Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 1998, p. 3683-3689, Vol. 64, No. 10
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Estimation of the Relative Abundance of Different
Bacteroides and Prevotella Ribotypes
in Gut Samples by Restriction Enzyme Profiling of PCR-Amplified 16S
rRNA Gene Sequences
Jacqueline
Wood,1
Karen P.
Scott,1
Gorazd
Avgu
tin,2
C. James
Newbold,1 and
Harry J.
Flint1,*
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn,
Aberdeen AB21 9SB, United Kingdom,1 and
Zootechnical Department, Biotechnical Faculty, University
of Ljubljana, 1230 Domzale, Slovenia2
Received 20 April 1998/Accepted 14 July 1998
We describe an approach for determining the genetic composition of
Bacteroides and Prevotella
populations in gut contents based on selective amplification of 16S
rRNA gene sequences (rDNA) followed by cleavage of the amplified
material with restriction enzymes. The relative contributions of
different ribotypes to total Bacteroides and
Prevotella 16S rDNA are estimated after end labelling of
one of the PCR primers, and the contribution of
Bacteroides and Prevotella
sequences to total eubacterial 16S rDNA is estimated by measuring the
binding of oligonucleotide probes to amplified DNA.
Bacteroides and Prevotella 16S rDNA
accounted for between 12 and 62% of total eubacterial 16S rDNA in
samples of ruminal contents from six sheep and a cow. Ribotypes 4, 5, 6, and 7, which include most cultivated rumen Prevotella
strains, together accounted for between 20 and 86% of the total
amplified Bacteroides and
Prevotella rDNA in these samples. The most abundant Bacteroides or Prevotella ribotype
in four animals, however, was ribotype 8, for which there is only one
known cultured isolate, while ribotypes 1 and 2, which include many
colonic Bacteroides spp., were the most
abundant in two animals. This indicates that some abundant
Bacteroides and Prevotella groups
in the rumen are underrepresented among cultured rumen
Prevotella isolates. The approach described here provides a
rapid, convenient, and widely applicable method for comparing the
genotypic composition of bacterial populations in gut samples.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Rowett Research
Institute, Greenburn Rd., Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, United Kingdom. Phone: 44(0) 1224 716651. Fax: 44(0) 1224 716687. E-mail:
hjf{at}rri.sari.ac.uk.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 1998, p. 3683-3689, Vol. 64, No. 10
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Shanks, O. C., Kelty, C. A., Sivaganesan, M., Varma, M., Haugland, R. A.
(2009). Quantitative PCR for Genetic Markers of Human Fecal Pollution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 5507-5513
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marti, R., Dabert, P., Pourcher, A.-M.
(2009). Pig Manure Contamination Marker Selection Based on the Influence of Biological Treatment on the Dominant Fecal Microbial Groups. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 4967-4974
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duncan, S. H., Aminov, R. I., Scott, K. P., Louis, P., Stanton, T. B., Flint, H. J.
(2006). Proposal of Roseburia faecis sp. nov., Roseburia hominis sp. nov. and Roseburia inulinivorans sp. nov., based on isolates from human faeces.. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
56: 2437-2441
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shanks, O. C., Santo Domingo, J. W., Lamendella, R., Kelty, C. A., Graham, J. E.
(2006). Competitive metagenomic DNA hybridization identifies host-specific microbial genetic markers in cow fecal samples.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 4054-4060
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Peu, P., Brugere, H., Pourcher, A.-M., Kerouredan, M., Godon, J.-J., Delgenes, J.-P., Dabert, P.
(2006). Dynamics of a Pig Slurry Microbial Community during Anaerobic Storage and Management.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 3578-3585
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fogarty, L. R., Voytek, M. A.
(2005). Comparison of Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA Genetic Markers for Fecal Samples from Different Animal Species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 5999-6007
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dick, L. K., Bernhard, A. E., Brodeur, T. J., Santo Domingo, J. W., Simpson, J. M., Walters, S. P., Field, K. G.
(2005). Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source Identification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 3184-3191
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Walker, N. D., McEwan, N. R., Wallace, R. J.
(2003). Cloning and functional expression of dipeptidyl peptidase IV from the ruminal bacterium Prevotella albensis M384T. Microbiology
149: 2227-2234
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fields, M. W., Russell, J. B.
(2001). The glucomannokinase of Prevotella bryantii B14 and its potential role in regulating {beta}-glucanase expression. Microbiology
147: 1035-1043
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barcenilla, A., Pryde, S. E., Martin, J. C., Duncan, S. H., Stewart, C. S., Henderson, C., Flint, H. J.
(2000). Phylogenetic Relationships of Butyrate-Producing Bacteria from the Human Gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66: 1654-1661
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pryde, S. E., Richardson, A. J., Stewart, C. S., Flint, H. J.
(1999). Molecular Analysis of the Microbial Diversity Present in the Colonic Wall, Colonic Lumen, and Cecal Lumen of a Pig. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65: 5372-5377
[Abstract]
[Full Text]