Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Food Microbiology

Influence of Osmolarity and the Presence of an Osmoprotectant on Lactococcus lactis Growth and Bacteriocin Production

Patricia Uguen, Jack Hamelin, Jean-Paul Le Pennec, Carlos Blanco
Patricia Uguen
Laboratoire de Biologie et Chimie Moléculaires, Université de Bretagne-Sud, 56000 Vannes, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Hamelin
Groupe Synthèse et Electrosynthèse Organiques 3 (UMR CNRS 6510) and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Paul Le Pennec
Laboratoire de Biologie et Chimie Moléculaires, Université de Bretagne-Sud, 56000 Vannes, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Blanco
Equipe Membranes et Osmorégulation (UPRES-A CNRS 6026),Université de Rennes I, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.1.291-293.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Growth inhibition of Lactococcus lactis provoked by increasing osmolarity is reversed when glycine betaine (GB) or its analogs are added to a defined medium. Lacticin 481 production increased sharply with growth medium osmolarity in the absence of osmoprotectant but remained unaffected when GB was supplied in media of increasing osmolarity.

Lactococcus lactis subsp.lactis ADRIA 85LO30 produces a bacteriocin, called lacticin 481 (17), that acts in particular against the food spoilage bacterium Clostridium tyrobutyricum. The use of this lantibiotic to prevent late blowing of cheese has been previously suggested (18). Cheese making involves the growth of lactic acid bacteria in high-osmotic-strength media. Knowing the effects of environmental conditions on the relationship between the growth of the producer strain and bacteriocin production could allow the optimization of cheese making.

Thus, we investigated the physiological response of L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30 in salt-enriched defined medium. Under these conditions, we determined the osmoprotective effect of glycine betaine (GB) on bacterial growth and also on lacticin 481 production.

Effect of increased osmotic strength on growth of L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30.The growth of L. lactisADRIA 85LO30 was assayed on chemically defined medium (CDM) (10) containing increasing concentrations of NaCl. The growth rate and the growth yield decreased with the increasing osmolarity of the medium (Table 1). Growth was abolished with NaCl contents higher than 0.5 M. In the presence of 0.4 M NaCl, both parameters were reduced by 70% of their value in the absence of NaCl. Therefore, this salt condition was used for further studies. Growth inhibition was also observed when other osmotica, such as sucrose or KCl, were used to increase the osmolarity of the medium (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Effect of NaCl concentration on growth parameters ofL. lactis ADRIA 85LO30 on CDM

To determine the major solutes accumulated under hyperosmotic strength, cells grown on CDM alone or with 0.4 M NaCl were harvested in exponential growth phase and ethanol-soluble fractions were analyzed by natural-abundance 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (6). As expected, no major intracellular compound was accumulated in unstressed cells (Fig.1A). In the presence of 0.4 M NaCl, the main accumulated solute was lactic acid (Fig. 1B). Lactic acid does not have the characteristics required for an osmoprotectant (2), so its accumulation could not efficiently counterbalance the osmotic pressure and was deleterious for bacterial metabolism. Thus, no accumulation of efficient osmolyte was detected by natural abundance 13C-NMR in stressed cells. This could explain the lower osmotolerance of L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30 compared to other strains of lactic acid bacteria (11).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Natural-abundance 13C-NMR spectra of ethanol-soluble fractions of L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30 grown on CDM without NaCl (A), with 0.4 M NaCl (B), and with 0.4 M NaCl added to 1 mM GB (C). The peaks were identified in comparison with reference spectra of commercial compounds: GB (b) and lactic acid (l).

Effect of compatible solutes on growth of L. lactisADRIA 85LO30.When present in salt-containing medium, GB is efficiently accumulated by most of the lactic acid bacteria studied (4, 5, 8, 16). Therefore, GB and other compounds known to act as bacterial osmoprotectants (2) were tested on osmotically stressed cells of L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30 (Table2). All of the methylated onium compounds structurally related to GB (i.e., dimethylsulfonioacetate [DMSA], dimethylsulfoniopropionate [DMSP], l-carnitine, and arsenobetaine) allowed the growth rate and the growth yield to increase by 60%. By contrast, no effect of choline, proline, or pipecolate on growth parameters was observed (Table 2). Many bacteria, includingEscherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, andStaphylococcus aureus, were able to oxidatively convert choline to GB (1, 7, 13). However, even under aerobic conditions, choline was unable to improve the growth of L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30 (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Influence of osmolarity of the medium on accumulation of different osmoprotectants by L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30

13C-NMR experiments were performed on cells grown in 0.4 M NaCl CDM supplemented with 1 mM GB. GB was the main solute observed on the spectrum (Fig. 1C), whereas lactate accumulation was abolished. The maximum accumulation levels of osmoprotectants were measured with and without 0.4 M NaCl. In salt-containing medium, bacteria were able to transport GB, DMSA, DMSP, l-carnitine, choline, proline, and pipecolate. The accumulation levels were correlated with the efficiencies of the osmoprotectants at improving growth (Table 2). Presumably, the structures of the osmoprotectants could play a role in their efficient uptake and accumulation. This hypothesis was previously suggested to account for the efficiency of choline transport byS. aureus (9) and for l-carnitine accumulation by Lactobacillus plantarum (12). Thus, GB and its analogs were accumulated at elevated levels in stressing medium, restablishing a positive turgor pressure, which is one of the effects usually attributed to osmoprotectants (2).

Effect of NaCl and GB on lacticin 481 production.We evaluated bacteriocin production by cells grown on CDM with and without NaCl. Lacticin 481 was obtained as previously described and assayed against the indicator strain L. lactis IL1837 (15, 17). In CDM without NaCl, bacteriocin production remained constant during all stages of growth and did not exceed 5 arbitrary units (AU) ml−1 (Fig. 2). When NaCl was supplied, production increased from the beginning of stationary phase, reaching a maximal value of 20 and 12 AU ml−1 in the presence of 0.2 and 0.4 M NaCl, respectively (Fig. 2). In all conditions, a decrease of bacteriocin production was observed in late stationary phase. Proteolytic activity was assayed (3) but was not detected. This result was in agreement with the fact that no decrease of optical density at 570 nm (OD570) was observed in stationary phase (Fig. 2), indicating that no cells lysis occurred. Thus, this decline could not be due to proteolytic enzymes released during cell lysis. The adsorption of bacteriocin to producer cells was also assayed (19) and was detected. This phenomenon would explain the decline of lacticin 481 production, as was described for amylovorin L471 (3).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Effect of NaCl and GB on lacticin 481 production during the growth of L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30. Cells were cultivated at 30°C without shaking on CDM with increasing NaCl concentrations or with 0.4 M NaCl added to 1 mM GB. Turbidimetry was monitored at 570 nm, and bacteriocin production (expressed in arbitrary units per milliliter) was evaluated. To quantify lacticin 481, twofold dilutions of produced bacteriocin were assayed by the supernatant diffusion method (15). The supernatants were dialyzed against CDM without NaCl and concentrated against solid polyethylene glycol 8000 for 48 h at 4°C in dialysis membranes with a molecular mass cutoff of 500 Da. The values are the means of triplicate experiments; the standard deviation was less than 20%. The solid symbols represent bacterial growth for each condition, and the open symbols represent bacteriocin production. Square, 0 M NaCl; diamond, 0.2 M NaCl; circle, 0.4 M NaCl; triangle, 0.4 M NaCl with 1 mM GB.

When 1 mM GB was added to CDM containing 0.4 M NaCl, lacticin 481 production was close to that obtained on nonstressing CDM (Fig. 2). The decrease could be explained by GB accumulation, which would allow a positive turgor pressure to be reestablished and would protect intracellular macromolecules (2). Thus, the failure of turgor or the alteration of macromolecules could be the inducers of bacteriocin production. This suggestion is supported by the results obtained with amylovorin L471, which demonstrated that unfavorable growth conditions stimulated bacteriocin production (3).

In this study, we demonstrated that GB improves the growth parameters of L. lactis ADRIA 85LO30 under hyperosmotic constraints but provokes the decrease of bacteriocin production. Also, as with nisin Z production by L. lactis I0-1 (14), optimal conditions for growth seem to be quite different from those for lacticin 481 production. Therefore, to improve bacteriocin production, it is important to know the differential effects of environmental factors on L. lactis growth and bacteriocin production.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by grants from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and the Ministère de la Recherche et de la Technologie. P.U. is the recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the Région Bretagne.

V. Pichereau is acknowledged for analysis of 13C-NMR spectra.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 July 1998.
    • Accepted 21 October 1998.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Boch J.,
    2. Kempf B.,
    3. Bremer E.
    Osmoregulation in Bacillus subtilis: synthesis of the osmoprotectant glycine betaine from exogenously provided choline. J. Bacteriol. 176 1994 5364 5371
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Csonka L. N.,
    2. Hanson A. D.
    Prokaryotic osmoregulation: genetics and physiology. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 45 1991 569 582
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. De Vuyst L.,
    2. Callewaert R.,
    3. Crabbé K.
    Primary metabolite kinetics of bacteriocin biosynthesis by Lactobacillus amylovorus and evidence for stimulation of bacteriocin production under unfavourable growth conditions. Microbiology 142 1996 817 827
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Glaasker E.,
    2. Konings W. N.,
    3. Poolman B.
    Osmotic regulation of intracellular solute pools in Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Bacteriol. 178 1996 575 582
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Glaasker E.,
    2. Tjan F. S. B.,
    3. Ter Steeg P. F.,
    4. Konings W. N.,
    5. Poolman B.
    Physiological response of Lactobacillus plantarum to salt and nonelectrolyte stress. J. Bacteriol. 180 1998 4718 4723
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gouesbet G.,
    2. Blanco C.,
    3. Hamelin J.,
    4. Bernard T.
    Osmotic adjustment in Brevibacterium ammoniagenes: pipecolic acid accumulation at elevated osmolalities. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138 1992 959 965
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Graham J. E.,
    2. Wilkinson B. J.
    Staphylococcus aureus osmoregulation: roles of choline, glycine betaine, proline, and taurine. J. Bacteriol. 174 1992 2711 2716
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hutkins R. W.,
    2. Ellefson W. L.,
    3. Kashket E. R.
    Betaine transport imparts osmotolerance on a strain of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53 1987 2275 2281
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kaenjak A.,
    2. Graham J. E.,
    3. Wilkinson B. J.
    Choline transport activity in Staphylococcus aureus induced by osmotic stress and low phosphate concentrations. J. Bacteriol. 175 1993 2400 2406
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kets E. P. W.,
    2. Galinski E. A.,
    3. de Bont J. A. M.
    Carnitine: a novel compatible solute in Lactobacillus plantarum. Arch. Microbiol. 162 1994 243 248
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kets E. P. W.,
    2. Teunissen P. J. M.,
    3. de Bont J. A. M.
    Effect of compatible solutes on survival of lactic acid bacteria subjected to drying. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 1996 259 261
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kets E. P. W.,
    2. de Bont J. A. M.
    Effect of carnitines on Lactobacillus plantarum subjected to osmotic stress. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 146 1997 205 209
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Landfald B.,
    2. Strom A. R.
    Choline-glycine betaine pathway confers a high level of osmotic tolerance in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 165 1986 849 855
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Matsusaki H.,
    2. Hendo N.,
    3. Sonomoto K.,
    4. Ishizaki A.
    Lantibiotic nisin Z fermentative production by Lactococcus lactis I0-1: relationship between production of the lantibiotic and lactate and cell growth. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 45 1996 36 40
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mayr-Harting H.,
    2. Hedges J. A.,
    3. Berkeley R. L. W.
    Methods for studying bacteriocins. Methods Microbiol. 7 1972 315 422
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Molenaar D.,
    2. Hagting A.,
    3. Alkema H.,
    4. Driessen A. J. M.,
    5. Konings W. N.
    Characteristics and osmoregulatory roles of uptake systems for proline and glycine betaine in Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 175 1993 5438 5444
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rincé A.,
    2. Dufour A.,
    3. Uguen P.,
    4. Le Pennec J. P.,
    5. Haras D.
    Characterization of the lacticin 481 operon: the Lactococcus lactis genes lctF,lctE, and lctG encode a putative ABC transporter involved in bacteriocin immunity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 1997 4252 4260
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Thuault D.,
    2. Beliard E.,
    3. Le Guern J.,
    4. Bourgeois C. M.
    Inhibition of Clostridium tyrobutyricum by bacteriocin-like substances produced by lactic acid bacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 74 1991 1145 1150
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Yang R.,
    2. Johnson M. C.,
    3. Ray B.
    Novel method to extract large amounts of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58 1992 3355 3359
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Influence of Osmolarity and the Presence of an Osmoprotectant on Lactococcus lactis Growth and Bacteriocin Production
Patricia Uguen, Jack Hamelin, Jean-Paul Le Pennec, Carlos Blanco
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 1999, 65 (1) 291-293; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.1.291-293.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Influence of Osmolarity and the Presence of an Osmoprotectant on Lactococcus lactis Growth and Bacteriocin Production
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Influence of Osmolarity and the Presence of an Osmoprotectant on Lactococcus lactis Growth and Bacteriocin Production
Patricia Uguen, Jack Hamelin, Jean-Paul Le Pennec, Carlos Blanco
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jan 1999, 65 (1) 291-293; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.1.291-293.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336