Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Plant Microbiology

Root Colonization by Agrobacterium tumefaciens Is Reduced in cel, attB,attD, and attR Mutants

Ann G. Matthysse, Susan McMahan
Ann G. Matthysse
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan McMahan
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.7.2341-2345.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Positions of transposon insertions in mutants used in this study. The cel and att regions of the bacterial chromosome are shown. Both of these regions have been sequenced (20, 21). An enlargement of the left end of theatt region is shown below the diagram of the larger clone. Triangles indicate the sites of transposon insertion in mutants used in this study. The small arrows with the triangles indicate the orientation of the promoterless β-galactosidase gene contained in Tn3HoHo1. The locations and directions of open reading frames (ORFs) are indicated by the larger arrows. The genes which have the highest homology to the open reading frames are indicated below the arrows (20, 21). Restriction sites are indicated as follows: E, EcoRI; C, ClaI; P, PstI; B,BamHI; X, XbaI; H, HindIII; S,SacI.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Attachment of bacteria to A. thaliana root hairs. Wild-type and mutant A. tumefaciens strains were incubated with roots of A. thaliana in 0.4% sucrose for 2 days. (A) Wild-type strain C58. Note the numerous bacteria attached to the root hairs. (B) Cellulose-minus strain C58::1. (C) Attachment-minus mutant C58::A205. The attachment of thecel and att mutants was much reduced compared with the attachment of the wild type. Similar results were observed for bacteria attached to the root epidermis. Bar = 5 μm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Numbers of bacteria recovered from tomato roots. (A) Log10 total number of bacteria per centimeter of root length recovered from tomato roots inoculated with wild-type strain C58 (⧫) and cellulose-minus mutants C58::1 (▪) and C58::A60 (▵). (B) Log10 total number of bacteria per centimeter of root length recovered from tomato roots inoculated with wild-type strain C58 (⧫) and attachment-minus mutants C58::A205 (▪), C58::N004 (▵), and C58::B123 (×). Note that cellulose-minus and attachment-minus bacteria had reduced abilities to colonize roots. These reductions were due to reductions in loosely bound, tightly bound, and irreversibly bound bacteria. The numbers shown are the means from a minimum of four separate experiments. The standard deviation of all points was less than 0.9.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Numbers of bacteria recovered from A. thaliana roots. (A) Log10 total number of bacteria per centimeter of root length recovered from A. thaliana roots inoculated with wild-type strain C58 (⧫) and cellulose-minus mutants C58::1 (▪) and C58::A60 (▵). (B) Log10 total number of bacteria per centimeter of root length recovered from A. thaliana roots inoculated with wild-type strain C58 (⧫) and attachment-minus mutants C58::A205 (▪) and C58::N004 (▵). Note that cellulose-minus and attachment-minus bacteria had reduced abilities to colonize the roots after the first day. The reductions in the total numbers of bacteria were due to reductions in loosely bound, tightly bound, and irreversibly bound bacteria. The numbers shown are the means from a minimum of four separate experiments. The standard deviation of all points was less than 0.5.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Numbers of wild-type strain C58 bacteria associated with tomato roots after incubation in soil for up to 10 days

    DayNo. of bacteria (mean log10 ± SD)a
    Loosely boundTightly boundIrreversibly bound
    02.7 ± 0.72.6 ± 0.70.7 ± 0.6
    12.3 ± 0.52.4 ± 0.60.2 ± 0.3
    22.7 ± 0.52.7 ± 0.70.8 ± 0.5
    33.7 ± 0.83.6 ± 0.81.5 ± 0.7
    44.4 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.31.5 ± 0.6
    54.8 ± 0.74.9 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.3
    65.0 ± 0.55.0 ± 0.61.6 ± 0.3
    74.8 ± 0.75.3 ± 0.83.0 ± 0.3
    86.9 ± 0.96.6 ± 0.63.1 ± 0.3
    97.7 ± 0.77.7 ± 0.73.7 ± 0.2
    106.7 ± 0.56.9 ± 0.83.4 ± 0.3
    • ↵a The method used to determine the numbers of loosely bound, tightly bound, and irreversibly bound bacteria is described in the text.

  • Table 2.

    Numbers of cellulose-minus C58::1 bacteria associated with tomato roots after incubation in soil for up to 10 days

    DayNo. of bacteria (mean log10 ± SD)a
    Loosely boundTightly boundIrreversibly bound
    02.1 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.40.2 ± 0.2
    12.4 ± 0.82.1 ± 1.10.2 ± 0.2
    22.0 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.40.4 ± 0.4
    32.3 ± 0.52.3 ± 0.70.5 ± 0.5
    42.4 ± 0.42.0 ± 1.01.1 ± 0.9
    52.2 ± 0.52.0 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.5
    62.2 ± 0.52.4 ± 0.60.7 ± 0.5
    72.5 ± 0.62.5 ± 0.60.7 ± 0.5
    82.4 ± 0.62.5 ± 0.60.8 ± 0.6
    92.6 ± 0.62.6 ± 0.61.3 ± 0.2
    103.2 ± 0.12.7 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.5
    • ↵a The method used to determine the numbers of loosely bound, tightly bound, and irreversibly bound bacteria is described in the text.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Root Colonization by Agrobacterium tumefaciens Is Reduced in cel, attB,attD, and attR Mutants
Ann G. Matthysse, Susan McMahan
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 1998, 64 (7) 2341-2345; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.7.2341-2345.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Root Colonization by Agrobacterium tumefaciens Is Reduced in cel, attB,attD, and attR Mutants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Root Colonization by Agrobacterium tumefaciens Is Reduced in cel, attB,attD, and attR Mutants
Ann G. Matthysse, Susan McMahan
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 1998, 64 (7) 2341-2345; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.7.2341-2345.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Arabidopsis
Lycopersicon esculentum
Plant Roots

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336