AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 24 August 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.01309-07v1
73/20/6386    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bollmann, A.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bollmann, A.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bollmann, A.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01309-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Growth of environmental samples in a diffusion chamber increases the diversity of recovered isolates

Annette Bollmann, Kim Lewis, and Slava S. Epstein*

Northeastern University, Department of Biology, 134 Mugar Life Science Building, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston MA 2115, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: s.epstein{at}neu.edu.


   Abstract

The majority of microorganisms from natural environments cannot be grown in the laboratory. The diffusion chamber-based approach is an alternative method that allows the microorganisms to grow their natural environment. An inoculum is sandwiched between semi-permeable (0.03-µm pore-size) membranes of the chamber, which is then returned into the source environment. The chamber allows for a free exchange of chemicals with the external milieu by diffusion, while restricting movement of cells. We used freshwater pond sediment to inoculate diffusion chambers and Petri dishes. The diffusion chambers were incubated on top of the sediment for four weeks. Both chamber- and Petri dish cultivation resulted in the isolation of numerous representatives of Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. However, the diffusion chamber-based approach also led to the isolation of species from rarely cultivated groups such as Deltaproteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Spirochaetes, and Acidobacteria. Material from the chambers was also transferred to new chambers in order to learn whether this will increase recovery of isolates. Several isolates could only be obtained from material transferred through multiple diffusion chambers. This suggests that continuous cultivation in diffusion chambers adapts some microorganisms for growth under otherwise prohibitive in vitro conditions.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.