AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 December 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02430-07v1
74/4/1064    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, K.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Schweizer, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, K.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Schweizer, H. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Choi, K.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Schweizer, H. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02430-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Genetic Tools for Select Agent Compliant Manipulation of Burkholderia pseudomallei

Kyoung-Hee Choi, Takehiko Mima, Yveth Casart Quintero, Drew Rholl, Ayush Kumar, Ifor R. Beacham, and Herbert P. Schweizer*

Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Rocky Mountain Regional Center of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Research, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1682, USA; School of Medical Science and Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University-Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Queensland 9726, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: Herbert.Schweizer{at}colostate.edu.


   Abstract

Because of Burkholderia pseudomallei’s classification as a select agent in the United States, genetic manipulation of this bacterium is strictly regulated. Only a few antibiotic selection markers, including gentamicin, kanamycin and zeocin, are currently approved for use with this bacterium, but wild-type strains are highly resistant to these antibiotics. To facilitate routine genetic manipulations of wild-type strains, several new tools were developed. A temperature-sensitive (Ts) pRO1600 broad-host-range replicon was isolated and used to construct curable plasmids where the Flp and Cre recombinase genes are expressed from the rhamnose-regulated Escherichia coli PBAD promoter, and kanamycin (npt-I) and zeocin (ble) selection markers from the constitutive B. thailandensis ribosomal PS12 or synthetic bacterial PEM7 promoters. Flp and Cre site-specific recombination systems allow in vivo excision and recycling of npt-II and ble selection markers contained on FRT or loxP cassettes. Finally, expression of Tn 7 site-specific transposase from the constitutive P1 integron promoter allowed development of an efficient site-specific chromosomal integration system for B. pseudomallei. In conjunction with a natural transformation method the utility of these new tools was demonstrated by isolating an unmarked {Delta}(amrRAB-oprA) efflux pump mutant. Exploiting natural transformation, chromosomal DNA fragments carrying this mutation marked with zeocin resistance were transferred between genomes of two different B. pseudomallei strains. Lastly, the deletion mutation was complemented by a chromosomally-integrated mini-Tn 7 element carrying the amrAB-oprA operon. The new tools allow routine select agent compliant genetic manipulations of B. pseudomallei and other Burkholderia species.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.