This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morales-Morales, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morales-Morales, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morales-Morales, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2003, p. 4098-4102, Vol. 69, No. 7
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.7.4098-4102.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Optimization of a Reusable Hollow-Fiber Ultrafilter for Simultaneous Concentration of Enteric Bacteria, Protozoa, and Viruses from Water

Hugo A. Morales-Morales, Guadalupe Vidal, John Olszewski, Channah M. Rock, Debanjana Dasgupta, Kevin H. Oshima, and Geoffrey B. Smith*

Biology Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003

Received 25 September 2002/ Accepted 25 March 2003

The detection and identification of pathogens from water samples remain challenging due to variations in recovery rates and the cost of procedures. Ultrafiltration offers the possibility to concentrate viral, bacterial, and protozoan organisms in a single process by using size-exclusion-based filtration. In this study, two hollow-fiber ultrafilters with 50,000-molecular-weight cutoffs were evaluated to concentrate microorganisms from 2- and 10-liter water samples. When known quantities (105 to 106 CFU/liter) of two species of enteric bacteria were introduced and concentrated from 2 liters of sterile water, the addition of 0.1% Tween 80 increased Escherichia coli strain K-12 recoveries from 70 to 84% and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis recoveries from 36 to 72%. An E. coli antibiotic-resistant strain, XL1-Blue, was recovered at a level (87%) similar to that for strain K-12 (96%) from 10 liters of sterile water. When E. coli XL1-Blue was introduced into 10 liters of nonsterile Rio Grande water with higher turbidity levels (23 to 29 nephelometric turbidity units) at two inoculum levels (9 x 105 and 2.4 x 103 per liter), the recovery efficiencies were 89 and 92%, respectively. The simultaneous addition of E. coli XL1-Blue (9 x 105 CFU/liter), Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (10 oocysts/liter), phage T1 (105 PFU/liter), and phage PP7 (105 PFU/liter) to 10 liters of Rio Grande surface water resulted in mean recoveries of 96, 54, 59, and 46%, respectively. Using a variety of surface waters from around the United States, we obtained recovery efficiencies for bacteria and viruses that were similar to those observed with the Rio Grande samples, but recovery of Cryptosporidium oocysts was decreased, averaging 32% (the site of collection of these samples had previously been identified as problematic for oocyst recovery). Results indicate that the use of ultrafiltration for simultaneous recovery of bacterial, viral, and protozoan pathogens from variable surface waters is ready for field deployment.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Biology Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003. Phone: (505) 646-6080. Fax: (505) 646-5665. E-mail: gsmith{at}nmsu.edu.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2003, p. 4098-4102, Vol. 69, No. 7
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.7.4098-4102.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Smith, C. M., Hill, V. R. (2009). Dead-End Hollow-Fiber Ultrafiltration for Recovery of Diverse Microbes from Water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 5284-5289 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aw, T. G., Gin, K. Y.-H., Ean Oon, L. L., Chen, E. X., Woo, C. H. (2009). Prevalence and Genotypes of Human Noroviruses in Tropical Urban Surface Waters and Clinical Samples in Singapore. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 4984-4992 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mull, B., Hill, V. R. (2009). Recovery and Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Surface Water, Using Ultrafiltration and Real-Time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 3593-3597 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hill, V. R., Polaczyk, A. L., Kahler, A. M., Cromeans, T. L., Hahn, D., Amburgey, J. E. (2009). Comparison of Hollow-Fiber Ultrafiltration to the USEPA VIRADEL Technique and USEPA Method 1623. J. Environ. Qual. 38: 822-825 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leskinen, S. D., Lim, D. V. (2008). Rapid Ultrafiltration Concentration and Biosensor Detection of Enterococci from Large Volumes of Florida Recreational Water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 4792-4798 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hill, V. R., Kahler, A. M., Jothikumar, N., Johnson, T. B., Hahn, D., Cromeans, T. L. (2007). Multistate Evaluation of an Ultrafiltration-Based Procedure for Simultaneous Recovery of Enteric Microbes in 100-Liter Tap Water Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 4218-4225 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hill, V. R., Polaczyk, A. L., Hahn, D., Narayanan, J., Cromeans, T. L., Roberts, J. M., Amburgey, J. E. (2005). Development of a Rapid Method for Simultaneous Recovery of Diverse Microbes in Drinking Water by Ultrafiltration with Sodium Polyphosphate and Surfactants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 6878-6884 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lim, D. V., Simpson, J. M., Kearns, E. A., Kramer, M. F. (2005). Current and Developing Technologies for Monitoring Agents of Bioterrorism and Biowarfare. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 583-607 [Abstract] [Full Text]