Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1970-1978, Vol. 75, No. 7
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01974-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Beat Ruffner,1,
Daniel Croll,1
Alexandre Colard,1
Ales Horák,2 and
Ian R. Sanders1*
Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore Building, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland,1 Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada2
Received 25 August 2008/ Accepted 21 January 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (Sod1) is a ubiquitous metalloprotein catalyzing the dismutation of superoxide into molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide. In the plant, expression of this molecule is usually one of the earliest detectable plant responses to pathogen infection and a key element of the plant defense system (5). In AMF, Sod1 encodes a functional polypeptide that scavenges reactive oxygen species (ROS) from metabolic processes (14). Potentially, it could be environmentally induced (i.e., heavy metal contamination in soils), but this is currently unknown. Furthermore, Sod1 has been suggested to be an essential component in the plant/fungus dialogue necessary to reach functional and structural compatibility between the partners (18, 27), but this has not been experimentally demonstrated. However, the gene was shown to be strongly expressed in the root during early stages of the plant-AMF symbiosis (27). Furthermore, evidence of its ROS-deactivating role in roots is supported by observations that hydrogen peroxide accumulates in the same tissue and that blocking of Sod1 in mycorrhizal roots markedly reduces hydrogen peroxide accumulation. Evidence therefore suggests that the Sod1 gene plays an important role for the fungus during establishment of symbiosis with the host plant, but its exact function remains unclear.
AMF are putative ancient asexuals, belonging to the fungal phylum Glomeromycota (12, 32), that form obligate symbiotic interactions with about 80% of land plants. AMF are known as important determinants of plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability, and productivity (36), yet very little is known about the evolution of their genes and genomes. Understanding the evolutionary fate of AMF genes, as well as studying their molecular divergence within and among species, can provide useful insights about the evolution of these ecologically important symbionts (16). In this study, homologous sequences encoding a copper-zinc superoxide dismutase protein (Sod1) have been isolated from five AMF species and a collection of Glomus intraradices isolates that were all initiated from single spores from one agricultural field to identify the level of molecular diversity within an AMF population. Codon-based maximum-likelihood procedures and recombination detection methods have been used to identify potential selective forces acting on these genes throughout their evolutionary history.
|
|
|---|
Gene amplification and cloning.
A total of four specific and slightly degenerate primers were designed based on the published Sod1 sequence of Gigaspora margarita (27). Primer sequences were the following: 5'-AAAGCTATTGCAGTTCTTAG-3' and 5'-CCCAATAACACCACAGGCAA-3'; 5'-GCAGTTITTTASWCCTGATAA-3' and 5'-TAACACCACAGGCAACACGA-3'.
DNA amplifications yielded one single fragment of the expected size with each pair of primers tested. The PCR products were separated on agarose gel and purified using a MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The fragments were cloned with a TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Inc.) following the manufacturers instructions. DNA sequences were determined using a version 3.1 Terminator cycler sequencing kit and separated on an ABI Prism 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
Sequence analyses, phylogenetic reconstruction, detection of positive selection, and recombination.
Sequences were analyzed and aligned using the Vector NTI package (Informax, Oxford, United Kingdom). Chromatograms were carefully examined by eye. A phylogenetic framework was reconstructed based on all Sod1 genes and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences using the neighbor-joining and minimum-evolution methods implemented in MEGA, version 3.1 (26). The maximum-likelihood tree was computed under the WAG+G model of evolution, chosen according to the Akaike information criterion (as computed with ProtTest, version 1.4 [1]), using Phyml, version 3.0 19). Bootstrap support was calculated from 1,000 replicates. Bayesian posterior probabilities were calculated using MrBayes, version 3.1.2, (22) with priors, chain number, and temperature set to default values; the aamodelpr parameter was fixed to particular protein models of evolution chosen according to the Akaike information criterion. Two parallel Markov chains were run for 2 x 106 generations; every 100th tree was sampled, and the first 5 x 105 generations were omitted from topology and probability reconstruction.
Codon-based likelihood ratio tests (LRTs), implemented in the PAML package, were used to detect potential signatures of selection in our data. Comparing the number of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions per site (dN/dS) is typically used to detect selection at the molecular level. Positive selection is inferred by a dN/dS ratio (
) exceeding 1, while purifying selection is characterized by a
of <1, and neutrality is indicated by a
of 1. To test hypotheses of molecular evolution, we used models that allow different
rates at different sites: the null model M1a (assuming two site classes: sites under purifying selection and neutrally evolving sites) and the alternative model M2a (adding a third site class: sites under positive selection) (30, 38). Comparison of the log-likelihood values under the two models reveals whether the model that allows for positively selected sites fits the data set better than the null model. The LRT compares twice the difference of the log-likelihood to a
2 distribution with a degree of freedom equal to the difference of free parameters in the corresponding models. Naïve and empirical Bayes calculations were used to analyze in more detail the site class of positive selection to identify particular sites under positive selection. The codon-based likelihood ratio tests have been performed among the six AMF species using the phylogenetic relationships represented in Fig. S1A in the supplemental material. The G. intraradices sequence used in the species data set corresponds to the isolate DAOM 181602. Rearranging the positions of G. proliferum, G. geosporum, and Glomus sp. within the AMF phylogeny did not affect the results reported in this study. The population data sets have been analyzed using the phylogenetic relationships shown in Fig. S1B in the supplemental material. The presence of recombination has been investigated using the program RDP2 (28) and default parameters. Recombination events have been investigated using an alignment of nucleotide sequences of the Sod1 gene from the totality of AMF species and isolates.
Real-time PCR procedures.
Real-time PCR was performed on three G. intraradices isolates (A2, A4, and C2) to compare relative copy numbers of the Sod1 genes. Using the Sod1 sequences we obtained from the 14 G. intraradices isolates, we designed primers that amplify a 100-bp fragment and that annealed to a region conserved among all variants. The primers and probe were as follows: forward primer (5' to 3'), CGA TTA CAG AGT TGG GAC CAC TTA; reverse primer (5' to 3'), CGT TGG CGA TTT GGG TAA TG; probe FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein), (5' to 3'): AGC AAC TTT ACC ATC CGG GCC AGC. The probe was labeled with FAM at the 5' end and with Black Hole quencher 1 at the 3' end. In the real-time PCR, the fluorescence of the probe was measured at each cycle at the annealing phase of the reaction. Real-time PCR amplification with the FAM-labeled probe was performed in 40 µl containing 1x qPCR Mastermix (Eurogentec), a 0.5 µM concentration of each primer, 0.25 µM probe, and 10 µl of DNA at different concentrations. The thermal cycling conditions comprised an initial step of 50°C for 2 min and 94°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 94°C for 15 s and 55°C for 1 min. Fluorescence data were collected using an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (SDS; Applied Biosystems). The SDS software then generated each real-time PCR profile after multicomponent analysis by plotting the log of the change in fluorescence (delta Rn, where Rn is the normalized reporter signal) versus cycle numbers. The cycle threshold (CT) was determined by the SDS software as the fractional cycle number. This indicates where the fluorescence crosses an arbitrary threshold intersecting the signal curves in their exponential phases. In each experiment, twofold serial dilutions of G. intraradices genomic DNA from the different isolates (ranging between 5,000 and 39.06 pg) were included to generate CT values. Two independent experiments were performed, each with eight concentrations of the genomic DNA. In half of the experiments, the DNA of the G. intraradices isolates was obtained from two independent extractions, thus allowing the possibility of checking whether a bias occurred in the CTs because of DNA extraction procedures. The CT values shown in Fig. 3 represent averages between the two independent experiments. All replicates offered very similar results and produced standard curves with regression coefficients (R2) of >0.99. The relative copy number of the Sod1 gene in each of the G. intraradices isolates could then be calculated easily by comparing the CT values of each of the isolates for a given amount of genomic DNA. The slopes resulting from the analyses of CT values relative to the log of the amount of genomic DNA were consistent and reproducible among isolates, and the efficiency of the quantitative PCR from genomic DNA was found to be more than 95%.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Results of real-time quantitative PCR showing linear regressions of the CT values and the log concentration of the G. intraradices isolate A1, A2, A4, and C2 genomic DNA.
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences of the fungal Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase gene Sod1. Sod1 genes from five AMF species and 14 isolates of G. intraradices were obtained in this study and compared with previously published sequences from the Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota and a sequence from Gigaspora margarita deposited in the GenBank. Values at nodes correspond to bootstrap support (1,000 bootstrap replicates) from neighbor-joining (first), minimum evolution (second), and maximum likelihood (third) and to posterior probabilities (fourth) from Bayesian analyses. Only bootstrap supports above 50 or posterior probabilities over 0.75 are shown. Scale bar represents 0.05 substitutions per site. The sequences from Rhizopus oryzae, Batrachochytrium dendrobatids, Phycomyces blakesleeanus, and Allomyces macrogynus were obtained from http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/genome, http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Phybl1/Phybl1.home.html, and http://www.bch.umontreal.ca/pepdb/pepdb.html. Please note that Sod1 sequences from isolate C2 and C5 differ only by synonymous substitutions and, therefore, share the same amino acid sequence.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Pairwise distances among representatives of the fungal Sod1 amino acid sequences analyzed in this study
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Consensus of neighbor-joining (uncorrected P distance) analyses is shown for ITS sequences from G. intraradices isolates analyzed in this study and harboring the most divergent Sod1 sequences, as well as from Glomus sp. (strain MUCL 43196), G. fasciculatum, and Glomus claroideum (defined as the outgroup). Numbers on branches indicate clade support in the percentage of 1,000 bootstrap replicates (only clade support that is >75% is shown), using the neighbor-joining analysis. Sequences are identified by their GenBank accession numbers. Sequences in bold were recovered from isolates used in this study. Scale bar represents 0.02 substitutions per site. Our analyses suggest that the isolate MUCL 43196 likely corresponds to an isolate from G. intraradices.
|
The results from the maximum-likelihood analysis of codon evolution showed that positive selection potentially acted at specific codons throughout the evolution of these AMF species. Indeed, all models that allowed for sites with a
(dN/dS) greater than 1 (M1, M2, and M8), that is, the models of positive selection, fitted the Sod1 data significantly better than the corresponding neutral models (M0, M3, and M7) (Table 2). More specifically, the
estimates, averaged over all sites and all branches, ranged from 0.5 to 0.61 among selection models. Models M1a and M7 gave lower estimates as they do not account for sites under positive selection. An LRT comparing model M1a (nearly neutral) to M2a (positive) indicated that the selection models fitted better (P = 0.009) (Table 3). The LRT comparing the model M7 (β, neutral) with M8 (β, selection) also rejected the null model (P = 0.004). Most sites in the fragment examined have apparently evolved either under purifying selection (M2a, 69%; M8, 92%) or neutrality (M2a, 26%; M8, 8%) (Table 2). The discrete model associated 10% of the sites under positive selection. Similarly, M2a and M8 indicated positive selection at a small subset of sites (4.7% and 7.7%) located within the fragment analyzed (Table 2). In more detailed analyses, a Bayesian approach identified seven sites affected by positive selection within the AMF lineage under model M8 and five under model M2a (Table 3). Overall, five amino acid sites were identified as potentially affected by positive selection when all sites that allowed for the presence of positive selection were used in the analysis (5G, 55F, 58T, 79P, and 88D). Sites 79P and 93D were predicted to be subject to positive selection at the 95% confidence level using all models.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Site-specific models for positive selectiona
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. LRTs for positive selectiona
|
Molecular diversity within a population of G. intraradices: recombination or diversifying selection?
Likelihood methods for detecting positive selection can be inaccurate if significant recombination has occurred among the sequences (4). The G. intraradices isolates analyzed in this study have been the subject of a multilocus genotyping study based on newly developed simple sequence repeat and nuclear gene intron markers (15). No events of recombination have been found between the isolates A2, A4, C2, and C5 using sequence data that was generated from these markers (14a). These isolates are the same ones that showed the highest molecular divergence in our study. To further test whether recombination played a significant role in shaping the diversity of the Sod1 sequences identified in our population, we performed an analysis to detect possible recombination events within the G. intraradices population (28). This analysis failed to identify any recombination events (data not shown), suggesting that other evolutionary forces played an important role in shaping the molecular diversity among the sequences.
To identify other possible evolutionary forces shaping the diversity at the G. intraradices Sod1 locus, we applied the same likelihood procedures reported in the previous section to the 14 G. intraradices isolates (which were initiated as single-spore cultures) harvested from one field. Consistent with what we identified among AMF species, we found that selection models applied to our population explained the data significantly better than neutral models (P < 0.05) (Tables 2 and 3). Although an LRT comparison between the discrete model M1a with M3 was only marginally significant (P = 0.09), the more stringent comparisons using M2, M8, and M8A (supplementary category
fixed at 1) models were significant (P = 0.036) (Table 3). Importantly, models accounting for positively selected sites produced very similar parameter estimates and associated the same proportion (4.9%) of amino acids to the supplementary category of positively selected sites. Testing alternative tree topologies to take into account the phylogenetic incertitude did not alter the outcome of our analysis. Overall, sites at positions 6 and 18 (6G and 18G) were predicted to be under positive selection by all models at a high level of significance. Importantly, amino acids 6G and 58F were commonly identified as being under positive selection at both the population and species levels (Table 3).
Selection on superoxide dismutases in fungal mutualists and pathogens.
AMF have sometimes been shown to harbor different alleles of one locus among the different genomes present in one isolate, but such intraindividual variability was not identified at the Sod1 locus. Although it could be important for the AMF to have copies with various functions for the Sod1 gene, the absence of such allelic variation is not surprising and has also been reported for other adaptively important genes, such as the plasma membrane-type II ATPases (13).
Rapid evolution of Sod1 has already been reported in pathogenic fungi (10). For example, the Sod1 enzymes from different varieties of the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans and Aspergillus sp. show substantial biochemical and physical differences (14, 21). In Aspergillus species, amino acid variation in the N-terminal domain of Cu-Zn dismutases has been shown to increase thermostability. This possibly affects their virulence as increased thermostability and activity have been reported in the most virulent strains with the potential to develop aspergillosis (21). While the role of the Sod1 genes in defense systems in plants, immune system in animals, and the pathogenesis of some fungi has been well characterized, their molecular variability has rarely been discussed in the context of adaptive evolution.
Our results are consistent with a rapid evolution of the Sod1 gene, which has been shown to be specifically upregulated during mycorrhizal symbiosis and upon exposure to root exudates. However, its specific role during the establishment of the mycorrhizal symbiosis is still unclear. For instance, it is not known whether its expression is directly related to the plant-fungus dialogue or whether it is in response to a change in environmental conditions dictated by the plant defense system (i.e., expression required to counteract the ROS released by the host). Rapid evolution of genes in a plant-fungal interaction might also be an indication of arms races, but such arms races are usually seen in host-pathogen interactions (6) and not expected to evolve in a mutualisitic symbiosis. Thus, an arms race scenario, although possible in the case of the Sod1 gene, seems unlikely considering the generalist nature of the AMF. From complementation studies in yeast, it has been demonstrated that the AMF Sod1 encodes an active polypeptide that effectively scavenges ROS (27). Moreover, this almost certainly occurs in AMF-colonized roots because suppression of Sod1 activity reduces build-up of peroxidase in the roots (27). It seems evident, therefore, that one important role for AMF Sod1 is the scavenging of ROS. This adaptive scenario implies that AMF are facing environmental situations similar to pathogens and, therefore, need to counteract the same plant defense barriers upon establishment of the mycorrhizal symbiosis. In this case, positive selection on the copper-zinc superoxide dismutase protein is better explained as a direct consequence of adaptation directed toward scavenging ROS produced by the host.
In parallel, Sod1 proteins have also been suggested as playing an important role in the fungal-plant molecular dialogue (18, 27) although conclusive evidence has not been provided for this. In this communication function of the Sod1 proteins, the rapid evolution of their amino acids could be related to the fact that tightly coevolved mutualisms are constantly exposed to nonmutualistic cheaters or parasites. As Sod1 plays a key role for pathogens to avoid plant immune systems (production of ROS), the AMF might need to slightly change their biochemical properties accordingly to avoid their proteins' being recognized as of pathogen origin. An alternate explanation could be related to the poor specificity of AMF species toward their host. High rates of protein evolution facilitating host interactions could render AMF species more broad in their host range or allow them to rapidly colonize hosts in the presence of competitors.
Diversifying selection in an AMF population?
The molecular evidence we have gathered in this study points toward an orthologous origin of the Sod1 sequences we identified within the G. intraradices population. Although it is true that we cannot conclusively reject a paralogous origin for a few of these, the absence of AMF isolates and species harboring more than one Sod1 sequence and the impossibility to absolutely reject the monophyly of our G. intraradices sequences are both additional lines of evidence that make this latter evolutionary scenario far less parsimonious than the one suggesting an accumulation of mutations among orthologous sequences.
Intraspecific sequence polymorphism for a given gene has most often evolved as a consequence of random mutations accumulated by genetic drift. In this case, amino acid replacements are considered as neutral, with no effect or weak effects on protein function. An important departure from neutrality is observed when recombination produces molecular diversity or when positive selection fixes advantageous mutations. In the latter case, selective sweeps of favorable mutations lead to an excess of nonsynonymous over synonymous substitutions between species.
In this study, the molecular diversity identified among spores of G. intraradices is unlikely a consequence of recombination as other studies and our own analyses failed to identify recombination events. However, even if recombination did account for part of the intraspecific variation, this would not have significant consequences on our codon-based likelihood analyses for two independent reasons. First, rare events of recombination have been demonstrated as not interfering with the detection of positive selection (4). Second, LRT comparisons using the more realistic model M7 against M8 were shown to be robust to false positives due to recombination. This is particularly the case if the model M7 allows the positive selection pressure to vary between 0 and 1 (not accounting for positive selection) and if the alternative model M8 allows an additional discrete class with a dN/dS that could be estimated to be >1 (and thus account for positive selection) (4). In this study, the LRT comparison between these two models was the most significant one. This suggests that even under rare recombination in the population, diversifying selection is certainly a likely explanation for the diversity observed at the Sod1 locus.
Within a population, directional selection is thought to shift allele frequency in favor of a newly derived mutation through a fitness advantage to certain individuals over others. Signals of positive selection are, therefore, rarely detectable at the population level. However, a changing environment, with variable selective pressures over time (i.e., interactions with multiple symbiotic partners), could lead to balanced polymorphism that is maintained within a single population. This feature is known for genes involved in plant defense systems, mating systems in fungi and plants, or immune response in animals, where a high level of polymorphism is favored and maintained through selection (31). Thus, rapid protein evolution and balancing selection at the locus Sod1 may offer evolutionary advantages for some isolates compared to others in a heterogeneous environment, resulting in the maintenance of high protein divergence within the population.
This work was supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation grant (3100AO-105790/1) to I.R.S.
Published ahead of print on 6 February 2009. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. ![]()
N.C. and B.R. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»