This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krause, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoorfar, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krause, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoorfar, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Krause, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hoorfar, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2006, p. 5463-5468, Vol. 72, No. 8
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00291-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparative, Collaborative, and On-Site Validation of a TaqMan PCR Method as a Tool for Certified Production of Fresh, Campylobacter-Free Chickens

M. Krause,1 M. H. Josefsen,1 M. Lund,1 N. R. Jacobsen,1 L. Brorsen,2 M. Moos,2 A. Stockmarr,1 and J. Hoorfar1*

Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, 27 Bülowsvej, 1790 Copenhagen, Denmark,1 Danpo, 3 Vestre Skovvej, 9600 Aars, Denmark2

Received 6 February 2006/ Accepted 11 June 2006

Certified Campylobacter-free poultry products have been produced in Denmark since 2002, the first example of fresh (unprocessed and nonfrozen) chickens labeled "Campylobacter free." This success occurred partly through use of a 4-hour gel-based PCR testing scheme on fecal swabs. In this study, a faster, real-time PCR approach was validated in comparative and collaborative trials, based on recommendations from the Nordic system for validation of alternative microbiological methods (NordVal). The comparative real-time PCR trial was performed in comparison to two reference culture protocols on naturally contaminated samples (99 shoe covers, 101 cloacal swabs, 102 neck skins from abattoirs, and 100 retail neck skins). Culturing included enrichment in both Bolton and Preston broths followed by isolation on Preston agar and mCCDA. In one or both culture protocols, 169 samples were identified as positive. The comparative trial resulted in relative accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 98%, 95%, and 97%, respectively. The collaborative trial included nine laboratories testing neck skin, cloacal swab, and shoe cover samples, spiked with low, medium, and high concentrations of Campylobacter jejuni. Valid results were obtained from six of the participating laboratories. Accuracy for high levels was 100% for neck skin and cloacal swab samples. For low levels, accuracy was 100% and 92% for neck skin and cloacal swab samples, respectively; however, detection in shoe cover samples failed. A second collaborative trial, with an optimized DNA extraction procedure, gave 100% accuracy results for all three spiking levels. Finally, on-site validation at the abattoir on a flock basis was performed on 400 samples. Real-time PCR correctly identified 10 of 20 flocks as positive; thus, the method fulfilled the NordVal validation criteria and has since been implemented at a major abattoir.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, 27 Bülowsvej, DK-1790 Copenhagen V, Denmark. Phone: 45-72346251. Fax: 45-72346001. E-mail: jho{at}dfvf.dk.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2006, p. 5463-5468, Vol. 72, No. 8
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00291-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Josefsen, M. H., Krause, M., Hansen, F., Hoorfar, J. (2007). Optimization of a 12-Hour TaqMan PCR-Based Method for Detection of Salmonella Bacteria in Meat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 3040-3048 [Abstract] [Full Text]