Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1876-1884, Vol. 75, No. 7
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01042-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Lorenz Adrian,2,3
Sabine Kleinsteuber,3
Jan R. Andreesen,1 and
Ute Lechner1*
Institut für Biologie/Mikrobiologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 06099 Halle, Germany,1 Fachgebiet Technische Biochemie, Technische Universität 13353 Berlin, Germany,2 Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany3
Received 9 May 2008/ Accepted 23 January 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The functions of only a few RdhA proteins of Dehalococcoides species have been elucidated by biochemical studies. The trichloroethene-reductive dehalogenase (TceA) of D. ethenogenes strain 195 catalyzes the reductive dechlorination of trichloroethene to ethene and of several other haloalkanes and haloalkenes. Membrane localization studies indicated that TceA is located on the exterior of the cytoplasmic membrane (28), as was also suggested for the chlorobenzene-reductive dehalogenase of strain CBDB1 (15). An additional enzyme is necessary in D. ethenogenes strain 195 for the complete dechlorination of tetrachloroethene (PCE) to ethene, the PCE-reductive dehalogenase (PceA) (29). Recent proteomic studies demonstrated the high abundance of both PceA and TceA during growth on PCE (11, 31). A reductive dehalogenase was partially purified from Dehalococcoides sp. strain VS and exhibited the highest activity with dichloroethenes and vinyl chloride (33). Strain BAV1 contains a different enzyme, BvcA, but it has a similar function, as indicated by the transcription analysis of cells grown with vinyl chloride (23).
The first chlorobenzene-reductive dehalogenase, CbrA, recently was identified and purified from Dehalococcoides sp. strain CBDB1 (2); it has no orthologues in other known genome sequences, including that of D. ethenogenes strain 195. CbrA catalyzes the dechlorination of 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene and 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene (1,2,3-TCB). Strain CBDB1 possesses a very high capability to reductively dechlorinate different classes of chlorinated aromatic compounds. Hexachlorobenzene, pentachlorobenzene, all three isomers of tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB (3, 18), five chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (6), pentachlorophenol, all three tetrachlorophenols, all six trichlorophenols, and three dichlorophenols (1) were reductively dechlorinated at positions flanked by one or two chlorine atoms, leading to branched dechlorination pathways. The PCB-dechlorinating strain DF-1, which is distantly related to Dehalococcoides, also is able to dechlorinate chlorinated benzenes but is restricted to the cleavage of carbon-chlorine bonds at positions flanked by two chlorines (46). D. ethenogenes strain 195 dechlorinates a less diverse range of chlorinated benzenes and chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins than strain CBDB1 (10), and, interestingly, can only cometabolically catalyze the dechlorination of 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB during growth on PCE.
The elucidation of the function of the multiple rdhA genes of Dehalococcoides sp. strain CBDB1 will aid our understanding of how the organism catalyzes the dehalogenation of this remarkably wide range of different chloroaromatics. Since proteomic studies still are hampered by the need for relatively large amounts of protein, which are difficult to obtain from bacteria cultivated with poorly soluble chloroaromatics, we have conducted transcription analyses targeting the whole set of 32 rdhA genes encoded in strain CBDB1. Using a terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (t-RFLP) approach for the differentiation of individual rdhA transcripts and quantitative PCR (qPCR) for quantification, the transcriptional response of Dehalococcoides sp. strain CBDB1 to two chlorinated benzenes, 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB, is presented.
|
|
|---|
Chemicals.
Chlorobenzenes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Seelze, Germany) at a purity of 99%.
Analytical techniques.
Chlorobenzenes were extracted from 0.5-ml samples with 1 ml of hexane and analyzed using a Shimadzu GC 14A equipped with a flame ionization detector and a DB608-megabore-capillary column (30 m; inside diameter, 0.331 mm; 0.5-µm film thickness; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA). Helium 5.0 served as the carrier gas (flow rate, 0.3 m s–1; column pressure, 2.4 x 105 Pa) and nitrogen 5.0 as the make-up gas. The following temperature program was used: initial hold at 40°C for 1.1 min; increase at a rate of 40°C min–1 to 70°C (hold for 1.9 min); 20°C min–1 to 140°C (hold for 1.2 min); 40°C min–1 to 160°C (hold for 1.2 min); 25°C min–1 to 220°C (hold for 0.5 min); and 40°C min–1 to 280°C, with a final hold for 5 min. Injector and detector temperatures were 250 and 280°C, respectively. A 10-level calibration curve (0.7 to 364 µM) was generated with authentic chlorobenzene standards and 1,3,5-tribromobenzene as an internal standard.
Transcription experiment.
TLP cultures supplemented with 1,2,3- or 1,2,4-TCB served as precultures to grow strain CBDB1 to cell numbers of 108 to 109 cells ml–1 based on the qPCR measurements of 16S rRNA gene copy numbers (see below). For a single transcription experiment, five replicate 50-ml cultures were inoculated with 10% [vol/vol] cells from one preculture. To reduce the level of dehalogenase gene transcripts that originated from precultivation, inoculated cultures were incubated without a chlorinated electron acceptor for 72 h. To start the transcription analysis, either 1,2,3- or 1,2,4-TCB was added from an acetone stock solution, and samples were taken immediately and after 24, 48, 72, and 168 h. Eight transcription experiments were performed, four with 1,2,3-TCB and four with 1,2,4-TCB as the electron acceptor. Half of each type of culture was inoculated with half the cells pregrown with 1,2,3-TCB and the other half pregrown with 1,2,4-TCB, thus representing four slightly different experimental conditions. For clarity, the results of only one replicate of each of the four variants are presented, but the same general observations were made in the parallel setups. At each sampling point, the concentration of formed dichlorobenzenes (DCBs) was measured in all replicate cultures, and one culture was completely harvested for nucleic acid extraction. Cultures supplemented with the respective amount of acetone served as controls.
Extraction of nucleic acids.
DNA was extracted from 1 ml of liquid culture using bead beating and ethanol precipitation as described previously (9). For RNA extraction, 45 ml of the cultures was harvested by centrifugation at 3,500 x g for 45 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded, except for a 1-ml residue. The pellet was resuspended in this volume, transferred to a 1.5-ml tube, and centrifuged at 5,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C. Of the supernatant, 900 µl was discarded. Luciferase mRNA (9.9 x 108 copies; Promega, Mannheim, Germany) was added to the residual 100-µl volume and served as an internal standard for normalization due to losses during mRNA preparation and reverse transcription (RT) inefficiencies. RNA was extracted immediately using the Total RNA Mini kit (A&A Biotechnologie, Gdynia, Poland). Contaminating DNA was removed using a DNase I kit (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) with treatment for 3 h. RNA was stored at –80°C. No DNA contamination was detected in RNA using DNase I-treated RNA as the template for qPCR (see below). The recovery of luciferase mRNA typically ranged between 5 and 20%.
RT.
RNA was quantified using a GeneQuant RNA/DNA calculator (Pharmacia Biosystems, Freiburg, Germany) at a wavelength of 260 nm. Within each experiment, equal amounts of sample RNA in the range of 0.1 to 1 µg were subjected to RT using random hexamer primers and the RevertAid H Minus first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
PCR amplification of rdhA targets from DNA or cDNA.
Thirteen degenerate primer pairs were used to amplify specific fragments of all 32 rdhA genes of strain CBDB1 (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The forward primers were labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM). The PCR mixture (30 µl) contained 1 µl of DNA or cDNA, 1x reaction buffer, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each of the four deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany), 210 nM of each primer (Metabion, Martinsried, Germany), and 0.1 U of HotStarTaq polymerase (Qiagen, Hildesheim, Germany). The PCR was performed using the following conditions: an initial incubation of 95°C for 15 min, followed by 36 to 50 cycles (for cDNA amplification) or 40 cycles (for DNA amplification) of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 45 to 58°C, 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The sensitivity of the PCR assay to detect cluster 3 and cluster 4b rdhA targets was analyzed using total DNA of strain CBDB1. First, the copy number of the genome in extracted total DNA of strain CBDB1 was determined as 8 x 105 copies µl–1 by qPCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene (see below). Total DNA was serially diluted from 8 x 105 to 100 genome copies µl–1, and 1 µl of each dilution served as the template for PCR. Cluster 3 and cluster 4b primers yielded PCR products from at least 80 and 800 copies per µl, respectively.
t-RFLP for the differentiation of dehalogenase gene transcripts.
The fluorescently labeled PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and analyzed on 1% (wt/vol) agarose gels. The amplicons of each degenerate primer pair were quantified by GeneQuant (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) and divided into aliquots. Each aliquot (100 to 500 ng of DNA) was digested with a single restriction enzyme (1 U of MspI, RsaI, AluI, MboI, FnuDII, PstI, or BsuRI; Fermentas) and the recommended restriction buffer for 5 h at 37°C in a total volume of 10 µl. A suitable set of restriction enzymes was applied to the products of each degenerate primer pair to obtain specific terminally labeled restriction fragments of all amplified dehalogenase genes or transcripts (Table 1). Digested PCR products were precipitated using standard techniques and vacuum dried using a SpeedVac SVC 100. The terminal restriction fragments (t-RFs) were size separated on either an ABI Prism 377 automated sequencer or an ABI Prism 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany). By comparison with an internal size standard [ROX Genescan 500(–250)], the fragment length was determined in a range between 50 and 500 bp using the Genescan 2.1 software (PE Applied Biosystems). t-RFs were assigned to specific rdhA genes by a comparison to the results of computational digests (Clone 4.0 software; Scientific & Educational Software, Durham, NC) of the appropriate gene sequences (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. t-RFs based on a computational digest of the rdhA gene sequences of strain CBDB1
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Plasmids used as qPCR standards
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Reductive dechlorination of 65 µM 1,2,3-TCB (A) and 50 µM 1,2,4-TCB (B) and the copy number of the 16S rRNA gene (). Dechlorination activity is demonstrated by the formation of the dechlorination products 1,3-DCB ( ) and 1,4-DCB ( ).
|
Transcription of rdhA genes during dechlorination of 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB.
After a starvation phase of 72 h, several parallel cultures were spiked with 1,2,3- or 1,2,4-TCB. Total RNA was extracted from cultures at different times and subjected to RT and subsequent PCR with 13 degenerate primer pairs. At time zero, no or only minor amounts of RT-PCR products were detectable (Fig. 2). After 24 or 48 h at the latest, RT-PCR products were obtained with all primers except the cluster 3 primer pair, which did not yield PCR products from cDNA throughout repeated experiments. With genomic DNA as the template, a PCR product was formed with the cluster 3 primers, suggesting that the respective rdhA genes were not transcribed or were transcribed at a very low level. A low transcript level was confirmed later with primers specifically targeting the individual rdhA transcripts (see below). The intensity of bands representing different transcribed rdhA clusters was relatively constant between the data points after 24 and 72 h but showed a sharp decrease between 72 and 168 h after induction. This decrease of rdhA transcription level corresponded with the cessation of dechlorination activity in the cultures (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Composite figure showing sections of gels with RT-PCR products obtained with 13 different degenerate primer pairs from cultures supplemented at time point 0 with 1,2,3-TCB (A) or 1,2,4-TCB (B). The approximate sizes of the respective amplicons according to a marker are given at the left. (C) t-RFLP analysis of the RT-PCR products (obtained after 48 h of incubation) revealed the transcription of 29 of the 32 dehalogenase genes of strain CBDB1 in both culture setups.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. t-RFLP profiles obtained from genomic DNA of strain CBDB1 (A and B), from cDNA of 1,2,3-TCB-supplemented cultures (C and D), and from cDNA of 1,2,4-TCB-supplemented cultures (E and F) amplified with the degenerate primer pairs cluster 1_af/r (left) and cluster 4_f/4b_r (right) and after digestion with RsaI (left) and AluI (right).
|
rdhA gene transcript levels.
In the literature, two different standards were described for the normalization of the transcription level quantification of rdhA genes in Dehalococcoides spp. The copy number of the rdhA transcripts was related to the transcript level of rpoB (11, 32, 36) or to the copy number of the rdhA gene itself (19, 20, 25). To find an appropriate standard for the quantification of the temporal variability of rdhA gene transcription in Dehalococcoides sp. strain CBDB1, the transcription of three house-keeping genes (tuf, rpoA, rpoB, which code for translation elongation factor TU and two subunits of RNA polymerase, respectively) and of the 16S rRNA gene was determined by RT-qPCR in 1,2,3-TCB-fed cultures. Fig. S2 in the supplemental material shows that rpoB, rpoA, and tuf mRNA levels increased 10- to 100-fold within 24 h after 1,2,3-TCB was supplied. Starting from an initial level that was several orders of magnitude higher, the 16S rRNA level also increased, but only by 1.6-fold. The relatively stable copy number of the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 1) suggested that the observed relative changes in the copy number of the house-keeping gene transcripts reflected differences in transcription rates rather than in cell numbers. Therefore, a cell number-based standard for the normalization of the transcription data was preferred in the current study. The copy number of each rdhA transcript was related to the copy number of the respective gene, thus allowing a direct comparison of the transcript levels of different rdhA genes despite the different amplification efficiencies with different primers and targets.
For qPCR studies of rdhA gene transcription, rdhA genes were selected that represented a specific response pattern to 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB in the t-RFLP analyses. The rdhA genes cbdbA1624, cbdbA1453, and cbdbA187 were chosen because they showed a specific response to either 1,2,3- or 1,2,4-TCB. The transcription of cbrA was monitored by qPCR to prove its upregulation by both TCBs. Its partner gene in cluster 2a_1, cbdbA1563, also was analyzed to allow a direct comparison to the results of t-RFLP. Additionally, the transcription of cbdbA1588, a member of cluster 1c, was quantified with no obvious differential response. cbdbA1588 encodes an orthologue of a PCE-reductive and putative 2,3-dichlorophenol-reductive dehalogenase of strain 195 (11, 31).
All targets studied showed an increase of at least one order of magnitude in transcription levels within the first 24 h of culture and continued to show high expression levels (Fig. 4), and active dechlorination was observed (Fig. 1). For both 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB, the highest transcription levels were observed for cbrA. The second highest expression level was observed with cbdbA1453 and cbdbA1624 in cultures with 1,2,3-TCB and 1,2,4-TCB, respectively, which is in accord with the t-RFLP results. As was also found by t-RFLP analysis, cbdbA187 transcripts reached a higher abundance with 1,2,3-TCB than with 1,2,4-TCB as the electron acceptor. However, it is interesting that the initial amounts of the different rdhA transcripts varied considerably. Whereas the transcripts of cbrA, cbdbA1624, and/or cbdbA1453 started at a similarly high level, the cbdbA187 and cbdbA1588 transcript levels were initially one to two orders of magnitude less abundant, and the cbdbA1563 level (not shown) was even three to four orders of magnitude less abundant. After 168 h, the transcript levels of all studied rdhA genes were reduced almost to their initial levels. The cbrA transcript remained at a comparatively high level, suggesting a mechanism that maintains a relatively high transcription level of this gene even after complete substrate conversion. To test the influence of the congener used to grow the preculture on rdhA gene expression in the analyzed cultures, similar experiments were set up in duplicate with cells pregrown with 1,2,3-TCB instead of 1,2,4-TCB. Fig. S3 in the supplemental material shows that similar results were obtained with this approach. In these experiments, cbdbA1618 was monitored instead of cbdbA1588, which also was clearly induced by both substrates but showed a relatively low transcript abundance level.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Quantitative transcription analysis of the five selected rdhA genes cbrA ( ), cbdbA1624 (), cbdbA1453 ( ), cbdbA1588 ( ), and cbdbA187 ( ) of strain CBDB1 in the presence of 1,2,3-TCB (A) or 1,2,4-TCB (B) or in the acetone control (C). The culture was inoculated with 10% (vol/vol) cells grown in a TLP culture with 1,2,4-TCB in hexadecane.
|
To investigate a possible influence of the solvent acetone on transcript levels, control cultures were analyzed (Fig. 4C). The levels of the transcription of cbrA and cbdbA1453 showed low temporal variations. A slight increase in the transcript levels was observed for cbdbA1624, cbdbA187, and cbdbA1588; however, these levels were low compared to those of the cultures fed with 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB (Fig. 4A, B). It is interesting that the transcripts were detectable at a similarly low level even after 168 h of chlorobenzene starvation in these cultures, which succeeded even after an initial 72-h starvation in the preincubation phase.
|
|
|---|
Using our RT-PCR/t-RFLP approach, we could find clear indications for 29 of the 32 rdhA genes in strain CBDB1 that they are transcribed in cultures with 1,2,3- or 1,2,4-TCB (Fig. 2). The expression of the complete, or a slightly reduced, set of rdhA genes recently was shown in D. ethenogenes strain 195 for growth on PCE and 2,3-dichlorophenol, respectively (11). The simultaneous transcription of some rdhA genes of a Dehalococcoides sp. strain in the KB1 mixed culture during the dechlorination of less chlorinated ethenes was reported previously (44). This complex transcriptional response suggests a global regulatory control that might be growth dependent. Canonical promoter sequences showing –10 and –35 regions of the
70 type have been identified upstream of rdhA genes in strains 195 (11) and VS (33). Accordingly, the genomes of Dehalococcoides sp. strains 195 and CBDB1 both contain
70 homologues (24, 38). Putative activator or repressor proteins of the MarR type or two-component regulatory protein family are encoded by genes that are in close proximity to the rdhA genes in strains CBDB1 and 195 and might be involved in the fine-tuning of transcription (24). Indeed, the observed transcript levels of different rdhA genes in cells of strain CBDB1 varied by several orders of magnitude. Assuming similar extraction efficiencies for DNA and RNA and one genome copy per cell, the normalization of rdhA transcript numbers by the number of each corresponding rdhA gene gives a rough estimate of transcript numbers per cell. Thus, at time zero, the 10 monitored rdhA transcripts varied between one transcript per 10,000 cells (cbdbA1563 and cbdbA243) to one transcript per cell (cbrA). Subsequently, all 10 rdhA transcripts increased in number, reaching a maximum before dechlorination was complete, followed by a slow decay in levels and finally approaching the initial level (Fig. 4A, B; also see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). This general pattern of induction and mRNA turnover also was reported for tceA and three further rdhA genes in Dehalococcoides species-containing mixed cultures (19, 25, 36). The final low transcript level, which was reached several days after complete dehalogenation, proved to be very stable, as demonstrated for tceA (25) and in the current study for the controls with acetone not supplemented with a chlorinated substrate. Whether this apparent longevity of mRNA is due to constitutive expression at a low level or to the stabilization of the mRNA presently is not known.
In the present study, the highest transcript level (10 to a maximum of 22 transcripts per rdhA gene) was indicated for cbrA, which codes for the recently identified chlorobenzene-reductive dehalogenase in strain CBDB1 (2). Isolated CbrA reductively dehalogenated 1,2,3-TCB to 1,3-DCB and 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene to 1,2,4-TCB, but the latter was not further converted, leaving open the question of whether CbrA also is responsible for 1,2,4-TCB dechlorination in CBDB1. Our results demonstrate that both 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB at least induced the transcription of cbrA to about 10-fold above the initial level and also above the level of most other rdhA gene transcripts. It would be of great interest to study other chlorinated benzenes or dibenzo-p-dioxins to determine whether they also act as efficient inducers or even constitute substrates of CbrA.
A similar correlation between a high transcript level (11) and the detectability of the corresponding protein with high coverage by mass spectrometry (31) has been demonstrated for D. ethenogenes strain 195 growing with PCE or 2,3-dichlorophenol. These findings also suggested a dual function for PceA as a PCE- and 2,3-dichlorophenol-reductive dehalogenase. In addition, CbdbA1588, the PceA homologue in strain CBDB1, was the dominant RdhA in membrane-enriched cell fractions after growth with 2,3-dichlorophenol (31). cbdbA1588 was not detected in cell extracts of strain CBDB1 after growth with 1,2,3-TCB (2), and the respective gene was transcribed only at a low level. Both findings suggest no direct involvement in TCB dechlorination.
Remarkably, transcripts of the cluster 3 rdhA genes cbdbA80, cbdbA88, and cbdbA243 were hardly detectable in mRNA of cells grown in TCB. Recently, the expression of CbdbA80 during growth on 1,2,3-TCB was observed when the preculture contained 1,2,4-TCB but not when the preculture was cultivated with a mixture of 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB (2). In addition, CbdbA80 was detected in a 2,3-dichlorophenol-dechlorinating culture of strain CBDB1 (31). The homologue DET1559 in strain 195 was expressed in a PCE-dechlorinating culture (31). Thus, it seems that cbdbA80 is not induced by one specific chlorinated compound. The reductive dehalogenase CbdbA88 recently was detected in membrane-enriched protein extracts, albeit with a low protein sequence coverage, during the growth of strain CBDB1 on 2,3-dichlorophenol (31). It was not detected in extracts of cells grown in 1,2,3-TCB (2). Therefore, a specific role for CbdbA88 in TCB dechlorination most likely can be excluded.
Two rdhA genes, cbdbA1453 and cbdbA1624, showed an intermediate transcription level with initial and maximum levels similar to, or no more than 10-fold lower than, those of cbrA (Fig. 4; also see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Both proteins share a 91.7% identity and are the two most similar RdhA proteins in strain CBDB1. Orthologues are encoded by the genomes of Dehalococcoides sp. strains FL2 and VS but are absent in strain 195. The relative transcript level of cbdbA1453 could be shown reproducibly to exceed that of cbdbA1624 in the presence of 1,2,3-TCB, whereas this ratio was reversed when 1,2,4-TCB was supplied as the electron acceptor, suggesting that a specific regulation had taken place. The cbdbA1453 and cbdbA1624 genes are located in the vicinity of genes encoding MarR-type regulators (24). This contrasts with the situation for the highly expressed cbrA and cbdbA1588 genes, which are associated with two-component regulatory genes. MarR-type regulators are known to be involved in the regulation of the catabolism of aromatic compounds, frequently acting as repressors (45). Possibly, a relatively tight (auto)regulation prevents high transcript and protein levels, complicating the detection by a proteomic approach. Currently, the function of cbdbA1453 and cbdbA1624 gene products in the dechlorination of TCBs is unknown. It is interesting that in addition to the orthologues of cbdbA1453 and cbdbA1624, the cbrA orthologue also is absent from strain 195, which cannot dechlorinate 1,2,3- and 1,2,4-TCB in the absence of PCE as a cosubstrate. In addition, a further Dehalococcoides sp. strain was isolated recently (8) that is able to grow by respiratory dehalogenation with chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and 1,2,3-TCB but not with 1,2,4-TCB. This strain has homologues of cbrA and cbdbA1453 but not of cbdbA1624 (unpublished results), further strengthening the correlation between the presence of cbdbA1624 and the ability of strain CBDB1 to dechlorinate 1,2,4-TCB.
If the function of a distinct RdhA protein is known, the corresponding gene and mRNA can serve as a biomarker for the characterization of a specific in situ dehalogenation potential or activity (19, 20). Recently, a correlation was demonstrated between vcrA and bvcA expression and the active in situ dechlorination of cis-DCE to ethene at a field site (26). The suggested function of CbrA as a chlorobenzene dehalogenase and its currently unique presence in the chlorobenzene-dehalorespiring strain CBDB1 suggest the use of cbrA as a functional marker for the natural potential of chlorobenzene dehalogenation at contaminated sites. Although more research is needed before a quantitative prediction of dechlorination rates can be derived, the presence of cbrA transcripts could be indicative of a capacity to dechlorinate chlorobenzenes.
We thank Gary Sawers for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 5 February 2009. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. ![]()
Present address: Fachgebiet Technische Biochemie, Technische Universität, 13353 Berlin, Germany. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»