AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 27 July 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.01083-07v1
73/18/5817    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, L.
Right arrow Articles by Handley, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, L.
Right arrow Articles by Handley, P. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, L.
Right arrow Articles by Handley, P. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01083-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Fungal communities associated with the degradation of polyester polyurethane in soil

Lee Cosgrove, Paula L. McGeechan, Geoff D. Robson, and Pauline S. Handley*

Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, 1.800 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK, M13 9PT, Arch UK Biocides Ltd, Blackley, Manchester, M9 8ZS UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: p.handley{at}manchester.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Soil fungal communities involved in the biodegradation of polyester polyurethane (PU) were investigated. PU coupons were buried in two sandy loam soils with different levels of organic carbon; one was acidic (pH 5.5) the other was more neutral (pH 6.7). After 5 months burial, the fungal communities on the surface of the PU were compared with the native soil communities using culture-based and molecular techniques. Putative PU degrading fungi were common in both soils, as <45% of the fungal colonies cleared the colloidal PU dispersion Impranil on solid medium. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) showed that fungal communities on the PU were less diverse than in the soil, and only a few species in the PU communities were detectable in the soil, indicating that only a small subset of the soil fungal communities colonised the PU. Soil type influenced the composition of the PU fungal communities. Geomyces pannorum and a Phoma sp. were the dominant species recovered by culturing from the PU buried in the acidic and neutral soils respectively. Both fungi degraded Impranil and represented >80% of cultivable colonies from each plastic. However, PU was highly susceptible to degradation in both soils, losing up to 95% of its tensile strength. Therefore, different fungi are associated with PU degradation in different soils but the physical process is independent of soil type.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.