AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 22 February 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.01803-07v1
74/8/2505    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Auinger, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boenigk, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Auinger, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boenigk, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Auinger, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boenigk, J.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.01803-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

An improved methodology for the identification of protists and microalgae from plankton samples preserved in Lugol's iodine solution: Combining microscopic analysis with single cell PCR

Barbara M. Auinger, Karin Pfandl, and Jens Boenigk*

Institute for Limnology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Mondseestr. 9, 5310 Mondsee, Austria

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: jens.boenigk{at}oeaw.ac.at.


   Abstract

Here we introduce a method for quantitative analysis of planktonic protists and microalgae from preserved field samples combining morphological and SSU rRNA gene sequence analysis. We linked a microscopic screening with PCR of single cells using field samples preserved with Lugol's iodine solution. Cells possessing a rigid cell wall were incubated with Viscozyme and subsequently with proteinase K for cell disruption; this was unnecessary for fragile cells. The addition of sodium thiosulfate to the PCR reaction tube considerably decreased the inhibiting effect of the fixative (iodine) on the PCR reaction and thus allowed for successful single cell PCR even of long DNA fragments (up to as many as 3000 base pairs). We further applied the protocol to investigate the dominant SSU genotypes in distinct flagellate morphospecies originating from different samples. We hypothesised that despite the morphological similarity, protist morphospecies in different habitats or sampled during different seasons are represented by different genotypes. Our results indicate species-specific differences: the two species Ochromonas sp. and Dinobryon divergens were represented by several different genotypes each and for the latter species the dominating genotype differed with habitat. In contrast, Dinobryon pediforme, D. bavaricum and Synura sphagnicola were exclusively represented by a single genotype each and the respective genotype was the same in different samples. In summary, our results highlight the significance of molecular variation within protist morphospecies.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.