This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pazoutova, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flieger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pazoutova, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flieger, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pazoutova, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flieger, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2000, p. 5419-5425, Vol. 66, No. 12
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Chemoraces and Habitat Specialization of Claviceps purpurea Populations

Sylvie Pazoutová,* Jana Olsovská, Marek Linka, Renata Kolínská, and Miroslav Flieger

Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic

Received 22 February 2000/Accepted 14 September 2000

We studied genetic variability of 100 isolates of Claviceps purpurea by using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), an EcoRI restriction site polymorphism in the 5.8S ribosomal DNA (rDNA), the alkaloids produced, and conidial morphology. We identified three groups: (i) group G1 from fields and open meadows (57 isolates), (ii) group G2 from shady or wet habitats (41 isolates), and (iii) group G3 from Spartina anglica from salt marshes (2 isolates). The sclerotia of G1 isolates contained ergotamines and ergotoxines; G2 isolates produced ergosine and ergocristine along with small amounts of ergocryptine; and G3 isolates produced ergocristine and ergocryptine. The conidia of G1 isolates were 5 to 8 µm long, the conidia of G2 isolates were 7 to 10 µm long, and the conidia of G3 isolates were 10 to 12 µm long. Sclerotia of the G2 and G3 isolates floated on water. In the 5.8S rDNA analysis, an EcoRI site was found in G1 and G3 isolates but not in G2 isolates. The host preferences of the groups were not absolute, and there were host genera that were common to both G1 and G2; the presence of members of different groups in the same locality was rare. Without the use of RAPD or rDNA polymorphism, it was not possible to distinguish the three groups solely on the basis of phenotype, host, or habitat. In general, populations of C. purpurea are not host specialized, as previously assumed, but they are habitat specialized, and collecting strategies and toxin risk assessments should be changed to reflect this paradigm shift.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Microbiology, CAS, Vídenská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic. Phone: (420 2) 475 2332. Fax: (420 2) 475 2347 or (420 2) 444 71286. E-mail: pazouto{at}biomed.cas.cz.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2000, p. 5419-5425, Vol. 66, No. 12
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.