Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AEM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
General Microbial Ecology

Acetogenic and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inhabiting the Rhizoplane and Deep Cortex Cells of the Sea Grass Halodule wrightii

Kirsten Küsel, Holly C. Pinkart, Harold L. Drake, Richard Devereux
Kirsten Küsel
Gulf Ecology Division, U.S. EPA/National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holly C. Pinkart
Gulf Ecology Division, U.S. EPA/National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harold L. Drake
Department of Ecological Microbiology, BITOEK, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Devereux
Gulf Ecology Division, U.S. EPA/National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.11.5117-5123.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Recent declines in sea grass distribution underscore the importance of understanding microbial community structure-function relationships in sea grass rhizospheres that might affect the viability of these plants. Phospholipid fatty acid analyses showed that sulfate-reducing bacteria and clostridia were enriched in sediments colonized by the sea grasses Halodule wrightii andThalassia testudinum compared to an adjacent unvegetated sediment. Most-probable-number analyses found that in contrast to butyrate-producing clostridia, acetogens and acetate-utilizing sulfate reducers were enriched by an order of magnitude in rhizosphere sediments. Although sea grass roots are oxygenated in the daytime, colorimetric root incubation studies demonstrated that acetogenic O-demethylation and sulfidogenic iron precipitation activities were tightly associated with washed, sediment-free H. wrightii roots. This suggests that the associated anaerobes are able to tolerate exposure to oxygen. To localize and quantify the anaerobic microbial colonization, root thin sections were hybridized with newly developed 33P-labeled probes that targeted (i) low-G+C-content gram-positive bacteria, (ii) cluster I species of clostridia, (iii) species of Acetobacterium, and (iv) species of Desulfovibrio. Microautoradiography revealed intercellular colonization of the roots by Acetobacteriumand Desulfovibrio species. Acetogenic bacteria occurred mostly in the rhizoplane and outermost cortex cell layers, and high numbers of sulfate reducers were detected on all epidermal cells and inward, colonizing some 60% of the deepest cortex cells. Approximately 30% of epidermal cells were colonized by bacteria that hybridized with an archaeal probe, strongly suggesting the presence of methanogens. Obligate anaerobes within the roots might contribute to the vitality of sea grasses and other aquatic plants and to the biogeochemistry of the surrounding sediment.

Sea grasses are centrally important to the productivity of estuarine ecosystems. They provide a link between sediment and water nutrient cycles, stabilize sediments, and offer protective habitats for invertebrates, fish, and their larvae (24, 52). Despite loss of sea grasses to disease and coastal development, little attention has been given to microorganisms that might affect their viability (24, 43, 49). Although sea grass roots were once considered to serve primarily as anchors, it is now known that in certain species they are important for obtaining nutrients (25, 57). In particular, upwards of 50% of the plant nitrogen requirement may be fulfilled by nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere (15, 16). Sea grass roots exude easily degradable organic carbon compounds that may chemotactically attract microorganisms from the surrounding sediment (57). Most rhizosphere bacteria are thought to live either near the root tips due to the excretion of mucilage or in the rhizoplane, which is defined as the root surface and outermost cell layers (13).

Sea grasses are adapted to being rooted in highly reduced, anoxic sediments where high rates of sulfate reduction might yield toxic levels of sulfide (7, 8, 57). During the day, oxygen produced by leaf photosynthesis is transported to the roots via mass flow or diffusion, generating an oxygen gradient around the roots. At night, the roots enter a near-dormant state of anaerobic fermentative metabolism and excrete phytotoxins like ethanol (36, 52). Thus, strict anaerobes in the sea grass rhizosphere could experience periods of elevated oxygen tension. While rates of anaerobic microbial processes are known to be high in sea grass bed sediments (8, 9, 31), little is known about the colonization of aquatic plant roots by anaerobic bacteria or their potential occurrence in deeper root cell layers.

The ability to detect bacteria in situ with rRNA probes (5) makes it possible to design and optimize oligonucleotide probes that target anaerobes enriched in sea grass rhizospheres and to localize and quantify the distribution of anaerobic bacteria associated with sea grass roots on a microhabitat scale. The objectives of this study were therefore to examine (i) the extent that sea grass rhizosphere sediments are enriched with anaerobic bacteria and (ii) the colonization of sea grass roots by the anaerobes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Field site and sampling.The sampling site for the study was near Big Sabine Point in Santa Rosa Sound, located in northwestern Florida. This sound is relatively unimpacted by pollution and contains a sea grass bed dominated by Halodule wrightii interspersed with Thalassium testudinum. Sediments and sea grasses were obtained in clear plastic cores (cellulose-acetate-butyrate; Wildlife Supply Co., Saginaw, Mich.; inner diameter, 4.7 cm) from a depth of about 1 m below the surface of the overlaying brackish water. Sea grasses rooted to a maximum depth of approximately 10 to 12 cm; sediment from this zone was considered rhizosphere sediment due to the dense network of roots. Unvegetated sediment samples were collected from a barren site immediately adjacent to the sea grass bed. The pH of the sediments was approximately 7.2.

Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis.Four replicate sediment cores from each site were obtained in late June and mid-October 1997, placed in a −70°C freezer for storage within an hour of collection, and sectioned by depth just prior to analysis (within 1 month of collection). Total lipids were extracted by using a modified Bligh-Dyer extraction procedure (59). The phospholipid and plasmalogen fractions were obtained through fractionation of the total lipid extract by solid-phase extraction (45). The fractionated components were methylated by using a mild alkaline methanolysis followed by a mild acid methanolysis (59). The resulting fatty acid methyl esters and plasmalogens were separated, quantified, and identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (58).

Enumeration of sediment microflora.Anaerobic bacteria were enumerated by the most-probable-number (MPN) technique in selective media (39), using a 10-fold dilution series with three replicate tubes per dilution. Anoxic media were prepared by using the modified Hungate technique (32). All substrates and inhibitors were added from anoxic sterile stock solutions.

Acetogens were cultivated in an undefined, reduced, bicarbonate-buffered medium (21) supplemented with NaCl (20 g liter−1) and either vanillate (6 mM) plus Ti(III)-nitriloacetate solution (0.25 mM) (42) or H2 (30 mM). Bromoethanesulfonic acid was added to a final concentration of 15 mM to inhibit methanogenic bacteria. The gas phase was 100% CO2, and the final pH was approximately 6.9. Acetogenic activity with vanillate was visualized by a colorimetric reaction, based on the capacity of acetogens to O demethylate methoxylated aromatic compounds via the acetyl coenzyme A pathway, described by Harriott and Frazer (29). Protocatechuate and catechol, the O-demethylated products of vanillate, form a yellow complex with Ti(III) (41).

To cultivate clostridia, an undefined, reduced medium that contained the following components (in grams per liter) was prepared: NaCl, 20.0; K2HPO4, 5.0; MgCl2 · 6H2O, 0.2; FeCl3 · 6H2O, 0.2; methylene blue, 0.002; yeast extract, 1.0;l-arginine-HCl, 0.5; l-lysine-HCl, 0.5; cellulose, 7.0; Na2S · 9H2O (as the reducing agent), 0.5; and the redox indicator resazurin, 0.001. A mineral solution containing MnCl2 · 4H2O (10.0 mM), CaCl2 · 2H2O (30.0 mM), CoCl2 · 6H2O (5.0 mM), and Na2MoO4 · 2H2O (5.0 mM) was added at 0.5 ml per liter. The gas phase was 100% N2, and the pH after autoclaving was approximately 6.9. To selectively enrich for spore-forming clostridia, 10 g (wet weight) of sediment was treated with 10 ml of ethanol (95%) for 1 h on a shaker (35) at room temperature prior to dilution.

Sulfate-reducing bacteria were enumerated in a defined, reduced saltwater medium (18) with either acetate (5 mM) or lactate (5 mM) as the electron donor. The gas phase was N2-CO2 (90:10; vol/vol), and the final pH was approximately 7.2.

Tubes were incubated at 30°C for 4 months and inspected weekly. Those that contained H2 as a substrate were incubated horizontally. Growth was determined visually and verified microscopically. MPN tubes were scored positive based on consumption of substrates or formation of products; uninoculated MPN tubes were used as controls. MPN values were calculated from standard tables and were within 95% certainty (1).

Root incubation studies. H. wrightii was obtained by coring and brought to the laboratory within 1 h of collection. The cores were released into a sterile glass dish, and the roots were carefully separated from the sediment. Healthy roots, white in appearance and free of lesions, were excised with a clean razor blade and washed twice in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (120 mM sodium phosphate, 0.85% NaCl, pH 7.2) to remove all sediment particles. Five to eight roots (2 to 3 cm long) were transferred to sterile serum bottles containing either (i) 50 ml of the acetogen medium supplemented with vanillate (6 mM) and Ti(III)-nitriloacetate solution (0.25 mM) but lacking yeast extract or (ii) 50 ml of filter-sterilized, anoxic seawater under an N2 gas phase supplemented with acetate, lactate, malate, and ethanol (1 mM each), electron donors typically used by sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Oligonucleotide probes.Oligonucleotide probes were designed by examining 16S rRNA sequences obtained from the Ribosomal Database Project (40) and aligned with the CLUSTAL W program (55). The intended probe specificity was verified with the CHECK_PROBE utility from the Ribosomal Database Project. Oligonucleotide probes were developed and optimized for (i) cluster I of the clostridia (Clost I) (19), (ii) species ofAcetobacterium and Eubacterium limosum (AW), (iii) low-G+C-content gram-positive bacteria (LGC), and (iv) species ofDesulfovibrio (DSV) (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes and target groups

Optimal wash temperatures were determined by hybridizing positive and negative control rRNAs fixed to membranes with 33P-labeled probes and washing the probe off at increasing temperatures (61). Nucleic acids used in these experiments were obtained from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC 27774,Acetobacterium woodii ATCC 29683, Bacillus subtilis 6051 (kindly provided by Fred J. Genthner), andClostridium magnum ATCC 49199. Preparation of nucleic acids, membranes, and hybridization buffers and conditions used were as described by Raskin et al. (48). The hybridization temperature was 40°C.

Additional probes were used for the detection of bacteria (Eub) (5), α-subdivision bacteria (Alfa) (5), archaea (Arch) (48), and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB 385) (3). Previously detailed procedures (4) were used to obtain purified oligonucleotides conjugated with the fluorescent dye Cy3, Cy5, fluorescein, or rhodamine (Amersham Life Science, Pittsburgh, Pa., and Research Organics, Cleveland, Ohio) or labeled with33P by using [γ-33P]ATP (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, Mass.) and polynucleotide kinase (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.).

In situ hybridization studies.Microbial colonization on the roots incubated in serum bottles for sulfate reduction was examined microscopically by staining intact or sliced roots with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) (46) followed by hybridizing with rhodamine-labeled Eub or SRB 385 probe (6, 30). Colonization of freshly collectedH. wrightii roots was determined by using root thin sections that were hybridized with 33P-labeled probes and examined with microautoradiography (47). The freshly collected roots were washed twice in sterile phosphate-buffered saline and then fixed overnight in a fresh preparation of 4% paraformaldehyde in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2. Fixed roots were transferred to 50% ethanol until sectioned. The roots were embedded in paraffin, and 8-μm sections were fixed on slides (47). The sections were deparaffinized with xylene and then dehydrated through a graded ethanol series. Probe was added to the sections and sealed beneath a coverslip. Hybridization and washing of the root sections were performed essentially as previously described (4).

Microscopy.An Optiphot microscope (Nippon Kogaku K.K., Tokyo, Japan), equipped with an EF-D episcopic fluorescence attachment, was used for epifluorescence and phase-contrast microscopy. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed with a Bio-Rad (Richmond, Calif.) model 1000 instrument.

Analytical techniques.Headspace gases were measured with Hewlett-Packard Co. (Palo Alto, Calif.) 5980 series II gas chromatographs (38). Gas values included the total amounts in both the liquid and gas phases. In this study, no distinction was made between CO2 and its carbonate forms. Concentrations were corrected for the changing liquid-to-gas phase volume ratio due to liquid samplings (0.7 ml). Aliphatic acids and aromatic compounds were determined with Hewlett-Packard 1090 series II high-performance liquid chromatographs (38). Sulfate was determined turbidimetrically following precipitation with barium (53). The sediment pH was measured with an Ingold (Hightstown, N.J.) U457-S7/110 combination pH electrode.

RESULTS

PLFA analysis.PLFA analyses have been used to monitor shifts in microbial communities, to detect specific groups of microorganisms, and to correlate biogeochemical activities with specific populations (11, 58). Analysis of PLFA biomarkers in samples taken from within the sea grass bed at Big Sabine Point revealed that gram-negative sulfate-reducing bacteria were approximately 11% of the bacterial biomass in the upper root zone of the rhizosphere sediment, compared to 6% in the same zone of the adjacent unvegetated sediment (Table 2). These values correspond to calculated densities of 3.3 × 108 and 2.4 × 108 sulfate-reducing bacteria g (dry weight) of sediment−1, respectively (58). Biomasses of bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria decreased slightly with increasing sediment depth (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

PLFA biomarkers and calculated cell numbers at different depths in rhizosphere and unvegetated sedimentsa

Biomarkers indicative of sulfate reducers belonged primarily to the genera Desulfovibrio and Desulfobulbus (34, 54). Desulfovibrio species possess a characteristic iso-branched monounsaturated series (iso-pentadecenoic acid [i15:1], iso-heptadecenoic acid [i17:1], and iso-nonadecenoic acid [i19:1]) that is unique to the genus. Desulfobulbus species contain the unique monounsaturated heptadecenoic fatty acid (17:1ω6). Relatively little of the methyleneheptadecanoic acids (cy18:0) that are unique for Desulfobacter species were detected.

A prominent feature of many clostridia (especially the butyric acid group) is the presence of plasmenyl analogues of phospholipids, known as plasmalogens (42). Acid methanolysis of plasmalogens releases dimethyl acetals, which are readily detected via mass spectrometry. A large amount of saturated acyl chains ranging in length from 12 to 18 carbons was detected (Table 2). These biomarkers (i) were indicative of clostridia, (ii) were found only in upper root zones of the rhizosphere sediment (Table 2), and (iii) yielded calculated densities of approximately 1.7 × 107and 1.0 × 107 clostridia g (dry weight) of sediment−1 in the upper and middle root zones, respectively.

Enumeration of sediment microflora.Since the lipid compositions of many acetogens and clostridia have not been characterized, an MPN approach with selective media was used to further evaluate the contributions of clostridia, acetogens, and sulfate reducers to the microbial communities in these sediments. Densities of butyrate-producing clostridia or their spores did not significantly differ between sediments obtained from the upper zones (0 to 10 cm) of the sea grass bed or the unvegetated site (Table3). The main products from fermentation of the organic carbon and nitrogen mixture by cultures arising with the lowest rhizosphere sediment dilution were acetate, propionate, and butyrate (18.4, 3.5, and 8.2 mM, respectively). Similarly, in the lowest dilutions of the unvegetated sediment, the concentrations of acetate, propionate, and butyrate were approximately 16.0, 4.5, and 7.9 mM, respectively. Butyrate concentrations in cultures obtained with the lowest dilutions of ethanol-pretreated rhizosphere and unvegetated sediments were enhanced to 18.8 and 13.1 mM, respectively, confirming that spore-forming butyrate-producing clostridia were selected by the ethanol pretreatment (35).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

MPN values of microbial anaerobic populations in rhizosphere and unvegetated sedimentsa

In contrast to the case for butyrate producers, acetogens were enriched by an order of magnitude in the rhizosphere sediment (Table 3). Consumption of H2 indicated by negative pressures in MPN tubes was confirmed by gas chromatography analyses. Larger amounts of acetate were produced in H2-utilizing dilutions than in sediment dilutions in medium lacking added substrate. Methane was not detected in any of these tubes. Likewise, O-demethylating acetogens were enriched in the rhizosphere sediments, although present in low numbers. Protocatechuate was detected as the main aromatic product formed from vanillate in the MPN tubes. The ring recovery approximated 68%, indicating a partial utilization of the aromatic ring.

Acetate-utilizing sulfate reducers were highly enriched in the rhizosphere sediment compared to the unvegetated sediment (Table 3) and represented a substantial part of the cell numbers calculated from the PLFA biomarkers (Table 2).

Root incubation studies.Acetogenic and sulfate-reducing activities were tightly bound to the rhizoplane when washedH. wrightii roots were incubated in serum bottles containing a medium to stimulate acetogens or sulfate reducers. During 4 weeks of incubation, no growth appeared in the selective medium for acetogens. However, roots turned yellow prior to coloration of the medium, indicating that vanillate was O demethylated to protocatechuate, which was confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography analyses. Acetate was formed during the incubation in a 4.2:3 substrate-to-acetate ratio, indicative of O-methyl group-dependent acetogenesis (21). Controls lacking vanillate did not show a color reaction.

Roots incubated in the seawater medium for sulfate-reducing bacteria blackened within 3 days of incubation, indicating sulfidogenesis and the subsequent formation of iron sulfides. No blackening or growth appeared in the medium.

In situ hybridization studies.As a first approach to examine microbial colonization, the blackened roots were stained with DAPI and then hybridized with fluorescent-dye-labeled oligonucleotide probes. Epifluorescence observation of DAPI-stained bacteria showed colonization of both the root surface and deeper root cells by a variety of morphologically distinct types. Bacteria were most abundant in the blackened parts of the roots. Most of the DAPI-stained bacteria also showed hybridization with the rhodamine-labeled Eub probe, a generalized probe capable of detecting practically all bacteria. A large proportion (about 50%) of DAPI-stained bacteria also hybridized with the rhodamine-labeled SRB 385 probe. However, quantification was not possible due to strong autofluorescence of the root material. The autofluorescence could not be readily overcome even by using CLSM in combination with the different fluorescent labels.

These problems were circumvented by using 33P-labeled probes and detecting hybridization with microautoradiography and light microscopy. Hybridization of root thin sections prepared with freshly sampled H. wrightii roots showed that bacteria occupied the intercellular root spaces and resided predominantly in the rhizoplane (Table 4). The rhizoplane, here considered the epidermal root cells, was colonized by bacteria that hybridized with all of the probes used. All rhizoplane cells were colonized by Desulfovibrio species (probe DSV), and a significant portion were colonized by clostridia (Clost I),Acetobacterium species (AW), α-subdivision proteobacteria (Alfa), and archaea (Arch). Bacteria identified as acetogens formed large clusters, whereas Desulfovibrio species occurred singly and were more evenly distributed (Fig.1). Clostridial, acetogen, and archaeal colonization extended into the cortex and was greater than that of α-subdivision proteobacteria. High numbers of bacteria inside the root hybridized with the Desulfovibrio probe (DSV) and were detected on the majority (61%) of the deepest cortex cells (Table 4). Fewer than 10% of the deepest cortex cells were colonized by gram-positive low-G+C-content bacteria andAcetobacterium species.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Distribution of microbes within H. wrightiiroots determined by in situ hybridizationa

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Phase-contrast micrographs of bacteria visualized by microautoradiography following in situ hybridization of H. wrightii longitudinal root sections with 33P-labeled rRNA probes. Magnification, ×1,000. Bacteria that retained probe appear black due to the deposition of silver grains from the photographic emulsion. (a) EUB probe for virtually all bacteria; (b) DSV probe for the sulfate-reducing Desulfovibrio species; (c) AW probe for the acetogens E. limosum andAcetobacterium. Cells hybridizing with the AW probe were found in dense clusters (arrow) on the outer root surface.

DISCUSSION

Sulfate reduction is the dominant terminal electron-accepting process in sea grass bed sediments (8). It was therefore expected that biomarkers for sulfate-reducing bacteria would be abundant in rhizosphere sediments. However, based on the habitats from which most clostridial species have been isolated, the abundance of biomarkers from clostridia in marine rhizosphere sediments was unexpected. The large phylogenetic group of gram-positive clostridia contains numerous physiological types, including the acetogenic bacteria (19). Although many clostridia and acetogens have not been characterized with respect to lipid composition, all clostridia examined to date contain plasmalogens, including the butyric acid group of clostridia from cluster I and the acetogen E. limosum (42). Thus, while the PLFA analysis could not specifically identify acetogens, the biogeochemical implications of acetogenic bacteria in sea grass bed sediments was intriguing and was pursued by enumeration studies with selective media. The results clearly showed that acetogens were enriched and comprised a significant fraction of the bacterial community in the rhizosphere sediment, in contrast to butyrate-producing clostridia, which were not enriched. MPNs of O-demethylating acetogens were less than those of H2-utilizing acetogens, suggesting that H2 is an important electron donor in the sea grass rhizosphere.

Rapid blackening of H. wrightii roots in the seawater medium was indicative of rhizosphere-associated sulfate-reducing activity, as reported in a recent study with Zostera marina(8). The presence of viable sulfate reducers in the blackened portions of roots was verified by in situ hybridization with the fluorescent-dye-labeled SRB 385 probe. However, root metabolism in an anoxic in vitro assay is clearly very different from in situ root metabolism. In addition, the observed distribution of root-inhabiting sulfate reducers might have been influenced by the use of excised roots, since bacteria can colonize both the ecto- and the endorhizosphere upon the death of epidermal and cortical cells (13).

CLSM has been used to overcome the strong autofluorescence of root material hybridized with fluorescent probes and to localize indigenous microorganisms in situ on the rhizoplane (6, 28). This advanced microscopic technique permitted detection of sulfate reducers on the H. wrightii root; however, it was not immediately applicable to quantify bacteria with either intact or sectioned roots. Hybridization of root thin sections with 33P-labeled rRNA probes followed by microautoradiography enabled detection and quantification, but of course this method lacks many of the capabilities available with CLSM, such as multicolor imaging with differently labeled probes or three-dimensional sectioning (2, 6).

Nonetheless, the use of radioactive probes (i) confirmed colonization of the sea grass rhizoplane with sulfate-reducing bacteria, as described by Blaabjerg and Finster (8); (ii) detected sulfate-reducing bacteria, acetogens, and methanogens within the cortex; and (iii) provided a means with which to quantify bacterial colonization on a per-root-cell basis (Table 4). To our knowledge, this is the first observation of what are considered to be strictly anaerobic bacteria as endorhizobacteria, i.e., living in deep root cell layers. Furthermore, the distribution of anaerobes suggests the successive utilization of electron acceptors across a sharp oxygen gradient emanating from the center of the root.

Desulfovibrio species were associated with almost every epidermal cell and with about 60% of the cells deeper inside the cortex. Although sulfate-reducing bacteria are described as strict anaerobes, they occur in oxic surface layers of aquatic habitats, are active in microbial mats at oxygen tensions near saturation (14, 27), and can even respire oxygen (20). Recently it was demonstrated that exposure of sea grass roots to oxygen does not affect root surface-associated sulfate-reducing activity (8). Thus, the colonization of the H. wrightii rhizoplane by sulfate-reducing bacteria was not as surprising as was their occurrence in the deeper root cell layers. The in situ activity of these endorhizobacterial sulfate reducers is not known. Earlier, microbially produced sulfide found within the roots of Spartina alterniflora was considered to have originated from the sediment pore water (17). If root-inhabiting bacteria reduce sulfate to sulfide, a reoxidation of sulfide via the microbial reduction of oxygen or nitrate might be a potential mechanism by which the plant tolerates endorhizobacterial sulfate-reducing activity.

About 60% of the root surface cells, and a smaller amount of the outermost cortex cells, had bacteria that hybridized with the clostridial Clost I and acetogen AW probes. Colonization of sea grass roots by acetogenic bacteria could be even greater, since the AW probe targeted only a limited number of known acetogens. Use of the archaeal probe revealed low but significant numbers of root-associated archaea. Recently, in situ hybridization with fluorescent probes detected methanogens on the surfaces of rice roots (28). Temporary exposure of rice roots to oxygen did not affect the activity of root-associated methanogens in anoxic in vitro assays (26, 33), and it is known that methanogens can survive oxygen stress for several hours (23). Thus, the rhizoplanes of aquatic plants appear to be common habitats for certain methanogenic bacteria.

Acetogens have not been previously reported to be associated with the roots of aquatic plants. Little is known about the activity of acetogenic bacteria under oxic conditions. Acetogens can be isolated or enriched from oxic forest soils (37, 38) and from termite guts that have steep oxygen gradients (12), and acetogens can tolerate periods of oxygenation in soil (56). Enumeration studies indicated that the sea grass root environment might be a preferred habitat for acetogens compared to the unvegetated sediment. The relatively low growth rates, low substrate affinities, and low energy yields of acetogens on certain substrates (e.g., H2-CO2) suggest that they are less competitive than general fermenters, sulfate reducers, and methanogens (50). However, the ability of acetogens to simultaneously utilize various substrates and terminal electron acceptors might compensate for such bioenergetic disadvantages (22). Since acetate is the main product of acetogens, it is noteworthy that biomarkers commonly associated with acetate-utilizing Desulfobacter species were detected only in very small amounts in the rhizosphere sediment. Although a possible trophic link between sulfate-reducing bacteria and acetogens in the endorhizosphere remains unclear, low-G+C-content gram-positive acetate-utilizing sulfate reducers might be involved (11).

The intercellular colonization of root cells might afford acetogens and sulfate reducers access to substrates that could facilitate an energy-intensive process like nitrogen fixation, a beneficial plant-microbe interaction. In fact, certain acetogens and sulfate reducers fix molecular nitrogen (10, 50, 51), and some N2-fixing species of clostridia and sulfate reducers can be enriched from both sea grass roots (60) and rhizosphere sediment (44). The observation that anaerobic bacteria colonize the endorhizospheres of submerged aquatic plants should foster interest in resolving (i) the in situ activity of these bacteria, (ii) the beneficial or harmful effects of these root-microbe interactions, and (iii) the occurrence of anaerobes in deeper root cell layers of other plants, such as rice, that are rooted in anoxic soils.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

K.K. and H.C.P. contributed equally to this work.

H.C.P. is the recipient of a National Research Council-U.S. EPA Postdoctoral Research Associateship. Support was provided in part by the German Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research, and Technology.

We thank Jeanne E. Gillet for preparation of the root sections and Peter J. Chapman for critical review of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 April 1999.
    • Accepted 18 August 1999.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alef K.
    Methodenhandbuch Bodenmikrobiologie: Aktivitäten, Biomasse, Differenzierung 1991 44 49 Ecomed, Landsberg/Lech Germany
  2. 2.↵
    1. Amann R. I.,
    2. Snaidr J.,
    3. Wagner M.,
    4. Ludwig W.,
    5. Schleifer K.-S.
    In situ visualization of high genetic diversity in a natural microbial community. J. Bacteriol. 178 1996 3496 3500
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Amann R. I.,
    2. Stromley J.,
    3. Devereux R.,
    4. Stahl D. A.
    Molecular and microscopic identification of sulfate-reducing bacteria in multispecies biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58 1992 614 623
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Amann R. I.,
    2. Krumholz L.,
    3. Stahl D. A.
    Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J. Bacteriol. 172 1990 762 770
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Amann R. I.,
    2. Ludwig W.,
    3. Schleifer K.-H.
    Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59 1995 142 169
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Assmus B.,
    2. Hutzler P.,
    3. Kirchhof G.,
    4. Amann R.,
    5. Lawrence J. R.,
    6. Hartmann A.
    In situ localization of Azospirillum brasilense in the rhizosphere of wheat with fluorescently labeled, rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes and scanning confocal laser microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 1995 1013 1019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Barko J. W.,
    2. Gunnison D.,
    3. Carpenter S. R.
    Sediment interactions with submerged macrophyte growth and community dynamics. Aquat. Bot. 41 1991 41 65
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Blaabjerg V.,
    2. Finster K.
    Sulphate reduction associated with roots and rhizomes of the marine macrophyte Zostera marina. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 15 1998 311 314
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Blackburn T. H.,
    2. Nedwell D. B.,
    3. Wiebe W. J.
    Active mineral cycling in a Jamaican seagrass sediment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 110 1994 233 239
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bogdahn M.,
    2. Andreesen J. R.,
    3. Kleiner D.
    Pathways and regulation of N2, ammonium and glutamate assimilation by Clostridium formicoaceticum. Arch. Microbiol. 134 1983 167 169
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Boschker H. T. S.,
    2. Nold S.,
    3. Wellsbury P.,
    4. Bos D.,
    5. deGraaf W.,
    6. Parkes R. P. J.,
    7. Cappenburg T. E.
    Direct linking of microbial populations to specific biogeochemical processes by 13C-labelling of biomarkers. Nature 392 1998 801 805
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Brune A.,
    2. Emerson D.,
    3. Breznak J. A.
    The termite gut microflora as an oxygen sink: microelectrode determination of oxygen and pH gradients in guts of lower and higher termites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 1995 2681 2687
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Campbell R.,
    2. Greaves M. P.
    Anatomy and community structure of the rhizosphere The rhizosphere. Lynch J. M. 1990 11 34 John Wiley & Sons Chichester, England
  14. 14.↵
    1. Canfield D. E.,
    2. DesMarais D. J.
    Aerobic sulphate reduction in microbial mats. Science 251 1991 1471 1473
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Capone D. G.,
    2. Penhale P. A.,
    3. Oremland R. S.,
    4. Taylor B. F.
    Relationship between productivity and N2 (C2H2) fixation in a Thalassia testudinum community. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24 1979 117 125
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Capone D. G.,
    2. Taylor B. F.
    N2 fixation in the rhizosphere of Thalassia testudinum. Can. J. Microbiol. 26 1980 998 1005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Carlson P. R.,
    2. Forrest J.
    Uptake of dissolved sulfide by Spartina alterniflora: evidence from natural sulfur isotope abundance ratios. Science 216 1982 633 635
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Collins M. D.,
    2. Widdel F.
    Respiratory quinones of sulphate-reducing and sulphur-reducing bacteria: a systematic investigation. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 8 1986 8 18
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Collins M. D.,
    2. Lawson P. A.,
    3. Willems A.,
    4. Cordoba J. J.,
    5. Fernandez-Garayzabal J.,
    6. Garcia P.,
    7. Cai J.,
    8. Hippe H.,
    9. Farrow J. A. E.
    The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44 1994 812 826
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Diling W.,
    2. Cypionka H.
    Aerobic respiration in sulphate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 71 1990 123 128
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Drake H. L.
    Acetogenesis, acetogenic bacteria, and the acetyl-CoA “Wood/Ljungdahl” pathway: past and current perspectives Acetogenesis. Drake H. L. 1994 3 60 Chapman and Hall, Inc. New York, N.Y
  22. 22.↵
    1. Drake H. L.,
    2. Daniel S. L.,
    3. Küsel K.,
    4. Matthies C.,
    5. Kuhner C.,
    6. Braus-Stromeyer S.
    Acetogenic bacteria: what are the in situ consequences of their diverse metabolic versatilities? BioFactors 9 1997 1 12
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Fetzer S.,
    2. Bak F.,
    3. Conrad R.
    Sensitivity of methanogenic bacteria from paddy soil to oxygen and desiccation. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 12 1993 107 115
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Fonseca M. S.,
    2. Meyer D. L.,
    3. Hall M. O.
    Development of planted seagrass beds in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. II. Faunal components. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 132 1992 141 156
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Fourqurean J. W.,
    2. Zieman J. C.,
    3. Powell G. V. N.
    Relationships between porewater nutrients and seagrasses in a subtropical environment. Mar. Biol. 114 1992 57 65
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Frenzel P.,
    2. Bosse U.
    Methyl fluoride, an inhibitor of methane oxidation and methane production. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 21 1996 25 36
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Fründ C.,
    2. Cohen Y.
    Diurnal cycles of sulfate reduction under oxic conditions in cyanobacterial mats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58 1992 70 77
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Großkopf R.,
    2. Stubner S.,
    3. Liesack W.
    Novel euryarchaeotal lineages detected on rice roots and in the anoxic bulk soil of flooded rice microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 1998 4983 4989
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Harriott O. T.,
    2. Frazer A. C.
    Enumeration of acetogens by a colorimetric assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 1997 296 300
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hicks R. E.,
    2. Amann R. I.,
    3. Stahl D. A.
    Dual staining of natural bacterioplankton with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and fluorescent oligonucleotide probes targeting kingdom-level 16S rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58 1992 2158 2163
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Holmer M.,
    2. Nielsen S. L.
    Sediment sulfur dynamics related to biomass-density patterns in Zostera marina (eelgrass) beds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 146 1997 163 171
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hungate R. E.
    A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. Methods Microbiol. 3B 1969 117 132
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. King G. M.
    Associations of methanotrophs with the roots and rhizomes of aquatic vegetation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60 1994 3220 3227
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kohring L. L.,
    2. Ringelberg D. B.,
    3. Devereux R.,
    4. Stahl D. A.,
    5. White D. C.
    Comparison of phylogenetic relationships based on phospholipid fatty acid profiles and ribosomal RNA sequence similarities among dissimilatory sulphate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 119 1994 303 308
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Koransky J. R. S. D.,
    2. Allen,
    3. Dowell V. R. Jr.
    Use of ethanol for selective isolation of sporeforming microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35 1978 762 765
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Kraemer G. P.,
    2. Alberte R. S.
    Impact of daily photosynthetic period on protein synthesis and carbohydrate stores in Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) roots: implications for survival in light-limited environments. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 185 1995 191 202
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kuhner C. H.,
    2. Frank C.,
    3. Grießhammer A.,
    4. Schmittroth M.,
    5. Acker G.,
    6. Gößner A.,
    7. Drake H. L.
    Sporomusa silvacetica sp. nov., an acetogenic bacterium isolated from aggregated forest soil. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47 1997 352 358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Küsel K.,
    2. Drake H. L.
    Effects of environmental parameters on the formation and turnover of acetate in forest soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 1995 3667 3675
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Küsel K.,
    2. Wagner C.,
    3. Drake H. L.
    Enumeration and metabolic product profiles of the anaerobic microflora in the mineral soil and litter of a beech forest. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 29 1999 91 103
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Maidak B. L.,
    2. Larsen N.,
    3. McCaughey M. J.,
    4. Overbeek R.,
    5. Olsen G. J.,
    6. Folgel K.,
    7. Blandy J.,
    8. Woese C. R.
    The Ribosomal Database Project. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 1994 3485 3487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Moench T. T.,
    2. Zeikus J. G.
    An improved preparation method for a titanium (III) media reductant. J. Microbiol. Methods 1 1983 199 202
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. O’Leary W. M.,
    2. Wilkinson S. G.
    Gram-positive bacteria Microbial lipids Ratledge C., Wilkinson S. G. I 1988 117 202 Academic Press London, United Kingdom
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Orth R. J.,
    2. Moore K. A.
    Chesapeake Bay: an unprecedented decline in submerged aquatic vegetation. Science 222 1983 51 52
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Patriquin D.,
    2. Knowles R.
    Nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere of marine angiosperms. Mar. Biol. 16 1972 49 58
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Pinkart H. C.,
    2. Devereux R.,
    3. Chapman P. J.
    Rapid separation of microbial lipids using solid phase extraction columns. J. Microbiol. Methods 34 1998 9 15
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.↵
    1. Porter K. G.,
    2. Feig Y. S.
    The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25 1980 943 948
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Prin Y.,
    2. Mallein-Gerin F.,
    3. Simonet P.
    Identification and localization of Frankia strains in Alnus nodules by in situ hybridization with nif H mRNA with strain-specific oligonucleotide probes. J. Exp. Bot. 44 1993 815 820
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Raskin L.,
    2. Stromley J. M.,
    3. Rittman B. E.,
    4. Stahl D. A.
    Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60 1994 1232 1240
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Robblee M. B.,
    2. Barber T. R.,
    3. Carlson P. R. Jr.,
    4. Durako M. J.,
    5. Fourqurean J. W.,
    6. Muehlstein L. K.,
    7. Porter D.,
    8. Yarbro L. A.,
    9. Zeeman J. C. D.
    Mass mortality of the tropical seagrass Thalassia testudinum in Florida Bay (USA). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 71 1991 297 299
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Schink B.
    Diversity, ecology, and isolation of acetogenic bacteria Acetogenesis. Drake H. L. 1994 197 235 Chapman and Hall, Inc. New York, N.Y
  51. 51.↵
    1. Smith D. W.
    Ecological actions of sulfate-reducing bacteria The sulfate-reducing bacteria: contemporary perspectives. Odom J. M., Singleton R. Jr. 1993 161 188 Springer Verlag New York, N.Y
  52. 52.↵
    1. Smith R. D.,
    2. Pregnall A. M.,
    3. Alberte R. S.
    Effects of anaerobiosis on root metabolism of Zostera marina (eelgrass): implications for survival in reducing sediments. Mar. Biol. 98 1988 131 141
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Tabatabai M. A.
    Determination of sulfate in water samples. Sulphur Inst. J. 10 1974 11 13
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    1. Taylor J.,
    2. Parkes R. J.
    The cellular fatty acids of the sulphate-reducing bacteria, Desulfobacter sp., Desulfobulbus sp., and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129 1983 3303 3309
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. Thompson J. D.,
    2. Higgins D. G.,
    3. Gibson T. J.
    CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 1994 4673 4680
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Wagner C.,
    2. Grießhammer A.,
    3. Drake H. L.
    Acetogenic capacities and the anaerobic turnover of carbon in a Kansas prairie soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 1996 494 500
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Waisel Y.,
    2. Agami M.
    Ecophysiology of roots of submerged aquatic plants Plant roots: the hidden half 2nd ed. Waisel Y., Eshel A., Kafkafi U. 1996 895 909 Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, N.Y
  58. 58.↵
    1. White D. C.,
    2. Pinkart H. C.,
    3. Ringelberg D. B.
    Biomass measurements: biochemical approaches Manual of environmental microbiology. Hurst C. J., Knudsen G. R., McInerney M. J., Stetzenbach L. D., Walter M. V. 1997 91 101 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
  59. 59.↵
    1. White D. C.,
    2. Ringelberg D. B.
    Signature lipid biomarker analysis Techniques in microbial ecology. Burlage R., Atlas R., Stahl D., Geesey G., Sayler G. 1998 255 272 Oxford University Press New York, N.Y
  60. 60.↵
    1. Wicks S. R.
    Evidence of nitrogen-fixing bacteria on seagrasses. Caribb. J. Sci. 15 1980 149 152
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    1. Zheng D.,
    2. Alm E. W.,
    3. Stahl D. A.,
    4. Raskin L.
    Characterization of small-subunit rRNA hybridization probes for quantitative molecular microbial ecology studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 1996 4504 4513
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Acetogenic and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inhabiting the Rhizoplane and Deep Cortex Cells of the Sea Grass Halodule wrightii
Kirsten Küsel, Holly C. Pinkart, Harold L. Drake, Richard Devereux
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Nov 1999, 65 (11) 5117-5123; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.11.5117-5123.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Applied and Environmental Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Acetogenic and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inhabiting the Rhizoplane and Deep Cortex Cells of the Sea Grass Halodule wrightii
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Acetogenic and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Inhabiting the Rhizoplane and Deep Cortex Cells of the Sea Grass Halodule wrightii
Kirsten Küsel, Holly C. Pinkart, Harold L. Drake, Richard Devereux
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Nov 1999, 65 (11) 5117-5123; DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.11.5117-5123.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Acetates
Acetobacteraceae
Desulfovibrio
Geologic Sediments
Gram-Positive Bacteria
Poaceae
Sulfates

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AEM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AppEnvMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

 

Print ISSN: 0099-2240; Online ISSN: 1098-5336