AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 16 March 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02579-06v1
73/10/3232    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hakkinen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hänninen, M.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hakkinen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hänninen, M.-L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hakkinen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hänninen, M.-L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02579-06
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in cattle in Finland and antimicrobial susceptibility of bovine Campylobacter jejuni strains

Marjaana Hakkinen*, Helmi Heiska, and Marja-Liisa Hänninen

Finnish Food Safety Authority, Mustialankatu 3, FI-00790 Finland; Department of Food and Environmental Hygiene, FI-00014 University of Helsinki

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: marjaana.hakkinen{at}evira.fi.


   Abstract

The study investigated the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in Finnish cattle at slaughter and carcass contamination after slaughter. During the period January - December 2003, bovine rectal fecal samples (n = 952) and carcass surface samples (n= 948) from twelve out of fifteen Finnish slaughterhouses were examined. In total, campylobacters were detected in 31.1% of fecal samples and in 3.5% of carcass surface samples. C. jejuni was isolated from 19.5%, C. coli from 2.2% and presumptive C. hyointestinalis from 10.8% of fecal samples. Campylobacters were detected in 4.4% and 37.4% of the fecal samples examined both by direct culture and by enrichment (n = 730), respectively, suggesting a low level of campylobacters in the intestinal content. A slightly increasing trend was observed in the overall prevalence of campylobacters towards the end of summer and autumn. Seventeen different serotypes were detected among the fecal C. jejuni isolates using a set of 25 commercial antisera for serotyping heat-stable antigens (Penner) of C. jejuni by passive hemagglutination. The predominant serotypes, Pen2 and Pen4-complex, were isolated from 52% of the fecal samples. Subtyping by PFGE (SmaI) yielded 56 and 20 subtypes out of 330 fecal and 70 carcass C. jejuni isolates, respectively. Minimum inhibitory concentration to ampicillin, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid and oxytetracycline of 187 C. jejuni isolates was determined using a commercial broth microdilution method. Sixteen (9%) of the isolates were resistant to at least one of the antimicrobials tested. Resistance to nalidixic acid was most commonly detected (6%). No multiresistance was observed.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.