AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 31 March 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02623-07v1
74/10/3319    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, R. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, R. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02623-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Transcription-Mediated Amplification and growth-based methods for the quantitation of Enterococcus in environmental waters

Ceri A. Morris*, A. Denene Blackwood, Marek Kirs, Neil D. Buttigieg, Rhian R. Morgan, James Hogan, Ian Weeks, and Rachel T. Noble

MLT Research Ltd., 5 Chiltern Close, Cardiff CF14 5DL, UK (A subsidiary of Gen-Probe Incorporated); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA; Gen-Probe Incorporated, 10210 Genetic Center Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA


   Abstract

An assay based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) technology was used to quantitate fecal indicator bacteria, Enterococcus, in environmental water samples. The results generated by this and two growth-based methods relative to the 104 MPN or CFU per 100 ml threshold show that the three methods are in good qualitative agreement when tested against a range of water samples taken from different locations. The results demonstrate sensitive and rapid detection (approximately 4 hours from sample collection to result) and quantitation of Enterococcus when compared to the growth-based methods.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.