AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 29 February 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02195-07v1
74/9/2717    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brons, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by van Elsas, J. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brons, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by van Elsas, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brons, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by van Elsas, J. D.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02195-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Analysis of Bacterial Communities in Soil by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis and Clone Libraries as Influenced by Different Reverse Primers

Jolanda K. Brons and Jan Dirk van Elsas*

Department of Microbial Ecology, Centre of Ecological and Evolutionary Studies (CEES), University of Groningen, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NN Haren, the Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: j.d.van.elsas{at}rug.nl.


   Abstract

To assess soil bacterial diversity, PCR systems consisting of several slightly different reverse primers together with forward primer F968-GC, have been used for subsequent DGGE or clone library analyses. In this study, a set of 13 hitherto-used and novel reverse primers was tested with the canonical forward primer as to the DGGE fingerprints obtained from a grassland soil. Analysis of these DGGE profiles by GelCompar showed that they all fell into two main clusters separated by a G/A alteration at position 14 in the reverse primer used.

To assess differences between the dominant bacteria amplified, we then produced four (100-membered) 16S rRNA gene clone libraries using reverse primers with either an A or a G at position 14, denoted R1401-1a, R1401-1b, R1401-2a and R1401-2b. Subsequent sequence analysis revealed that, on the basis of the about 410-bp sequence information, all four primers amplified similar as well as different (under which novel) bacterial groups from soil. Most clones fell into two main phyla, the Firmicutes and the Proteobacteria. Within the Firmicutes, the majority of the clones belonged to the genus Bacillus. Within the Proteobacteria, the majority of the clones fell into the proteobacterial alpha or gamma subgroups, whereas a few were delta and beta Proteobacteria. Other phyla found were Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Chlorobi, Bacteroidetes, Chlamydiae, Candidate division TM7, Ferribacter, Cyanobacteria and Deinococcus. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that the reverse primers R1401-1b and R1401-1a both produced libraries with highest diversities, yet amplified different types. Their concomitant use is recommended.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.