Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH MICROBIOLOGY

Effects of Halides on Plasmid-Mediated Silver Resistance in Escherichia coli

Amit Gupta, Maria Maynes, Simon Silver
Amit Gupta
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612-7344
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Maynes
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612-7344
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Silver
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612-7344
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.5042-5045.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Silver resistance of sensitive Escherichia coli J53 and resistance plasmid-containing J53(pMG101) was affected by halides in the growth medium. The effects of halides on Ag+ resistance were measured with AgNO3 and silver sulfadiazine, both on agar and in liquid. Low concentrations of chloride made the differences in MICs between sensitive and resistant strains larger. High concentrations of halides increased the sensitivities of both strains to Ag+.

Silver salts and compounds are used widely as environmental biocides and as clinical antimicrobial agents (2, 7, 10, 13, 17). Ag+-resistant bacteria have been isolated (2, 8, 18), and resistance has sometimes been plasmid linked (5, 12, 19). However, most reports have been preliminary (e.g., references 5, 8, and16) and the existence of silver-resistant bacteria in clinics has been questioned (10, 17), largely because of the compounding effects of environmental factors on toxicity and resistance (2, 3). Silver-binding components such as microbial biomass, proteins, lignin, and chloride are such factors. Among silver salts, AgNO3 is water soluble, Ag2SO4 and Ag-acetate are sparingly soluble, and AgCl, AgBr, AgI, and Ag2S are basically insoluble (4).

The purpose of this report is to set out easy-to-use conditions for measuring silver sensitivity and resistance in familiar and widely used media, Luria-Bertani (LB) agar and broth (14), so as to facilitate wider identification of silver resistance in nature.

Metal resistances including silver resistance are found in environments exposed to compounds that might provide for selection (3, 7, 17). Environmental toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms is affected by both biotic and abiotic factors (3, 13, 16). These factors, for example, alter the bioavailability of metal ions (1, 3, 15). For Hg2+, and as we will show for Ag+ below, addition of Cl− increases toxicity to bacteria (6), presumedly by increasing membrane permeability (11). The amount of bioavailable Hg2+ decreased when Cl−levels exceeded 1 mM (1). This reduction was suggested to be due to an increase in the proportion of negatively charged mercury or Hg(II) complexes (HgCl3−/HgCl42−[1]). Similarly, in early and preliminary studies, the difference between Ag+-sensitive and -resistant cells was most clear in the presence of Cl−, while in the absence of Cl−, cells with or without the resistance plasmid were both sensitive to Ag+ (16).

The genes for Ag+ resistance have been identified recently (9). The cluster of seven genes (and two open reading frames of unknown function) is organized into three divergently transcribed units. The gene products are tentatively identified by homologies with other available sequences, but frequently these are also for proteins that have not been directly isolated. SilE is a periplasmic metal-binding protein that has been purified and measured for Ag+-binding properties (9). SilS and SilR are a presumed two-component membrane sensor and transcriptional responder, and SilCBA and SilP are a presumed Ag+ efflux chemiosmotic cation-proton antiporter and a P-type ATPase, respectively.

The effects of halide ions on Ag+ resistance ofEscherichia coli K-12 strains J53 (Ag+sensitive) and J53(pMG101) (Ag+ resistant) (9, 12) were measured on LB agar (14) streaked with log-phase cultures at a density of 200 Klett turbidity units (which corresponds to 2 g [wet weight] of cells per liter) (see Fig. 1and 2). Since Ag+ is bactericidal rather than bacteriostatic, as are some other toxic heavy metals, the numbers of cells streaked and their growth phase have great influence on growth appearing on the agar plate (reference 16 and data not shown). NaCl alone, without Ag+, was toxic at high concentrations: at 40 g of NaCl per liter, the resistant J53(pMG101) cells showed reduced growth whereas the sensitive strain J53 reproducibly showed unimpaired growth (data not shown). A similar difference in NaCl sensitivity was found in liquid media (see below). We do not know whether this enhanced sensitivity to NaCl is associated with the silver resistance determinant or another region on the 180-kb (9) plasmid. In LB agar with added Ag+ and no added NaCl, E. coli J53 grew with up to 100 μM Ag+ and J53(pMG101) grew at 600 μM Ag+ (Fig.1A). E. coli J53 grew with up to 50 μM Ag+ with 10 g of NaCl per liter (171 mM [Fig. 1B]), but there was no growth at 50 μM Ag+ with higher NaCl levels (Fig. 1C and D). Growth ofE. coli J53(pMG101) was barely reduced at 600 μM Ag+ and 10 g of NaCl per liter (Fig. 1B), but in 20 g of NaCl per liter there was no growth at 200 μM Ag+ and a marked reduction in growth at 100 μM Ag+ (Fig. 1C). In 30 g of NaCl per liter, slight growth of E. coli J53(pMG101) was observed only at 50 μM Ag+ (Fig. 1D). These results on agar media (Fig.1) were quantitatively reproducible from experiment to experiment and were consistent with those obtained in liquid media (see below). It seemed likely that the effects of NaCl on silver toxicity result from the low solubility of AgCl (solubility product, 1.56 × 10−10 mol/liter [20]) and the formation of water-soluble complex anions, AgCl2−and AgCl32− (4), at higher chloride levels. Similar chemistry occurs with the other halides, bromide and iodide (solubility products of AgBr and AgI, 7.7 × 10−13 and 1.5 × 10−16mol/liter, respectively [20]), and formation of anionic complexes (Ag X2− and Ag X32−, where X is Cl, Br, or I) with relative stabilities of I− > Br− > Cl− (4). In addition to the anionic silver complexes, cationic species (Ag2X+ and Ag3X2+) are formed in aqueous solutions (4). The water-soluble ionic Ag-halide complexes might have increased access to the cell membrane, resulting in increased bioavailability of Ag+. At low halide levels, silver is excluded by precipitating as Ag X , but at higher concentrations there is an increase in the proportion of accessible anionic complexes, resulting in decreased Ag+ resistance.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Growth of E. coli J53 (sensitive, left) and J53(pMG101) (resistant, right) on LB agar with NaCl and AgNO3 after 20 h at 37°C. LB was supplemented with AgNO3 and no added NaCl (A), AgNO3 and 10 g of NaCl per liter (B), AgNO3 and 20 g of NaCl per liter (C), and AgNO3 and 30 g of NaCl per liter (D). The numbers below the panels represent the AgNO3concentration added to each petri dish.

Growth experiments were conducted with NaBr- and NaI-supplemented LB agar and AgNO3 (Fig. 2). The Ag+ sensitivity of E. coli J53 increased with the addition of low levels (2.5 g/liter) of NaBr (Fig. 2A), although NaBr alone was not toxic up to 30 g/liter (data not shown). A high level (30 g/liter) of NaBr reduced the Ag+ resistance of J53(pMG101) substantially (Fig. 2A), as was found with 30 g of NaCl per liter (Fig. 1D). The addition of 5 g of NaI per liter (35 mM) reduced the Ag+ sensitivity of E. coliJ53 (Fig. 2B), allowing growth in 0.6 mM Ag+, presumably by removing the Ag+ as precipitated AgI. Higher I− levels (10 or 20 g/liter [Fig. 2B]) increased the sensitivity of the resistant strain, presumably by solubilizing Ag+ in a more “bioavailable” anionic complex.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Growth of E. coli J53 and J53(pMG101) on LB agar plates supplemented with NaBr and AgNO3 (A) or NaI and AgNO3 (B). The numbers on the sides of the panels represent the NaBr or NaI concentration, and the numbers below the panels represent the AgNO3 concentration added to each petri dish.

Since Ag-sulfadiazine is the primary silver compound in clinical use (7, 13), it is appropriate to measure differences between AgNO3 and Ag-sulfadiazine. Sulfadiazine in this compound is thought to function not as an antibiotic, but rather to complex silver in a water-insoluble form that is “slow released” for bioactivity (2, 13). The blackening on the skin from Ag+ reduction with AgNO3 is not seen with Ag-sulfadiazine. In the absence of added NaCl, Ag-sulfadiazine was slightly more toxic than AgNO3 (compare Fig.3 with Fig. 1A). Growth of sensitiveE. coli J53 was reduced at 100 μM Ag-sulfadiazine, and resistant J53(pMG101) grew at up to 600 μM Ag-sulfadiazine. The toxicity of Ag-sulfadiazine to sensitive and resistant cells increased with the addition of NaCl (Fig. 3), as had been the case with AgNO3 (Fig. 1). Comparing the toxicity of AgNO3with that of Ag-sulfadiazine, the latter was less (roughly twofold) toxic after the addition of NaCl (compare Fig. 3 with Fig. 1). For example, growth of resistant J53(pMG101) was reduced at 200 μM Ag-sulfadiazine, compared to 100 μM AgNO3(with 20 g of NaCl per liter), and growth of resistant J53(pMG101) occurred at 100 μM Ag-sulfadiazine, compared to 50 μM AgNO3 (with 30 g of NaCl per liter [Fig. 3]).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Growth of E. coli J53 and J53(pMG101) on LB agar supplemented with NaCl and Ag-sulfadiazine. The numbers on the sides of the panels represent the NaCl or Ag-sulfadiazine concentration added to each petri dish.

Although growth on agar plates is the more ready means of distinguishing Ag+-sensitive from Ag+-resistantE. coli (Fig. 1 to 3), liquid growth experiments showed basically similar results (Fig. 4). The effects of chloride ions on Ag+ resistance of E. coli J53 and J53(pMG101) were measured in LB broth (14) containing NaCl and/or AgNO3, inoculated with 2 Klett turbidity units (20 μg [wet weight] of cells per ml) of log-phase cells. Low NaCl levels enhanced Ag+ resistance ofE. coli J53(pMG101) from 400 μM Ag+to more than 600 μM Ag+ (Fig. 4A, C, and D). Growth of sensitive E. coli was unaffected at 50 μM Ag+, but turbidity was reduced at 100 μM Ag+. With added higher NaCl concentrations, there was reduced growth of sensitive cells at 50 μM Ag+ (Fig. 4D to F). Addition of 5 or 10 g of NaCl per liter (85 or 171 mM) to LB allowed growth ofE. coli J53(pMG101) in 600 μM Ag+ (Fig.4C and D), but growth was reduced by Ag+ at higher levels (20 or 30 g/liter) of NaCl (Fig. 4E and F). In LB liquid cultures, NaCl (50 or 60 g/liter) by itself, without added silver, was more toxic for strain J53(pMG101) than for the plasmidless strain J53 (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Growth of E. coli J53 (•) and J53(pMG101) (■) in LB liquid broth. LB media were supplemented with AgNO3 (no added NaCl) (A), NaCl (no added AgNO3) (B), AgNO3 and 5 g of NaCl per liter (C), AgNO3 and 10 g of NaCl per liter (D), AgNO3 and 20 g of NaCl per liter (E), and AgNO3 and 30 g of NaCl per liter (F). Turbidity was measured after 20 h of growth at 37°C by a Klett-Summerson colorimeter with a Kodak 56 green filter.

These results provide a basis for measurement of Ag+sensitivity and resistance by bacterial isolates, which is useful since silver compounds are increasingly being used as microbicidal agents (2, 10, 13, 17). Environmental silver-binding components are quite diverse and radically affect the proportion of silver that is bioavailable. In clinical settings, Cl− and proteins bind Ag+; in soil and most aqueous environments, Cl− and organic S and N ligands predominate for Ag(I) binding.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the Department of Energy.

We thank A. O. Summers (University of Georgia, Athens) forE. coli J53(pMG101) and Portia Harris (Xavier University, New Orleans, La.) for assistance during this work.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 September 1998.
    • Accepted 5 October 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barkay T.,
    2. Gillman M.,
    3. Turner R. R.
    Effects of dissolved organic carbon and salinity on bioavailability of mercury. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 1997 4267 4271
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Clement J. L.,
    2. Jarrett P. S.
    Antibacterial silver. Metal-Based Drugs 1 1994 467 482
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Collins Y. E.,
    2. Stotzky G.
    Factors affecting the toxicity of heavy metals to microbes Metal ions and bacteria. Beveridge T. J., Doyle R. J. 1989 31 90 John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, N.Y
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cotton F. A.,
    2. Wilkinson G.
    Silver and gold: group IB(11) Advanced inorganic chemistry 5th ed. 1988 937 949 John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, N.Y
  5. 5.↵
    1. Deshpande L. M.,
    2. Chopade B. A.
    Plasmid mediated silver resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Biometals 7 1994 49 56
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Farrell R. E.,
    2. Germida J. J.,
    3. Huang P. M.
    Biotoxicity of mercury as influenced by mercury(II) speciation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56 1990 3006 3016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. George N.,
    2. Faoagali J.,
    3. Muller M.
    Silvazine™ (silver sulfadiazine and chlorhexidine) activity against 200 clinical isolates. Burns 23 1997 493 495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Goddard P. A.,
    2. Bull A. T.
    The isolation and characterization of bacteria capable of accumulating silver. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31 1989 308 313
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Gupta, A., K. Matsui, J.-F. Lo, and S. Silver. Molecular basis for resistance to silver cations inSalmonella. Nature Med., in press.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gupta A.,
    2. Silver S.
    Silver as a biocide: will resistance become a problem? Nat. Biotechnol. 16 1998 888
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gutknecht J.
    Inorganic mercury (Hg2+) transport through lipid bi-layer membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 61 1981 61 66
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. McHugh S. L.,
    2. Moellering R. C.,
    3. Hopkins C. C.,
    4. Swartz M. N.
    Salmonella typhimurium resistant to silver nitrate, chloramphenicol, and ampicillin. Lancet i 1975 235 240
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Russell A. D.,
    2. Hugo W. B.
    Antimicrobial activity and action of silver. Prog. Med. Chem. 31 1994 351 370
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 2nd ed. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  15. 15.↵
    1. Selifonova O.,
    2. Burlage R.,
    3. Barkay T.
    Bioluminescent sensors for detection of bioavailable Hg(II) in the environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 1993 3083 3090
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Silver S.
    Mechanisms of plasmid-determined heavy metal resistances Molecular biology, pathogenicity, and ecology of bacterial plasmids. Levy S. B., Clowes R. C., Koenig E. L. 1981 179 189 Plenum Publishing Corp. New York, N.Y
  17. 17.↵
    Silver, S., A. Gupta, K. Matsui, and J.-F. Lo. Resistance to Ag(I) cations in bacteria: environments, genes and proteins. Metal-Based Drugs, in press.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Slawson R. M.,
    2. Van Dyke M. I.,
    3. Lee H.,
    4. Trevors J. T.
    Germanium and silver resistance, accumulation, and toxicity in microorganisms. Plasmid 27 1992 72 79
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Starodub M. E.,
    2. Trevors J. T.
    Mobilization of Escherichia coli R1 silver-resistance plasmid pJT1 by Tn5-Mob into Escherichia coli C600. Biol. Metals 3 1990 24 27
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Weast R. C.
    CRC handbook of chemistry and physics 49th ed. 1968 B 307 The Chemical Rubber Company Cleveland, Ohio
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Effects of Halides on Plasmid-Mediated Silver Resistance in Escherichia coli
Amit Gupta, Maria Maynes, Simon Silver
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Dec 1998, 64 (12) 5042-5045; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.5042-5045.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of Halides on Plasmid-Mediated Silver Resistance in Escherichia coli
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Effects of Halides on Plasmid-Mediated Silver Resistance in Escherichia coli
Amit Gupta, Maria Maynes, Simon Silver
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Dec 1998, 64 (12) 5042-5045; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.5042-5045.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Drug Resistance, Microbial
Escherichia coli
R Factors
silver
Silver Nitrate
Sodium Chloride

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336