This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Holck, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Holck, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rudi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Holck, A. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2005, p. 1018-1024, Vol. 71, No. 2
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.2.1018-1024.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Use of Ethidium Monoazide and PCR in Combination for Quantification of Viable and Dead Cells in Complex Samples

Knut Rudi,* Birgitte Moen, Signe Marie Drømtorp, and Askild L. Holck

Matforsk, Norwegian Institute for Food Research, Ås, Norway

Received 16 July 2004/ Accepted 16 September 2004

The distinction between viable and dead cells is a major issue in many aspects of biological research. The current technologies for determining viable versus dead cells cannot readily be used for quantitative differentiation of specific cells in mixed populations. This is a serious limitation. We have solved this problem by developing a new concept with the viable/dead stain ethidium monoazide (EMA) in combination with real-time PCR (EMA-PCR). A dynamic range of approximately 4 log10 was obtained for the EMA-PCR viable/dead assay. Viable/dead differentiation is obtained by covalent binding of EMA to DNA in dead cells by photoactivation. EMA penetrates only dead cells with compromised membrane/cell wall systems. DNA covalently bound to EMA cannot be PCR amplified. Thus, only DNA from viable cells can be detected. We evaluated EMA-PCR with the major food-borne bacterium Campylobacter jejuni as an example. Traditional diagnosis of this bacterium is very difficult due to its specific growth requirements and because it may enter a state where it is viable but not cultivable. The conditions analyzed included detection in mixed and natural samples, survival in food, and survival after disinfection or antibiotic treatment. We obtained reliable viable/dead quantifications for all conditions tested. Comparison with standard fluorescence-based viable/dead techniques showed that the EMA-PCR has a broader dynamic range and enables quantification in mixed and complex samples. In conclusion, EMA-PCR offers a novel real-time PCR method for quantitative distinction between viable and dead cells with potentially very wide application.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Matforsk, Norwegian Institute for Food Research, Osloveien 1, 1430 Ås, Norway. Phone: 47 64 97 01 00. Fax: 47 64 97 03 33. E-mail: knut.rudi{at}matforsk.no.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2005, p. 1018-1024, Vol. 71, No. 2
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.2.1018-1024.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Delgado-Viscogliosi, P., Solignac, L., Delattre, J.-M. (2009). Viability PCR, a Culture-Independent Method for Rapid and Selective Quantification of Viable Legionella pneumophila Cells in Environmental Water Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 3502-3512 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rawsthorne, H., Dock, C. N., Jaykus, L. A. (2009). PCR-Based Method Using Propidium Monoazide To Distinguish Viable from Nonviable Bacillus subtilis Spores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2936-2939 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bae, S., Wuertz, S. (2009). Discrimination of Viable and Dead Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria by Quantitative PCR with Propidium Monoazide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2940-2944 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chang, B., Sugiyama, K., Taguri, T., Amemura-Maekawa, J., Kura, F., Watanabe, H. (2009). Specific Detection of Viable Legionella Cells by Combined Use of Photoactivated Ethidium Monoazide and PCR/Real-Time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 147-153 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Soejima, T., Iida, K.-i., Qin, T., Taniai, H., Seki, M., Yoshida, S.-i. (2008). Method To Detect Only Live Bacteria during PCR Amplification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2305-2313 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wagner, A. O., Malin, C., Knapp, B. A., Illmer, P. (2008). Removal of Free Extracellular DNA from Environmental Samples by Ethidium Monoazide and Propidium Monoazide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 2537-2539 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pan, Y., Breidt, F. Jr. (2007). Enumeration of Viable Listeria monocytogenes Cells by Real-Time PCR with Propidium Monoazide and Ethidium Monoazide in the Presence of Dead Cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 8028-8031 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pecson, B. M., Barrios, J. A., Johnson, D. R., Nelson, K. L. (2006). A Real-Time PCR Method for Quantifying Viable Ascaris Eggs Using the First Internally Transcribed Spacer Region of Ribosomal DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 7864-7872 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shimomura, Y., Ohno, R., Kawai, F., Kimbara, K. (2006). Method for assessment of viability and morphological changes of bacteria in the early stage of colony formation on a simulated natural environment.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 5037-5042 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bruhn, J. B., Haagensen, J. A. J., Bagge-Ravn, D., Gram, L. (2006). Culture Conditions of Roseobacter Strain 27-4 Affect Its Attachment and Biofilm Formation as Quantified by Real-Time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 3011-3015 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nocker, A., Camper, A. K. (2006). Selective removal of DNA from dead cells of mixed bacterial communities by use of ethidium monoazide.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 1997-2004 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Malorny, B., Hoorfar, J. (2005). Toward Standardization of Diagnostic PCR Testing of Fecal Samples: Lessons from the Detection of Salmonellae in Pigs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3033-3037 [Full Text]