. Durden. 2003. Wolbachia endosymbionts in fleas (Siphonaptera). J. Parasitol. 89:283-289.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Hertig, M., and S. B. Wolbach. 1924. Studies on Rickettsia-like microorganisms in insects. J. Med. Res. 44:329-374.
13 - Hertig, M. 1936. The rickettsia, Wolbachia pipientis (gen. et sp. n.) and associated inclusions of the mosquito, Culex pipiens. Parasitology 28:453-486.
14 - Jeyaprakash, A., and M. A. Hoy. 2000. Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty-three arthropod species. Insect Mol. Biol. 9:393-405.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Jolley, K. A., M.-S. Chan, and M. C. J. Maiden. 2004. mlstdbNet-distributed multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) databases. BMC Bioinformatics 5:86.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Kassem, H. A., and G. Osaman. 2007. Maternal transmission of Wolbachia in Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 101:435-440.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Kondo, N., N. Nikoh, N. Ijichi, M. Shimada, and T. Fukatsu. 2002. Genome fragment of Wolbachia endosymbiont transferred to X chromosome of host insect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA USA 99:14280-14285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Makepeace, B., L. Rodgers, and A. Trees. 2006. Rate of elimination of Wolbachia pipientis by doxycycline in vitro increases following drug withdrawal. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:922-927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Miller, W., and M. Riegler. 2006. Evolutionary dynamics of wAu-like Wolbachia variants in neotropical Drosophila spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:826-835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Osuna, A., A. Jiménez-Ortiz, and J. Lozano-Maldonado. 1979. Medios de cultivo para la obtención de formas metaciclicas de Trypanosoma cruzi. Rev. Iber. Parasitol. 39:129-133.
21 - Osuna, A., F. J. Adroher, and J. A. Lupiañez. 1990. Influence of electrolytes and non-electrolytes on growth and differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi. Cell Differ. Dev. 30:89-95.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Pearlman, E., and I. Gillette-Ferguson. 2007. Onchocerca volvulus, Wolbachia and river blindness. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 92:254-265.[Medline]
23 - Pineda, V., E. Montalvo, D. Alvarez, A. M. Santamaría, J. E. Calzada, and A. Saldaña. 2008. Feeding sources and trypanosome infection index of Rhodnius pallescens in a Chagas disease endemic area of Amador County, Panama. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 50:113-116.[Medline]
24 - Punkosdy, G., D. Addis, and P. Lammie. 2003. Characterization of antibody responses to Wolbachia surface protein in humans with lymphatic filariasis. Infect. Immun. 71:5104-5114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Rigaud, T., C. Souty-Grosset, R. Raimond, J. Mocquard, and P. Juchault. 1991. Feminizing endocytobiosis in the terrestrial crustacean Armadillium vulgare LART (isopoda): recent acquisitions. Endocytobiosis Cell Res. 7:259-273.
26 - Rio, R. V., Y. N. Wu, G. Filardo, and S. Aksoy. 2006. Dynamics of multiple symbiont density regulation during host development: tsetse fly and its microbial flora. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273:805-814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Ruang-Areerate, T., and P. Kittayapong. 2006. Wolbachia transinfection in Aedes aegypti: a potential gene driver of dengue vectors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:12534-12539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28 - Sakamoto, J. M., J. Feinstein, and J. L. Rasgon. 2006. Wolbachia infections in the Cimicidae: museum specimens as an untapped resource for endosymbiont surveys. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:3161-3167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Sakamoto, J. M., and J. L. Rasgon. 2006. Geographic distribution of Wolbachia infections in Cimex lectularius (Heteroptera: Cimicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 43:696-700.[CrossRef][Medline]
30 - Schaub, G. A., C. A. Boker, C. Jensen, and D. Reduth. 1989. Cannibalism and coprophagy are modes of transmission of Blastocrithidia triatomae (Trypanosomatidae) between triatomines. J. Protozool. 36:171-175.[Medline]
31 - Schaub, G. A., and C. Jensen. 1990. Developmental time and mortality of the reduviid bug Triatoma infestans with differential exposure to coprophagic infections with Blastocrithidia triatomae (Trypanosomatidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 55:17-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
32 - Sousa, O. E., and C. M. Johnson. 1973. Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli in triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) collected in the Republic of Panama. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 22:18-23.[Medline]
33 - Stouthamer, R., J. A. J. Breeuwer, and G. D. D. Hurts. 1999. Wolbachia pipientis: microbial manipulator of arthropod reproduction. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 53:71-102.[CrossRef][Medline]
34 - Suba, N., C. Shiny, M. J. Taylor, and R. B. Narayanan. 2007. Brugia malayi Wolbachia hsp60 IgG antibody and isotype reactivity in different clinical groups infected or exposed to human bancroftian lymphatic filariasis. Exp. Parasitol. 116:291-295.[CrossRef][Medline]
35 - Sun, L., M. Riegler, and S. O'Neill. 2003. Development of a physical and genetic map of the virulent Wolbachia strain wMelPop. J. Bacteriol. 185:7077-7084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36 - Taylor, M. J., C. Bandi, and A. Hoerauf. 2005. Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts of filarial nematodes. Adv. Parasitol. 60:245-284.[Medline]
37 - Tsai, K. H., C. G. Huang, L. C. Wang, Y. W. Yu, W. J. Wu, and W. J. Chen. 2007. Molecular evidence for the endosymbiont Wolbachia in a non-filaroid nematode, Angiostrongylus cantonensis. J. Biomed. Sci. 14:607-615.[CrossRef][Medline]
38 - Van Meer, M. M. M., J. Witteveldt, and R. Stouthamer. 1999. Phylogeny of the arthropod endosybiont Wolbachia based on the wsp gene. Insect Mol. Biol. 83:399-408.
39 - Weiss, B. L., R. Mouchotte, R. V. Rio, Y. N. Wu, Z. Wu, A. Heddi, and S. Aksoy. 2006. Interspecific transfer of bacterial endosymbionts between tsetse fly species: infection establishment and effect on host fitness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:7013-7021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40 - Werren, J. 1997. Biology of Wolbahcia. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:587-609.[CrossRef][Medline]
41 - Werren, J., D. Windsor, and L. Guo. 1995. Distribution of Wolbachia among neotropical arthropods. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262:197-204.[CrossRef]
42 - Werren, J. H., and D. M. Windsor. 2000. Wolbachia infection frequencies in insects: evidence for a global equilibrium? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:1277-1285.[Medline]
43 - Xi, Z., and S. Dobson. 2005. Characterization of Wolbachia transfection efficiency by using microinjection cytoplasm and embryo homogenate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:3199-3204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44 - Zhou, W., F. Rousset, and S. O'Neill. 1998. Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc. Biol. Sci. B 265:509-515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45 - Zulantay, I., P. Honores, A. Solari, W. Apt, S. Ortiz, A. Osuna, A. Rojas, B. Lopez, and G. Sánchez. 2004. Use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridization assays to detect Trypanosoma cruzi in chronic chagasic patients treated with itraconazole or allopurinol. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 48:253-257.[CrossRef][Medline]
46 - Zulantay, I., W. Apt, L. C. Gil, C. Rocha, K. Mundaca, A. Solari, G. Sánchez, C. Rodriguez, G. Martínez, L. M. de Pablos, L. Sandoval, J. Rodríguez, S. Vilchez, and A. Osuna. 2007. The PCR-based detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in the faeces of Triatoma infestans fed on patients with chronic American trypanosomiasis gives higher sensitivity and a quicker result than routine xenodiagnosis. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 101:673-679.[CrossRef][Medline]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2009, p. 547-550, Vol. 75, No. 2
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01665-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.