Previous Article
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2007, p. 5074, Vol. 73, No. 15
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02898-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Unsupported Conclusions on the Bacillus anthracis Spores

LETTER
Douglas J. Beecher reported on the methodology that a U.S. Federal
Bureau of Investigation laboratory used to identify an intentionally
anthrax-contaminated letter(s) among mail collected from a Congressional
building or postal facility that serves the U.S. Congress after
the incident of contamination that occurred on 15 October 2001
(
1). The described sampling strategy and initial screening and
analysis methodology using direct plating were reported to be
efficient and safe. However, the data supplied in the paper
could not be used as evidence for judging the quality of the
spores or to support or dismiss conceptions about the presence
or absence of spore additives or about the production engineering
used to prepare the spores. Furthermore, the type of sampling
and analysis data presented in the paper could not be used for
extrapolation of ideas concerning spore quality or the method
of production. It is possible that Dr. Beecher's laboratory
has performed additional analysis and obtained data that might
support such conclusions but that were not included in the paper;
if that is the case, it would be more scientifically appropriate
to add "unpublished data" in parentheses next to the conclusions
he offered concerning the apparent lack of additives, spore
quality as reflected in particle size distribution, and the
production engineering. In a meeting I attended in September
2006, a presentation was made by a scientist who had worked
on samples of anthrax collected from letters involved in the
same incident in October 2001; that scientist described the
anthrax spore as uncoated but said that it contained an additive
that affected the spore's electrical charges (D. Small, CBRN
Counter-Proliferation and Response, Paris, France, 18-20 September
2006; organized by SMi [
www.smi-online.co.uk]).
It would be of importance for Dr. Beecher to submit data in support of his conclusions in another paper to establish a sound scientific basis for his arguments.

REFERENCE
1 - Beecher, D. J. 2006. Forensic application of microbiological culture analysis to identify mail intentionally contaminated with Bacillus anthracis spores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5304-5310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
| | | | | |
Kay A. Mereish
United Nations 866 UN Plaza New York, New York 10017 Phone: (212) 963-4094 Fax: (967) 367-2130 E-mail: mereish{at}un.org
|
| | | | | |
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2007, p. 5074, Vol. 73, No. 15
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02898-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.