This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunfield, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Germida, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunfield, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Germida, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dunfield, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Germida, J. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7310-7318, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7310-7318.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Seasonal Changes in the Rhizosphere Microbial Communities Associated with Field-Grown Genetically Modified Canola (Brassica napus)

Kari E. Dunfield{dagger} and James J. Germida*

Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Received 9 April 2003/ Accepted 4 September 2003

The introduction of transgenic plants into agricultural ecosystems has raised the question of the ecological impact of these plants on nontarget organisms, such as soil bacteria. Although differences in both the genetic structure and the metabolic function of the microbial communities associated with some transgenic plant lines have been established, it remains to be seen whether these differences have an ecological impact on the soil microbial communities. We conducted a 2-year, multiple-site field study in which rhizosphere samples associated with a transgenic canola variety and a conventional canola variety were sampled at six times throughout the growing season. The objectives of this study were to identify differences between the rhizosphere microbial community associated with the transgenic plants and the rhizosphere microbial community associated with the conventional canola plants and to determine whether the differences were permanent or depended on the presence of the plant. Community-level physiological profiles, fatty acid methyl ester profiles, and terminal amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis profiles of rhizosphere microbial communities were compared to the profiles of the microbial community associated with an unplanted, fallow field plot. Principal-component analysis showed that there was variation in the microbial community associated with both canola variety and growth season. Importantly, while differences between the microbial communities associated with the transgenic plant variety were observed at several times throughout the growing season, all analyses indicated that when the microbial communities were assessed after winter, there were no differences between microbial communities from field plots that contained harvested transgenic canola plants and microbial communities from field plots that did not contain plants during the field season. Hence, the changes in the microbial community structure associated with genetically modified plants were temporary and did not persist into the next field season.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A8, Canada. Phone: (306) 966-6836. Fax: (306) 966-6881. E-mail: germida{at}sask.usask.ca.

{dagger} Present address: Darling Marine Center, University of Maine, Walpole, Maine.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7310-7318, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7310-7318.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Weinert, N., Meincke, R., Gottwald, C., Heuer, H., Gomes, N. C. M., Schloter, M., Berg, G., Smalla, K. (2009). Rhizosphere Communities of Genetically Modified Zeaxanthin-Accumulating Potato Plants and Their Parent Cultivar Differ Less than Those of Different Potato Cultivars. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 3859-3865 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Icoz, I., Saxena, D., Andow, D. A., Zwahlen, C., Stotzky, G. (2008). Microbial populations and enzyme activities in soil in situ under transgenic corn expressing cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis.. J. Environ. Qual. 37: 647-662 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cerdeira, A. L., Duke, S. O. (2006). The Current Status and Environmental Impacts of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops: A Review. J. Environ. Qual. 35: 1633-1658 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Castaldini, M., Turrini, A., Sbrana, C., Benedetti, A., Marchionni, M., Mocali, S., Fabiani, A., Landi, S., Santomassimo, F., Pietrangeli, B., Nuti, M. P., Miclaus, N., Giovannetti, M. (2005). Impact of Bt Corn on Rhizospheric and Soil Eubacterial Communities and on Beneficial Mycorrhizal Symbiosis in Experimental Microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 6719-6729 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kremer, R.J., Motavalli, P.P. (2004). Introduction. J. Environ. Qual. 33: 805-805 [Full Text]  
  • Dunfield, K. E., Germida, J. J. (2004). Impact of Genetically Modified Crops on Soil- and Plant-Associated Microbial Communities. J. Environ. Qual. 33: 806-815 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»