This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montville, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montville, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, D. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Montville, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, D. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7188-7193, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7188-7193.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Inoculum Size Influences Bacterial Cross Contamination between Surfaces

R. Montville and D. W. Schaffner*

Food Risk Analysis Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-8520

Received 23 May 2003/ Accepted 15 September 2003

Many factors have been shown to influence bacterial transfer between surfaces, including surface type, bacterial species, moisture level, pressure, and friction, but the effect of inoculum size on bacterial transfer has not yet been established. Bacterial cross contamination rates during performance of common food service tasks were previously determined in our laboratory using nalidixic acid-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes. Eight different transfer rates were determined, each involving a minimum of 30 volunteers. The influence of source inoculum level on the percentage of bacteria transferred (percent transfer rates) and log10 CFU per recipient surface was determined using statistical analysis. The effect of inoculum size on transfer rate was highly statistically significant (P < 0.0001) for all transfer rate data combined (352 observations) and for each individual cross contamination rate, except for data on contamination via transfer from chicken to hand through a glove barrier (P = 0.1643). Where inoculum size on the source was greater, transfer rates were lower, and where inoculum size on the source was less, transfer rates were higher. The negative linear trend was more obvious for activities that had a larger range of inoculum sizes on the source surface. This phenomenon has serious implications for research seeking to determine bacterial cross contamination rates, since the different transfer efficiencies that were previously shown to be associated with certain activities may actually be the result of differing initial inoculum levels. The initial inoculum size on the source and the amount of bacteria transferred must both be considered to accurately determine bacterial transfer rates.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Food Risk Analysis Institute, Rutgers University, 65 Dudley Rd., New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520. Phone: (732) 932-9611, ext. 214. Fax: (732) 932-6776. E-mail: schaffner{at}aesop.rutgers.edu.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7188-7193, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7188-7193.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Midelet, G., Kobilinsky, A., Carpentier, B. (2006). Construction and Analysis of Fractional Multifactorial Designs To Study Attachment Strength and Transfer of Listeria monocytogenes from Pure or Mixed Biofilms after Contact with a Solid Model Food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 2313-2321 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Luber, P., Brynestad, S., Topsch, D., Scherer, K., Bartelt, E. (2006). Quantification of Campylobacter Species Cross-Contamination during Handling of Contaminated Fresh Chicken Parts in Kitchens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 66-70 [Abstract] [Full Text]