AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 6 April 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02060-06v1
73/11/3630    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dilling, S.
Right arrow Articles by Müller, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dilling, S.
Right arrow Articles by Müller, V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dilling, S.
Right arrow Articles by Müller, V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02060-06
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Regulation of caffeate respiration in the acetogenic bacterium Acetobacterium woodii

Sabrina Dilling, Frank Imkamp, Silke Schmidt, and Volker Müller*

Molecular Microbiology & Bioenergetics, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: vmueller{at}bio.uni-frankfurt.de.


   Abstract

The anaerobic acetogenic bacterium Acetobacterium woodii can conserve energy by oxidation of various substrates coupled to either carbonate or caffeate respiration. We have used a cell suspension system to study the regulation and the kinetics of induction of caffeate respiration. After addition of caffeate to cell suspensions of fructose-grown cells there was a lag phase of about 90 min before caffeate reduction commenced. However, in the presence of tetracycline caffeate was not reduced indicating that de novo protein synthesis is required to confer the ability for caffeate respiration. Induction also took place in the presence of CO2 and, once induced, caffeate and CO2 were used simultaneously as electron acceptors. Induction of caffeate reduction was also observed with H2 + CO2 as substrate, but the lag phase was much longer. Again, caffeate and CO2 were used simultaneously as electron acceptors. In contrast, during oxidation of methyl groups derived from methanol or betaine, acetogenesis was the preferred energy conserving pathway, caffeate reduction started only after acetogenesis came to completion. The differential flow of reductants was also observed with suspensions of resting cells in which caffeate reduction was induced prior to harvesting the cells. These cell suspensions utilized caffeate and CO2 simultaneously with fructose or hydrogen as electron donors, but CO2 was preferred over caffeate during methyl group oxidation. Resting cells of caffeate-induced cells could reduce caffeate but also p-coumarate or ferulate with hydrogen as electron donor. p-coumarate or ferulate also served as inducers for caffeate reduction. Interestingly, caffeate-induced cells reduced ferulate in the absence of external reductant, indicating that caffeate also induces the enzymes required for oxidation of the methyl group of ferulate.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.