Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1998, p. 4307-4312, Vol. 64, No. 11
Faculté de Pharmacie,
Received 13 January 1998/Accepted 13 July 1998
In this study, three types of treated wastewater were tested for
infectious enteroviruses, the enterovirus genome, somatic coliphages,
and Bacteroides fragilis phages. The aim of this work was
to determine whether the presence of the two types of bacteriophages or
of the enterovirus genome was a good indicator of infectious enterovirus contamination. The enterovirus genome was detected by
reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Infectious enteroviruses were quantified by cell culturing (BGM cells), and the
bacteriophages were quantified by plaque formation on the host
bacterium (Escherichia coli or B. fragilis) in
agar medium. Forty-eight samples of treated wastewater were
analyzed. Sixteen samples had been subjected to a secondary
treatment for 8 to 12 h (A), 16 had been subjected to a secondary
treatment for 30 h (B1), and 16 had been subjected to both
secondary and tertiary treatments (B2). The mean concentrations of
somatic coliphages were 4.9 × 104 PFU · liter
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Detection of Infectious Enteroviruses, Enterovirus
Genomes, Somatic Coliphages, and Bacteroides fragilis
Phages in Treated Wastewater
1 for treatment line A, 9.8 × 103
PFU · liter
1 for B1, and 1.4 × 103 PFU · liter
1 for B2, with all the
samples testing positive (100%). The mean concentrations of B. fragilis phages were 1.7 × 103 PFU · liter
1 for A (100% positive samples), 17 to 24 PFU
· liter
1 for B1 (44% positive samples), and 0.8 to 13 PFU · liter
1 for B2 (6% positive samples). The
mean concentrations of infectious enteroviruses were 4 most
probable number of cytopathogenic units (MPNCU) · liter
1 for A (31% positive samples) and <1 MPNCU
· liter
1 for B1 and B2 (0% positive samples). The
percentages of samples testing positive for the enterovirus genome were
100% for A, 56% for B1, and 19% for B2. The percentages of samples
testing positive for the enterovirus genome were significantly higher
than those for infectious enteroviruses. This finding may have been due
to the presence of noninfectious enteroviruses or to the presence of infectious enteroviruses that do not multiply in BGM cell cultures. However, under our experimental conditions, nondetection of the genome
implies the absence of infectious viruses. There was a significant
correlation between the concentration of somatic coliphages or
B. fragilis phages and the presence of infectious
enteroviruses or the presence of the enterovirus genome. However, the
somatic coliphage concentration did not lead to fluctuations in the
infectious enterovirus concentration, whereas the B. fragilis phage concentration did.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Faculté de
Pharmacie, Laboratoire de Virologie, 5 rue Albert Lebrun, 54000 Nancy, France. Phone: 33.3.83.17.88.25. Fax: 33.3.83.17.88.79. E-mail: lschwart{at}pharma.u-nancy.fr.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1998, p. 4307-4312, Vol. 64, No. 11
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»