This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dauendorffer, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dailloux, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dauendorffer, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dailloux, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dauendorffer, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dailloux, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 1999, p. 4239-4240, Vol. 65, No. 9
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0

Effect of Methodology on the Tuberculocidal Activity of a Glutaraldehyde-Based Disinfectant

J. N. Dauendorffer, C. Laurain, M. Weber, and M. Dailloux*

Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Nancy, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France

Received 4 November 1998/Accepted 9 June 1999

Although official guidelines recommend a plate counting method for testing the susceptibility of mycobacteria to disinfectants, manufacturers usually prefer to employ the BACTEC procedure. Data showing that the BACTEC method overestimates the activity of a glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in comparison with a conventional plate counting procedure are presented.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Nancy, Route de Neufchateau, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France. Phone: 33 3 83 15 34 72. Fax: 33 3 83 15 34 74. E-mail: m.dailloux{at}chu_nancy.fr.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 1999, p. 4239-4240, Vol. 65, No. 9
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0