This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fritschel, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fritschel, S. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Fritschel, S. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1998, p. 4390-4395, Vol. 64, No. 11
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of the BAX for Screening/E. coli O157:H7 Method with Conventional Methods for Detection of Extremely Low Levels of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Ground Beef

Jennifer L. Johnson,1 Cheryl L. Brooke,2 and Scott J. Fritschel2,*

Deibel Laboratories, Madison, Wisconsin 53704,1 and Qualicon, a DuPont Subsidiary, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-03572

Received 6 February 1998/Accepted 12 August 1998

Escherichia coli O157:H7 is an important food-borne pathogen. Often E. coli O157:H7 is difficult to detect, because it is present sporadically at very low levels together with very high levels of competitor organisms which can be difficult to distinguish phenotypically. Cultural methods are time-consuming and give variable results in the detection of E. coli O157:H7. This study examined the performance of BAX for Screening/E. coli O157:H7, a new rapid method for the detection of E. coli O157:H7, against traditional and improved cultural methods and an immunodiffusion assay. All cultural methods demonstrated inadequacy in detecting the presence of E. coli O157:H7 in inoculated samples. The limitations of these cultural methods further complicate evaluation of screening methodologies. The BAX for Screening/E. coli O157:H7 assay outperformed the other methods, with a detection rate of 96.5%, compared to 39% for the best cultural method and 71.5% for the immunodiffusion method. The BAX for Screening/E. coli O157:H7 assay proved to be a rapid, highly sensitive test for the detection of low levels of E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Qualicon, Inc., Route 141 & Henry Clay Rd., Wilmington, DE 19880-0357. Phone: (302) 695-2262. Fax: (302) 695-4106. E-mail: Scott.J.fritschel{at}usa.dupont.com.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1998, p. 4390-4395, Vol. 64, No. 11
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Weimer, B. C., Walsh, M. K., Beer, C., Koka, R., Wang, X. (2001). Solid-Phase Capture of Proteins, Spores, and Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 1300-1307 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ajjarapu, S., Shelef, L. A. (1999). Fate of pGFP-Bearing Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Ground Beef at 2 and 10{degrees}C and Effects of Lactate, Diacetate, and Citrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 5394-5397 [Abstract] [Full Text]