This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schippers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sand, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schippers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sand, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schippers, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sand, W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Sep 1996, 3424-3431, Vol 62, No. 9
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Sulfur Chemistry in Bacterial Leaching of Pyrite

A Schippers, P Jozsa and W Sand
Universitat Hamburg, Institut fur Allgemeine Botanik, Abteilung Mikrobiologie, D-22609 Hamburg, Germany

In the case of pyrite bioleaching by Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, an organism without sulfur-oxidizing capacity, besides the production of tetra- and pentathionate, a considerable accumulation of elemental sulfur occurred. A similar result was obtained for chemical oxidation assays with acidic, sterile iron(III) ion-containing solutions. In the case of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, only slight amounts of elemental sulfur were detectable because of the organism's capacity to oxidize sulfur compounds. In the course of oxidative, chemical pyrite degradation under alkaline conditions, the accumulation of tetrathionate, trithionate, and thiosulfate occurred. The data indicate that thiosulfate, trithionate, tetrathionate, and disulfane-monosulfonic acid are key intermediate sulfur compounds in oxidative pyrite degradation. A novel (cyclic) leaching mechanism is proposed which basically is indirect.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Enders, M. S., Knickerbocker, C., Titley, S. R., Southam, G. (2006). The Role of Bacteria in the Supergene Environment of the Morenci Porphyry Copper Deposit, Greenlee County, Arizona. Economic Geology 101: 59-70 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Southam, G., Saunders, J. A. (2005). The Geomicrobiology of Ore Deposits. Economic Geology 100: 1067-1084 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dopson, M., Lindström, E. B. (1999). Potential Role of Thiobacillus caldus in Arsenopyrite Bioleaching. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 36-40 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schippers, A., Sand, W. (1999). Bacterial Leaching of Metal Sulfides Proceeds by Two Indirect Mechanisms via Thiosulfate or via Polysulfides and Sulfur. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 319-321 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gehrke, T., Telegdi, J., Thierry, D., Sand, W. (1998). Importance of Extracellular Polymeric Substances from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans for Bioleaching. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 2743-2747 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»