Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2005, p. 3388, Vol. 71, No. 6
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.6.3388.2005
| LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
|
|
|---|
Surprisingly, although the original literature was cited, the fatty acid composition of the bacteria shown in Table 2 of this paper is contradictory to many previous scientific publications on the fatty acid composition of E. coli. The fatty acid content of E. coli has been investigated intensively. This bacterium was shown to contain the saturated fatty acids 12:0, 14:0, 16:0, and 18:0; the unsaturated fatty acids 16:1
9cis and 18:1
11cis; and the cyclopropane fatty acids 17cyclo and 19cyclo (6, 8). Among these, the three fatty acids palmitic acid (16:0), palmitoleic acid (16:1
9cis), and cis-vaccenic acid (18:1
11cis) are the dominant ones that make up more than 90% of the fatty acid content in exponentially growing cells. Very recently, this fatty acid composition was also measured for E. coli strain O157:H7 (9, 10). Therefore, I have several concerns regarding the data and conclusions presented in the paper by Chiou et al. (1). (i) In E. coli, fatty acids are synthesized by the so-called anaerobic pathway of fatty acid biosynthesis (3, 8). There are no fatty acids present in this bacterium that are synthesized by the so-called aerobic pathway of fatty acid biosynthesis. Therefore, it is confusing that the authors report the presence of oleic acid (18:1
9cis). Instead, E. coli is expected to contain cis-vaccenic acid (18:1
11cis) as C18 unsaturated fatty acid (7). (ii) No odd-numbered fatty acids such as 17:0 or 19:0 have been detected in E. coli (3, 6). Therefore, it can be assumed that the peaks found in the chromatogram and presented in Table 2 (1) were the two cyclopropane fatty acids (17cyclo and 19cyclo) (4). (iii) No cis-trans isomerization of unsaturated fatty acids has been described in E. coli. This is substantiated by both genomic and physiological studies (2, 5, 7). Therefore, the reported presence of this isomerase in E. coli O157:H7 may be questioned.
In conclusion, errors caused by misidentification of fatty acid methyl ester chromatograms and maybe by the erroneous allocation of the single peaks to fatty acid standards may have contributed to the fatty acid composition reported in the paper of Chiou et al. (1).
|
|
|---|
|
Hermann J. Heipieper
Department of Bioremediation UFZ Center for Environmental Research Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany Phone: 49 341 235 2772 Fax: 49 341 235 2492 E-mail: hermann.heipieper@ufz.de
|
||||||
|
|
|---|
11cis) may have been detected but incorrectly reported as oleic acid (18:1
9cis), the trans-configured form being elaidic acid (18:1
9trans). The n-17:0 and n-19:0 fatty acids are incorrectly listed in Table 2. These acids should be listed as 17:0cyclo and 19:0cyclo, respectively. The possibility of isomerization mediated by ethanol stress of E. coli O157:H7 is being further investigated.
|
Robin Y.-Y. Chiou
Department of Food Science National Chiayi University Chiayi, Taiwan, Republic of China Phone: 8865-2717613 Fax: 8865-2775524 E-mail: rychiou{at}mail.ncyu.edu.tw
|
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»