Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2009, p. 2629-2637, Vol. 75, No. 9
0099-2240/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02145-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Oral Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Received 16 September 2008/ Accepted 22 February 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Streptococcus mutans is the etiological agent of dental caries (17). A key virulence attribute of this organism is acid tolerance, since catabolism of dietary carbohydrates lowers the pH of dental plaque to values below 4.0 (3). S. mutans has multiple strategies to cope with low pH and gains a competitive advantage over acid-sensitive bacteria under acidic conditions (19, 21). Although a variety of oral streptococci utilize ammonia generation from urea or from amino acids as a fundamental acid tolerance mechanism (19), alkali production was not considered a mechanism employed by S. mutans to cope with acidification until the AgDS was characterized for S. mutans UA159 (11) and, subsequently, for other mutans streptococci (13). The primary roles of the AgDS in S. mutans and other mutans streptococci appear to be to catabolize agmatine, to produce ATP, and to augment acid tolerance (11, 12).
The aguR gene, which encodes a trans-acting factor required for efficient AgDS expression, is located 239 bp upstream of aguB and is transcribed in the opposite direction (12). AguR is a putative LuxR-like transcriptional regulator belonging to the FixJ-NarL superfamily, which includes two-component response regulators involved in quorum sensing (10). AguR is 318 amino acids long, with a predicted molecular mass of 37,611 Da, and has several noteworthy structural features (Fig. 1). Computer algorithms at http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/and http://bp.nuap.nagoya-u.ac.jp/sosui/ predict an N-terminal signal sequence and as many as four membrane-spanning domains that may allow for a substantial portion of the protein to be exposed to the environment. A predicted helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif of the LuxR family is located in the C terminus of the protein and likely mediates DNA binding. It was reported previously that induction of the AgDS of S. mutans is optimal at low pH when agmatine is present (12). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that agmatine and low-pH induction of the AgDS of S. mutans is mediated through the AguR transcriptional regulator.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Predicted topology and linker insertions for AguR. The four-transmembrane-domain model is based on computer algorithms from http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/ and http://bp.nuap.nagoya-u.ac.jp/sosui/. Transmembrane domains are indicated by boxes and numbered in the top left corners. The circles indicate that insertions adjacent to these residues resulted in altered responses to pH and agmatine. The square indicates that insertions at this residue resulted only in altered responses to agmatine. The diamond indicates that insertions at this point in AguR altered only pH responsiveness. The hexagons indicate that mutagenesis at these residues resulted in no significant changes in the response to stimuli.
|
|
|
|---|
For studies on pH- and agmatine-dependent regulation of AgDS expression, S. mutans strains were grown in continuous culture in a Biostat i Twin Controller chemostat (Braun Biotech, Inc., Allentown, PA) in a tryptone-yeast extract (TY) medium (29) supplemented with 25 mM galactose at a dilution rate (D) of 0.3 h–1. Cultures were maintained at pH 5.5 or pH 7.0 by the addition of 2 M KOH. Samples were harvested at steady state, which was defined as cultivation under given conditions for at least 10 generations. Where indicated, cultures were pulsed with 10 mM agmatine for 1 h prior to sampling.
DNA manipulation.
Genomic DNA was isolated from S. mutans UA159 as previously described (7). Plasmid DNA used in sequencing reactions was prepared from E. coli by use of a miniprep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Restriction and DNA-modifying enzymes were purchased from Life Technologies Inc. (Rockville, MD) or New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA).
Construction of reporter gene fusions.
A 157-bp fragment upstream of the aguB start codon (PaguB) was amplified using primers PaguB-S and PaguB-AS (Table 1), with inserted SacI and BamHI restriction sites to facilitate cloning. The promoter region was fused to a promoterless lacZ gene derived from Streptococcus salivarius on pMC195 (6). After confirming the correct sequence of the promoter fusion by DNA sequencing, the PaguB-lacZ construct was cloned into plasmid pMC340B (30), which allows for integration of the gene fusion in S. mutans as a single copy at the mtlA-phnA locus, and the construct was transformed into S. mutans UA159 to create strain WTZ. Transformants were selected on BHI agar with Km and screened by PCR to confirm that the desired integration had occurred. Strain WTZ was transformed with plasmid pMSP3535 (4), which allows for nisin-inducible expression from the nisA promoter, to generate WTZ/V, or with a nisR/nisK-deficient derivative of pMSP3535 (pMSP-
nisRK) to generate WTZ/V-RK. pMSP-
nisRK was constructed by removal of an EcoRV fragment from pMSP3535 to delete both the nisR and nisK genes. Plasmid transformants were selected on BHI agar containing Em.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. S. mutans strains used in this study
|
Deletion of aguD.
Primers aguD-S and aguD-SmaI-AS (Table 1) were used to amplify a 0.6-kbp region upstream of aguD. Primers aguD-SmaI-S and aguD-AS (Table 1) were used to amplify a 0.6-kbp region downstream of aguD. The PCR products were digested with SmaI and ligated to a nonpolar Km resistance cassette from pALH124 (2). The ligation mixture was introduced into S. mutans UA159 by natural transformation to generate an aguD mutant, and bacteria were plated on BHI agar with Km. Double-crossover mutants were confirmed by PCR.
Linker scanning mutagenesis.
Mutagenesis was performed with the GPS-LS linker scanning system (New England Biolabs) according to the supplier's instructions. The GPS-LS system allows for random insertion of 15 nucleotides into the gene of interest, with only two of the six possible reading frames creating stop codons. In the other four reading frames, the insertion introduces five amino acids into the protein of interest. A transposon (Tp) donor plasmid (pGPS5; Km resistant) and the TnsABC transposase were used to mutagenize plasmid pMSP-aguR in vitro. The mutagenized plasmids were electroporated into E. coli by selection on LB agar containing Km, and the colonies were pooled for isolation of plasmids. The Tp-containing XbaI-SphI fragments harboring the mutated aguR genes from pools of targeted plasmids were cloned back into pMSP3535 to construct pMSP-aguR::Tp plasmids. One hundred individual pMSP-aguR::Tp plasmids were each digested with PmeI to release the Tp and then were religated. The resulting clones were selected on BHI agar containing Em and screened for Km sensitivity. Insertions were located by DNA sequencing with the primers pMSP3535F and pMSP3535R (Table 1). Selected pMSP-aguR::Tp plasmids were used to transform the R– strain, and transformants were selected on BHI agar containing Em.
β-Galactosidase assay.
Measurements of β-galactosidase activity were obtained using a modification of the Miller protocol (31). Briefly, cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed once with Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, and 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, pH 7.0), and resuspended in 1/10 of the original culture volume in the same buffer. One milliliter of the suspension was used to determine the OD600. Another 500 µl of the sample was vortexed with 25 µl of a toluene-acetone mix (1:9) for 2 min and then kept at 37°C. A reaction was initiated by adding 100 µl of ONPG (o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside) solution (4 mg/ml) and terminated by the addition of 500 µl of 1 M Na2CO3. Samples were centrifuged at maximum speed for 2 min using a tabletop centrifuge, and the OD of the supernatant fluid was measured at 420 and 550 nm. Activity was expressed in Miller units (31).
Expression and purification of recombinant AguR in E. coli.
A 324-bp fragment encoding the C-terminal one-third (amino acids 210 to 318) of AguR was amplified by PCR using primers aguR3-S and aguR3-AS, with BamHI and PstI sites added (Table 1). The PCR product was then digested with BamHI and PstI and inserted in frame behind the malE gene on pMAL-p2X (New England Biolabs) to create a maltose binding protein fusion. Expression of the recombinant AguR protein was induced with 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside) for 3 h, and protein lysates were prepared by homogenization with a BeadBeater (Biospec, Bartlesville, OK). The recombinant protein was purified using an amylose column as recommended by the supplier. Polyclonal AguR antibody was elicited in rabbits with the purified recombinant AguR protein at Lampire Biological Laboratories (Pipersville, PA).
Western blot assays of AguR protein.
Mid-exponential-phase (OD600
0.5 to 0.6) cells were centrifuged and washed twice with Tris-buffered saline (10 mM Tris, 0.9% NaCl, pH 7.4). Whole-cell lysates were obtained by homogenization in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) boiling buffer (60 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, and 5% SDS) in the presence of glass beads, followed by centrifugation at 2,000 x g for 10 min (8). Protein samples were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and incubated with affinity-purified (23) AguR antibody, followed by peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD). Signals were developed using a SuperSignal West Femto chemiluminescence kit (Thermo, Waltham, MA).
Real-time PCR.
Extraction of RNA, reverse transcription-PCR, real-time PCR, and copy number normalizations were performed as previously described (1). The primers used for reverse transcription-PCR and real-time PCR for the aguA gene are described elsewhere (12). The aguR-specific primers (aguR-RT-S and aguR-RT-AS) were designed using Beacon Designer 4.0 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA) and are detailed in Table 1.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. LacZ specific activities in AguR variants of S. mutans carrying PaguB-lacZ gene fusions. Cells were grown in TV medium containing 25 mM galactose, with or without 10 mM agmatine, to mid-exponential phase, and LacZ specific activities were measured. The values shown represent the means and standard deviations for three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. LacZ specific activities of AguR variants of S. mutans carrying PaguB-lacZ. Cells were grown to mid-exponential phase in TY broth containing 25 mM galactose with 10 mM agmatine that had been acidified to pH 5.5 with HCl (TY-HCl) or in TY broth buffered at pH 7.0 (TY-KPB), and the LacZ specific activities were measured. The values shown represent the means and standard deviations for three independent experiments.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. LacZ activity expressed from PaguB in S. mutans strains growing in continuous chemostat culturec
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Linker mutation locations, inserted residues, and responsiveness of mutants to pH and agmatine in agu operon induction
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Western blot analysis of wild-type, WTZ, R–/V, R–/R, and RLS mutant strains of S. mutans. Following SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and subjected to Western blotting using an affinity-purified AguR antibody at a dilution of 1:100. Lanes are marked with the strains examined. (A) Western analysis of various RLS insertion mutants and control strains (see Table 2). (B) The truncated derivative RLS 286 (lane 3) expresses a protein of the correct predicted molecular mass at a level comparable to that of the intact AguR protein (lane 1). Lane 2 contains an equivalent amount of protein from an aguR deletion mutant. (C) Western blot showing the presence of full-length AguR (37 kDa) and the potential processed form of AguR expressed as a single copy in the wild-type background, except that fivefold more protein was loaded in that lane (5xWTZ) (lane 1). Lane 2 harbors a control showing no reactive bands for an AguR-deficient mutant. Lanes 3 and 4 harbor one-fifth the amount of protein in lanes 1 and 2, but extracts were prepared from strains expressing plasmid-borne derivatives of mutant aguR genes (see Table 4).
|
Regions of AguR required for low-pH induction.
To determine whether mutagenesis of different domains of AguR would affect pH-dependent expression from the aguB promoter, the various strains were grown in TY broth containing 10 mM agmatine that was acidified to pH 5.5 or buffered at pH 7.0 (Fig. 1 and 3). Cells were harvested in mid-exponential phase, and LacZ activity was measured. Unlike the strain carrying a wild-type copy of the AguR protein, the RLS 41, 46, 52, 53, 73, 81, 88, 168, and 175 mutants showed no difference in PaguB transcription at pH 5.5 or pH 7.0. An increase of about 1.3-fold in PaguB transcription at low pH was detected in the RLS 60, 65, 66, and 67 mutants, compared with the 2-fold induction seen at pH 5.5 in the R–/R strain. A twofold increase in PaguB expression at low pH was observed for the RLS 103, 104, 105, 106, 110, 121, 158, 161, 201, and 209 mutants (Fig. 1 and 3).
Chemostat studies with AguR variants.
Since the effects of the mutated versions of aguR on aguB promoter expression were studied in batch culture, we examined whether a subset of the mutants did in fact have an aberrant response to low pH and agmatine in continuous culture. LacZ activity was measured in cells that were cultivated to steady state at pH 7.0 or pH 5.5 and then pulsed with 10 mM agmatine for 60 min. The RLS 110 strain expressed approximately threefold higher LacZ activity in response to agmatine, but no induction at pH 5.5 was noted (Table 3). Conversely, a twofold increase in PaguB expression of RLS 41 was stimulated by the addition of 10 mM agmatine, but no difference in PaguB expression in this strain was seen at pH 7.0 and pH 5.5 (Table 3). The RLS 46 and 175 mutants, in which responses to low pH and agmatine were eliminated, showed a basal level of PaguB expression, and no induction by agmatine or low pH was detected (Table 3). Therefore, the results using chemostat-grown cells confirmed that AguR is required for the response to low pH and agmatine and that mutations in different regions of the predicted membrane-spanning or extracellular domains can affect pH and agmatine induction independently or can eliminate both responses.
Mutations in the HTH motif.
AguR is a LuxR-like transcriptional regulator in which the C-terminal HTH domain is implicated in DNA binding (28). However, the conserved acylated homoserine lactone binding region, typical of LuxR, could not be found in AguR. To confirm that the C-terminal HTH motif of AguR was involved in AguR-DNA binding, the RLS 102, 162, 174, 205, and 286 mutants, which contain truncated AguR proteins with termination codons before the HTH motif (Table 2; Fig. 1), were analyzed. First, real-time PCR was used to confirm that the truncated aguR genes could be expressed at a level comparable to that of the parental copy, and the data showed that the truncated aguR derivatives RLS 102, 162, 174, 205, and 286 were transcribed at a level similar to that of wild-type aguR in the R–/R strain (data not shown). The RLS 286 mutant was the only mutant in which the truncated AguR protein had an overlapping region to the C-terminal one-third of AguR that was used to elicit the AguR antibody. By use of Western blot analysis, the truncated AguR protein in RLS 286 could be detected at levels comparable to that of wild-type AguR in the R–/R strain (Fig. 4B). All of these mutants showed a basal level of PaguB transcription, and no induction by agmatine or low pH could be observed (data not shown), suggesting that the agu operon could not be activated by inducing signals through AguR derivatives lacking the HTH motif.
Involvement of AguD in regulation of the AgDS.
AguD is a predicted agmatine-putrescine antiporter. Recently, CadC, which activates the transcription of the lysine decarboxylase genes of E. coli in the presence of low pH and lysine, was shown to sense the presence of extracellular lysine indirectly through the LysP permease. S. mutans UA159 and an AguD-deficient derivative were cultured in TV medium containing 25 mM galactose, with or without 10 mM agmatine. Expression of the AgDS was monitored by real-time PCR with the aguA (AgD) gene as a target. The data (Fig. 5) showed that in the absence of exogenous agmatine, aguA mRNA was about 100-fold more abundant in the aguD mutant than in the wild-type strain. When the strains were grown in the presence of 10 mM agmatine, a slight but statistically significant increase (
1.5-fold) in aguA expression was seen in the AguD-deficient strain (Fig. 5A). Thus, in the absence of exogenous agmatine, AguD acts as a negative regulator of agu gene expression.
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Real-time PCR monitoring of aguA mRNA. Reverse transcription was initiated from 1 µg of total RNA from the wild-type (WT) and AguD-deficient strains of S. mutans cultured in TV medium containing 25 mM galactose, with or without 10 mM agmatine (A), or in TY-KPB or TY-HCl containing 25 mM galactose and 10 mM agmatine (B). The amount of aguA cDNA was determined by real-time PCR using SYBR green. The data represent means ± standard deviations obtained from three different RNA preparations and reverse transcription reactions. Asterisks indicate that aguA gene expression in the mutant differed significantly from that in the wild-type strain under the same culture conditions (P < 0.05; Student's t test).
|
|
|
|---|
The mutational analysis conducted here demonstrates that it is possible to isolate derivatives of AguR that lose the ability to activate transcription in response to pH but not agmatine, and vice versa (Fig. 2 and 3). Likewise, we were able to isolate mutant forms of AguR that lost the ability to respond to either signal. The introduced mutations likely either disrupt a binding site or cause conformational changes that inhibit normal AguR function, since our data show that diminished production or stability of the proteins is not responsible for the observed effects. The simplest interpretation of these findings is that AguR can bind to agmatine, which stimulates AguR binding to its target sequence, and that acidic conditions favor a conformation for AguR that makes signal transduction to the DNA binding domain more efficient. Such a model would be reasonable were it not for the fact that deletion of the aguD gene, which encodes the predicted agmatine-putrescine antiporter, dramatically altered agu gene expression in the absence of agmatine. It seems, therefore, that the mechanism for regulation of agu gene expression by agmatine may be similar to what was recently reported for regulation of cadAB expression by lysine, CadC, and LysP. Specifically, the lack of exogenous agmatine may result in an association between AguD and AguR that interferes with the interaction of AguR with its target. The addition of exogenous agmatine could destabilize this association. An alternative explanation is that internalized agmatine is the actual inducing signal and that the loss of the antiporter inhibits accumulation of agmatine in cells. However, if the predicted topology and orientation of AguR are correct, then induction by intracellular agmatine seems unlikely since the mutations that affect induction by agmatine do not map to intracellular domains. Further analyses of the topology of AguR and its ability to directly interact with agmatine are needed to reach a firm conclusion. Notably, we have attempted to produce a full-length AguR protein to explore the latter possibility but have not been able to express the N-terminal two-thirds of the protein in E. coli. It is also noteworthy that AguR is produced in S. mutans at extremely low levels, so an analysis of the binding characteristics of AguR will require a breakthrough in expression of this protein in sufficient quantities to conduct the necessary biochemical studies.
A recent report suggested that the regulation of cadAB gene expression by CadC may be even more complex than previously appreciated. In particular, site-specific proteolysis of the periplasmic domain of CadC, which is generated in cells exposed to acidic conditions, causes the release of a biologically active cytoplasmic form of the N-terminal DNA binding domain of CadC that can stimulate target gene activation (18). It is clear from our Western blots that a smaller species of AguR is commonly observed in strains expressing full-length wild-type or mutated AguR proteins. The observation that this lower-molecular-weight protein is indeed a derivative of AguR is supported by the fact that the protein is absent in strains lacking AguR and that all Western blotting was done with an antibody that was raised against a highly purified recombinant AguR protein that was expressed in E. coli. Furthermore, the antibodies used in the Western blots were affinity purified using the purified recombinant AguR protein. There is one open reading frame (SMu0441) in S. mutans with limited homology to the C-terminal DNA binding protein of AguR, but inactivation of the gene for that protein did not alter the results of Western blotting (data not shown). We are in the process of determining where the potential cleavage of AguR occurs and whether the processing is stimulated by growth under particular conditions, e.g., low pH.
An unexpected finding that arose from this study was that aguB promoter activity in the presence of inducing concentrations of agmatine was altered in strains carrying only the vector pMSP3535. Furthermore, deletion of the nisRK two-component system (TCS) from the vector eliminated this effect on agu expression (Fig. 2). NisRK is a TCS that senses environmental nisin and activates nisA promoter expression by using a classical TCS phosphorelay circuit (15). Notably, we have seen an effect of NisRK on one other unrelated gene in S. mutans (L. Zeng and R. Burne, unpublished data). While this observation may serve primarily as a cautionary note on the use of pMSP3535 for certain gene regulation studies, the finding may have some importance in terms of agu gene expression. In particular, the regulation of certain genes by pH, as well as the general property of acid tolerance in S. mutans, has been shown to be influenced in strains lacking a number of different TCS constituents, including CovR, CiaRH, VicRK, and ComDE (2, 22, 24, 27). The influence of heterologous expression of a TCS in S. mutans, in this case NisRK, that may potentially cross talk with endogenous TCSs raises the possibility that pH-dependent expression of the agu operon could be, at least in part, controlled by a TCS. Efforts are ongoing to probe in more detail the basis for low-pH-dependent enhancement of agu gene expression.
Elucidation of the genetics, physiology, and biochemistry of agmatine catabolism is an important first step in understanding the role of the agmatine deiminase in oral biofilm ecology and disease. The AgDS conveys bioenergetic advantages to S. mutans and other oral streptococci through enhancement of the
pH and through generation of ATP (12), so it should contribute in major ways to the persistence and virulence of these organisms. Moreover, the complexity of regulation of the AgDS by substrate, catabolite control, and relevant environmental stresses, including pH, along with the relatively broad distribution of the system in pathogens and commensals, makes this an excellent model for the study of gene regulation and physiology in streptococci.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant DE10362 from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
Published ahead of print on 6 March 2009. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»