Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
General Microbial Ecology

Grazing Pressure by a Bacterivorous Flagellate Reverses the Relative Abundance of Comamonas acidovoransPX54 and Vibrio Strain CB5 in Chemostat Cocultures

Martin W. Hahn, Manfred G. Höfle
Martin W. Hahn
GBF-National Research Center of Biotechnology, AG Microbial Ecology, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manfred G. Höfle
GBF-National Research Center of Biotechnology, AG Microbial Ecology, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.5.1910-1918.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Influence of grazing by the bacterivorous flagellateOchromonas sp., inoculated on day 14 into C. acidovorans PX54 and Vibrio strain CB5 chemostat cultures (Flag1 experiment). (A) Total bacterial abundance and flagellate abundance. (B) Relative abundance of C. acidovorans PX54 determined either by immunofluorescence microscopy or by distinguishing colony types on agar plates. (C) Mean cell volume of the total bacterial community and percentage ofC. acidovorans PX54 cells larger than 10 μm (filamentous cells). (D) Biomasses of C. acidovorans PX54 and Vibrio strain CB5 populations in the flagellate-free and flagellate-controlled phases. Inoculation of the bacterivorous flagellate Ochromonas sp. is indicated by vertical lines.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Influence of grazing by Ochromonas sp. on the model community consisting of C. acidovorans PX54 andVibrio strain CB5 (Flag2 experiment). (A) Bacterial abundance before and after inoculation with Vibrio strain CB5 and after introduction of the predator Ochromonas sp. and abundance of this flagellate. (B) Relative abundance of C. acidovorans PX54 and percentage of C. acidovorans PX54 cells larger than 10 μm (filamentous cells).

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    (A and B) Microphotographs of C. acidovoransPX54 (green) and Vibrio strain CB5 (red) stained with fluorescently labelled antibodies (Flag1 experiment). (A) Before flagellate inoculation (day 8). (B) After flagellate inoculation (day 32). (C) Filamentous C. acidovorans PX54 cells grown in a flagellate-free batch culture (late exponential growth stage; cells stained with DAPI).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Transient stage after introduction of the flagellate (on day 14) into a chemostat culture of C. acidovorans PX54 andVibrio strain CB5 (Flag1 experiment). In the beginning, the total bacterial numbers of both species decreased at similar rates, indicating nonselective grazing by the flagellate (lower panel). After day 16, Vibrio strain CB5 abundance continued to decrease but C. acidovorans PX54 abundance increased again and the relative species composition changed (upper panel).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Size class distribution of Vibrio strain CB5 cells (left panels) and C. acidovorans PX54 cells (right panels) in corresponding chemostat samples from flagellate-free and flagellate-controlled phases (Flag1 experiment). Cells longer than 5 μm were pooled in one size class (>5 μm). To avoid distortion of size class distribution, measured cell lengths were corrected for size overestimation caused by cell staining with fluorescently labelled antibodies but not for size overestimation caused by DAPI staining (for details, see Materials and Methods).

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Influence of growth rate on the cell size and abundance of C. acidovorans PX54 and Vibrio strain CB5 in chemostat cultures (Dilut experiment). The change in dilution rate (growth rate) from 0.5 to 2.0 day−1 at day 10 simulated nonselective grazing similar to size-selective grazing byOchromonas sp. in flagellate-controlled phases of the Flag1 and Flag2 experiments.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Four-step mechanism explaining the observed changes in relative species composition of binary chemostat cultures after introduction of the flagellate Ochromonas sp. Changes were caused by a combination of a grazing-controlled increase in the bacterial growth rate with the different growth rate-dependent elongation of cells of the two species and size-selective grazing by the flagellate.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Overview of the three chemostat experiments

    ExptDay of inoculation with:Day of:
    C. acidovoransPX54Vibrio strain CB5Ochromonassp.Increase in dilution rateEnd of expt
    Flag1111438
    Flag21153462
    Dilut111017
  • Table 2.

    Steady-state parameters of the flagellate-free and flagellate-controlled phases and parameters of the transient stages (after flagellate introduction until establishment of a new steady state) of the Flag1 and Flag2 chemostat experimenta

    ParameterFlag1 exptFlag2 exptb
    Steady state
     Total bacterial abundance (106 ml−1)
      Without flagellates10.3 ± 0.59.9 ± 0.4
      With flagellates0.34 ± 0.070.32 ± 0.06
     Relative abundance of C. acidovorans PX54 (%)
      Without flagellates6.5 ± 1.07.3 ± 0.4
      With flagellates67.0 ± 3.867.0 ± 1.1
    Dynamic state (from transient stage; day−1)
     Rate of increase in flagellate no.b0.511.15
     Rate of bacterial cell no.cdecrease0.651.14
    • ↵a Data on the flagellate-free phase of the Flag2 experiment represent the situation after inoculation withVibrio strain CB5. Steady-state parameters represent mean values ± standard deviations, and transient-stage values represent rates of exponential changes following flagellate inoculation.

    • ↵b After inoculation with Vibriostrain CB5.

    • ↵c After inoculation with the flagellate.

  • Table 3.

    Abundance of C. acidovorans PX54 andVibrio strain CB5 in the steady state of the flagellate-free phases of the three chemostat experimentsa

    ExptPeriod (days)Mean abundance ± SD (106 ml−1)
    C. acidovoransPX54Vibrio strain CB5
    14–140.67 ± 0.089.63 ± 0.55
    2b2–150.68 ± 0.06
    2c20–340.72 ± 0.079.18 ± 0.51
    36–101.00 ± 0.176.30 ± 0.13
    • ↵a In each experiment, the growth rate during the first phase was 0.5 day−1. In contrast to the other experiments, C. acidovorans PX54 grew initially in the Flag2 experiment without Vibrio strain CB5. This species was introduced at day 15 of the experiment, and 4 days later, a second steady state was established. Note that C. acidovorans PX54 abundance was not significantly (P > 0.1) influenced by the Vibrio strain CB5 population.

    • ↵b Steady state before inoculation withVibrio strain CB5.

    • ↵c Steady state after inoculation withVibrio strain CB5.

  • Table 4.

    Effect of growth phase on cell size in batch culture experimentsa

    BacteriumMean cell vol (μm3)% of cells >10 μm longμmax (h−1)
    Log phaseStationary phase
    C. acidovoransPX540.760.09<10.17
    Vibrio strain CB50.310.070.20
    • ↵a Mean cell volume in the late logarithmic and stationary phases (35 h after the end of the log phase), percentage of filamentous cells (late logarithmic phase), and the maximum growth rates of the two bacterial strains are shown. Batch cultures were grown in NSY medium at 15°C and 150 rpm.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Grazing Pressure by a Bacterivorous Flagellate Reverses the Relative Abundance of Comamonas acidovoransPX54 and Vibrio Strain CB5 in Chemostat Cocultures
Martin W. Hahn, Manfred G. Höfle
Applied and Environmental Microbiology May 1998, 64 (5) 1910-1918; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.5.1910-1918.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Grazing Pressure by a Bacterivorous Flagellate Reverses the Relative Abundance of Comamonas acidovoransPX54 and Vibrio Strain CB5 in Chemostat Cocultures
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Grazing Pressure by a Bacterivorous Flagellate Reverses the Relative Abundance of Comamonas acidovoransPX54 and Vibrio Strain CB5 in Chemostat Cocultures
Martin W. Hahn, Manfred G. Höfle
Applied and Environmental Microbiology May 1998, 64 (5) 1910-1918; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.5.1910-1918.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336