Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

Chemostat Production of Plantaricin C ByLactobacillus plantarum LL441

J. M. Bruno Bárcena, F. Siñeriz, D. González de Llano, Ana Rodríguez, Juan E. Suárez
J. M. Bruno Bárcena
Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (IPLA-CSIC), 33300 Villaviciosa, Asturias, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Siñeriz
Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (IPLA-CSIC), 33300 Villaviciosa, Asturias, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. González de Llano
Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (IPLA-CSIC), 33300 Villaviciosa, Asturias, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Rodríguez
Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (IPLA-CSIC), 33300 Villaviciosa, Asturias, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan E. Suárez
Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (IPLA-CSIC), 33300 Villaviciosa, Asturias, and
Área de Microbiologı́a, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.9.3512-3514.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Plantaricin C, a bacteriocin synthesized by Lactobacillus plantarum LL441, was optimally produced in chemostats kept at pH 5.0, 30°C, 150 rpm, and a dilution rate of 0.05 h−1 when glucose was used as carbon source and a dilution rate of 0.10 to 0.12 h−1 when sucrose or fructose was used instead. Production was abolished at high dilution rates, i.e., when the cells grew rapidly in all carbon sources.

During a screening for bacteria with good technological properties, Lactobacillus plantarum LL441 was isolated from homemade cheese whey. It produces one bacteriocin, plantaricin C (6), a 3.5-kDa peptide that is resistant to harsh environmental conditions and active at pH values from 2.0 to 7.0. It is bactericidal, and in some cases bacteriolytic, to a range of gram-positive organisms that include members of the generaClostridium, Bacillus, andStaphylococcus and also to Listeria monocytogenes(6). Plantaricin C induces the formation of pores in the plasma membrane of sensitive cells, resulting in the dissipation of the proton motive force and in leakage of cytoplasmic solutes. No receptor or energized membranes are needed for its action, explaining, in part, its wide range of susceptible bacteria (7). All these properties allow plantaricin C to be considered a potential food preservative. To achieve this objective, one of the first requirements is mass production of the bacteriocin under standardized conditions to ensure a regular supply for the different tests to be performed and, eventually, for the market. We chose continuous culture as a first step towards this goal.

L. plantarum LL441 was grown in MRS (4) broth to stationary phase, concentrated 10-fold in fresh MRS containing 20% (vol/vol) glycerol, and stored at −20°C. Aliquots (15 ml each) of this culture were used every time the fermentor was inoculated. Unless otherwise stated, the culture medium (BRFS) contained (in grams per liter) yeast extract, 10; MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.05; (NH4)2HPO4, 2.5; MnSO4, 0.005; and the carbon source (glucose, sucrose, or fructose), 5. In experiments during medium development, the growth rate increased up to sugar concentrations of 20 g/liter (higher concentrations were not tested), indicating that it was unlikely that other medium components would be limiting when the carbon source was used at 5 g/liter. Incubation was done in a chemostat Biostat B (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) at 30°C, with a working volume of 700 ml. The pH was maintained by the automatic addition of 2 N NH4OH. The cultures were stirred at 150 rpm. Cultures were started in batch mode. When the population in the vessel reached the exponential phase, continuous cultures were established by pumping in fresh medium, starting at the lowest dilution rate. Steady-state growth, as assessed by biomass, and glucose and lactate concentrations, was reached after three to four residence times of fresh medium passed through the chemostat. Steady-state conditions were maintained for at least two more volume passages, and only afterwards was data collection started. All values shown in the text are averages of triplicates that differed by less than 5%. The dilution rates could be varied upwards or downwards, resulting in constant product concentrations once steady states were reestablished.

Biomass was measured as the absorbance at 600 nm (A600). Dry-weight determinations were carried out after triplicate culture samples (3 ml each) were passed through 0.22-μm pore-size filters and dried at 85°C overnight. A correlation between dry weight and A600 was established to calculate the biomass concentration from the absorbance readings.

Plantaricin C production was tested by the agar well diffusion test (17), with Lactobacillus sake CECT 906 as the indicator strain. The titer was defined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution showing definite inhibition of growth of the indicator lawn and was expressed in arbitrary activity units per milliliter.

Glucose level was determined with the glucose (Trinder) kit (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). Other sugars, lactate, acetate, and formate were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography with a Beckman System Gold Liquid Chromatograph as previously described (8).

Influence of pH on the production of plantaricin C.To establish the optimal pH value for plantaricin C production, a chemostat was run at a dilution rate of 0.15 h−1, which corresponds to about 20% of the maximal growth rate. The growth-limiting substrate, glucose, was fed at a concentration of 5 g/liter at time zero. The production of plantaricin C was evaluated in steady state at pH values of 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0. Plantaricin C was detected only at pH 5.0. The pH seems to be a factor that affects bacteriocin production by lactic acid bacteria (3, 5, 13, 14), possibly indicating that it has a regulatory effect driven by the ionic conditions of the medium or that it may exert a general effect on the cell envelope, since variations in the osmolarity of the media (18) or in the concentrations of ethanol (13) and Tween 80 (15) were shown to influence the levels of production of other bacteriocins.

Growth of L. plantarum LL441 in the chemostat.In order to determine the maximum productivity of the strain, steady states were obtained at different dilution rates, with glucose as the carbon source and the pH kept at 5.0 (Fig.1). Calculation of the critical dilution rate (0.62 h−1) corresponding to the maximal growth rate was done by the method of Pirt and Callow (16). Maximum biomass productivity (0.47 g [dry weight] liter−1h−1) corresponded to a dilution rate of 0.33 h−1, around 50% of the maximal growth rate (μmax = 0.62 h−1). This behavior seems to be characteristic of lactobacilli (1, 9, 10). Lactate was the only fermentation product that was detected among those we looked for (lactate, acetate, and formate), and the fermentation balances were close to 100% carbon recovery (data not shown).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Effects of the dilution rate on biomass, glucose, and lactic acid concentrations, and biomass productivity by L. plantarum LL441 grown in BRFS medium with 0.5% glucose at 30°C, a pH of 5.0, and 150 rpm.

Influence of the dilution rate and carbon source on the production of plantaricin C.Plantaricin C production was tested at different dilution rates, with glucose, sucrose, or fructose as a growth-limiting substrate; all were fed at the time zero concentration of 0.5% (wt/vol).

The synthesis of plantaricin C, with glucose as the carbon source, is shown in Fig. 2a. Production occurred only at very low dilution rates (0.05 h−1), when the bacteria were growing very slowly. This finding is in agreement with a previous observation (6) in which plantaricin C was produced at the end of the exponential growth phase in MRS broth when, presumably, the substrate levels were declining, which in turn would provoke a decrease in the growth rate of the cultures. Generally, it is assumed that bacteriocins are produced during the exponential growth phase; hence, their synthesis would be considered growth linked (5, 14). If this was true, production would have resulted in a line parallel to biomass concentration and productivity would be maximal near the μmax. However, plantaricin C production was observed only at very low dilution rates, i.e., when the cultures grew slowly; consequently, production would probably be best considered to be typical of a product synthesized during the exponential/stationary growth transition phase, as was already anticipated by batch experiments (see above). This situation might be more general; for example, de Vuyst and Vandamme (5) found that there is a lag in nisin production with respect to growth in cultures of Lactococcus lactis incubated with sucrose as a carbon source. Furthermore, the production of pediocin AcH byPediococcus acidilactici H (3) might follow secondary metabolite kinetics although, as the pH was not controlled, the data might be misleading, since pH presumably influences production of the bacteriocin. On the other hand, production of lactococcin 140 byL. lactis seems to be growth linked (14).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Effects of the dilution rate on biomass concentration and plantaricin C production (arbitrary activity units) by L. plantarum LL441 grown in BRFS medium with 0.5% of different carbon sources at 30°C, a pH of 5.0, and 150 rpm. AU, arbitrary units.

Since glucose may act as a mediator of catabolic repression, the influence of other carbon sources was tested. Experiments were carried out with sucrose (Fig. 2b) or fructose (Fig. 2c). In these cases production of plantaricin C was found at dilution rates (0.1 to 0.12 h−1) double those determined to give significant production with glucose, although further increases in the dilution rate resulted in the abolition of bacteriocin synthesis. It was also determined that the bacteriocin titers of the culture supernatants were similar under optimal conditions for the three carbon sources tested, i.e., the yield was doubled in media with sucrose or fructose with respect to glucose. The apparent difference between plantaricin C production in media with glucose, sucrose, and fructose was confirmed by analysis of variance (12), which showed significant differences (P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were found between the production levels of these last two sugars.

All homofermentative lactic acid bacteria examined so far possess phosphoenolpyruvate-sugar phosphotransferase systems (2) and, consequently, glucose would inhibit the uptake of sugars via phosphorylation of the heat-stable protein of the phosphoenolpyruvate-sugar phosphotransferase systems system (19). The availability of glucose increases with dilution rate, which could lead to increased levels of phosphorylated products which may trigger regulatory mechanisms, leading to a reduced glucose intake and to the switching off of catabolite-sensitive operons. This may be the case of plantaricin C, because media with sucrose or fructose as carbon sources still supported its synthesis at concentrations that did not allow synthesis when the sugar used was glucose.

From the point of view of the producer strain, the synthesis of antimicrobial substances would be advantageous precisely when nutrients become limiting, because under these conditions, the bacteriocins produced would antagonize potential competitors for the exhausting nutrients, a concept discussed in early reviews on antibiotic production (11). This situation reflects what occurs in chemostats at low dilution rates, when ATP levels in the cell are low and the regulatory mechanisms mediated by phosphorylated proteins would not be activated.

Finally, the supernatant of the harvest bottle (collected in the cold for 24 h) had the same titer as the medium in the chemostat, indicating that downstream processing can be made batchwise at least every 24 h.

The results presented here raise the possibility of scaling up plantaricin C production experiments to pilot plant assays. The starting conditions would probably be a batch-fed system with a limited carbon source, a controlled pH, and feed rates corresponding to 10 to 20% of the μmax.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants ALI93-0873-CO2 and BIOT-CT96-0402 from the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologı́a of Spain and the BIOTECH Program of the European Union, respectively. F.S. was the recipient of a visitor’s grant from the University of Oviedo. We thank the Consejo de Investigaciones de la Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (CIUNT) and UNESCO on its 50th anniversary.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 7 November 1997.
    • Accepted 5 July 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Aeschlimann A.,
    2. Di Stasi L.,
    3. von Stockar V.
    Continuous production of lactic acid from whey permeate by Lactobacillus helveticus in two chemostats in series. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 12 1990 26 932
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Axelsson L. T.
    Lactic acid bacteria: classification and physiology Lactic acid bacteria. Salminen S., von Wright A. 1993 1 63 Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, N.Y
  3. 3.↵
    1. Biswas S. R.,
    2. Ray P.,
    3. Johnson M. C.,
    4. Ray B.
    Influence of growth conditions on the production of a bacteriocin, pediocin AcH, by Pediococcus acidilactici H. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57 1991 1265 1267
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. de Man J. C.,
    2. Rogosa M.,
    3. Sharpe M. E.
    A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23 1960 30 135
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. de Vuyst L.,
    2. Vandamme E. J.
    Influence of the carbon source on nisin production in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis batch fermentations. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138 1992 571 578
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. González B.,
    2. Arca P.,
    3. Mayo B.,
    4. Suárez J. E.
    Detection, purification and partial characterization of plantaricin C, a bacteriocin produced by a Lactobacillus plantarum strain of dairy origin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60 1994 2158 2163
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. González B.,
    2. Glaasker E.,
    3. Kunji R. S.,
    4. Driessen A.,
    5. Suárez J. E.,
    6. Konings W.
    Bactericidal mode of action of plantaricin C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 1996 2701 2709
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. González de Llano D.,
    2. Rodrı́guez A.,
    3. Cuesta P.
    Effect of lactic starter cultures on the organic acid composition of milk and cheese during ripening. Analysis by HPLC. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 80 1996 570 576
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. González-Vara R. A.,
    2. Pinelli D.,
    3. Rossi M.,
    4. Fajner D.,
    5. Magelli F.,
    6. Matteuzzi D.
    Production of L(+) and D(−) lactic acid isomers by Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei DSM 20011 and Lactobacillus coryneformis subsp. torquens DSM 20004 in continuous fermentation. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 81 1996 548 552
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jarry A.
    Production industrielle d’acide lactique Bacteries lactiques de Roissart H., Luquet F. M. II 1994 519 525 Lorica Grenoble, France
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Martin J. F.,
    2. Demain A. L.
    Control of antibiotic biosynthesis. Microbiol. Rev. 44 1980 230 251
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Miller J. C.,
    2. Miller J. N.
    Significance tests Statistics for analytical chemistry. Chalmers R. A., Mason M. 1988 53 80 Ellis Horwood Limited Chichester, England
  13. 13.↵
    1. Mortvedt-Abildgaard C. I.,
    2. Nissen-Meyer J.,
    3. Jelle B.,
    4. Grenov B.,
    5. Skaugen M.,
    6. Nes I. F.
    Production and pH-dependent bactericidal activity of Lactocin S, a lantibiotic from Lactobacillus sake L45. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 1995 175 179
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Parente E.,
    2. Ricciardi A.,
    3. Addario G.
    Influence of pH on growth and bacteriocin production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis 140NWC during batch fermentation. Appl. Environ. Biotechnol. 41 1994 388 394
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Parente E.,
    2. Hill C.
    A comparison of the factors affecting the production of two bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 73 1992 290 298
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Pirt S. J.,
    2. Callow D. S.
    Studies on the growth of Penicillium chrysogenum in continuous flow culture with reference to penicillin production. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23 1960 87 98
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Reddish G. F.
    Methods for testing antiseptics. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 14 1929 649 658
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ruiz-Barba J. L.,
    2. Catchcart D. P.,
    3. Warner P. J.,
    4. Jiménez-Diaz R.
    Use of Lactobacillus plantarum LPCO10, a bacteriocin producer, as a starter culture in Spanish-style green olive fermentations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60 1994 2059 2064
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Saier M. H.,
    2. Chauvaux S.,
    3. Cook G. M.,
    4. Deutscher J.,
    5. Paulsen I. T.,
    6. Reizer J.,
    7. Ye J.-J.
    Catabolite repression and inducer control in Gram-positive bacteria. Microbiology 142 1996 217 230
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Chemostat Production of Plantaricin C ByLactobacillus plantarum LL441
J. M. Bruno Bárcena, F. Siñeriz, D. González de Llano, Ana Rodríguez, Juan E. Suárez
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Sep 1998, 64 (9) 3512-3514; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.9.3512-3514.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chemostat Production of Plantaricin C ByLactobacillus plantarum LL441
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Chemostat Production of Plantaricin C ByLactobacillus plantarum LL441
J. M. Bruno Bárcena, F. Siñeriz, D. González de Llano, Ana Rodríguez, Juan E. Suárez
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Sep 1998, 64 (9) 3512-3514; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.9.3512-3514.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

bacteriocins
lactobacillus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336