This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elsgaard, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elsgaard, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elsgaard, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2000, p. 3878-3882, Vol. 66, No. 9
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Ethylene Removal at Low Temperatures under Biofilter and Batch Conditions

Lars Elsgaard*

Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Physiology and Soil Science, Research Center Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark

Received 19 May 2000/Accepted 2 July 2000

Removal of the plant hormone ethylene (C2H4) is often required by horticultural storage facilities, which are operated at temperatures below 10°C. The aim of this study was to demonstrate an efficient, biological C2H4 removal under such low-temperature conditions. Peat-soil, acclimated to degradation of C2H4, was packed in a biofilter (687 cm3) and subjected to an airflow (~73 ml min-1) with 2 ppm (µl liter-1) C2H4. The C2H4 removal efficiencies achieved at 20, 10, and 5°C, respectively, were 99.0, 98.8, and 98.4%. This corresponded to C2H4 levels of 0.022 to 0.032 ppm in the biofilter outlet air. At 2°C, the average C2H4 removal efficiency dropped to 83%. The detailed temperature response of C2H4 removal was tested under batch conditions by incubation of 1-g soil samples in a temperature gradient ranging from 0 to 29°C with increments of 1°C. The C2H4 removal rate was highest at 26°C (0.85 µg of C2H4 g [dry weight]-1 h-1), but remained at levels of 0.14 to 0.28 µg of C2H4 g (dry weight)-1 h-1 at 0 to 10°C. At 35 to 40°C, the C2H4 removal rate was negligible (0.02 to 0.06 µg of C2H4 g [dry weight]-1 h-1). The Q10 (i.e., the ratio of rates 10°C apart) for C2H4 removal was 1.9 for the interval 0 to 10°C. In conclusion, the present results demonstrated microbial C2H4 removal, which proceeded at 0 to 2°C and produced a moderately psychrophilic temperature response.


* Mailing address: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Physiology and Soil Science, Research Center Foulum, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark. Phone: 45 8999 1873. Fax: 45 8999 1619. E-mail: lars.elsgaard{at}agrsci.dk.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2000, p. 3878-3882, Vol. 66, No. 9
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.