Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Invertebrate Microbiology

Molecular Analysis of Hypervirulent Somatic Hybrids of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Beauveria bassiana andBeauveria sulfurescens

Muriel Viaud, Yvonne Couteaudier, Guy Riba
Muriel Viaud
Station de Recherches de Lutte Biologique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, La Minière, 78285 Guyancourt, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yvonne Couteaudier
Station de Recherches de Lutte Biologique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, La Minière, 78285 Guyancourt, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy Riba
Station de Recherches de Lutte Biologique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, La Minière, 78285 Guyancourt, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.1.88-93.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Protoplast fusion of diauxotrophic mutants of a Beauveria bassiana entomopathogenic strain (Bb28) and a Beauveria sulfurescens toxinogenic strain (Bs2) produced hybrids which were significantly different from the parents in pathogenicity. Some of the hybrids were hypervirulent and killed insects more quickly than the Bb28 strain, probably because these hybrids had acquired the toxic activity of the Bs2 strain. By using six nuclear genes and a telomeric fingerprint probe, the molecular structures of the hybrids were studied. The results demonstrated the occurrence of parasexual events. Hybrids appeared to be diploid or aneuploid, with portions of the genome being heterozygous. A mitochondrial molecular marker indicated homoplasmy of the hybrids and inheritance of mitochondria from strain Bs2 or Bb28. The pathogenicities and the ploidies of the hybrids remained stable after passage through the host insect, showing that somatic hybridization provides an attractive method for the genetic improvement of biocontrol efficiency in the genus Beauveria.

The entomopathogenic fungusBeauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. is widely used as biological control agent for crop pests (6, 7, 14). Despite the agricultural importance of some strains, the genetics of this imperfect fungus has rarely been studied. Like many fungi, B. bassiana lacks a conventional sexual cycle but exhibits parasexual recombination (31). The term parasexual cycle was first used by Pontecorvo et al. (32) to describe the genetic process inAspergillus nidulans, which involves (i) heterokaryon formation, (ii) fusion of two unlike haploid nuclei to give a diploid heterozygous nucleus, and (iii) mitotic recombination. Mitotic recombination may include crossing over leading to intrachromosomal recombination and nondisjunction, whereby the amount of genetic information per nucleus is reduced to the haploid level (36). Since its first demonstration by Pontecorvo et al., parasexual recombination has been detected in many ascomycetes, basidiomycetes, and deuteromycetes, suggesting that parasexual processes are widespread in fungi (5). Nevertheless, heterokaryon formation, a prerequisite for the parasexual cycle, seems to be limited by the existence of vegetative incompatibility in many fungi (4, 18, 25), including B. bassiana(9). This limitation can be overcome by protoplast fusion in many fungi, and this technology is a valuable method for intra- and interspecific hybridization (16).

Previously, we have obtained, through protoplast fusion, one somatic hybrid which was a cross between a B. bassiana strain (Bb28) that is pathogenic toward the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) and a Beauveria sulfurescens strain (Bs2) producing an insecticidal toxin (8). This hybrid was hypervirulent toward O. nubilalis because of the combination of the two parental insecticidal activities. This preliminary result suggested that protoplast fusion could be a useful tool for increasing the biocontrol ability of Beauveria. To confirm this assumption, several experiments were conducted to enhance the number of recovered hybrids and analyze their virulence toward O. nubilalis. Moreover, molecular tools were developed to understand the genetic exchanges involved in protoplast fusion. The aims of this work were (i) to obtain a high number of Beauveria somatic hybrids and (ii) to determine the molecular nature of the hybrids obtained and the possible mitotic recombination involved by combining the information given by different independent molecular markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Beauveria strains.The Beauveriastrains used in this investigation were selected from the culture collection of the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique at La Minière, France. The B. bassiana strain (Bb28) was isolated from the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) in France. This strain has a low level of virulence toward O. nubilalis. The B. sulfurescens strain (Bs2) was previously described by Couteaudier et al. (8). This strain is nonpathogenic toward any known insect but produces an entomotoxic glycoprotein (28). Double auxotrophic mutants, i.e., Bb28 arg− ino−, requiring arginine and inositol, and Bs2 lys−leu−, requiring lysine and leucine, were selected after treatment of wild strains with mutagens sequentially as follows: 3% (vol/vol) ethylmethane sulfonate (2 h of incubation) and 10% (wt/vol) nitrosoguanidine (2 h of incubation).

Media.The culture media were complete agar medium (CM) and minimal medium (MM), as previously described (35). Incubation was at 25°C throughout.

Protoplast fusion.Protoplast isolation and fusion were performed as in our previous work (8) with a polyethylene glycol concentration of 30%. Prototrophic fusion products were selected on MM supplemented with 20% sucrose (MMS). In addition, fusion products with recombinant phenotypes were identified on MMS supplemented with arginine, lysine, leucine, and inositol (each at 0.2 mg · ml−1) either singly or in pairs (20). Parental protoplasts were subjected to the same polyethylene glycol treatment and regeneration process. Each putative prototrophic colony was purified from single conidia and transferred to CM. Mitotic stability was tested by five colony passages onto CM; thereafter, 10 individual conidia of each of these fusion products were tested for phenotypic stability on MM. These stable fusion products were treated with the haploidizing agents benomyl (0.5 μg · ml−1), para-fluoro-dl-phenylalanine (5 μg · ml−1), and chloral hydrate (1 mg · ml−1) for 2 weeks on agar plates. Thereafter, 100 individual conidia of each of these fusion products were tested on MM for prototrophy.

Pathogenicity toward O. nubilalis.The pathogenicities of the hybrids toward O. nubilalis were compared to those of the original wild-type strains Bb28 and Bs2 and diauxotrophic parental strains. Sixty newly emerged fifth-instar larvae were dipped in 20-ml conidial suspensions (105, 106, 107, and 108 conidia · ml−1), and insect mortality was assessed daily (34). The 60 larvae were separated into four batches of 15 larvae in order to determine the standard error, and the experiments were performed twice. Parallel controls (treated with sterile distilled water) were included. Controls showed no mortality over the course of the experiments. To assess virulence of the wild strains, mutants, and hybrids, full logarithmic plots of insect mortality against time were analyzed by first-order linear regression equations as described by Gupta et al. (19) for B. bassiana bioassays. These equations allowed us to determine the time required to kill 50% of the insect population (LT50) and the dose required to kill 50% of the insect population (LD50) in 15 days.

DNA extraction.Fungal strains were cultivated in Roux flasks containing 130 ml of liquid CM. The mycelium was collected by filtration in a sterile filter funnel and ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen. The DNA extraction method used was that described by Daboussi et al. (10).

DNA amplifications.DNA amplification was performed with an Appligene (Illkirch, France) kit and model 60 Braun DNA thermal cycler. Amplifications were performed in a 100-μl reaction volume with 0.2 μM primers E23 and E24 (5′CCGAAGCAGAATTCGGTAAGCG3′ and 5′GCTGAATTACCATTGCGGAGAGG3′, respectively) (30) and approximately 50 ng of template DNA. Control amplifications, using primers only, were performed to ensure that the reagents used were not contaminated with extraneous template DNA. The PCR cycling protocol consisted of 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min for 30 cycles. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 1% (wt/vol) agarose gels. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (1 μg · ml−1) and photographed under UV transillumination with Polaroid 667 type film.

Southern blot analysis.Southern blotting procedures were performed as described by Maniatis et al. (27). Total genomic DNA (10 μg) was digested with EcoRI,HindIII, BamHI, and AluI (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) and separated electrophoretically on a 0.6% (wt/vol) agarose gel. Total DNA, cut by restriction enzymes, was transferred to a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England) with a vacuum apparatus. Conserved genes previously cloned in B. bassiana were used as probes. They encode mitochondrial rRNA, β-tubulin, histone 4, and protease 1 (39). A chitin synthase gene was cloned, as described previously for the other genes, by using the degenerate primers CHS1 and CHS2 defined by Chua et al. (7). The nitrate reductase gene cloned from B. bassiana (EMBL, GenBank, and DDBJ nucleotide sequence database accession number X84950 ) was also used. The karyotypes of the Bb28 and Bs2 strains determined by contour-clamped homogenous electric field (CHEF) analysis and the chromosomal localizations of these genes are presented in Table 1. Double auxotrophic mutants have the same genome organization as the wild strains (unpublished results). The telomeric probe, pTel 13, cloned from the fungus Botrytis cinerea, contains a telomeric repeat, (TTAGGG)11, and 153 bp of a telomere-associated DNA region (26). Plasmid DNA was radiolabelled by using a random primer kit (T7 Quick prime; Pharmacia) and [α-32P]dCTP. Hybridizations were conducted under stringent conditions (65°C), and washes were with 2× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate)–0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate as described by Daboussi et al. (10). Blots were exposed to MP-type films (Amersham) with intensifier screens for 2 to 7 days at −80°C.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Estimation of sizes of chromosomal bands from parentalBeauveria strains as determined by CHEF analysis and chromosomal locations of the probes as determined by Southern hybridization of CHEF gels (39)

Stability after parasitic growth on insects.Five prototrophic hybrids and the Bb28 strain were passed through two disease cycles on successive generations of O. nubilalis. After the first disease cycle, single spores recovered from the cadavers of insects were cultured on CM before inoculation of a second insect generation. After each disease cycle, 100 individual conidia were plated on MM to determine the percentage of prototrophic conidia, and two single conidial cultures were used for DNA isolation and telomeric fingerprinting.

RESULTS

Obtaining B. bassiana-B. sulfurescens prototrophic hybrids.Fusion of protoplasts from the diauxotrophic mutants Bb28arg− ino− and Bs2lys− leu− resulted in the recovery of prototrophic fusion products at a frequency of 5 × 10−4; no colonies from protoplasts of only one of the fusion partners appeared on MMS, suggesting that no back mutations occurred among 107 protoplasts. Single-spore isolates originating from 48 colonies on MMS were tested for prototrophy. After five subcultures on CM without selection pressure, the fusion products remained prototrophic. The spores produced by the fusion products were larger than the parental spores. They were cylindrical and approximately 3 μm wide and 4 μm long, whereas the parental spores were spherical with a diameter of 3 μm. Since Beauveriaspores are uninucleate, their size is related to their ploidy (16, 23). Consequently, the fusion products seem to be diploid or aneuploid (between n and 2n). The stable prototrophic growth and the large size of the spores suggest the hybrid status of the fusion products. Haploidization assays were performed for five hybrids (A22, C2, C17, D2, and D9) with three known haploidizing agents (benomyl,para-fluoro-DL-phenylalanine, and chloral hydrate), without any success. No auxotrophic segregants were observed, and the spores remained large.

In other fusion experiments, MMS was supplemented with growth requirements of the parental strains to allow the recovery of recombinant segregants, as suggested by Hamlyn et al. (20). Unfortunately, all the selected fusion products were prototrophic and had the same spore size as the fusion products described above.

Pathogenicities of hybrids.Pathogenic activities of parental strains and hybrids were assessed by bioassays under standardized conditions. The O. nubilalis larva mortalities obtained with the Bb28 strain and five hybrids (A22, C2, C17, D2, and D9) are presented in Fig. 1. No insect was infected when spore suspensions of the Bs2 wild strain or the Bb28arg− ino− and Bs2lys− leu− parental mutants were used (data not shown), but the parental strain Bb28 appeared to be weakly pathogenic toward O. nubilalis. Some of the hybrids, including C17, D9, and D2, appeared to be hypervirulent, and others, including C2, were less virulent than the Bb28 parental strain. The logarithmic transformation of the time to mortality and the percent mortality resulted in linear regression lines with correlation coefficients greater than 0.9. The resulting LT50s and LD50s confirmed the great variability in the pathogenicities of the hybrids and the occurrence of hypervirulent hybrids (Table 2). For example, the C17 hybrid has an LT50 (at an inoculum concentration of 108 conidia · ml−1) approximately 2.4-fold lower than that of the Bb28 parental strain and an LD50 approximately 290-fold lower than that of the Bb28 strain. These experiments were conducted twice with similar results.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Pathogenic activities of the parental strain Bb28 and hybrids toward O. nubilalis. Four batches of 15 newly emerged fifth-instar larvae were dipped in conidial suspensions with 108 conidia · ml−1 and insect mortality was assessed daily. The standard error is indicated for day 15.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Virulence of the parental strain Bb28 and hybrid strains toward O. nubilalis

Molecular characterization of the hybrids by using conserved genes.The mapped genes (Table 1) were used as markers to study inheritance in the hybrids. PCR amplification of a part of the 28S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (30) was done with parental strains and hybrids. The PCR products obtained with primers E23 and E24 were of different sizes in the two strains, approximately 100 and 500 bp (Fig.2). The smallest fragment, from strain Bb28, is the same size as the homologous fragment ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae (17). DNA amplification of the Bs2 strain revealed a larger fragment containing a nucleotide insertion of approximately 400 bp. Since some Beauveriastrains were previously found to have 350- to 450-bp group I introns in this region (29, 30), the insertion in the Bs2 strain is probably a group I intron. This insertion allows molecular differentiation of the parental strains. The diauxotrophic mutants had the same patterns as the wild strains, but all the hybrids had additive banding patterns. This result indicates that the hybrids have both kinds of ribosomal units.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

PCR amplification patterns of Beauveriaparental strains and hybrids with rDNA conserved primers E23 and E24. Lanes: 1, no DNA; 2, Bs2; 3, Bb28; 4, hybrid A22; 5, hybrid C2; 6, hybrid C5; 7, hybrid C13; 8, hybrid C17; 9, hybrid D7; 10, hybrid D8; 11, hybrid D9; 12, hybrid D15; 13, hybrid D22. DNA sizes are given on the right.

Southern blot hybridizations were performed after digestion of total DNA with different restriction enzymes. Examples of the different restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns are shown in Fig. 3. DNAs from the Bb28 strain and from the D8 and D22 hybrids were digested with EcoRI and produced one band at 7 kb that hybridized to the histone 4 gene probe, while the Bs2 strain and the A22, C2, C5, C17, and D7 hybrids displayed a different pattern with a band at 11 kb. The pattern of the C13 hybrid contained both parental bands. The same experiments were conducted with nuclear probes corresponding to the genes encoding β-tubulin, nitrate reductase, a chitin synthase, and protease 1. In each case, the diauxotrophic mutants showed the same patterns as the wild strains. All the hybrids had additive banding patterns for the β-tubulin, chitin synthase, and protease 1 genes. In contrast, the results with the histone 4 and nitrate reductase genes were additive banding patterns or unique patterns of either parental strain (Table3). Four hybrids (C12, C13, D14, and D26) displayed additive banding patterns for the six nuclear genes, indicating that large parts of their genomes are diploid and heterozygous. The other hybrids showed only one parental pattern for the histone 4 gene, and in one case (hybrid A7) for the nitrate reductase gene, indicating that parts of their genomes are haploid or homozygous. Since we used genes on different chromosomes (Table 1), the molecular characterization of the hybrids indicates that different parental chromosomal regions are present in the hybrid genomes.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Southern hybridization analysis of histone 4 restriction fragments showing segregation of RFLPs following somatic hybridization between strains Bb28 and Bs2. EcoRI-digested genomic DNA was electrophoresed, blotted to nylon, and hybridized with the histone 4 probe. Lanes: 1, Bb28; 2, Bs2; 3, hybrid A22; 4, hybrid C13; 5, hybrid C2; 6, hybrid C5; 7, hybrid D8; 8, hybrid C17; 9, hybrid D7; 10, hybrid D22. DNA sizes (in kilobase pairs) are given on the right.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Molecular characterization of the hybrids with conserved genes

The mitochondrial marker used to study the inheritance of the mitochondrial DNA is part of the small ribosomal unit cloned from the Bb28 strain. When used as a probe in Southern blot procedures, this marker indicated that the hybrids carry mitochondrial DNA from only one parental strain (Table 3).

Molecular characterization of the hybrids with telomeric fingerprints.A telomeric probe previously cloned in B. cinerea (26) and used to fingerprint numerousBeauveria isolates (9, 39) was used to estimate the minimum ploidies of the hybrids. Southern blots of DNAs from strains Bb28 and Bs2 cut with EcoRI (Fig.4) exhibited 10 and 13 bands, respectively, which hybridized to the telomeric probe. These bands were numbered 1 to 10 for strain Bb28 and 1 to 13 for strain Bs2 in order to monitor their inheritance in the hybrid patterns. The diauxotrophic mutants had the same telomeric patterns as the wild strains. Since the parental Bb28 and Bs2 telomeric patterns were different, it was possible to determine the minimum number and the origin of the telomeres in the hybrid genomes. Figure 4 presents the telomeric patterns of only eight hybrids, but all the hybrids were analyzed by using the same technique. The number of telomeric bands revealed by the blots was between 16 (in hybrid A7) and 20 (in hybrid D3), which indicates a minimum of 8 to 10 chromosomes in the hybrids. Nevertheless, these numbers could be underestimated, since (i) some telomeric bands are thought to comigrate in each parental strain (39), (ii) bands 8 and 10 from strain Bs2 cannot be differentiated from bands 4 and 8 from strain Bb28, and (iii) crossing over and chromosomic segregation during mitotic recombination may lead to heterozygous chromosomes with homozygous telomeric regions (5, 36). All the hybrids had bands 6 and 9 from Bs2 and band 5 from Bb28. No other telomeric bands were found in any of the hybrids, but all of the hybrids carried at least four bands from Bb28 and at least six bands from Bs2. These results confirm that the hybrid nuclei were heterozygous. Moreover, the telomeric patterns indicate that all the hybrids have a part of their genomes which is haploid or homozygous.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Southern hybridization analysis of telomeric restriction fragments showing segregation of RFLPs in a somatic hybridization between strains Bb28 and Bs2. EcoRI-digested genomic DNA was electrophoresed, blotted to nylon, and hybridized with the telomeric probe from B. cinerea. Lanes: 1, Bs2; 2, Bb28; 3, hybrid A22; 4, hybrid C2; 5, hybrid C5; 6, hybrid C13; 7, hybrid C17; 8, hybrid D7; 9, hybrid D9; 10, hybrid D15. The parental bands are numbered 1 to 10 for strain Bb28 and 1 to 13 for strain Bs2. DNAs size (in kilobase pairs) are given on the right. The arrow indicates a new telomeric band that was present in neither parent.

Cosegregation of telomeric bands was studied with the software Genepop (33), which is able to distinguish linked markers even when total haploidization is not realized. This analysis indicated the absence of conserved telomere pairs (corresponding to the two extremities of one chromosome) in the segregants, suggesting that intrachromosomal recombination had occurred. Six of the 48 hybrids, e.g., D7, had a new telomeric band that was present in neither parent (Fig. 4). Such a new restriction fragment could result from mutation, recombination, or rearrangement.

Stability after parasitic growth on insects.The biological and molecular stabilities of the hybrids A22, C2, C17, D2, and D9 were evaluated through infection of O. nubilalis followed by reisolation of single conidial isolates from mycosed cadavers. After the first and second disease cycles, the 100 conidia isolated for each hybrid remained prototrophic, and the virulence of the hybrid was conserved in the two experiments. After each disease cycle, DNA was extracted from two single conidial cultures and subjected to telomeric fingerprinting. The original configuration of the banding patterns was retained in all cases, except for a single conidial culture isolated after the two disease cycles of the D2 hybrid (Fig.5). In this case, a new telomeric band that was present in neither parent appeared.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Southern hybridization analysis of telomeric restriction fragments, showing telomeric fingerprints of the D2 hybrid before disease (lane 1) and after one (lane 2) and two (lanes 3 and 4) disease cycles on O. nubilalis. DNAs size (in kilobase pairs) are given on the right. For one culture after two disease cycles, a new telomeric band that was present in neither parent appeared (arrow).

DISCUSSION

Entomopathogenic fungi are being used for the control of many insect pests as an environmentally acceptable alternative to chemical insecticides. A key aim of recent work has been to increase the speed of killing and so improve the commercial efficacy of these biocontrol agents (38). One way that this might be achieved is by adding the toxic activity of B. sulfurescens(28) to B. bassiana pathogenic strains. The fusion frequency between B. bassiana Bb28 and B. sulfurescens Bs2 that we obtained was higher than previously reported: 5 × 10−4 instead of approximately 10−6 (8). The stable prototrophic growth of the fusion products even in the presence of haploidizing agents and the large size of the spores indicate the hybrid status of the 48 fusion products analyzed (16, 23). Some of the hybrids appear to be hypervirulent. Hybrid C17 and others have LT50s and LD50s significantly lower than those of the Bb28 strain and remain stable after multiple disease cycles. This rapid kill of insects combined with stability of virulence following passage through the insect constitutes a success in the engineering of the entomopathogenicBeauveria fungi.

The molecular analysis using both conserved genes, such as the protease 1 gene, which is involved in pathogenicity (21), and telomeric sequences indicated a partially heterozygous diploid structure of the hybrids and showed that whole genomes from both parents had not been successfully integrated into the progeny. So far as we know, molecular evidence for parasexual recombination is available for only a few species of filamentous fungi. Durand et al. (11) and Arnau and Oliver (2) showed mitotic rearrangements in integrated plasmid DNA during protoplast fusion inPenicillium roqueforti and Cladosporium fulvum, respectively. In P. roqueforti, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers showed that recombination between two transformants of the same strain during the parasexual cycle was not limited to the foreign DNA sequences introduced into the parental strain (12). In the present study evidence has been obtained, with both genes and telomeric markers, that karyogamy and genetic modifications occur after protoplast fusion involving theB. bassiana Bb28 and B. sulfurescens Bs2 strains. The resulting hybrids are diploid or aneuploid, with a minimum of 8 to 10 chromosomes. A portion of the hybrid genomes was heterozygous, while other portions were haploid or homozygous. Haploidization seems to be limited even in the presence of haploidizing agents or on the host insect. The absence of conserved telomere pairs in the segregants may indicate intrachromosomal recombination. Moreover, a new telomeric restriction fragment is present in some hybrids. During the disease cycles of the hybrids on the host insect, a few telomeric rearrangements also occurred. Since the telomeric patterns of the wild strains were previously found to be stable during mitosis (9), new telomeric bands in hybrids could be the result of recombination in the telomeric associated DNA. Such new telomeric bands were also observed after meiotic recombination in Neurospora crassa (37) and in Magnaporthe grisea(13).

In several filamentous fungi, the segregation behavior of hybrids produced after protoplast fusion seems to be influenced by the taxonomic relationship of the parental strains. In a cross between two members of the A. nidulans group (A. nidulans andAspergillus rugulosus), diploid hybrids which gave rise to haploid segregants were obtained, suggesting that these two species were similar in overall genome organization (23). By contrast, in a cross between the distantly related species A. nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus, an aneuploid structure of the fusion products was presumed (24). The same situation was observed in Penicillium: haploid recombinants have been isolated only from hybrid progeny derived from taxonomically closely related species. Some stable hybrids obtained from crosses between Penicillum chrysogenum and P. roquefortihad spores that were larger than those of either parent and were unaffected when grown in the presence of haploidizing agents, which implies that their chromosome configuration was probably stable (1). We hypothesize that the B. bassiana-B. sulfurescens hybrids are similar because of the different genome organizations in the parental strains.

The presence of only one parental mitochondrial ribosomal type reveals the hybrid homoplasmy of the B. bassiana-B. sulfurescenshybrids. In isogamous species, such as S. cerevisiae, uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial markers is thought to be due to vegetative segregation by random partitioning of mitochondria during cell division (22). The same vegetative segregation seems to occur after protoplast fusion between B. bassiana andB. sulfurescens. In our study, because only one mitochondrial marker was used, it was not possible to examine mitochondrial recombination similar to that demonstrated forCoprinus cinereus (3) and Lentinula edodes (15).

One of the most striking features of our results is the variability in pathogenicity among the hybrids, but no correlation between molecular pattern and pathogenicity was found. In conclusion, somatic hybridization via protoplast fusion provides an attractive method for the genetic improvement of biocontrol efficiency in the genusBeauveria, in which strains with different host ranges and toxicities are genetically isolated because of vegetative incompatibility (9).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank C. Levis and Y. Brygoo (INRA, Versailles, France) for providing the pTel 13 probe and T. R. Glare (Ag Research, Lincoln, New-Zealand) and J. M. Clarkson (Bath University, Bath, United Kingdom) for critical review of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 June 1997.
    • Accepted 20 October 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Anné J.,
    2. Peberdy J. F.
    Protoplast fusion and interspecies hybridization in Penicillium Fungal protoplast; applications in biochemistry and genetics. Peberdy J. F., Ferenczy L. 1985 259 277 Marcel Dekker New York, N.Y
  2. 2.↵
    1. Arnau J.,
    2. Oliver R. P.
    Inheritance and alteration of transforming DNA during an induced parasexual cycle in the imperfect fungus Cladosporium fulvum. Curr. Genet. 23 1993 508 511
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Baptista-Ferreira J. L. C.,
    2. Economou A.,
    3. Casselton L. A.
    Mitochondrial genetics of Coprinus: recombination of mitochondrial genomes. Curr. Genet. 7 1983 405 407
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Begueret J.,
    2. Turcq B.,
    3. Clavé C.
    Vegetative incompatibility in filamentous fungi: het genes begin to talk. Trends Genet. 10 1994 441 446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Caten C. E.
    Parasexual processes in fungi The fungal nucleus. Gull K., Oliver S. G. 1980 73 95 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom
  6. 6.↵
    1. Charnley A. K.
    Microbial pathogens and insect pest control. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 12 1991 149 157
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chua S. S.,
    2. Momamy M.,
    3. Mendoza L.,
    4. Szaniszlo P. J.
    Identification of three chitin synthase genes in the dimorphic fungal pathogen Sporothrix schenckii. Curr. Microbiol. 29 1994 151 156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Couteaudier Y.,
    2. Viaud M.,
    3. Riba G.
    Genetic nature, stability and improved virulence of hybrids from protoplast fusion in Beauveria. Microb. Ecol. 32 1996 1 10
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Couteaudier Y.,
    2. Viaud M.
    New insights into population structure of Beauveria bassiana with regard to vegetative compatibility groups and telomeric restriction fragment length polymorphisms. FEMS Microb. Ecol. 22 1997 175 182
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Daboussi M. J.,
    2. Djeballi A. D.,
    3. Gerlinger C.,
    4. Blaiseau P. L.,
    5. Bouvier I.,
    6. Cassan M.
    Transformation of seven species of filamentous fungi using the nitrate reductase gene of Aspergillus nidulans. Curr. Genet. 15 1989 453 456
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Durand N.,
    2. Reymond P.,
    3. Fèvre M.
    Transmission and modification of transformation markers during an induced parasexual cycle in Penicillium roqueforti. Curr. Genet. 21 1992 377 383
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Durand N.,
    2. Reymond P.,
    3. Fèvre M.
    Randomly amplified polymorphic DNAs assess recombination following an induced parasexual cycle in Penicillium roqueforti. Curr. Genet. 24 1993 417 420
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Farman M. L.,
    2. Leong S. A.
    Genetic and physical mapping of telomeres in the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. Genetics 140 1995 479 492
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ferron P.,
    2. Fargues J.,
    3. Riba G.
    Fungi as microbial insecticides against pests Handbook of applied mycology Arora D. K., Ajello L., Mujerjii K. G. 2 1991 665 706 Marcel Dekker New York, N.Y
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fukada M.,
    2. Harada Y.,
    3. Imahori S.,
    4. Fukumasa-Nakai Y.,
    5. Hayashi Y.
    Inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in sexual crosses and protoplast cell fusion in Lentinula edodes. Curr. Genet. 27 1995 550 554
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gadau M. E.,
    2. Lingg A. J.
    Protoplast fusion in fungi Handbook of applied mycology Arora D. K., Elander R. P., Mukerji K. G. 4 1992 101 129 Marcel Dekker New York, N.Y
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Georgiev O. I.,
    2. Nikolaev N.,
    3. Hadjiolov A. A.,
    4. Skryabin K. G.,
    5. Zakharyev V. M.,
    6. Bayev A. A.
    The structure of the yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Complete sequence of the 25s rRNA gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 9 1981 6953 6958
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Glass N. L.,
    2. Kuldau G. A.
    Mating type and vegetative incompatibility in filamentous ascomycetes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 30 1992 201 224
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gupta S. C.,
    2. Leathers T. L.,
    3. El-Sayed G. N.,
    4. Ignoffo C. M.
    Relationships among enzymes activities and virulence parameters in Beauveria bassiana infections of Galleria mellonella and Trichoplusia ni. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 64 1994 13 17
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hamlyn P. F.,
    2. Birkett J. A.,
    3. Perez G.,
    4. Peberdy J. F.
    Protoplast fusion as a tool for genetic analysis in Cephalosporium acremonium. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131 1985 2813 2823
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Joshi L.,
    2. St. Leger R. J.,
    3. Bidochka M. J.
    Cloning of a cuticle-degrading protease from the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 125 1995 211 218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kawano S.,
    2. Takano H.,
    3. Kuroiwa T.
    Sexuality of mitochondria: fusion, recombination, and plasmids. Int. Rev. Cytol. 161 1995 49 110
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kevei F.,
    2. Peberdy J. F.
    Induced segregation in interspecific hybrids of Aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus rugulosus obtained by protoplast fusion. Mol. Gen. Genet. 170 1979 213 218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kevei F.,
    2. Peberdy J. F.
    Interspecies hybridization after protoplast fusion in Aspergillus Fungal protoplast; applications in biochemistry and genetics. Peberdy J. F., Ferenczy L. 1985 241 257 Marcel Dekker New York, N.Y
  25. 25.↵
    1. Leslie J. F.
    Fungal vegetative compatibility. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 31 1993 127 150
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Levis, C., M. Dutertre, D. Fortini, and Y. Brygoo.A Botrytis cinerea telomeric DNA, pTEL13, a useful tool for strain identification. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., in press.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Maniatis T.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Sambrook J.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1982 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  28. 28.↵
    1. Mollier P.,
    2. Lagnel J.,
    3. Fournet B.,
    4. Aioun A.,
    5. Riba G.
    A glycoprotein highly toxic for Galleria mellonella larvae secreted by the entomopathogenous fungus Beauveria sulfurescens. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 64 1994 200 207
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Neuvéglise C.,
    2. Brygoo Y.
    Identification of group-I introns in the 28s rDNA of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria brongniartii. Curr. Genet. 27 1994 38 45
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Neuvéglise C.,
    2. Brygoo Y.,
    3. Riba G.
    28s rDNA group-I introns: a powerful tool for identifying strains of Beauveria brongniartii. Mol. Ecol. 6 1997 195 201
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Paccola-Meirelles L. D.,
    2. Azevedo J. L.
    Parasexuality in Beauveria bassiana. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 57 1991 172 176
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Pontecorvo G.,
    2. Roper J. A.,
    3. Hemmons L. M.,
    4. Macdonald K. D.,
    5. Bufton A. W. J.
    The genetics of Aspergillus nidulans. Adv. Genet. 5 1953 141 238
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Raymond M.,
    2. Rousset F.
    Genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86 1995 248 249
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Riba G.,
    2. Marcandier S.,
    3. Richard G.,
    4. Larget I.
    Sensibilité de la pyrale du maı̈s (Ostrinia nubilalis) (Lep. Pyralidae) aux Hyphomycètes entomopathogènes. Entomophaga 28 1983 55 64
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Riba G.,
    2. Ravelojoana A. A. M.
    The parasexual cycle in the entomopathogenous fungus Paecilomyces fumosoroseus (Wize) Brown and Smith. Can. J. Microbiol. 30 1984 922 926
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Roper J. A.
    The parasexual cycle The fungi II. Ainsworth G. C., Sussman A. S. 1966 589 617 Academic Press San Diego, Calif
  37. 37.↵
    1. Schechtman M. G.
    Segregation patterns of Neurospora chromosome ends: mapping chromosomes tips. Fung. Genet. Newsl. 36 1989 71 73
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. St. Leger R. J.,
    2. Joshi L.,
    3. Bidochka M. J.,
    4. Roberts D. W.
    Construction of an improved mycoinsecticide overexpressing a toxic protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 1996 6349 6354
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Viaud M.,
    2. Couteaudier Y.,
    3. Levis C.,
    4. Riba G.
    Genome organization in Beauveria bassiana: electrophoretic karyotype, gene mapping and telomeric fingerprint. Fung. Genet. Biol. 20 1996 175 183
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Molecular Analysis of Hypervirulent Somatic Hybrids of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Beauveria bassiana andBeauveria sulfurescens
Muriel Viaud, Yvonne Couteaudier, Guy Riba
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 1998, 64 (1) 88-93; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.1.88-93.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Analysis of Hypervirulent Somatic Hybrids of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Beauveria bassiana andBeauveria sulfurescens
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Molecular Analysis of Hypervirulent Somatic Hybrids of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Beauveria bassiana andBeauveria sulfurescens
Muriel Viaud, Yvonne Couteaudier, Guy Riba
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 1998, 64 (1) 88-93; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.1.88-93.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Mitosporic Fungi
Recombination, Genetic
virulence

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336