This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pembrey, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pembrey, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, R. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pembrey, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, R. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 1999, p. 2877-2894, Vol. 65, No. 7
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Cell Surface Analysis Techniques: What Do Cell Preparation Protocols Do to Cell Surface Properties?

Richard S. Pembrey, Kevin C. Marshall, and René P. Schneider*

School of Microbiology and Immunology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia

Received 25 September 1998/Accepted 31 March 1999

Cell surface analysis often requires manipulation of cells prior to examination. The most commonly employed procedures are centrifugation at different speeds, changes of media during washing or final resuspension, desiccation (either air drying for contact angle measurements or freeze-drying for sensitive spectroscopic analysis, such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy), and contact with hydrocarbon (hydrophobicity assays). The effects of these procedures on electrophoretic mobility, adhesion to solid substrata, affinity to a number of Sepharose columns, structural integrity, and cell viability were systematically investigated for a range of model organisms, including carbon- and nitrogen-limited Psychrobacter sp. strain SW8 (glycocalyx-bearing cells), Escherichia coli (gram-negative cells without a glycocalyx), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (gram-positive cells without a glycocalyx). All of the cell manipulation procedures severely modified the physicochemical properties of cells, but with each procedure some organisms were more susceptible than others. Considerable disruption of cell surfaces occurred when organisms were placed in contact with a hydrocarbon (hexadecane). The majority of cells became nonculturable after air drying and freeze-drying. Centrifugation at a high speed (15,000 × g) modified many cell surface parameters significantly, although cell viability was considerably affected only in E. coli. The type of washing or resuspension medium had a strong influence on the values of cell surface parameters, particularly when high-salt solutions were compared with low-salt buffers. The values for parameters obtained with different methods that allegedly measure similar cell surface properties did not correlate for most cells. These results demonstrate that the methods used to prepare cells for cell surface analysis need to be critically investigated for each microorganism so that the final results obtained reflect the nature of the in situ microbial cell surface as closely as possible. There is an urgent need for new, reliable, nondestructive, minimally manipulative cell surface analysis techniques that can be used in situ.


* Corresponding author. Present address: Laboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Cidade Universitaria, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1374, CEP 05508-900 São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Phone: 55 11 818 7205. Fax: 55 11 818 7354. E-mail: schneide{at}icb.usp.br.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 1999, p. 2877-2894, Vol. 65, No. 7
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Soon, R. L., Nation, R. L., Hartley, P. G., Larson, I., Li, J. (2009). Atomic Force Microscopy Investigation of the Morphology and Topography of Colistin-Heteroresistant Acinetobacter baumannii Strains as a Function of Growth Phase and in Response to Colistin Treatment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 4979-4986 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bolster, C. H., Haznedaroglu, B. Z., Walker, S. L. (2009). Diversity in Cell Properties and Transport Behavior among 12 Different Environmental Escherichia coli Isolates. J. Environ. Qual. 38: 465-472 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tazehkand, S. S., Torkzaban, S., Bradford, S. A., Walker, S. L. (2008). Cell Preparation Methods Influence Escherichia coli D21g Surface Chemistry and Transport in Saturated Sand. J. Environ. Qual. 37: 2108-2115 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stukalov, O., Korenevsky, A., Beveridge, T. J., Dutcher, J. R. (2008). Use of Atomic Force Microscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy for Correlative Studies of Bacterial Capsules. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 5457-5465 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • de Kerchove, A. J., Elimelech, M. (2007). Impact of Alginate Conditioning Film on Deposition Kinetics of Motile and Nonmotile Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 5227-5234 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Korenevsky, A., Beveridge, T. J. (2007). The surface physicochemistry and adhesiveness of Shewanella are affected by their surface polysaccharides. Microbiology 153: 1872-1883 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mohebali, G., Ball, A., Kaytash, A., Rasekh, B. (2007). Stabilization of water/gas oil emulsions by desulfurizing cells of Gordonia alkanivorans RIPI90A. Microbiology 153: 1573-1581 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Banner, M. A., Cunniffe, J. G., Macintosh, R. L., Foster, T. J., Rohde, H., Mack, D., Hoyes, E., Derrick, J., Upton, M., Handley, P. S. (2007). Localized Tufts of Fibrils on Staphylococcus epidermidis NCTC 11047 Are Comprised of the Accumulation-Associated Protein. J. Bacteriol. 189: 2793-2804 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Walker, S. L., Hill, J. E., Redman, J. A., Elimelech, M. (2005). Influence of Growth Phase on Adhesion Kinetics of Escherichia coli D21g. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 3093-3099 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Emerson, R. J. IV, Camesano, T. A. (2004). Nanoscale Investigation of Pathogenic Microbial Adhesion to a Biomaterial. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 6012-6022 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Butkus, M. A., Bays, J. T., Labare, M. P. (2003). Influence of Surface Characteristics on the Stability of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 3819-3825 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Matz, C., Jürgens, K. (2001). Effects of Hydrophobic and Electrostatic Cell Surface Properties of Bacteria on Feeding Rates of Heterotrophic Nanoflagellates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 814-820 [Abstract] [Full Text]