Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2009, p. 1460-1464, Vol. 75, No. 5
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02096-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Targeted Engineering of the Antibacterial Peptide Apidaecin, Based on an In Vivo Monitoring Assay System
Seiichi Taguchi,1*
Kensuke Mita,1
Kenta Ichinohe,1 and
Shigeki Hashimoto2
Division of Biotechnology and Macromolecular Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, N13W8, Kita-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan,1
Faculty of Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Oshamanbe, Hokkaido 049-3514, Japan2
Received 10 September 2008/
Accepted 22 December 2008

ABSTRACT
Seven mutant forms of the antibacterial peptide apidaecin with
increased activity were created by combinatorial mutagenesis
targeted to the three N-terminal amino acid residues that had
previously been identified as a nonessential region. An in vitro
MIC assay revealed that the amino acid substitutions in the
functionally variable region were effective in improving differential
activity toward the four gram-negative bacteria tested, while
a gram-positive bacterium was unaffected.

INTRODUCTION
Antibacterial peptides (ABPs) are effector molecules that form
a first line of host defense against pathogens, are involved
in innate immunity, and are found in different groups of organisms
(
1,
8,
15). In particular, insects having large repertories
of ABPs are amazingly resistant to bacterial infections and
thus are prominent cell factories for genuine combinatorial
chemistry of ABPs acquired during the long-term evolution of
immune defense systems against environmental pathogens. Apidaecin
(AP) is a member of the proline-rich ABP family (
13,
16). Honeybee-derived
AP exists in four isoforms that are each 18 amino acids long,
commonly including three arginine and six proline residues (
3).
ABPs such as AP have been recognized as potential therapeutic
alternatives to antibiotics because of their immediate effect,
their apparent nontoxicity toward eukaryotic cells, and the
fact that there is little or no bacterial resistance (
6,
11).
Although it does not display membrane-disrupting activity (bacteriolytic
action), AP exhibits bacteriostatic action specifically toward
gram-negative bacteria such as
Escherichia coli (
2,
4). To date,
a mechanism for the action of AP was proposed in which AP binds
initially to lipopolysaccharide in the cell membrane and subsequently
to the heat shock protein DnaK and related chaperones of
E. coli in a specific manner (
14,
16).
In this study, we used combinatorial mutagenesis to create APs with improved activities toward gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli. To this end, the region of AP targeted for engineering was the three N-terminal residues. These residues were chosen based on the structure-activity relationships of naturally occurring derivatives (AP family members) (4) or artificially mutated derivatives (5, 7, 17, 21, 22, 24). Previously, we proposed the first in vivo system for monitoring the antibacterial activities of the products of the randomly mutagenized genes for AP and thanatin (20) based on antibacterial activity-associated growth inhibition (21). This "suicide" system utilizes an ABP-sensitive strain of E. coli as the host for expression of PCR-mutagenized AP molecules. When a successful (i.e., activity-enhancing) PCR-generated random mutation is introduced into the structural gene for AP, diminished growth of isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-induced recipient cells is measured via either reduced colony size (agar cultures) or reduced optical density (liquid cultures). However, in principle, severe growth inhibition caused by mutations with highly enhanced activity may be a constraint for screening mutants by colony formation on a plate. The plate assay based on activity-dependent colony size was used for primary screening, and the liquid assay profiling growth inhibition caused by antibacterial activity was used for more precise estimation of the effects of mutations. Indeed, with these assays, amino acids indispensable for activity identified by this system were easily confirmed by measuring the MICs of synthetic artificial mutant peptides (22) (Fig. 1). The results obtained in our study were also supported by those obtained from site-specific amino acid substitution experiments (5, 7, 26). Figure 1 shows a multiple-sequence alignment of natural homologs and the mapping of mutant forms of AP causing complete or partial activity loss. The C-terminal region (amino acids 12 to 19) and many of the proline and arginine residues have been found to play a crucial role in the antibacterial activity of AP (5, 7, 17, 22, 26). Therefore, for targeted engineering, we specifically targeted the N-terminal region consisting of the first three amino acid residues that are structurally nonconservative among AP homologs and are functionally tolerant of amino acid substitutions. Together with this mutation strategy, the in vivo monitoring assay system was expected to function efficiently in high-throughput screening for AP molecules with increased activity.
The expression plasmid vector pOS

B-AP1 (
21,
22) was used to
generate a random AP gene mutant library. pOS

B-AP1 was previously
constructed by fusing the chemically synthesized AP gene with
that for a bacterial cell stable protection partner, namely,
the
Streptomyces subtilisin inhibitor (
19,
23). Expression of
the AP fusion gene can be stringently regulated by the addition
of a fine-tuned concentration of the transcription inducer IPTG,
depending on the growth inhibition of the host cells (
21,
22).
pOS1 (
23) with the
Streptomyces subtilisin inhibitor gene alone
was used as a control expression vector. Mutant APs were generated
by PCR with four forward primers that included mutagenic sequences
that encoded all 20 of the possible amino acids in the three
N-terminal positions of AP (Table
1). The entire region of the
AP gene was amplified with individual forward primers and a
Tag reverse primer. PCR was performed with 100 µl of a
reaction mixture (2.5 nM pOS

B-AP1, 0.01 U of KOD+ [Toyobo],
1 µM primers, 0.2 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate,
10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.0], 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl
2) with a program
consisting of 30 cycles of 95°C for 20 s (denaturation),
47°C for 30 s (annealing), and 67°C for 90 s (elongation),
followed by an extension reaction consisting of 72°C for
7 min and finally termination by cooling down to 4°C on
an iCycler (Bio-Rad). After amplification, the mutagenized DNA
fragments, including heterogeneous mutant AP genes, were religated
at the EcoRI and BamHI sites into the original plasmid, pOS

B-AP1,
predigested with the same restriction enzymes to generate a
mixture of the plasmids that encode mutant APs (designated pOS

B-APN).
The mixture of resultant plasmids was introduced into
E. coli JM109 cells that were then plated on Luria-Bertani agar plates
supplemented with 0.02 mM IPTG and 50 µg/ml ampicillin.
Plasmid pOS

B-APX carrying the wild-type AP gene was also used
as a control for accurate screening.
Theoretically, there are 20
3 possible combinations that could
be generated by substitution of all 20 of the possible amino
acids at the three positions. With the plate assay method developed
here, from a total of 5.7
x 10
4 clones obtained, 431 clones
were primarily selected as candidates, as judged by colony size,
which is closely related to the levels of antibacterial activity
of the mutated AP. Finally, we isolated 95 clones by repeated
screening based on the plate assay method. Next, all clones
were subjected to the liquid culture-based growth inhibition
assay to quantitatively estimate antibacterial activity. Induction
of the expression of mutant genes was performed by the addition
of IPTG to the Luria-Bertani medium containing transformant
cells with an optical density of 0.05 at 600 nm. Finally, we
obtained seven mutants that clearly exhibited enhanced growth
inhibition. Figure
2 shows the representative growth curves
in liquid medium for transformant strains harboring plasmids
carrying the wild-type AP gene and the seven mutated AP genes,
with pOS1 as a control. Mutant 1C-20 exhibited the greatest
growth inhibition. Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that
two or three amino acid substitutions were found in the target
region in all seven of the mutants, as shown in Fig.
2. Notably,
a single or double substitution of arginine occurred at the
first and/or third position of the target region. Mutant 1C-20
had arginine residues at the first and third positions.
Enhancement of the antibacterial activity of the mutated APs
was not fully judged based on the growth inhibition assay, in
which AP was produced intracellularly, because in practical
use, extracellularly added AP exhibits antibacterial activity.
Therefore, we chemically prepared the seven selected APs as
follows. Peptide synthesis was carried out with a manual peptide
synthesis system (CCS-600V; EYELA) according to the standard
9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl solid-phase peptide synthesis protocol.
The peptide sequence was extended on leucine-loaded Wang resin
(90-µmol scale), which provided C-terminal peptide carboxylic
acid upon cleavage. Protected amino acids were coupled with
3 equivalents of 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino acids, 3 equivalents
of
N,
N'-diisopropylcarbodiimide, 3 equivalents of 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole,
and 6 equivalents of diisopropylethylamine in
N,
N-dimethylformamide.
Amino acid side chains were protected as follows:
tert-butyl
for Tyr; trityl for Asn, Gln, and His; and 2,2,5,7,8-pentamethylchroman-6-sulfonyl
for Arg. Cleavage of the peptide from the resin and deprotection
of all side chain protecting groups were accomplished by treating
the resin with a fresh mixture of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA),
H
2O, and triisopropylsilane (95:2.5:2.5) for 2.5 h. The solution
was filtered, and the resin was rinsed with the cocktail. Diethyl
ether was added to the filtrate to precipitate the peptide.
Purification of the crude peptide by high-performance liquid
chromatography was carried out on a C
18 reverse-phase column
(5 µm, 10 by 250 mm) with solvent A (0.1% TFA in water)
and solvent B (80% acetonitrile in 0.1% TFA in water) as the
mobile phase. Elution was effected with a linear gradient of
20 to 50% B over 20 min and then 50 to 100% B over 10 min at
a flow rate of 4.0 ml/min (monitoring at 225 nm). The desired
product was recovered from the appropriate fractions by lyophilization.
The molecular masses of the peptides were analyzed by matrix-assisted
laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry
with a Voyager-DE STR-H (Applied Biosystems) with

-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic
acid as the matrix. The matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass
spectrometry (M+H)
+ results were as follows: wild type, 2,108.2
(calculated) and 2,108.1 (determined); 1C-20, 2,234.3 (calculated)
and 2,234.4 (determined); 1A-11, 2,175.3 (calculated) and 2,175.3
(determined); 1A-20, 2,135.2 (calculated) and 2,134.8 (determined);
1A-39, 2,190.3 (calculated) and 2,190.3 (determined); 1C-21,
2,206.3 (calculated) and 2,206.8 (determined); 1C-3, 2,189.3
(calculated) and 2,189.1 (determined); 1G-17, 2,177.3 (calculated)
and 2,177.4 (determined).
Synthesized wild-type and mutant AP peptides were subjected to a MIC assay. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the peptide needed for the inhibition of bacterial growth. The MIC was determined by a microtitration assay with test strain cells in wells of multititer plates according to the procedure reported previously (21, 22). Briefly, the assay was performed by adding 20 µl of each purified peptide sample to 80 µl of PB medium (1% Bacto tryptone, 0.9% NaCl) inoculated with 1,250 cells (defined by CFU counting) of all of the test strains, followed by culturing for 15 h at 30°C under shaking conditions in 96-well multititer plates. The five bacterial strains used as test targets (listed in Table 2) were E. coli JM109 and BL21(DE3), the gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas putida GPp104 and Ralstonia eutropha H16, and the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis 168 (data not shown). To check for bacterial contamination in the peptide sample, medium containing the peptides alone was used as a negative control. Experimental reproducibility was confirmed by performing three trials.
Table
2 is a summary of the MIC assay results. Most of the mutants
exhibited activity comparable to or higher than that of wild-type
AP toward
E. coli JM109, which was used in the in vivo monitoring
assay system as the host for AP gene expression. Interestingly,
it was found that mutant 1C-20 had acquired approximately 10-fold-improved
activity over that of wild-type AP. This MIC result correlated
well with that obtained in the growth inhibition assay. Target
spectrum specificity is also an attractive objective for the
engineering of ABPs. The positive correlations between in vitro
and in vivo assays were found in the other three bacteria, although
sensitivity to the APs was different in the different bacterial
species. Thus, activity was stronger toward
E. coli BL21(DE3)
(up to 20-fold over wild-type AP) and weaker toward
R. eutropha H16 (down to one-quarter of the activity of wild-type AP). Thus,
the in vivo monitoring assay system has been proven useful for
the rapid screening of mutants. However, only 1G-17 showed a
lack of correlation between the results observed in the two
assays. This contradictory relationship might be a result of
the reduced membrane-permeating ability of the VVR mutant, since
the in vivo assay system is conducted by expression of the AP
gene from the inside of the bacterial cells. With regard to
the gram-positive bacterium
B. subtilis, no antibacterial activity
was detected as it was not intrinsically sensitive to wild-type
AP (data not shown).
Thus, construction of an AP mutant library will allow treatments to consist of either a single molecule or a mixture with other types of antibacterial molecules such as conventional antibiotics, depending on the practical demands. There are several functional-mapping and engineering strategies that can be applied to ABPs, such as chimeragenesis (17, 18), site-specific glucosidation (10), chemical modification (10, 12), and amino acid substitution (5, 7, 20-22, 26). In this study, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of targeted engineering in a region that is dispensable for the antibacterial activity of AP. In addition, the in vivo monitoring assay system has proven to be a powerful tool for efficient screening of AP derivatives with increased activity in conjunction with the targeted mutagenesis approach. The functional requirement of arginine for gain of activity can be accounted for by the mutation pattern. High diversity in the codon encoding arginine (AGG, CGT, CGC, and CGG) was found in the first position of six of the mutant forms, with the exception of 1G-17 (Fig. 2). Also, the contribution of arginine at the third position to enhanced activity can be considered by the study of two mutant forms, 1C-20 and 1G-17.
Recent studies have indicated that arginine-rich peptides such as the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein can cross the cytoplasmic membrane and enter mammalian cells (9, 25). Although the mechanism of this translocation is not well understood, arginines in these peptides play an important role in facilitating their translocation. This notion suggests that arginines in the N-terminal region of mutant APs allow efficient translocation through the bacterial membrane, which is consequently reflected in higher antimicrobial activities. Actually, cell penetration efficiency is dramatically reduced when an N-terminal cationic cluster of bactenecin, a proline-rich ABP like AP, is removed (24). Thus, the charged N-terminal region might be a key structural element of the membrane translocation ability of mutant peptides. Interestingly, 1C-20 acquires the highest activity by a cumulative effect of arginine substitutions. Also, a proline and aliphatic residues (valine or leucine) seem to be potential contributors to activity enhancement. Furthermore, the frequent occurrence of basic amino acids and proline was also found in the corresponding target region of natural or artificial AP derivatives (Fig. 1). These findings may provide us with a more rational sequence design strategy to further improve the antibacterial activity and alter the activity spectrum of AP and related peptides.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank I. Hirao, M. Maeda, T. Ooi, K. Matsumoto, and Y. Orikasa
for useful comments and Y. Kaji and M. Wakabayashi for technical
assistance. We also thank S. Jin, Open Facility of Hokkaido
University Sousei Hall, for the measurement of the molecular
masses of peptides with Voyager-DE STR-H. We are deeply indebted
to M. Ikedo and M. Arai, Biochemical Research Laboratory, Eiken
Chemical Co. Ltd., for technical support for the MIC assay.
Our work described here was partly supported by the Global COE Program (project B01, Catalysis as the Basis for Innovation in Materials Science) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Biotechnology and Macromolecular Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, N13W8, Kita-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan. Phone and fax: 81-11-706-6610. E-mail:
staguchi{at}eng.hokudai.ac.jp 
Published ahead of print on 29 December 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Bulet, P., C. Hetru, J. L. Dimarcq, and J. A. Hoffmann. 1999. Antimicrobial peptides in insects: structure and function. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 23:329-344.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Casteels, P., C. Ampe, F. Jacobs, and P. Tempst. 1993. Functional and chemical characterization of hymenoptaecin, an antibacterial polypeptide that is infection-inducible in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J. Biol. Chem. 268:7044-7054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Casteels, P., C. Ampe, F. Jacobs, C. Vaeck, and P. Tempst. 1989. Apidaecins: antibacterial peptides from honeybees. EMBO J. 8:2387-2391.[Medline]
4 - Casteels, P., J. Romagnolo, M. Castle, K. Casteels-Josson, H. Erdjument-Bromage, and P. Tempst. 1994. Biodiversity of apidaecin-type peptide antibiotics. J. Biol. Chem. 269:26107-26115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Castle, M., A. Nazarian, S. S. Yi, and P. Tempst. 1999. Lethal effects of apidaecin on Escherichia coli involve sequential molecular interactions with diverse targets. J. Biol. Chem. 274:32555-32564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Chopra, I., J. Hodgson, B. Metcalf, and G. Poste. 1997. The search for antimicrobial agents effective against bacteria resistant to multiple antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:497-503.[Medline]
7 - Dutta, R. C., S. Nagpal, and D. M. Salunke. 2008. Functional mapping of apidaecin through secondary structure correlation. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 40:1005-1015.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Fehlbaum, P., P. Bulet, S. Chemysh, J. P. Briand, J. P. Roussel, L. Letellier, C. Hetru, and J. A. Hoffmann. 1996. Structure-activity analysis of thanatin, a 21-residue inducible insect defense peptide with sequence homology to frog antimicrobial peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 6:1221-1225.
9 - Futaki, S., T. Suzuki, W. Ohashi, T. Yagami, S. Tanaka, K. Ueda, and Y. Sugiura. 2001. Arginine-rich peptides. An abundant source of membrane-permeable peptides having potential as carriers for intracellular protein delivery. J. Biol. Chem. 276:5836-5840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Gobbo, M., L. Biondi, F. Filira, R. Gennaro, M. Benincasa, B. Scolaro, and R. Rocchi. 2002. Antimicrobial peptides: synthesis and antibacterial activity of linear and cyclic drosocin and apidaecin 1b analogues. J. Med. Chem. 45:4494-4504.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Hancock, R. E. 1997. Peptide antibiotics. Lancet 349:418-422.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Imamura, T., N. Yamamoto, A. Tamura, S. Murabayashi, S. Hashimoto, H. Shimada, and S. Taguchi. 2008. NMR based structure-activity relationship analysis of an antimicrobial peptide, thanatin, engineered by site-specific chemical modification: activity improvement and spectrum alteration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 369:609-615.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Li, W.-F., G.-X. Ma, and X.-X. Zhou. 2006. Apidaecin-type peptides: biodiversity, structure-function relationships and mode of action. Peptides 27:2350-2359.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Otvos, L., Jr., I. O, M. E. Rogers, P. J. Consolvo, B. A. Condie, S. Lovas, P. Bulet, and M. Blaszczyk-Thurin. 2000. Interaction between heat shock proteins and antimicrobial peptides. Biochemistry 39:14150-14159.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Otvos, L., Jr. 2000. Antibacterial peptides isolated from insects. J. Peptide Sci. 6:497-511.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Otvos, L., Jr. 2002. The short proline-rich antibacterial peptide family. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59:1138-1150.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Otvos, L., Jr., J. D. Wada, F. Lin, B. A. Condie, J. Hanrieder, and R. Hoffmann. 2005. Designer antibacterial peptides kill fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates. J. Med. Chem. 48:5349-5359.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Sato, H., and J. B. Feix. 2008. Lysine-enriched cecropin-mellitin antimicrobial peptides with enhanced selectivity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:4463-4465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Taguchi, S., I. Kumagai, J. Nakayama, A. Suzuki, and K. Miura. 1989. Efficient extracellular expression of a foreign protein in Streptomyces using secretory protease inhibitor (SSI) gene fusions. Bio/Technology 7:1063-1066.
20 - Taguchi, S., K. Kuwasako, A. Suenaga, M. Okada, and H. Momose. 2000. Functional mapping against Escherichia coli for the broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptide, thanatin, based on an in vivo monitoring assay system. J. Biochem. 128:745-754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Taguchi, S., K. Nakagawa, M. Maeno, and H. Momose. 1994. In vivo monitoring system for structure-function relationship analysis of the antibacterial peptide apidaecin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:3566-3572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Taguchi, S., A. Ozaki, K. Nakagawa, and H. Momose. 1996. Functional mapping of amino acid residues responsible for the antibacterial action of apidaecin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:4652-4655.[Abstract]
23 - Taguchi, S., Y. Yoshida, K. Matsumoto, and H. Momose. 1993. Improved leader and putative terminator sequences for high-level production of Streptomyces subtilisin inhibitor in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39:732-737.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Tomasinsig, L., B. Skerlavaj, N. Papo, B. Giabbai, Y. Shai, and M. Zanetti. 2006. Arginine-rich peptides. An abundant source of membrane-permeable peptides having potential as carriers for intracellular protein delivery. J. Biol. Chem. 281:383-391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Wender, P. A., D. J. Mitchell, K. Pattabiraman, E. T. Pelkey, L. Steinman, and J. B. Rothbard. 2000. The design, synthesis, and evaluation of molecules that enable or enhance cellular uptake: peptoid molecular transporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13003-13008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Zhou, X.-X., W.-F. Li, and Y.-J. Pan. 2008. Functional and structural characterization of apidaecin and its N-terminal and C-terminal fragments. J. Peptide Sci. 14:697-707.[CrossRef][Medline]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2009, p. 1460-1464, Vol. 75, No. 5
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02096-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.