Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Methods

A Simple and Reliable Method for Hybridization of Homothallic Wine Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Manuel Ramírez, Francisco Peréz, José A. Regodón
Manuel Ramírez
Departamento de Microbiologı́a, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francisco Peréz
Departamento de Microbiologı́a, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José A. Regodón
Instituto de Tecnologı́a Agroalimentaria, Junta de Extremadura, 06080 Badajoz, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.5039-5041.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A procedure was developed for the hybridization and improvement of homothallic industrial wine yeasts. Killer cycloheximide-sensitive strains were crossed with killer-sensitive cycloheximide-resistant strains to get killer cycloheximide-resistant hybrids, thereby enabling hybrid selection and identification. This procedure also allows backcrossing of spore colonies from the hybrids with parental strains.

Hybridization is the first method to be considered for improvement of diploid industrial yeast strains. For heterothallic strains, one can select hybrids by micromanipulating the zygotes formed between meiotic segregants with complementary mating types. For homothallic strains, the most frequently used of the industrial yeasts (1, 5, 8, 11, 13, 16), different strategies have to be used. Some approaches use laboratory haploid heterothallic strains with appropriate markers to be crossed with haploid cells from spores of homothallic industrial strains. In these cases, hybrids are easy to detect, and improvement of some industrial yeasts has been described (5, 7, 8, 15). However, backcrossing is needed to regenerate the industrial strain properties that are lacking in laboratory strains (7, 15). For two homothallic strains, hybridization can be accomplished by mixing sporulated cultures (13, 19). Cell fusion can occur between spore germination and diploidization. However, hybrids are obtained with lower frequency, and they are difficult to identify. In this paper, we describe a method for homothallic wine yeast spore hybridization that allows hybrid selection and identification, so that a greater number of hybrids can be obtained easily. The method takes advantage of the fact that the killer phenotype is very frequent among wine yeasts (3, 6, 14, 17). By changing the culture conditions, one can make yeasts conjugate or kill each other.

The killer phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is determined by double-stranded RNA molecules. Several situations that lead to the loss of this phenotype have been described. Among them are high-temperature growth and the presence of certain compounds, such as ethidium bromide, 5-fluorouracil, or cycloheximide, in the culture medium (2, 4, 10, 18). We isolated cycloheximide-resistant (CYHR) spontaneous mutants in YEPD-CYH medium (1% Bacto-yeast extract, 2% Bacto-peptone, 2% glucose, 2% Bacto-agar, 2 μg of cycloheximide per ml) from killer K2 (K+) cycloheximide-sensitive (CYHS) diploid homothallic wine yeasts. These mutants lose the killer phenotype, becoming killer-sensitive (K−) strains. All of the mutants isolated bear heterozygous dominant chromosomal mutations (JP73R and JP85R in Table 1).

The K− CYHR spontaneous mutants JP73R and JP85R and the wild-type prototrophic yeasts JP85 and JP88 (K+ CYHS) were sporulated, and tetrad analysis was performed (12 to 14 tetrads for each strain). Standard yeast genetic procedures were used for sporulation of cultures and dissection of asci (9). The spore viability and the segregation ratio of the colony size are given in Table 1. In order to obtain homozygous strains free from growth-retarding alleles, single-spore cultures having large colony size were sporulated again, and 12 to 14 tetrads were analyzed. The procedure was repeated until 100% of the viable spores and a uniform large colony size were obtained for all of the spore colonies in YEPD (one repeat for JP85, JP88, and JP85R and three repeats for JP73R). The single-spore cultures chosen from JP73R and JP85R progenies were always CYHR. Finally, we chose four homozygous single-spore cultures for breeding: 854D from JP85, 881A from JP88, 85R4A from JP85R, and 73R11D from JP73. All of these spore cultures showed must fermentation kinetics and enological properties that were very similar to those of the original yeasts (data not shown). Consequently, all of these homozygous strains can be considered equally suitable for industrial fermentation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of the S. cerevisiae strains used in this study

The homozygous K− CYHR (854D and 881A) and K+ CYHS (85R4A and 73R11D) spore cultures were crossed to obtain K+ CYHRhybrids. The following crosses were performed: 854D × 85R4A, 881A × 85R4A, and 854D × 73R11D. Since all of the strains are homothallic, it is necessary to mix spores to achieve conjugation of haploid cells before they become diploid as a consequence of a mating-type switch. The parental yeasts were inoculated in sporulation medium (1% potassium acetate, 0.1% Bacto-yeast extract, 0.05% glucose, 2% Bacto-agar) and incubated at 25°C until more than 50% of the tetrads (from 10 to 30 days) were obtained. A small dab of each sporulated culture was treated with Zymolyase to digest the ascus wall (9). Tetrads were picked up with the microneedle of a micromanipulator, each ascus was broken separately, and the four spores were mixed thoroughly with the four spores from another tetrad of a different parent. As controls, eight spore mixtures were created with two different tetrads from the same parental strain. Each cross was repeated five times (five mixtures). Since we accomplished three crosses with different parental strains, the total number of eight-spore mixtures was 35: 15 with spores from different parental strains and 20 with spores from the same parental strain (controls). All of the mixtures were mixed in YEPD plates and then incubated for 4 days at 30°C. Under these conditions, the K2 killer toxin is inactive, so that the killer cells do not kill the sensitive cells which can conjugate. Subsequently, the mixture cultures from the YEPD plates were inoculated in low-pH (pH 4.4) blue plates (9) and incubated for 4 to 5 days at 20°C. Under these conditions, the K2 killer toxin is active and kills the sensitive cells of the K− CYHR parents. However, the toxin kills cells neither from the K+ CYHS parental strains nor from the K+ CYHS and K+CYHR hybrids that originated by conjugation. Single-cell colonies of the culture mixtures grown on low-pH blue plates were isolated by spreading samples of the cultures over YEPD plates followed by incubation at 30°C. Four colonies of each mixture (20 of each cross) were replica plated to YEPD-CYH (2 μg of cycloheximide per ml) and incubated at 30°C. As expected, all of the colonies from the control crosses of K− CYHR parental strains (85R4A and 73R11D) grew in YEPD-CYH. On the contrary, no colony from the controls of K+ CYHS parental strains (854D and 881A) grew. The results of the crosses between different parental strains were variable. In some mixtures, none of the four colonies was resistant to cycloheximide. Probably, there was no conjugation between cells from different parental strains, and all of the K−CYHR cells died in low-pH blue plates. Also, it is possible that we did not catch any hybrid among the four colonies chosen. However, in other mixtures, it was possible to obtain several CYHR colonies (from 1 to 4). We were able to isolate CYHR colonies from more than one mixture of each cross performed with different parental strains. These resistant yeasts should be K+ CYHR hybrids.

To confirm this, we analyzed the killer phenotype of all 20 of the colonies isolated from each cross, both resistant and not resistant to cycloheximide. As expected, all of the CYHS colonies from the controls of K+ CYHS parental strains (854D × 854D and 881A × 881A) were K+, and all of the CYHR colonies from the controls of K− CYHR parental strains (85R4A × 85R4A and 73R11D × 73R11D) were K−. With respect to the crosses of different parental strains (854D × 85R4A, 881A × 85R4A, and 854D × 73R11D), all of the CYHS colonies were K+ (Table2). These colonies are from cells of the K+ CYHS parental strain that have not conjugated or from haploid cells of the same parent that have conjugated with a haploid sister cell of a different mating type. All of the CYHR colonies from the crosses 854D × 85R4A and 854D × 73R11D and 50% of those from the cross 881A × 85R4A were K+. Therefore, all of these CYHRcolonies are hybrids obtained by conjugation of cells from different parental strains. The rest (50%) of the CYHR colonies from the cross 881A × 85R4A were K−. They may correspond to K+ CYHR parent cells that, for some reason, have resisted the killer toxin in low-pH blue plates or to K+ CYHR hybrids that do not express the killer phenotype under our test conditions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Crossbreeding of K+ CYHS (854D and 881A) with K− CYHR (85R4A and 73R11D) homozygous homothallic strains to obtain killer K2 cycloheximide-resistant hybrids (K+ CYHR)

To double-check the new hybrids, we analyzed the progeny of one K+ CYHR hybrid from each cross (3AR from 854D × 85R4A, 7AR from 881A × 85R4A, and 15CR from 854D × 73R11D). After sporulation and dissection of 12 to 14 tetrads, the spore colonies were replica plated to YEPD-CYH with different concentrations of cycloheximide. The segregation ratio was 2CYHR:2CYHS for the three hybrids in cycloheximide concentrations equal to or lower than the MIC for the original CYHR parental strain (Table3). The MIC for all of the CYHR spore colonies was the same as that for the corresponding parental strain. This shows that these heterozygous strains are actually hybrids that originated by the conjugation of haploid cells from spores of different parental strains.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Cycloheximide resistance segregation ratio of the K+ CYHR hybrids

Vinification trials in sterile must with the hybrids 3AR, 7AR, and 15CR and with four K+ CYHR spore colonies from each hybrid were performed as described by Regodón et al. (12). As a control, vinification trials with the original yeasts (JP85, JP88, JP73R, and JP85R) were performed in parallel. The fermentation kinetics and the quality of the resulting wines were analyzed. In all cases, the results obtained with the hybrids and the meiotic spore segregants were equal to or better than those of the original wine yeasts (data not shown). These results suggest that our method for homothallic yeast hybridization could be very useful for industrial yeast improvement. In our case, we obtained new hybrids with a killer phenotype that are very easy to monitor in industrial fermentations, just by replica plating to YEPD-CYH. Because cycloheximide inhibits mammalian cells, it is not currently used in human disease treatment. Moreover, cycloheximide resistance is widespread in wild yeasts; some of these yeasts (such asBrettanomyces or Dekkera andZygosaccharomyces) are involved in spontaneous must fermentation and therefore are ingested by humans without toxic effects.

This hybridization method could also be used to enable genetic studies of natural wild yeast populations without the need for crossing with laboratory domesticated strains. Back crossing of K+CYHR spore cultures from the hybrids with the K+ CYHS parental yeasts is also possible if the killer spore culture cells are cured by growing them in YEPD-CYH. Care should be taken, because CYHR strains do not lose the killer phenotype as easily as CYHS strains (2). Cells should be spread over YEPD-CYH plates in order to produce single-cell colonies, and these should be tested for killer phenotype loss. We obtained killer phenotype losses of 20 to 80%, 28 to 40%, and 15 to 33% among different K+ CYHRsingle-spore cultures from 3AR, 7AR, and 15CR, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was partially financed by projects CICYT 95-0090-OP (Spanish Government) and EIB94-09 (Government of Extremadura).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 June 1998.
    • Accepted 15 September 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bakalinsky A. T.,
    2. Snow R.
    Conversion of wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to heterothallism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56 1990 849 857
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Carroll C.,
    2. Wickner R. B.
    Translation and M1 double-stranded RNA propagation: MAK18 = RPL41B and cycloheximide curing. J. Bacteriol. 177 1995 2887 2891
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Da Silva G. A.
    The occurrence of killer, sensitive, and neutral yeasts in Brazilian Riesling Italico grape must and the effect of neutral strains on killing behaviour. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 46 1996 112 121
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fink G. R.,
    2. Styles C. A.
    Curing of a killer factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69 1972 2846 2849
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Guijo S.,
    2. Mauricio J. C.,
    3. Salmon J. M.,
    4. Ortega J. M.
    Determination of the relative ploidy in different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used for fermentation and “flor” film ageing of dry sherry-type wines. Yeast 13 1997 101 117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hidalgo P.,
    2. Flores M.
    Occurrence of the killer character in yeasts associated with Spanish wine production. Food Microbiol. 11 1994 161 167
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ibragimova S. I.,
    2. Kozlov D. G.,
    3. Kartasheva N. N.,
    4. Suntsov N. I.,
    5. Efremov B. D.,
    6. Benevolensky S. V.
    A strategy for construction of industrial strains of distiller’s yeast. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 46 1994 285 290
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jiménez J.,
    2. Benı́tez T.
    Genetic analysis of highly ethanol-tolerant wine yeasts. Curr. Genet. 12 1987 421 428
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kaiser C.,
    2. Michaelis S.,
    3. Mitchell A.
    Methods in yeast genetics. 1994 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mitchell D. J.,
    2. Bevan E. A.,
    3. Herring A. J.
    Correlation between dsRNA in yeast and killer character. Heredity 31 1973 133 134
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mortimer R. K.,
    2. Romano P.,
    3. Suzzi G.,
    4. Polsinelli M.
    Genome renewal: a new phenomenon revealed from a genetic study of 43 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from natural fermentation of grape musts. Yeast 10 1994 1543 1552
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Regodón J. A.,
    2. Pérez F.,
    3. Valdés M. E.,
    4. De Miguel C.,
    5. Ramı́rez M.
    A simple and effective approach for selection of wine yeast strains. Food Microbiol. 14 1997 247 254
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Romano P.,
    2. Soli M. G.,
    3. Suzzi G.,
    4. Grazia L.,
    5. Zambonelli C.
    Improvement of a wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain by a breeding program. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50 1985 1064 1067
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Shimizu K.
    Killer yeast Wine microbiology and biotechnology. Fleet G. H. 1993 243 263 Harwood Academic Publishers Newark, N.J
  15. 15.↵
    1. Thornton R. J.
    The introduction of flocculation into a homothallic wine yeast. A practical example of the modification of winemaking properties by the use of genetic techniques. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 36 1985 47 49
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Thornton R. J.,
    2. Eschenbruch R.
    Homothallism in wine yeasts. Antonie Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 42 1976 503 509
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Vagnoli P.,
    2. Musmanno R. A.,
    3. Cresti S.,
    4. Di Maggio T.,
    5. Coratza G.
    Occurrence of killer yeasts in spontaneous wine fermentations from the Tuscany region of Italy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 1993 4037 4043
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wickner R. B.
    “Killer character” of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: curing by growth at elevated temperature. J. Bacteriol. 117 1974 1356 1357
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Winge O.,
    2. Laustsen O.
    Artificial species hybridisation in yeast. C. R. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg Ser. Physiol. 22 1938 235 244
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Simple and Reliable Method for Hybridization of Homothallic Wine Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Manuel Ramírez, Francisco Peréz, José A. Regodón
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Dec 1998, 64 (12) 5039-5041; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.5039-5041.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Simple and Reliable Method for Hybridization of Homothallic Wine Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Simple and Reliable Method for Hybridization of Homothallic Wine Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Manuel Ramírez, Francisco Peréz, José A. Regodón
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Dec 1998, 64 (12) 5039-5041; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.5039-5041.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336