This Article Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: AEM.01272-06v1 72/10/6600    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walker, E. L. Articles by Stabb, E. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Walker, E. L. Articles by Stabb, E. V. Agricola Articles by Walker, E. L. Articles by Stabb, E. V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01272-06
Copyright (c) 2006, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Photolyase confers resistance to UV light but does not contribute to the symbiotic benefit of bioluminescence in Vibrio fischeri ES114

Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: estabb{at}uga.edu.

	Abstract

Recent reports suggest that the selective advantage of bioluminescence for bacteria is mediated by light-dependent stimulation of photolyase to repair DNA lesions. Despite evidence for this model, photolyase mutants have not been characterized in a naturally bioluminescent bacterium, nor has this hypothesis been tested in bioluminescent bacteria under natural conditions. We have now characterized the photolyase encoded by phr in the bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri ES114. Consistent with Phr possessing photolyase activity, phr conferred light-dependent resistance to UV light. However, upon comparing ES114 to a phr mutant and a dark luxCDABEG mutant, we found that bioluminescence did not detectably affect photolyase-mediated resistance to UV light. Addition of the light-stimulating autoinducer N-3-oxo-hexanoyl homoserine lactone appeared to increase UV resistance, but this was independent of photolyase or bioluminescence. Moreover, although bioluminescence confers an advantage for V. fischeri during colonization of its natural host, Euprymna scolopes, the phr mutant colonized this host to the same level as wild type. Taken together, our results indicate that at least in V. fischeri strain ES114 the benefits of bioluminescence during symbiotic colonization are not mediated by photolyase, and although some UV resistance mechanism may be co-regulated with bioluminescence, we found no evidence that light production benefits cells by stimulating photolyase in this strain.