This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Maier, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Maier, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dorn, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Maier, R. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2003, p. 2209-2216, Vol. 69, No. 4
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2209-2216.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effect of Temperature, pH, and Initial Cell Number on luxCDABE and nah Gene Expression during Naphthalene and Salicylate Catabolism in the Bioreporter Organism Pseudomonas putida RB1353

Jonathan G. Dorn, Robert J. Frye, and Raina M. Maier*

Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721

Received 6 September 2002/ Accepted 2 January 2003

One limitation of employing lux bioreporters to monitor in situ microbial gene expression in dynamic, laboratory-scale systems is the confounding variability in the luminescent responses. For example, despite careful control of oxygen tension, growth stage, and cell number, luminescence from Pseudomonas putida RB1353, a naphthalene-degrading lux bioreporter, varied by more than sevenfold during saturated flow column experiments in our laboratory. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine what additional factors influence the luminescent response. Specifically, this study investigated the impact of temperature, pH, and initial cell number (variations within an order of magnitude) on the peak luminescence of P. putida RB1353 and the maximum degradation rate (Vmax) during salicylate and naphthalene catabolism. Statistical analyses based on general linear models indicated that under constant oxygen tension, temperature and pH accounted for 98.1% of the variability in luminescence during salicylate catabolism and 94.2 and 49.5% of the variability in Vmax during salicylate and naphthalene catabolism, respectively. Temperature, pH, and initial substrate concentration accounted for 99.9% of the variability in luminescence during naphthalene catabolism. Initial cell number, within an order of magnitude, did not have a significant influence on either peak luminescence or Vmax during salicylate and naphthalene catabolism. Over the ranges of temperature and pH evaluated, peak luminescence varied by more than 4 orders of magnitude. The minimum parameter deviation required to alter lux gene expression during salicylate and naphthalene catabolism was a change in temperature of 1°C, a change in pH of 0.2, or a change in initial cell number of 1 order of magnitude. Results from this study indicate that there is a need for careful characterization of the impact of environmental conditions on both the expression of the reporter and catabolic genes and the activities of the gene products. For example, even though lux gene expression was occurring at ~35°C, the luciferase enzyme was inactive. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that with careful characterization and standardization of measurement conditions, the attainment of a reproducible luminescent response and an understanding of the response are feasible.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 429 Shantz Building, Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210038, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038. Phone: (520) 621-7231. Fax: (520) 621-1647. E-mail: rmaier{at}ag.arizona.edu.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2003, p. 2209-2216, Vol. 69, No. 4
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2209-2216.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Buchan, B. W., McLendon, M. K., Jones, B. D. (2008). Identification of Differentially Regulated Francisella tularensis Genes by Use of a Newly Developed Tn5-Based Transposon Delivery System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 2637-2645 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wiles, S., Ferguson, K., Stefanidou, M., Young, D. B., Robertson, B. D. (2005). Alternative Luciferase for Monitoring Bacterial Cells under Adverse Conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 3427-3432 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Haddix, P. L., Shaw, N. J., LeChevallier, M. W. (2004). Characterization of Bioluminescent Derivatives of Assimilable Organic Carbon Test Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 850-854 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Werlen, C., Jaspers, M. C. M., van der Meer, J. R. (2004). Measurement of Biologically Available Naphthalene in Gas and Aqueous Phases by Use of a Pseudomonas putida Biosensor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 43-51 [Abstract] [Full Text]