This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stevenson, D. M. Articles by Weimer, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stevenson, D. M. Articles by Weimer, P. J. Agricola Articles by Stevenson, D. M. Articles by Weimer, P. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2005, p. 4672-4678, Vol. 71, No. 8
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.8.4672-4678.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Expression of 17 Genes in Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 during Fermentation of Cellulose or Cellobiose in Continuous Culture

Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706,¹ United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53706²

Received 17 December 2004/ Accepted 5 March 2005

Clostridium thermocellum is a thermophilic, anaerobic, cellulolytic bacterium that produces ethanol and acetic acid as major fermentation end products. The effect of growth conditions on gene expression in C. thermocellum ATCC 27405 was studied using cells grown in continuous culture under cellobiose or cellulose limitation over a 10-fold range of dilution rates (0.013 to 0.16 h^–1). Fermentation product distribution displayed similar patterns in cellobiose- or cellulose-grown cultures, including substantial shifts in the proportion of ethanol and acetic acid with changes in growth rate. Expression of 17 genes involved or potentially involved in cellulose degradation, intracellular phosphorylation, catabolite repression, and fermentation end product formation was quantified by real-time PCR, with normalization to two calibrator genes (recA and the 16S rRNA gene) to determine relative expression. Thirteen genes displayed modest (fivefold or less) differences in expression with growth rate or substrate type: sdbA (cellulosomal scaffoldin-dockerin binding protein), cdp (cellodextrin phosphorylase), cbp (cellobiose phosphorylase), hydA (hydrogenase), ldh (lactate dehydrogenase), ack (acetate kinase), one putative type IV alcohol dehydrogenase, two putative cyclic AMP binding proteins, three putative Hpr-like proteins, and a putative Hpr serine kinase. By contrast, four genes displayed >10-fold-reduced levels of expression when grown on cellobiose at dilution rates of >0.05 h^–1: cipA (cellulosomal scaffolding protein), celS (exoglucanase), manA (mannanase), and a second type IV alcohol dehydrogenase. The data suggest that at least some cellulosomal components are transcriptionally regulated but that differences in expression with growth rate or among substrates do not directly account for observed changes in fermentation end product distribution.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Gold, N. D., Martin, V. J. J. (2007). Global View of the Clostridium thermocellum Cellulosome Revealed by Quantitative Proteomic Analysis. J. Bacteriol. 189: 6787-6795 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Newcomb, M., Chen, C.-Y., Wu, J. H. D. (2007). Induction of the celC operon of Clostridium thermocellum by laminaribiose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 3747-3752 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Price, E. P., Huygens, F., Giffard, P. M. (2006). Fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni by Using Resolution-Optimized Binary Gene Targets Derived from Comparative Genome Hybridization Studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 7793-7803 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weimer, P. J., Price, N. P. J., Kroukamp, O., Joubert, L.-M., Wolfaardt, G. M., Van Zyl, W. H. (2006). Studies of the Extracellular Glycocalyx of the Anaerobic Cellulolytic Bacterium Ruminococcus albus 7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 7559-7566 [Abstract] [Full Text]