This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dinoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dinoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dinoto, A.
Right arrow Articles by Yokota, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2006, p. 7739-7747, Vol. 72, No. 12
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01777-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Population Dynamics of Bifidobacterium Species in Human Feces during Raffinose Administration Monitored by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization-Flow Cytometry{triangledown}

Achmad Dinoto,1 Tatiana M. Marques,1 Kanta Sakamoto,2 Satoru Fukiya,1 Jun Watanabe,2 Susumu Ito,2 and Atsushi Yokota1*

Laboratory of Microbial Physiology, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-9 Nishi-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan,1 Creative Research Initiative Sousei (CRIS), Hokkaido University, Kita-21 Nishi-10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 001-0021, Japan2

Received 26 July 2006/ Accepted 9 October 2006

The population dynamics of bifidobacteria in human feces during raffinose administration were investigated at the species level by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) coupled with flow cytometry (FCM) analysis. Although double-staining FISH-FCM using both fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and indodicarbocyanine (Cy5) as labeling dyes for fecal samples has been reported, the analysis was interfered with by strong autofluorescence at the FITC fluorescence region because of the presence of autofluorescence particles/debris in the fecal samples. We circumvented this problem by using only Cy5 fluorescent dye in the FISH-FCM analysis. Thirteen subjects received 2 g of raffinose twice a day for 4 weeks. Fecal samples were collected, and the bifidobacterial populations were monitored using the established FISH-FCM method. The results showed an increase in bifidobacteria from about 12.5% of total bacteria in the prefeeding period to about 28.7 and 37.2% after the 2-week and 4-week feeding periods, respectively. Bifidobacterium adolescentis, the Bifidobacterium catenulatum group, and Bifidobacterium longum were the major species, in that order, at the prefeeding period, and these bacteria were found to increase nearly in parallel during the raffinose administration. During the feeding periods, indigenous bifidobacterial populations became more diverse, such that minor species in human adults, such as Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium dentium, and Bifidobacterium angulatum, proliferated. Four weeks after raffinose administration was stopped, the proportion of each major bifidobacterial species, as well as that of total bifidobacteria, returned to approximately the original values for the prefeeding period, whereas that of each minor species appeared to differ considerably from its original value. To the best of our knowledge, these results provide the first clear demonstration of the population dynamics of indigenous bifidobacteria at the species level in response to raffinose administration.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Microbial Physiology, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-9 Nishi-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8589, Japan. Phone: 81-11-706-2501. Fax: 81-11-706-4961. E-mail: yokota{at}chem.agr.hokudai.ac.jp.

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 20 October 2006.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2006, p. 7739-7747, Vol. 72, No. 12
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01777-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.