Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2000, p. 2783-2790, Vol. 66, No. 7
Marine Science Institute, University of
California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
931061; School of Biological Sciences,
Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
99164-42362; Scripps Institution of
Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla,
California 92093-02023; and Station
Biologique de Roscoff, 29682 Roscoff Cedex, France4
Received 18 January 2000/Accepted 11 April 2000
The hydrothermal vent tubeworm Riftia pachyptila lacks
a mouth and gut and lives in association with intracellular,
sulfide-oxidizing chemoautotrophic bacteria. Growth of this tubeworm
requires an exogenous source of nitrogen for biosynthesis, and, as
determined in previous studies, environmental ammonia and free amino
acids appear to be unlikely sources of nitrogen. Nitrate, however, is present in situ (K. Johnson, J. Childress, R. Hessler, C. Sakamoto-Arnold, and C. Beehler, Deep-Sea Res. 35:1723-1744, 1988), is
taken up by the host, and can be chemically reduced by the symbionts
(U. Hentschel and H. Felbeck, Nature 366:338-340, 1993). Here we
report that at an in situ concentration of 40 µM, nitrate is acquired by R. pachyptila at a rate of 3.54 µmol g
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Fate of Nitrate Acquired by the Tubeworm
Riftia pachyptila
1
h
1, while elimination of nitrite and elimination of
ammonia occur at much lower rates (0.017 and 0.21 µmol
g
1 h
1, respectively). We also observed
reduction of nitrite (and accordingly nitrate) to ammonia in the
trophosome tissue. When R. pachyptila tubeworms are exposed
to constant in situ conditions for 60 h, there is a difference
between the amount of nitrogen acquired via nitrate uptake and the
amount of nitrogen lost via nitrite and ammonia elimination, which
indicates that there is a nitrogen "sink." Our results demonstrate
that storage of nitrate does not account for the observed
stoichiometric differences in the amounts of nitrogen. Nitrate uptake
was not correlated with sulfide or inorganic carbon flux, suggesting
that nitrate is probably not an important oxidant in metabolism of the
symbionts. Accordingly, we describe a nitrogen flux model for this
association, in which the product of symbiont nitrate reduction,
ammonia, is the primary source of nitrogen for the host and the
symbionts and fulfills the association's nitrogen needs via
incorporation of ammonia into amino acids.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Marine Science
Institute, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA
93106. Phone: (805) 893-3659. Fax: (805) 893-4724. E-mail: girguis{at}lifesci.ucsb.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»