AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 26 October 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.01501-07v1
74/1/32    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurth, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nitsche, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurth, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nitsche, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kurth, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nitsche, A.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01501-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Orthopoxvirus detection in environmental specimens during suspected bioterror attacks: Inhibitory influences of common household products

Andreas Kurth*, John Achenbach, Liljia Miller, Ian M. Mackay, Georg Pauli, and Andreas Nitsche

Center for Biological Safety, Robert Koch-Institute, Berlin, Germany; Queensland Paediatric Infectious Disease Laboratory, SASVRC, Royal Children's Hospital, and CMVC, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: kurtha{at}rki.de.


   Abstract

After terrorists attacked the United States in 2001 the appearance of letters and other objects containing powdery substances with an unknown potential for biological threat focused attention on the speed, sensitivity and reliability of diagnostic methods. This study summarizes the abilities and limitations of real-time PCR, electron microscopy (EM) and virus isolation when used to detect potential bioweapons. In particular, we investigated the inhibitory influence of different common household products present in environmental specimens on PCR yield, EM detection and virus isolation. We used Vaccinia virus as a model for orthopoxviruses by spiking it into specimens. In the second part of the study we described modifications of diagnostic methods to overcome inhibitory effects. A variety of PCR amplification enhancers, DNA extraction protocols and the application of internal controls were evaluated to improve diagnostic simplicity, speed, and reliability. As a result, we strongly recommend using at least two different front-line techniques in parallel, e.g. EM and PCR. A positive result obtained by any one of these techniques should be followed by a biological method to confirm the putative diagnosis. Confirmatory methods include virus isolation followed by an agent-specific immunofluorescence assay (IFA) to confirm the presence of replication-competent particles.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.